• صفحه اصلی
  • اعتباریابی پرسش نامه نگرش به اینترنت در نمونه‌ای منتخب از دانشجویان

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : 1053-ICTEDU (R2) بازدید : 340 صفحه: 21 - 39

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

اعتباریابی پرسش نامه نگرش به اینترنت در نمونه‌ای منتخب از دانشجویان

محورهای موضوعی : فن‎آوری اطلاعات

محمدعلی زکی 1

1 - دانشیار جامعه‌شناسی دانشگاه امام حسین(ع)

تاریخ دریافت : 1392/04/10 تاریخ پذیرش : 1392/10/12 تاریخ انتشار : 1392/01/12

کلید واژه: روایی, دانشجویان, نگرش به اینترنت, پایایی, پرسش‌نامه نگرش به اینترنت جونز و کلارک,

چکیده مقاله :

اینترنت، بخشی مهم از زندگی روزمره جامعه کنونی است. مدل پذیرش فن آوری دیویس سعی در تحلیل چگونگی استفاده از اینترنت دارد. نگرش به اینترنت، یکی از متغیرهای مدل مذکور است. مقاله حاضر سعی در اعتباریابی پرسش‌نامه نگرش به اینترنت دارد. روش تحقیق پیمایشی و اطلاعات آن از بین دانشجویان مقاطع کارشناسی و کارشناسی‌ارشد دختر و پسر دانشگاه های اصفهان و آزاد اسلامی واحد دهاقان جمع آوری گردیده است. ابزار پژوهش، پرسش نامه نگرش به اینترنت جونز و کلارک (1994) می‌باشد. ابزار تحقیق از پایایی 84/0 برخوردار بوده است. تحلیل عاملی بیانگر آن بود که تمامی40 گویه ابزار تحقیق قابل تقلیل در سه عامل هستند که معرف روایی سازه ابزار می‌باشد. نتایج پژوهش بیانگر آن است که نگرش دانشجویان به اینترنت در سطح بالایی ابراز شده است. تفاوت معناداری در نگرش به اینترنت بر حسب جنسیت، نوع دانشگاه و هم‌چنین بر حسب مقطع تحصیلی مشاهده نشد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Internet is an important part of everyday life of the present society. The Technology Acceptance Model of Davis tries to give analysis of how to use internet. Attitudes towards internet are one of the variables of the model. The present paper tries to test validity of attitudes towards internet. The data in this study was collected among BA and MA male and female students from Isfahan University and Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan Branch using survey research. The tool used was Jones and Clark questionnaire on attitudes towards internet. The results indicated that the students’ attitudes towards internet were expressed at a high level. Significant difference in attitudes towards the internet based on sex, kind of university and level of education was not observed. The reliability of the research tool was 0.84. The factor analysis confirmed that all 40 items of the tool could be reduced to three factors, which indicates the constructor validity of the tool. 

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Aliabadi, Kh., & Moshtaqi Largani, S. (2006). Reliability of “Computer Attitude Skills” (Persian Form), determining its factorial structure and correlation between CAS and personal characteristics of Tehran universities’ students. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 12(2), 111-126. (in Persian).
    2.
  2. Al Mahmud, Md. A. (2011). Students’ attitudes towards Internet: A study on private universities of Bangladesh. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(6), 9-19.
    3.
  3. Atarodi, M., &  Saeedy Rezvani, M. (2011). The explanation of effective factors on attitudes to computer among the student of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Information and Communication Technology inEducational Sciences, 2(1), 41-58. (in Persian).
    4.
  4. Aydin, S. (2007). Attitudes of EFL learners towards the Internet. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 6(3), 18-26.
    5.
  5. Chang, Shu-hsun, C., Chou, H., & Yang, J. M. (2010). The literature review of technology acceptance model: A study of the bibliometric distributions. Technology, 1634-1640.
    6.
  6. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2000). Internal consistency reliabilties for 14 computer attitude scales. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8 , 327-36.
    7.
  7. Davis F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (2004). Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: Implications for software project management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51, 31-46.
    8.
  8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Percieived usefulness, perceived ease of user acceptance of information techuology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-40.
    9.
  9. Davis, F. D., Bagzzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparsen of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982- 1003.
    10.
  10. Dinev. T., & Koufteros, X. (2002). Self-efficacy and internet usage-measurement and factorial alidity. Retrieved from http://www.fau.edu/~tdinev/publicatios/ self.pdf
    11.
  11. Graff, M. (2003). Cognitive style and attitudes towards using online learning and assessment methods. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 1(1), 21-28.
    12.
  12. Graff, M., Davies, J., & Mcnorton, M. (2004). Cognitive style and cross cultural differences in internet use and computer attitudes. Electronic Journal E-Learning, 2(2), 25-40.
    13.
  13. 13. Hagayegh, S. A., Kajbaf M. B., Shabani  A., Nikbakhat  M., & Farhani H. A. (2008). Analysis of Psychometrics Properties of Internet Attitude Scale (IAS_40). Health Information Management, 5(1), 65- 72. (in Persian).
    14.
  14. Isman, A. (2004). Attitudes of students towards internet. Turskish Online Journal of Distance Education, 5(4), 340-360.
    15.
  15. Jones, T., & Clarke, V. A. (1994). A computer attitude scale for secondary students. Computers & Education, 22(4), 315-318.
    16.
  16. Kashif-Ur-Rehman, A., Hunjra, I., Safwan, N. & Ahmad, A. (2010). Students’ attitude towards the uses of Internet. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(6), 46-55.
    17.
  17. Kutluca, T. (2011). A study on computer usage and attitudes toward computers of prospective preschool teachers. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 2(1), 1-14.
    18.
  18. Kutluca, T., & Baskan, H. (2013). Vocational college students' computer usage and attitudes toward computers. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges-May/Mayıs: 149-156.
    19.
  19. Loyed, B. H., & Gressard, C. P. (1984). Reliability and factoral Validity of Computer Attitude Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44(2), 501-505.
    20.
  20. Loyed, B. H., & Oyd, D. E. (1985). Reliability and validity of  an instrument for the assessment of computer attitudes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(4), 903-908.
    21.
  21. Morse, B. J., Gullekson, N. L., Morris, S. A., & Popovich, P. M. (2011). The development of a general Internet attitudes scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 480-489.
    22.
  22. Norton, C., Corbit, M., Greene, E., & Ormaechea, L. (2008). A comparison of self-directed learning in a virtual world environment to traditional science teaching methods. Proceedings of the NARST 2008 Annual Meeting.
    23.
  23. Obiekwe, J. (2009). An assessment of the psychometric properties of computer attitude scale for secondary students (CASSS) from the perspective of American college students: Implications to teaching and learning. Ninth Annual IBER & TLC Conference Proceedings 2009 Las Vegas, NV, USA.
    24.
  24. Paris, P. (2004). E-learning: A study on sedondary students' attitudes towards online web assisted learning. International Education Journal, 5(1), 98-123.
    25.
  25. Roussos, P. (2007). The Greek computer attitudes scale: Construction and assessment of psychometric properties. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 578–590.
    26.
  26. Selwyn, N. (1997). Students’ attitudes toward computers: Validation of a computer attitude scale for 16-19 education. Computers & Education, 28, 35-41.
    27.
  27. Shaft, T. M., Sharfman, M. P., & Wu, W. W. (2004). Reliability assessment of the attitude towards computers instrument (ATCI). Computers in Human behavior, 20, 661-689.
    28.
  28. Smalley, N., Graff, M. G., & Saunders, D. (2001). A revised computer attitude scale for secondary students’. Educational and Child Psychology, 18(3), 47-57.
    29.
  29. Sumak, B., Hericko, M., & Pusnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user type and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067-77.
    30.
  30.  Teo, T. (2008). Assessing the computer attitudes of students: An Asian perspective. Computers and Human Behavior, 24(4), 1634-1642.
    31.
  31. Teo, T. (2010). A cross-cultural validation of the Selwyn’s computer attitude scale (CAS). International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 6(2), 36-46.
    32.
  32. Tsai, C. C. (2004). Adolescents' perceptions toward the Internet: A 4-T framework. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 458-463.
    33.
  33. Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Tsai, M. J. (2001). Developing an Internet attitude scale for high school students. Computers & Education, 37, 41-51.
    34.
  34. Valois, P., Frenette, E., Villeneuve, P., Sabourin, S., & Bordeleau, C. (2000). Nonparametric item analysis and confirmatory factorial validity of the computer attitude scale for secondary students. Computers & Education, 35, 281-294.
    35.
  35. Yaman, M. (2007). The Attitudes of the physical education students towars Internet. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 6(3), 79-86.
    36.
  36. Zaki, M. A. (2005). The attitude of the trainees of computer institutes of Isfahan toward the computer and the social factors affecting it. Journal of Social Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 2(2), 29-60. (in Persian).
    37.
  37. Zaki, M. A. (2006). Testing and validation for internet attitude scale among male and female students at Isfahan University and university of medical science. Journal of Information Sciences and Technology, 22(1&2), 29-58. (in Persian).
    38.
  38. Zhang, Y. (2002). Comparison of Internet attitudes between industrial employees and college students. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 143-149.
    39.
  39. Zhang, Y. (2005). Age, gender, and internet attitudes amoung employees in the business world. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 1-10.
    40.

مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]