ارائه الگوی رهبری آینده نگر در سازمان آموزش و پرورش
حیدر محمدی
1
(
دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی،مدیریت آموزشی،واحد کرمانشاه،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،کرمانشاه،ایران
)
مریم اسلام پناه
2
(
دانشیار، گروه مدیریت آموزشی،واحد کرمانشاه ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،کرمانشاه،ایران
)
محمد جواد کرم افروز
3
(
دانشیار،گروه مدیریت آموزشی،واحد کرمانشاه،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،کرمانشاه،ایران
)
فرامرز ملکیان
4
(
استادیار،گروه مدیریت آموزشی ،واحد کرمانشاه،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی؛کرمانشاه،ایران
)
کلید واژه: رهبری, رهبری آینده نگر, نظام آموزش و پرورش.,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه و هدف: هدایت سازمان آموزش و پرورش در زمان امروزی یک چالش منحصر به فرد است که نیازمند آینده نگری و رهبری موثر در این زمینه است، با درک این مهم هدف پژوهش ارائه الگوی رهبری آینده نگر در سازمان آموزش و پرورش، بر اساس رویکرد کیفی بود.
روش شناسی پژوهش: از روش داده بنیاد بهره گرفته شد. مشارکت کنندگان بخش کیفی شامل اساتید و مدیران سطوح عالی آموزش پرورش در کرمانشاه بودند، که از طریق روش نمونه گیری هدفمند تعداد 10 نفر بعنوان مطلعین کلیدی انتخاب شدند، برآورد حجم نمونه مورد نظر بر مبنای اشباع نظری داده‌ها انجام شد. داده‌ها از طریق مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته گردآوری شد. اعتبار و روایی داده‌ها از دو روش بازبینی مشارکت کنندگان و کدگذاری مجدد توسط خبرگان محاسبه گردید. داده‌ها بوسیله کد گذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی تحلیل شدند.
یافته ها: یافته‌های نشان داد که مقوله‌های عمده و هسته‌ای در قالب ابعاد شش گانه شرایط علّی از جمله(شرایط ساختاری، شرایط فرهنگی، فرایندهای سازمانی، انگیزه های فردی و ویژگی های شخصیتی)، پدیده محوری(مدیریت استراتژیک، تجزیه و تحلیل و تشخیص سازمان، حل مساله، مدیریت تغییر و نوآوری، ویژگی ها، مهارت ها و رفتارها)، شرایط زمینه ای(توسعه کارتیمی، بازتعریف ارزش‌ها، توسعه اجتماعات یادگیری، تمرکز بر اعضای سازمان)، شرایط مداخله‌گر(حمایت دولت، تغییرات محیطی، تکنولوژی، شبکه‌های ارتباط اجتماعی)، راهبردها(اصلاح ساختار مدیریت نظام آموزش، اصلاح قوانین و آیین نامه‌ها و بستر سازی و نهادینه سازی آینده پژوهی) و پیامدها(پیشرفت عملکرد و تحکیم نقش نظام آموزش و پرورش) به سطح انتزاعی بالاتر ارتقاءداده شد.
بحث و نتیجه گیری: به دلیل پیچیدگی سازمانی این سازمان، اهداف متعدد و ارزش های سنتی آن رهبری آینده نگر امکان ترسیم و برنامه ریزی برای رسیدن به آینده مطلوب را فراهم می کند که بواسطه آن پاسخگویی به نیازهای جدید اجتماع میسر می گردد.
چکیده انگلیسی :
Introduction: Leading the education organization in today's time is a unique challenge which requires foresight and effective leadership in this field, with the understanding of this importance, the aim of the research was to present a model of forward-looking leadership in the education organization, based on a qualitative approach.
research methodology: the foundation's data method was used. The participants of the qualitative part included professors and managers of higher education levels in Kermanshah, who were selected as key informants through the purposeful sampling method of 10 people, the estimation of the desired sample size was done based on theoretical data saturation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The reliability and validity of the data were calculated from the two methods of review by participants and recoding by experts. The data were analyzed by open, central and selective coding.
Findings: the findings showed that the main and core categories in the form The six dimensions of causal conditions including (structural conditions, cultural conditions, organizational processes, individual motivations and personality traits), central phenomenon (strategic management, organization analysis and diagnosis, problem solving, change and innovation management, characteristics, skills and behaviors), background conditions (development of curriculum, redefining values, development of learning communities, focus on organization members),intervening conditions (government support, environmental changes, technology,social communication networks), strategies (reforming the management structure of the education system, Amendment of laws and regulations and foundation and institutionalization of future research) and consequences (improvement of performance and consolidation of the role of the education system) were upgraded to higher abstract level.
Conclusion: because of the organizational complexity of this organization, its multiple goals and traditional values, its forward-looking leadership provides the possibility of drawing and planning to reach the desired future, through which it is possible to respond to the new needs of society.
1. Afjeei, S.A.A.(2015). Philosophical foundations and theories of leadership and organizational behavior, Tehran: Samit Publications. . ]in persian[
2. Ali, F., Nursyamsi, I & Madris, S.(2019).The Effect of Visionary Leadership on Study Program Performance in Lldikti IX Sulawesi, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science,6(10):242-248
3. Al-Yousef, B. (2012). Servant leadership perception and job satisfaction among SFDA employees in Saudi Arabia—A correlational study.
4. Amofa, A. K., Okronipa, G. A., & Boateng, K. (2016).Leadership Styles and Organisational Pro-ductivity: A Case Study of Ghana Cement Limited. European Journal of Business and Man-agement , 8(2): 131-143.
5. Ardalan, M.R., Beheshtirad, R., & Soltanzadeh, V. (2015).the causal model of security-oriented leadership in reducing retaliatory behaviors with the mediating role of work conscience, Journal of Educational Leadership and Management,1(3): 51-72. . ]in persian[
6. Azizan, N. A. A. (2018).Future Leadership: The relationship between organizational structure and innovation. Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management Journal ,42(1):19-23.
7. Babainejad, G.(2014). investigation of the relationship between knowledge leadership style and the level of application of human resource information system in executive bodies of Kerman city, master's thesis in information systems management, Islamic Azad University, Rafsanjan branch. . ]in persian[
8. Bergsten, E., Haapakangas, A., & Hallman, A.M.(2021). Effects of relocation to activity-based workplaces on perceived productivity: Importance of change-oriented leadership, Applied Ergonomics , 93: 103-114.
9. Carleton, E.L., Barling, J., & Trivisonno, M.(2018). Leaders’ Trait Mindfulness and Transformational Leadership: TheMediating Roles of Leaders’ Positive Affect and Leadership Self-Efficacy, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science,50(3): 185-194.
10. Coban H., & Sarikaya M.(2016). A Research On The Relationship Between Organizational Silence And Burnout, European Journal of Scientific Research , 15:145-154.
11. Dashtahi, A. K., Ekrami, M., Navehebrahim, A., & Sarmad, M. R.(2016). Application of Leadership Theories in Higher Distance Education Leadership. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS)ISSN 2356-5926,,1(1): 1087-1097.
12. Dhammika K. A. S.(2018). Visionary Leadership And Organizational Commitment: The Medi-ating Effect Of Leader Member Exchange (LMX), Journal of Management , 4 (1): 1-10.
13. Eyal, O.(2008). When Parents Choose to Start up a School: A Social-Capital Perspective on Educational Entrepreneurship. Journal of Educational Administration , 46(1): 99-118.
14. Farhi, A., Poursaid, S. M., & Shabani, M.(2017). Employing expert personnel in positions appropriate to their expertise, Human Resource Management Research Quarterly of Imam Hossein University (AS). 9(1): 75-100. . ]in persian[
15. Fischer, T., Tian, A.M., & Hughes, D.J. (2021).Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink, The Leadership Quarterly , 32(6): 195-209.
16. Geh, E.Z.(2014).Organizational spiritual leadership of worlds “made” and “found” : An experiential learning model for “feel”", Leadership & Organization Development Journal,35(2):137 – 151.
17. Genza, G. M., & Musisi, B.(2018). Educational Entrepreneurship (EE): Delineating the Domain and Highlighting its Importance and Feasibility in Educational Management in Uganda. American Journal of Educational Research,6(1):9-17.
18. Hagg, G., &Scholin, T. (2018).The policy influence on the development of Future Leadership in higher education: A Swedish perspective, Education + Training , 60(7): 656-673.
19. Hakak, M., Saedi, A.B. & Momeni Moqreh, M.(2019). Identifying and prioritizing the antecedents and consequences of the forward-looking leadership style using the fuzzy Delphi approach, Management Futures Quarterly , 31(120): 69-75. . ]in persian[
20. Hamilton, S.W. (2008).Who will Save Americs Urban Catholic Schools?, Newyork: Thomas Fordham Institute .
21. Howard, M., & Holmes, P.(2019). Social courage fosters both voice and silence in the workplace: A study on multidimensional voice and silence with boundary conditions, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance , 25(2): 147-159.
22. Islam, N., Afrin, S., Alif, S. K., Hassan, R., Islam, M. M., Kayani, R. E., & Khan, M. M. (2020).Factors Preventing future leadership: The Case of University Graduates in Bangladesh. World,,11(1): 1-9.
23. Jansen, S., Van de Zande,T., Brinkkemper, S., Stam, E., & Varma, V. (2015).How education, stimulation, and incubation encourage student entrepreneurship: Observations from MIT, IIIT, and Utrecht University, The International Journal of Management Education,13(2): 170-181.
24. Jiang, W., An, Y., Wang, L., & Zheng, C.(2021). Newcomers' reaction to the abusive supervision toward peers during organizational socialization, Journal of Vocational Behavior,128: 1-8.
25. Ju, D., Huang, M., & Chen, C. (2019).Supervisory consequences of abusive supervision: An investigation of sense of power, managerial self-efficacy, and Future-oriented leadership behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,154: 80-95.
26. Kateřina, K., & Jana, Š. (2019).Factors Affecting Entry into Future Leadership for University Students. European Research Studies,22(4):398-416.
27. Koyluoglu,S.A., Beduk, A., Duman, L., & Buyukbayraktar, H.(2015). Analyzing the Relation Between Teachers’ Organizational Silence Perception and Whistle Blowing Perceptio, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,207: 536-547.
28. Kuttim, M., Kallaste, M., Venesaar, U., & Kiis, A.(2014). Entrepreneurship Education at University Level and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 11024: 658-668.
29. Lacatuş, M. L., & Staiculescu, C. (2016).Future Leadership in Education. In International conference knowledge-based organization, 22(2): 438-443.
30. Levine, M. V.(2009). The False Promise of the Entrepreneurial University: Selling Academic Commercialism as an Engine of Economic Development in Milwaukee., Working Paper in University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
31. Manning, G.(2012). The art of leadership. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
32. Mayer, A.(2008). Review confirms work Place Counseling Reduces stress. British medical Journal, 322 : 637.
33. McKeown, A., & Bates, L.(2013).Emotional intelligent leadership: Findings from a study of public library branch managers in Northern Ireland, Library Management,34(6/7): 462 – 485.
34. Nalda, F.R., Emeterio, M.C., & Arias-Oliva, M. (2020).The strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools, Computers in Human Behavior , 112: 106-117.
35. Nejati, M.R.(2020). the role of forward-looking leadership in promoting the organizational identity of employees through the mediation of social responsibility in the Social Security Organization of Central Province, Master's Thesis of Organizational Behavior, Payam Noor University, Central Provinc. . ]in persian[
36. Nikokar, H., Akbari, M., Ahi, P., & Qiazi, R.(2019). Explaining the role of forward-looking leadership in improving organizational productivity through the mediation of organizational commitment, Administrative Management Research Quarterly , 14(1): 101-123. . ]in persian[
37. Northouse, P. G.(2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
38. Nurmi, P., & Paasio, K.(2007). Entrepreneurship in Finnish universities, Education + Training , 49(1): 56-65.
39. Oganisjana, K., &Laizans, T.(2015).Opportunity–Oriented Problem–Based Learning for Enhancing Entrepreneurship of University Students, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 21: 135-141.
40. Owens Jr, R. E., & Valesky, T. C.(2014). Organizational behavior in education: Leadership and school reform. Pearson Higher Ed.
41. Raithel,K.(2016). Leadership of Cultural Diversity: The impact of leadership. Diss. Rotterdam School of Management (RSM), Erasmus University.
42. Ramsden, P.(2018). Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge.
43. Rezaian, A.(2017).Fundamentals of Organization and Management, Tehran, Samt Publications. . ]in persian[
44. Riter, L. (2020).Future Leadership: A Narrative Study Examining Professional Transition Experiences of Educators Who Have Experimented with the Launching of an Educational Activity (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University).
45. Serafrazi, M., Zareh, S. & Pirouz, P.(2019).a forward-looking leadership style is a basic necessity in organizational unity and employee empowerment, International Conference on Interdisciplinary Studies in Management and Engineering. . ]in persian[
46. Shafai, A. A. (2018).The Perceptions of Saudi Arabia Higher Educational Leaders on Servant Leadership: The Use of Authority and Power.
47. Shen, C., Yang, J., He, P., Wu, Y.(2019). How does abusive supervision restrict employees’ feedback-seeking behavior?, Journal of Managerial Psychology , 34(8): 546-559.
48. Sipe, J. W., & Frick, D. M.(2015). Seven pillars of servant leadership: Practicing the wisdom of leading by serving. Paulist Press.
49. Spears, L. C.(2010). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. The Journal of Virtues & Leadership,1(1): 25-30.
50. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2014).The principles of qualitative research method (basic theory; procedures and methods), (Translator: Rahmatullah Rahmatpour), Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. . ]in persian[
51. Vitagliano, R., Borasi, R., Jefferson, F., Che, J., & Miller, D.(2008). AERA– Division A: Administration, Organization, and Leadership Entrepreneurial Leadership, Comparing the Practices of an Entrepreneurial Principal and an Education Entrepreneur. Warner School of Education – University of Rochester.
52. Williams K. R.(2018). Toxic leadership in defense and federal workplaces: sabotaging the mission and innovation, International Journal of Public Leadership , 14(3):179-198.
53. Wiseman, A.W.(2014). Internationally Comparative Approaches to Innovation and Future Leadership in Education, in Alexander W. Wiseman (ed.) International Educational Innovation and Public Sector Entrepreneurship (International Perspectives on Education and Society, 23:3 - 31
54. Xu, J., Wang, X., & Yan, L.(2021). The moderating effect of abusive supervision on information security policy compliance: Evidence from the hospitality industry, Computers & Security , 111: 102-114.
55. Yang,L.R., Huang, C., & Hsu, J.T.(2014). Knowledge leadership to improve project and organizational performance, International Journal of Project Management,32(1): 40-53.
56. Zhang, L., & Guo, H.(2019). Enabling knowledge diversity to benefit cross-functional project teams: Joint roles of knowledge leadership and transactive memory system, Information & Management,56: 103-120.