The effect of physical and mechanical properties on the abrasion resistance of artificial stones produced with granite waste
Subject Areas : Journal of Simulation and Analysis of Novel Technologies in Mechanical EngineeringSeyyed Mohammad Javad Mousavi 1 , Reza Abedinzadeh 2 , Mohammad Reisi 3
1 - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khomeinishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomeinishahr, Iran
2 - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stone Research Center, Khomeinishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomeinishahr, Iran
3 - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stone Research Center, Khomeinishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomeinishahr, Iran
Keywords: Compressive Strength, Hardness, Abrasion resistance, Artificial stone, Granite waste,
Abstract :
The recycling of mine stone waste has been interesting for the creation of employment opportunities and added value and the prevention of environmental pollution. The present study examined the effects of the physicomechanical properties on the abrasion resistance of artificial stones produced with granite cut waste. A total of four artificial specimens were produced under different compositions and methods. Their physicomechanical properties, such as density, porosity, water absorption, hardness, compressive strength, and abrasion resistance, were evaluated. Finally, the artificial stones were compared to natural granite and marble in abrasion resistance. It was found that an increase in the porosity and water absorption reduced hardness, compressive strength, and abrasion resistance. Furthermore, hardness, compressive strength, and abrasion resistance declined as the porosity and water absorption increased. The increased rotational speed and load in the Taber abrasion test diminished abrasion resistance. The epoxy resin-based artificial stone exhibited the highest performance among the artificial specimens. It had almost the same porosity and water absorption as natural granite and marble. However, the epoxy resin-based stone with lower Mohs hardness and compressive strength showed less abrasion resistance compared to the natural granite and marble. As a result, all four artificial stones showed satisfactory performance for the flooring of congested areas.
[1] Bagherpor, Z., Nazari, S., Bagherzadeh, P., Fazlavi, A. (2019). Description and effective parameters determination of the production process of fine-grained artificial stone from waste silica. SN Applied Sciences, 1(11), 1-10.
[2] Poudel, J., Lee, YM., Kim, HJ., Oh, SC. (2021). Methyl methacrylate (MMA) and alumina recovery from waste artificial marble powder pyrolysis. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 23(1), 214-221.
[3] Sepahvand, Z., Barani, K. (2018). Production of Artificial Stone from Dimension Stone Waste. Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, 50(3), 453-460
[4] Barani, K., Esmaili, H. (2016). Production of artificial stone slabs using waste granite and marble stone sludge samples. Mining and Environment, 7(1), 135-141.
[5] Peixoto, J., Carvalho, EAS., Gomes, MLPM., da Silva Guimarães, R., Monteiro, SN., de Azevedo, AR., Vieira, CMF. (2022), Incorporation of Industrial Glass Waste into Polymeric Resin to Develop Artificial Stones for Civil Construction. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 47 (4), 4313-4322
[6] Gomes, MLP., Carvalho, EA., Demartini, TJ., de Carvalho, EA., Colorado, HA., Vieira, CMF. (2021). Mechanical and physical investigation of an artificial stone produced with granite residue and epoxy resin. Journal of Composite Materials, 55 (9), 1247-1254
[7] Silva, FS., Ribeiro, CEG., Rodriguez, RJS. (2017). Physical and mechanical characterization of artificial stone with marble calcite waste and epoxy resin. Materials Research, 21 (1), 1-6.
[8] Gomes, MLP., Carvalho, EA., Sobrinho, LN., Monteiro, SN., Rodriguez, RJ., Vieira, CMF. (2018). Production and characterization of a novel artificial stone using brick residue and quarry dust in epoxy matrix. Journal of materials research and technology, 7 (4), 492-498
[9] Kim, YU., Yun, BY., Nam, J., Choi, JY., Wi, S., Kim, S. (2021), Evaluation of thermal properties of phase change material-integrated artificial stone according to biochar loading content. Construction and Building Materials, 305, 124682
[10] Shishegaran, A., Saeedi, M., Mirvalad, S., Korayem, AH. (2021). The mechanical strength of the artificial stones, containing the travertine wastes and sand. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 11, 1688-1709
[11] Lee, M-G., Lo, S-L., Kan, Y-C., Chiang, C-H., Chang, J-H., Yu-Min, S., Yatsenko, E., Hu, S-H. (2022), Water quenched slag from incinerator ash used as artificial stone. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00827.
[12] Karaca, Z., Yılmaz, NG., Goktan, R. (2012). Abrasion wear characterization of some selected stone flooring materials with respect to contact load. Construction and Building Materials, 36, 520-526.
[13] Kearsley, E., Wainwright, P. (2001). Porosity and permeability of foamed concrete. Cement and concrete research, 31(5), 805-812.
[14] Yavuz, H., Ugur, I., Demirdag, S. (2008). Abrasion resistance of carbonate rocks used in dimension stone industry and correlations between abrasion and rock properties. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 45(2), 260-267.
[15] Hamid, AA., Ghosh, P., Jain, S., Ray, S. (2008). The influence of porosity and particles content on dry sliding wear of cast in situ Al (Ti)–Al2O3 (TiO2) composite. Wear, 265(1-2), 14-26.
[16] Yılmaz, NG., Goktan, R., Kibici, Y. (2011). An investigation of the petrographic and physico-mechanical properties of true granites influencing diamond tool wear performance, and development of a new wear index. Wear 271(5-6), 960-969.
[17] Sinha, A., Farhat, Z. (2015). A study of porosity effect on tribological behavior of cast Al A380M and sintered Al 6061 alloys. Journal of Surface Engineered Materials and Advanced Technology, 5(01), 1.
[18] Abedinzadeh, R., Safavi, S., Karimzadeh, F. (2015). A comparative study on wear properties of nanostructured Al and Al/Al2O3 nanocomposite prepared by microwave-assisted hot press sintering and conventional hot pressing. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29(9), 3685-3690.
[19] Yılmaz, NG., Goktan, R., Onargan, T. (2017). Correlative relations between three-body abrasion wear resistance and petrographic properties of selected granites used as floor coverings. Wear, 372, 197-207.
[20] Jeong, D., Erb, U., Aust, K., Palumbo, G. (2003). The relationship between hardness and abrasive wear resistance of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni–P coatings. Scripta Materialia, 48(8), 1067-1072.
[21] Justo, J., Castro, J. (2021). Mechanical properties of 4 rocks at different temperatures and fracture assessment using the strain energy density criterion. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 25, 100212.
[22] Ternero, F., Rosa, LG., Urban, P., Montes, JM., Cuevas, FG. (2021). Influence of the total porosity on the properties of sintered materials- A review. Metals, 11(5), 730.
[23] Li, Y-X., Chen, Y-M., Wei, J-X., He, X-Y., Zhang, H-T., Zhang, W-S. (2006). A study on the relationship between porosity of the cement paste with mineral additives and compressive strength of mortar based on this paste. Cement and concrete research, 36(9), 1740-1743.
[24] Pathri, B., Chaudhary, R., Mali, H., Nagar, R. (2017). Abrasion wear characterization of natural stones subjected to foot traffic and correlation between abrasion and mechanical properties. Res Pap, 4(4), 10-17.