• صفحه اصلی
  • ارزیابی رتبه‌بندی تفسیری محرک‌های اکولوژیکِ تولید پایدار در صنعت نفت

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : JSDE-2301-1261 (R2) بازدید : 89 صفحه: 69 - 87

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

ارزیابی رتبه‌بندی تفسیری محرک‌های اکولوژیکِ تولید پایدار در صنعت نفت

محورهای موضوعی : انرژی

سید علی سیدی 1 , حسن مهرمنش 2 , محمدعلی افشار کاظمی 3

1 - گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 - گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
3 - گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/11/11 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/09/15 تاریخ انتشار : 1403/04/01

کلید واژه: محرک‌های اکولوژیک, تولید پایدار, موقعیت‌یابی اقلیمی و زیست‌محیطی.,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: افزایش فعالیت‌های صنعتی و پراکندگی صنایع وابسته بهم در موقعیت‌های اقلیمی نامناسب از یک سو باعث بروز مشکلات و مسائل زیست‌محیطی شده است و از سویی دیگر مانع جدی بر سراه تولید پایدار در صنایع می‌تواند قلمداد شود. هدف این پژوهش ارزیابی رتبه‌بندی تفسیری محرک‌های اکولوژیکِ تولید پایدار در صنعت نفت می باشد.

روش بررسی: در این پژوهش که از نظر روش شناسی توسعه‌ا‌ی و ترکیبی محسوب می‌شود، تلاش گردید تا با اتکاء به فرآیندهای تحلیل فراترکیب و دلفی در بخش کیفی پژوهش، اقدام به شناسایی محرک‌های اکولوژیکِ تولید پایدار در صنعت نفت شود. سپس در بخش کمی از تحلیل رتبه‌بندی تفسیری در یک بازه 6 ماه، جهتِ شناسایی اثرگذارترین محرک‌ اکولوژیکِ تولید پایدار در صنعت نفت استفاده گردد. جامعه‌ی آماری در بخش کیفی، ۱4 نفر از متخصصان و خبرگان رشته مدیریت صنعتی در سطح دانشگاهی بودند و در بخش کمی از مشارکت 23 نفر از مدیران و کارشناسان لایه مدیریت مرکز توسعه در شرکت ملی نفت ایران که چه به لحاظ دانشی و چه به لحاظ تجربی دارای سابقه بودند، بهره برده شد.

یافته ها: نتایج پژوهش در بخش کیفی پس از غربالگری محتوایی ۱4 پژوهش تأیید شده، از وجود 6 محرک اکولوژیک تولید پایدار در صنعت نفت حکایت داشت. این مولفه‌ها از طریق تحلیل دلفی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند و نتایج این بخش نشان داد هر 6 بعد شناسایی شده مورد تایی قرار گرفتند. نتایج در بخش کمی پژوهش نشان داد، از مجموع تاثیرگذاری کلی مبتنی بر مقیاسه زوجی بین مولفه‌های پژوهش مشخص شد، درصد تاثیرگذاری محرک، موقعیت‌یابی اکولوژیک اقلیمی و زیست‌محیطی نسبت به بقیه محرک‌های اکولوژیک تولید پایدار در صنعت نفت بیشتر است.

بحث و نتیجه گیری: نتیجه کسب شده بیان کننده‌ی این واقعیت است که انجام موقعیت یابی اکولوژیک به لحاظ اقلیمی و زیست‌محیطی، به صنعت نفت کمک می‌کند تا با گردهم آوردن شرکت‌های فعال در این عرصه، ضمن اینکه باعث می‌شوند تا از پراکندگی شرکت‌های صنعتی جلوگیری گردد، در عین حال می‌تواند با ارزیابی خاک؛ تنوع گیاهی و جانوری و سایر جنبه‌های محیط‌زیستی، مانع از فرسایش منابع طبیعی و آلایندگی‌های زیست‌محیطی گردد.

 

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: The increase in industrial activities and the dispersion of interdependent industries in unfavorable climatic situations have caused environmental problems and issues on the other hand, it can be considered a serious obstacle to sustainable production in industries. The purpose of this research is Interpretive ranking appraisal of ecological drivers of sustainable production in the oil industry.  

Material and Methodology: This research, which is considered developmental and mixed in terms of methodology, tried to identify the ecological drivers of sustainable production in the oil industry by relying on Meta-synthesis analysis and Delphi processes in the qualitative part of the research. Then, in the quantitative part, interpretive ranking analysis will be used to identify the most effective ecological driver of sustainable production in oil industry. The participant in the qualitative section was 14 specialists and experts in the field of industrial management at the university level and in the quantitative part, the participation of 23 managers and the experts was used from the management level of the development center in the National Iranian Oil Company, who had experience both in terms of knowledge and experience. The results of the research in the qualitative part after the content screening of 14 confirmed studies indicated the existence of 6 ecological drivers of sustainable production in the oil industry.

Findings: The results in the quantitative part of the research showed that, from the sum of the overall effectiveness based on the paired scale between the research components, it was determined that the percentage of influence of the stimulus, ecological, climatic and environmental positioning is higher than the rest of the ecological stimuli of sustainable production in the oil industry.

Discussion and Conclusion: The obtained result expresses the fact that ecological positioning in terms of climate and environment helps the oil industry by bringing together companies active in this field, while preventing the dispersion of industrial companies, at the same time can by evaluating the soil; Plant and animal diversity and other environmental aspects prevent the erosion of natural resources and environmental pollution.

چکیده تصویری:

  1. Moosavi-Haghighi, M, H., Rajabi, A. (2013). Modeling the Effect of Energy Intensity Changes in Industrial Sector on the Economic and Environmental Indices: A System Dynamics Approach. JEMR, 4(12):103-134. (In Persian)
  2. Moeini Jazani, R., Kasrai, A. R., Asilzadeh, A., Sohrabi, T. (2020). Development of a dynamic model of knowledge management in Iran's oil industry using the system dynamics approach (SD), 15(12): 67-82. (In Persian)
  3. Shariat, M. A., Iranzadeh, S., & Bafandeh Zendeh, A. (2017). Identifying and Ranking Factors Affecting the Realization of Sustainable Production with a Shift from Industrial to Ecological Production (Case Study: Private Industrial Manufacturing Companies in Semnan). Public Management Researches, 10(37): 177-201. (In Persian)
  4. Sisaye, S. (2012). An ecological analysis of four competing approaches to sustainability development: Integration of industrial ecology and ecological anthropology literature, World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 8(1): 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/20425961211221606
  5. Akhtar, F., Lodhi, S.A. and Shah Khan, S. (2015). Permaculture approach: linking ecological sustainability to businesses strategies, Management of Environmental Quality, 26(6): 795-809. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2015-0001
  6. Cheng, L. and Leong, S. (2017). Knowledge management ecological approach: a cross-discipline case study, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(4): 839-856. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0492
  7. Jasti, N.V.K., Jha, N.K., Chaganti, P.K. and Kota, S. (2022). Sustainable production system: literature review and trends, Management of Environmental Quality, 33(3): 692-717. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2020-0246
  8. Lüdeke‐Freund, F., Walmsley, D., Plath, M., Wreesmann, J. and Klein, A. (2012). Sustainable plant oil production for aviation fuels: Assessment challenges and consequences for new feedstock concepts, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(2): 186-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021211282313
  9. Fraccascia, L., Giannoccaro, I., and Albino, V. (2021). Ecosystem indicators for measuring industrial symbiosis, Ecological economics, 183: 106944.
  10. Keyghobadi, A. (2021). Explain a model for evaluating supply chain sustainability in the oil and gas industry based on the structural equation model. Journal of Human Capital Empowerment, 4(2): 129-146. (In Persian)
  11. Saheb Honar, H., Taheri Fard, A., Pileh Froush, M. (2017). Analysis and Evaluation of Effects of Hidrocarburi Fields Development Through the Iran Petroleum Contracts (IPC) on the Country's Macroeconomic in Future. Majlis and Rahbord, 24(92): 81-110. (In Persian)
  12. Afum, E., Zhang, R., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y. and Sun, Z. (2021). Sustainability excellence: the interactions of lean production, internal green practices and green product innovation, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 12(6): 1089-1114. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-07-2020-0109
  13. Salimath, M.S. and Jones, R. (2011). Population ecology theory: implications for sustainability, Management Decision, 49(6): 874-910. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111143595
  14. Stević, Ž., Karamaşa, Ç., Demir, E. and Korucuk, S. (2021). Assessing sustainable production under circular economy context using a novel rough-fuzzy MCDM model: a case of the forestry industry in the Eastern Black Sea region, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2020-0419
  15. Krajnc, D. & Glavic, P. (2003). Indicators of sustainable production. Journal of Clean Techn Environ Policy, 5(4): 279-288.
  16. Bag, S. and Pretorius, J.H.C. (2022). Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: proposal of a research framework, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(4): 864-898. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2020-2120
  17. Burnier, P.C., Guerra, D.d.S. and Spers, E.E. (2021). Measuring consumer perceptions over beef good practices and sustainable production process, British Food Journal, 123(4): 1362-1383. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2019-0904
  18. Iraji, M., Ghasemi, A. R., Farsijani, H., & Sanavi Fard, R. (2018). Presenting a Sustainable Strategy Production Model by Meta-Synthesis Approaches. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 9(33): 75-96. (In Persian).
  19. Chertow, M. R. (2000). Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25(2): 313-337.
  20. Posch, A. (2010). Industrial Recycling Networks as Star- ting Points for Broader Sustainability-Oriented Coope- ration?, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(2): 242-257
  21. Sushil, A. (2017a), “Multi- criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM–IRP with a big data framework, Production Planning & Control, 28(11/12): 999-1010
  22. Chithambaranathan, P., Subramanian, N. and Palaniappan, P.K. (2015). An innovative framework for performance analysis of members of supply chains, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(2): 309-334
  23. Jaggi, Ch, K., Kamna, P., Kamna, K, M. (2022). Sustainable production system with preservation strategy and renewable energy under different carbon tax policies, International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2022.2094647
  24. Fernández-González, R., Puime-Guillén, F. & Vila-Biglieri, J.E. (2022). Environmental strategy and the petroleum industry: a sustainability balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-022-01543-9
  25. Awan, U. (2022). Industrial Ecology in Support of Sustainable Development Goals, Responsible Consumption and Production, 370-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95726-5_18
  26. Sitepu, M, H., Matondang, A, R., Sembiring, M, T. (2021). Sustainability assessment in crude palm oil production: A review, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
  27. Cherepovitsyn, A.; Rutenko, E.; Solovyova, V. (2021). Sustainable Development of Oil and Gas Resources: A System of Environmental, Socio-Economic, and Innovation Indicators. J. Mar. Sci. Eng, 9(2): 1307-1327. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9111307
  28. Huber, J. (2020). Towards Industrial Ecology: Sustainable Development as a Concept of Ecological Modernization, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2(4): 269-285
  29. Okeke, A. (2019). Towards sustainability in the global oil and gas industry: Identifying where the emphasis lies, Elsevier Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 12(3): 98-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2019.100145
  30. Doric, B., Dimovski, V. (2018). Managing petroleum sector performance – a sustainable administrative design, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1): 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1421995
  31. Azar, A., rajabzadeh ghatromi, A., & akhavan, A. (2017). Mapping Sustainable Production Model Using ISM and Fuzzy DEMATEL. Industrial Management Studies, 15(46): 1-26.

 

 

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Moosavi-Haghighi, M, H., Rajabi, A. (2013). Modeling the Effect of Energy Intensity Changes in Industrial Sector on the Economic and Environmental Indices: A System Dynamics Approach. JEMR, 4(12):103-134. (In Persian)
2. Moeini Jazani, R., Kasrai, A. R., Asilzadeh, A., Sohrabi, T. (2020). Development of a dynamic model of knowledge management in Iran's oil industry using the system dynamics approach (SD), 15(12): 67-82. (In Persian)
3. Shariat, M. A., Iranzadeh, S., & Bafandeh Zendeh, A. (2017). Identifying and Ranking Factors Affecting the Realization of Sustainable Production with a Shift from Industrial to Ecological Production (Case Study: Private Industrial Manufacturing Companies in Semnan). Public Management Researches, 10(37): 177-201. (In Persian)
4. Sisaye, S. (2012). An ecological analysis of four competing approaches to sustainability development: Integration of industrial ecology and ecological anthropology literature, World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 8(1): 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/20425961211221606
5. Akhtar, F., Lodhi, S.A. and Shah Khan, S. (2015). Permaculture approach: linking ecological sustainability to businesses strategies, Management of Environmental Quality, 26(6): 795-809. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2015-0001
6. Cheng, L. and Leong, S. (2017). Knowledge management ecological approach: a cross-discipline case study, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(4): 839-856. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0492
7. Jasti, N.V.K., Jha, N.K., Chaganti, P.K. and Kota, S. (2022). Sustainable production system: literature review and trends, Management of Environmental Quality, 33(3): 692-717. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2020-0246
8. Lüdeke‐Freund, F., Walmsley, D., Plath, M., Wreesmann, J. and Klein, A. (2012). Sustainable plant oil production for aviation fuels: Assessment challenges and consequences for new feedstock concepts, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(2): 186-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021211282313
9. Fraccascia, L., Giannoccaro, I., and Albino, V. (2021). Ecosystem indicators for measuring industrial symbiosis, Ecological economics, 183: 106944.
10. Keyghobadi, A. (2021). Explain a model for evaluating supply chain sustainability in the oil and gas industry based on the structural equation model. Journal of Human Capital Empowerment, 4(2): 129-146. (In Persian)
11. Saheb Honar, H., Taheri Fard, A., Pileh Froush, M. (2017). Analysis and Evaluation of Effects of Hidrocarburi Fields Development Through the Iran Petroleum Contracts (IPC) on the Country's Macroeconomic in Future. Majlis and Rahbord, 24(92): 81-110. (In Persian)
12. Afum, E., Zhang, R., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y. and Sun, Z. (2021). Sustainability excellence: the interactions of lean production, internal green practices and green product innovation, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 12(6): 1089-1114. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-07-2020-0109
13. Salimath, M.S. and Jones, R. (2011). Population ecology theory: implications for sustainability, Management Decision, 49(6): 874-910. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111143595
14. Stević, Ž., Karamaşa, Ç., Demir, E. and Korucuk, S. (2021). Assessing sustainable production under circular economy context using a novel rough-fuzzy MCDM model: a case of the forestry industry in the Eastern Black Sea region, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2020-0419
15. Krajnc, D. & Glavic, P. (2003). Indicators of sustainable production. Journal of Clean Techn Environ Policy, 5(4): 279-288.
16. Bag, S. and Pretorius, J.H.C. (2022). Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: proposal of a research framework, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(4): 864-898. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2020-2120
17. Burnier, P.C., Guerra, D.d.S. and Spers, E.E. (2021). Measuring consumer perceptions over beef good practices and sustainable production process, British Food Journal, 123(4): 1362-1383. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2019-0904
18. Iraji, M., Ghasemi, A. R., Farsijani, H., & Sanavi Fard, R. (2018). Presenting a Sustainable Strategy Production Model by Meta-Synthesis Approaches. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 9(33): 75-96. (In Persian).
19. Chertow, M. R. (2000). Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25(2): 313-337.
20. Posch, A. (2010). Industrial Recycling Networks as Star- ting Points for Broader Sustainability-Oriented Coope- ration?, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(2): 242-257
21. Sushil, A. (2017a), “Multi- criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM–IRP with a big data framework, Production Planning & Control, 28(11/12): 999-1010
22. Chithambaranathan, P., Subramanian, N. and Palaniappan, P.K. (2015). An innovative framework for performance analysis of members of supply chains, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(2): 309-334
23. Jaggi, Ch, K., Kamna, P., Kamna, K, M. (2022). Sustainable production system with preservation strategy and renewable energy under different carbon tax policies, International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2022.2094647
24. Fernández-González, R., Puime-Guillén, F. & Vila-Biglieri, J.E. (2022). Environmental strategy and the petroleum industry: a sustainability balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-022-01543-9
25. Awan, U. (2022). Industrial Ecology in Support of Sustainable Development Goals, Responsible Consumption and Production, 370-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95726-5_18
26. Sitepu, M, H., Matondang, A, R., Sembiring, M, T. (2021). Sustainability assessment in crude palm oil production: A review, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
27. Cherepovitsyn, A.; Rutenko, E.; Solovyova, V. (2021). Sustainable Development of Oil and Gas Resources: A System of Environmental, Socio-Economic, and Innovation Indicators. J. Mar. Sci. Eng, 9(2): 1307-1327. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9111307
28. Huber, J. (2020). Towards Industrial Ecology: Sustainable Development as a Concept of Ecological Modernization, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2(4): 269-285
29. Okeke, A. (2019). Towards sustainability in the global oil and gas industry: Identifying where the emphasis lies, Elsevier Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 12(3): 98-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2019.100145
30. Doric, B., Dimovski, V. (2018). Managing petroleum sector performance – a sustainable administrative design, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1): 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1421995
31. Azar, A., rajabzadeh ghatromi, A., & akhavan, A. (2017). Mapping Sustainable Production Model Using ISM and Fuzzy DEMATEL. Industrial Management Studies, 15(46): 1-26.



مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]