مرور تطبیقی چگونگی تحقق پذیری طرح های توسعه روستايي با رویکرد پایداری محیطی
محورهای موضوعی : معماریبهناز رحیمی 1 , حسین زینتی 2 , سید امیر حسین گرکانی 3 , سجاد امیری 4
1 - پژوهشکده سوانح طبیعی
2 - دانش اموخته توسعه روستایی. دانشگاه تهران. ایران
3 - گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران مرکز
4 - گروه احیا مناطق کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی،دانشگاه تهران
کلید واژه: پایداری محیط, مطالعات محیطی, محیط روستایی, طرح های توسعه ای,
چکیده مقاله :
در این پژوهش مرور تطبیقی طرح‌های توسعه با رویکرد پایداری را مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار خواهیم داد و به دنبال پیدایش راهکارها و مدل‌های جدید توسعه خواهیم گشت که به اهداف کوتاه‌مدت و بلندمدت همگام باشند و به جوامع و محیط زیست کمک کنند. برای تدوین چگونگی تحقق پذیری پایداری محیط روستایی با رویکرد زیباشناختی و شناسایی فرایند و مولفه های مرتبط، از این روش استفاده شود. جامعه آماری این مطالعه نظام‌مند شامل کلیه مقالات پژوهشی در حوزه پایداری محیطی و طرح های توسعه¬ی نواحی روستایی منتشر شده،حاصل از مطالعات کمی و کیفی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفته است.علت انتخاب قالب مقاله از بین پژوهش¬های انجام‌شده علتی روش‌شناختی و متناظر با واقعیت عینی بوده است. مرور پژوهش‌های پیشین نشان‌دهنده ضعف چارچوب‌های موجود در رابطه با چگونگی تحقق پذیری هویت روستایی مبتنی بر رویکرد زیباشناختی است. هدف این تحقیق، چگونگی تحقق پذیری هویت روستایی با رویکرد مرور نظام مند است. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، بنیادی است، و با رویکرد مرور نظامند ادبیات مرتبط با مولفه‌های هویت، منظر و زیبا شناختی روستایی در فاصله سال‌های 2000 تا 2022، با استفاده از 3 کلیدواژه مشخص و استراتژی شفاف و از پیش طراحی شده، از 5 پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی، جمع‌آوری شد. پس از غربالگری و ارزیابی کیفی، تحلیل نهایی روی 37 مقاله انجام شد. از سوی دیگر روش فراتحلیل مستلزم شناسایی ارتباط بین مولفه ها است که این امر منوط به شناخت مولفه ها شود. تحقق پذیری پایداری محیطی در طرح‌های توسعه روستایی نیازمند هماهنگی اقتصادی، اجتماعی و محیطی است که به حفظ منابع طبیعی، کاهش آلودگی و تضمین کیفیت زندگی مردم محلی می‌پردازد. این اهداف با همکاری بین دولت، جامعه محلی و سازمان‌های محیط زیستی قابل دستیابی هستند.
In this research, we will analyze the comparative review of development plans with a sustainable approach and look for the emergence of new solutions and development models that are in sync with short-term and long-term goals and help communities and the environment. This method should be used to formulate how to realize the sustainability of the rural environment with an aesthetic approach and to identify the process and related components. The statistical population of this systematic study includes all published research articles in the field of environmental sustainability and development plans of rural areas, resulting from quantitative and qualitative studies. It has been objective reality. The review of previous research shows the weakness of the existing frameworks in relation to the realization of the rural identity based on the aesthetic approach. The purpose of this research is how to realize rural identity with a systematic review approach. The current research is fundamental in terms of its purpose, and with the approach of a systematic review of the literature related to the components of rural identity, landscape and aesthetics between the years 2000 and 2022, using 3 specific keywords and a clear and pre-designed strategy, from 5 databases. Information was collected. After screening and qualitative assessment, the final analysis was done on 37 articles. On the other hand, the meta-analysis method requires the identification of the relationship between the components, which depends on the knowledge of the components. The realization of environmental sustainability in rural development plans requires economic, social and environmental coordination that preserves natural resources, reduces pollution and ensures the quality of life of local people. These goals can be achieved by cooperation between the government, local community and environmental organizations.
• دبیری, فرهاد, خلعتبری, یلدا, زارعی, سحر. (1397). دستیابی به توسعه پایدار از منظر حقوق بین الملل محیط زیست. انسان و محیط زیست, 16(1), 63-73.
• شیخی, محمد, جمعه پور, محمود, سجادی, افشین. (1397). سنجش رابطه میان رضایتمندی شهروندان از کیفیت محیطی و پایداری اجتماعی. دانش شهرسازی, 2(4), 19-31. doi: 10.22124/upk.2019.10171.1090
• جاودان, مجتبی, فرجی سبکبار, حسن, صادقلو, طاهره سجاسی قیداری, حمدالله. (1399). ارائه مدل تحلیل رتبه پایداری در نواحی روستایی (مطالعه موردی: بخش سربند استان مرکزی). توسعه پایدار محیط جغرافیایی, 2(3), 34-51. doi: 10.52547/sdge.2.3.34
• درستکار, احسان, & ودایع خیری, رقیه. (1400). واکاوی سازمان فضایی منطقه ای و پایداری محیطی در نظام شکل گیری فضا. انسان و محیط زیست, 19(1), 133-143.
Agnoletti, M., & Santoro, A. (2018). Rural landscape planning and forest management in Tuscany (Italy). Forests, 9(8), 473.
Albu, A. N., Popescu, M., Plesoianu, D. M., Urdea, M. C., & Mocanu, N. (2014). Management of natural and cultural heritage from Southern Dobrogea of geographical point of view. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 15(4), 1893-1901.
An, W., & Alarcón, S. (2020). How Can Rural Tourism Be Sustainable? A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 12(18), 7758.
Angel, S., Parent, J., & Civco, D. L. (2012). The fragmentation of urban landscapes: global evidence of a key attribute of the spatial structure of cities, 1990–2000. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), 249-283.
Baez, S., Mazzarino, M., Peralvo, M., & Sears, R. R. (2020). Evaluating the Impacts of a Small-Grants Program on Sustainable Development and Biodiversity Conservation in Andean Forest Landscapes. Mountain Research and Development, 40(2), D1.
Baró, F., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Haase, D. (2017). Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: Insights for landscape planning and management. Ecosystem Services, 24, 147-159.
Borón, V., Payán, E., MacMillan, D., & Tzanopoulos, J. (2016). Achieving sustainable development in rural areas in Colombia: Future scenarios for biodiversity conservation under land use change. Land Use Policy, 59, 27-37.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Burholt, V. (2012). The dimensionality of ‘place attachment’ for older people in rural areas of South West England and Wales. Environment and Planning A, 44(12), 2901-2921.
Chirita, V., Matei, D., & Efros, V. (2015). Geo-Cultural Landscape–Landmark of Sustainable Development of the Rural Area of Bucovina. Carpathian Journal of Earth And Environmental Sciences, 10, 255-264.
Cottrell, J. R., & Cottrell, S. P. (2015). Sense-of-place influences on perceived environmental change: Effects on future holiday experiences to Saaremaa, Estonia. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 15(4), 425-446.
Dika, I. R., Aničić, B., Krklec, K., Andlar, G., Hrdalo, I., & Pereković, P. (2011). Cultural landscape evaluation and possibilities for future development–a case study of the island of Krk (Croatia). Acta geographica Slovenica, 51(1), 129-150.
Dobrovodská, M., Kanka, R., David, S., Kollár, J., Špulerová, J., Štefunková, D., & Gajdoš, P. (2019). Assessment of the biocultural value of traditional agricultural landscape on a plot-by-plot level: case studies from Slovakia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(10), 2615-2645.
Fatimah, T. (2015). The impacts of rural tourism initiatives on cultural landscape sustainability in Borobudur area. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 28, 567-577.
Forman, R. T. T., & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape Ecology. California: John Wiley & Sons.
Forman, R. T., & Godron, M. (1981). Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience, 31(10), 733-740.
García-Llorente, M., Rossignoli, C. M., Di Iacovo, F., & Moruzzo, R. (2016). Social farming in the promotion of social-ecological sustainability in rural and periurban areas. Sustainability, 8(12), 1238.
Gormus, S., & Oguz, D. (2013). Role of Landscape Character Analysis in Evaluation Interaction between Rural Settlement and Protected Area: Kapisuyu Basin Sample. Journal of Agricultural Sciences-Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(4), 310-322.
Guastella, G., Pareglio, S., (2016). Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: Using Urban Patterns to Map the Agricultural Systems, Journal of Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, Vol 8, Pp 88–98.
Gullino, P., Devecchi, M., & Larcher, F. (2018). How can different stakeholders contribute to rural landscape planning policy? The case study of Pralormo municipality (Italy). Journal of Rural Studies, 57, 99-109.
Guzmán Luna, A., Ferguson, B. G., Giraldo, O., Schmook, B., & Aldasoro Maya, E. M. (2019). Agroecology and restoration ecology: fertile ground for Mexican peasant territorialit?. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 43(10), 1174-1200.
Herrero-Jáuregui, C., Arnaiz-Schmitz, C., Herrera, L., Smart, S. M., Montes, C., Pineda, F. D., & Schmitz, M. F. (2019). Aligning landscape structure with ecosystem services along an urban–rural gradient. Trade-offs and transitions towards cultural services. Landscape Ecology, 34(7), 1525-1545.
Iverson, A. L., Gonthier, D. J., Pak, D., Ennis, K. K., Burnham, R. J., Perfecto, I., ... & Vandermeer, J. H. (2019). A multifunctional approach for achieving simultaneous biodiversity conservation and farmer livelihood in coffee agroecosystems. Biological Conservation, 238, 108179.
Kaza, N. (2013). The changing urban landscape of the continental United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110, 74-86.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 62(10), e1-e34.
Marchi, M., Ferrara, C., Biasi, R., Salvia, R., & Salvati, L. (2018). Agro-forest management and soil degradation in Mediterranean environments: towards a strategy for sustainable land use in vineyard and olive cropland. Sustainability, 10(7), 2565.
Melloni, G., Turetta, A. P. D., Bonatti, M., & Sieber, S. (2020). A Stakeholder Analysis for a Water-Energy-Food Nexus Evaluation in an Atlantic Forest Area: Implications for an Integrated Assessment and a Participatory Approach. Water, 12(7), 1977.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic reviews, 10(1), 1-11.
Paquette, S., Domon, G., (2003). Changing Ruralities, Changing landscapes: Exploring Social Recomposition Using a Multi-Scale Approach, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol 19, Pp 425–444.
Parcerisas, L., Marull, J., Pino, J., Tello, E., Coll, F., & Basnou, C. (2012). Land use changes, landscape ecology and their socioeconomic driving forces in the Spanish Mediterranean coast (El Maresme County, 1850–2005). Environmental Science & Policy, 23, 120-132.
Pena, S. B., Abreu, M. M., Teles, R., & Espírito-Santo, M. D. (2010). A methodology for creating greenways through multidisciplinary sustainable landscape planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(4), 970-983.
Peng, L., Liu, S., and Sun, L., (2016). Spatial-Temporal Changes of Rurality Driven by Urbanization and Industrialization: a Case Study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in Chongqing, China, Journal of Habitat International, Vol 51, Pp 124-132.
Peroff, D. M., Morais, D. B., Seekamp, E., Sills, E., & Wallace, T. (2020). Assessing residents’ place attachment to the Guatemalan Maya landscape through mixed methods photo elicitation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 379-402.
Pirselimoğlu, Z., & Demirel, Ö. (2012). A study of an ecologically based recreation and tourism planning approach: a case study on Trabzon Çalköy high plateau in Turkey. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(4), 349-360.
Porteous, J. D. (2013). Environmental aesthetics: Ideas, politics and planning. New York: Routledge.
Quattrone, M., Tomaselli, G., D’Emilio, A., & Russo, P. (2018). Analysis and evaluation of abandoned railways aimed at greenway conversion: A methodological application in the Sicilian landscape using multi-criteria analysis and geographical information system. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 49(3), 151-163.
Rijnks, R., Strijker, D., (2013). Spatial Effects on the Image and Identity of a Rural Area, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol 36, Pp 103-111.
Salvati, L., & Zitti, M. (2012). Monitoring vegetation and land use quality along the rural–urban gradient in a Mediterranean region. Applied Geography, 32(2), 896-903.
Salvati, L., De Zuliani, E., Sabbi, A., Cancellieri, L., Tufano, M., Caneva, G., & Savo, V. (2017). Land-cover changes and sustainable development in a rural cultural landscape of central Italy: classical trends and counter-intuitive results. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 24(1), 27-36.
Sarmiento-Mateos, P., Arnaiz-Schmitz, C., Herrero-Jáuregui, C., D Pineda, F., & Schmitz, M. F. (2019). Designing protected areas for social–ecological sustainability: Effectiveness of management guidelines for preserving cultural landscapes. Sustainability, 11(10), 2871.
Silva, L. T., Souza, A. C. F. D., & Silva, L. A. M. (2020). Ecology, interactions and human perceptions of Cerdocyon thous in rural landscapes in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 92(3).
Soler-Estrela, A. (2018). Cultural Landscape Assessment: The Rural Architectural Heritage (13th–17th Centuries) in Mediterranean Valleys of Marina Alta, Spain. Buildings, 8(10), 140.
Sollberg, I., Schiavetti, A., & Moraes, M. E. B. (2014). Agricultural management in the una’s wildlife refuge: a perspective of conservation by agroforestry. Revista Árvore, 38(2), 241-250.
Stretch, D., Sofaer, N. (2012). How to write a systematic review of reasons. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(2), 121- 126.
Tatum, K., Porter, N., & Hale, J. (2017). A feeling for what’s best: Landscape aesthetics and notions of appropriate residential architecture in Dartmoor National Park, England. Journal of Rural Studies, 56, 167-179.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
Wezel, A., & Jauneau, J. C. (2011). Agroecology–interpretations, approaches and their links to nature conservation, rural development and ecotourism. Integrating agriculture, conservation and ecotourism: Examples from the field, 1-25.
Wu, J. (2013). Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landscape ecology, 28(1), 1-11.
Yang, Q., Li, J., Gan, X., Zhang, J., Yang, F., & Qian, Y. (2012). Comparison of landscape patterns between metropolises and small-sized cities: a gradient analysis with changing grain size in Shanghai and Zhangjiagang, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(5), 1446-1464.