شبیه سازی جریان در تونل باد و بهینه سازی شکل آئرودینامیک ساختمان‌های بلند برای بهبود ضریب پسا تحت تأثیر نیروی باد

محورهای موضوعی : معماری

عبداله بقائی دائمی ¹ , سید رحمان اقبالی ² , حسین معز ³ , پیام بهرامی ⁴

1 - باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران.
2 - داﻧﺸﯿﺎر، داﻧﺸﮑﺪه ﻣﻌﻤﺎرى و ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎزى، داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﺑﯿﻦ اﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ اﻣﺎم ﺧﻤﯿﻨﻰ ﻗﺰوﯾﻦ، اﯾﺮان
3 - استاد‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌یار، گروه مهند‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌سی عمران، واحد‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ رشت، د‌‌‌‌‌‌انشگاه آزاد‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ اسلامی، رشت، ایران
4 - Ph.D. Optim Design Inc., Illinois Office, 2700 Patriot Blvd., Suite 250, Glenview, IL 60026, USA

تاریخ دریافت : 1348/10/11 تاریخ پذیرش : 1348/10/11 تاریخ انتشار : 1348/10/11

کلید واژه: شبیه سازی تونل باد, بهینه سازی آئرودینامیک, شکل ساختمانهای بلند, ضریب پسا, نیروی باد,

چکیده مقاله :

رفتارشناسی باد در اطراف ساختمان‌های بلند به‌عنوان یکی از مباحث بسیار مهم در طراحی معماری و طراحی سازه شناخته می‌شود. هدف از انجام این پژوهش، بررسی تکنیک‌های آئرودینامیکی و بهینه‌سازی فرم در ساختمان‌های بلند برای کاهش نیروی پسا بود.برای شبیه‌سازی دینامیک سیالات محاسباتی و تونل باد از نرم‌افزار Autodesk Flow Design 2014 بهره‌گیری شد. این شبیه سازی بر روی 29 مدل ساختمانی که با تکنیک‌های آئرودینامیکی طراحی شده بودند انجام شد. تکنیک‌های آئرودینامیکی به دو صورت اصلاحات آئرودینامیکی شامل پخ زدن، نرم کردن و دندانه‌دار کردن و همین‌طور فرم‌های آئرودینامیکی نیز شامل مخروطی، عقب‌نشینی و پیچشی بودند که بر روی اشکال با سطح مقطع مربع، مثلث و دایره مدل‌سازی شدند. یافته‌ها نشان داد برای طراحی ساختمان‌های حدود 150 متر، شکل پایه مثلث با اصلاح آئرودینامیکی پخ خورده و با فرم آئرودینامیکی مخروطی می‌تواند دارای کمترین میزان ضریب پسا و همین‌طور بهترین رفتار آئرودینامیکی را در برابر نیروی باد داشته باشد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Aerodynamic behavior is an important characteristic of tall and ductile buildings, so aerodynamic design can play a key role in reducing the wind effects. A tall building response to wind can be controlled by application of aerodynamic improvements to building’s design in order to manipulate the wind flow pattern and break the effective wind force acting on the structure. Traditionally the approach of structural engineers to mitigating wind loading and associated deflections and motions on tall buildings was to stiffen the building with the aim of increasing the natural frequency. Tall buildings are extremely sensitive to the wind. Thus, assessment of wind loads to design these buildings is essential. Monitoring the wind, which is forcing extraordinary tall buildings, is highly challenging. Due to increasing construction in recent decades, the study on wind flow over tall buildings has become a popular subject in theoretical research and applied engineering applications. By looking at recent constructions in Iran, it is obvious that despite the fact that constructing tall buildings is spreading, there is less concentration on environmental factors such as the wind’s aerodynamic. In tall buildings, aerodynamic behavior generally becomes important. The wind-induced building response of tall buildings can be reduced by means of aerodynamic from design and modifications that change the flow pattern around the building or break up the wind affecting the building face. Aerodynamic-based design can be divided into two types, “aerodynamic architectural design” and “aerodynamic architectural modifications” and their subgroups. The accurate estimation of the critical response parameters, such as top floor accelerations and displacements, is of fundamental importance when ensuring reliable designs of tall buildings. Methods to this end are typically set in a modal analysis framework and therefore require the estimation of the generalized forcing functions. Tall buildings are particularly prone to dynamic excitations such as those from natural disasters like strong winds and earthquakes, and this has become an especially important design issue. One way to minimize wind-induced vibrations of tall buildings is to focus more on their shapes in the design stage. Investigated aerodynamic forces and wind pressures acting on tall buildings with various unconventional configurations. The proposed of this research, investigation of aerodynamic shape optimization on tall buildings in order to reduce drag force. The aerodynamic forms such as a set-back, tapered and helical (twisted) and also aerodynamic modifications such as a chamfered corner, rounded corner and recessed corner to control and reduce wind forces and vortices on tall buildings are considered. On this basis, the study was carried out with numerical simulation of wind tunnel test on 29 building models. In order to construct 3D models, AutoCAD 2014 software was deployed and also to numerically simulate wind tunnel Autodesk Flow Design 2014 is used. Building samples were entered into the software via format FBX. The results showed that for a tall building with a triangular footprint and height of about 150 meters, base shape with chamfered corners of aerodynamic modification and tapered of aerodynamic form can have the best aerodynamic behavior against wind forces.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. بقائی د‌‌‌‌ائمی، عبد‌‌‌‌اله. (1396). طراحی الگوی مناسب مسکن د‌‌‌‌ر ساختمان‌ بلند‌‌‌‌ با محوریت استفاد‌‌‌‌ه از فاکتورهای محیطی د‌‌‌‌ر اقلیم معتد‌‌‌‌ل و مرطوب-بام رشت، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد‌‌‌‌، گروه معماری، د‌‌‌‌انشگاه آزاد‌‌‌‌ اسلامی، واحد‌‌‌‌ رشت، ایران.
2. بقائی د‌‌‌‌ائمی، عبد‌‌‌‌اله؛ و اقبالی، سید‌‌‌‌ رحمان (1396). مروری بر پید‌‌‌‌ایش و تحول ساختمان‌های بلند‌‌‌‌ مسکونی از د‌‌‌‌ریچه معماری معاصر جهان و ایران (نگاهی به وضعیت آماری و د‌‌‌‌رخواست صد‌‌‌‌ور پروانه)، کنفرانس عمران، معماری و شهرسازی کشورهای جهان اسلام، د‌‌‌‌انشگاه تبریز، ایران.

3. Ali, M., & Arms‌trong, P. (1995). Architecture of Tall Buildings, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat Committee (CTBUH), New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
4. Amin, J. A., & Ahuja, A. K. (2010). Aerodynamic modifications to the shape of the buildings: a review of the s‌tate-of-the-art. Asian journal of civil engineering (building and housing), 11(4), 433-450.
5. Amin, J. A., & Ahuja, A. K. (2014). Characteris‌tics of wind forces and responses of rectangular tall buildings, International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering (IJASE), 6(66), 1-14.
6. Arakeri, J. H., & Shankar, P. N. (2000). Ludwig Prandtl and boundary layers in fluid flow. Resonance, 5(12), 48-63.
7. Autodesk (2014). Retrieved January, 2014,from http://www.simhub.autodesk.com/resources/flow-design-wind-tunnel-validation-brief.
8. Baghaei Daemei, A. (2019). Wind Tunnel Simulation on the Pedes‌trian Level and Inves‌tigation of Flow Characteris‌tics Around Buildings. Journal of Energy Management and Technology, 3(1), 58-68.
9. Baghaei Daemei, A., Ayoubi Mobarhan, S., Ansari Vaske, F., & Bahrami, P. (2018). A review of tall buildings architectural design consideration and guiding principles (Case s‌tudy: City of Toronto), International Interdisciplinary Conference "Russia and the Eas‌t: the Interaction in Art", October 18-19, Russia, Moscow.
10. Baghaei Daemei, A., Khalatbari Limaki, A., & Safari, H. (2016). Opening Performance Simulation in Natural Ventilation Using Design Builder (Case Study: A Residential Home in Rasht). Energy Procedia, 100, 412-422.
11. Baghaei Daemei, A., Mehrinejad Khotbehsara, E., Malekian Nobarani, E, Bahrami, P. (2019). Study on wind aerodynamic and flow characteris‌tics of triangular-shaped tall buildings and CFD simulation in order to assess drag coefficient. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, Available online 18 February, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2018.08.008.
12. Baskaran, A., & Kashef, A. (1996). Inves‌tigation of air flow around buildings using computational fluid dynamics techniques. Engineering Structures, 18(11), 861-875.
13. Blocken, B., Carmeliet, J., & Stathopoulos, T. (2007). CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 95(9–11), 941-962.
14. Cermak, J. E. (1975). Applications of fluid mechanics to wind engineering a Freeman Scholar lecture. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 97 (1), 9–38.
15. Cooper, K. R., Nakayama, M., Sasaki, Y., Fediw, A. A., Resende-Ide, S., & Zan, S. J. (1997). Uns‌teady aerodynamic force measurements on a super-tall building with a tapered cross section. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 72, 199–212.
16. Currie, I. G. (2012). Fundamental Mechanics of Fluids. (4th ed.). New York: CRC Press.
17. Davenport, A. G. (1971). The response of six building shapes to turbulent wind, philosophical transactions of the royal society A, 269(1199), 385–394.
18. Dutton, R., & Isyumov, N. (1990). Reduction of tall building motion by aerodynamic treatments. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 36, 739-47.
19. Fadl, M. S., & Karadelis, J. N. (2013). CFD simulation for wind comfort and safety in urban area: a case s‌tudy of Coventry university central campus. International Journal of Architecture, Engineering and Cons‌truction (IJAEC), 2(2), 131-143.
20. Gu, M., Huang, P., Tao, L., Zhou, X., & Fan, Z. (2010).
Experimental s‌tudy on wind loading on a complicated group-tower. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 26, 1142–1154.
21. Günel, M., & Ilgin, H. E. (2014). Tall Buildings Structural Sys‌tems and Aerodynamic Form. Firs‌t published. Routledge, New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
22. Hall, N. (2015). Retrieved May, 2015, from www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/drag1.html.
23. Hayashida, H., & Iwasa, Y. (1990). Aerodynamic shape effects on tall building for vortex induced vibration. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 33(1-2), 237-42.
24. Ho, P. H. K. (2007). Economics Planning of Super Tall Buildings in Asia Pacific Cities, Strategic Integration of Surveying Services FIG Working Week, May 13–17, Hong Kong, China.
25. Holmes, J. D. (2001). Wind Loading of Structures. London: Spon Press.
26. Hu, J. C., Zhou, Y., & Dalton, C. (2006). Effects of the corner radius on the near wake of a square prism. Experiments in Fluids, 40(1), 106.
27. Huang, S., Li, Q. S., & Xu, S. (2007). Numerical evaluation of wind effects on a tall s‌teel building by CFD. Journal of Cons‌tructional Steel Research, 63(5), 612-627.
28. Ilgin, H. E., & Günel, M. H. (2007). The role of aerodynamic modifications in the form of tall buildings agains‌t wind excitation. METU JFA, 24(2), 17-25.
29. Irwin, P. A. (2009). Wind Engineering Challenges of the New Generation of Super-Tall Buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 97, 328–334.
30. Irwin, P. A., Kilpatrick, J., Robinson, J., & Frisque, A. (2008). Wind and Tall Buildings: Negatives and Positives. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 17, 915–928.
31. Isyumov, N., Dutton, R., & Davenport, A. G. (1989). Aerodynamic methods for mitigating wind-induced building motions, Structural Design Analyze and Tes‌ting, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE library): 462–470.
32. Kareem, A. (1983). Mitigation of Wind-Induced Motions
of Tall Buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 11(1–3), 273-284.
33. Kareem, A., Kijewski, T., & Tamura, Y. (1999). Mitigation of Motion of Tall Buildings with Specific Examples of Recent Applications. Wind and Structures, 2(3), 201–251.
34. Kawai, H. (1998). Effects of corner modifications on aeroelas‌tic ins‌tabilities of tall buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 74-76, 719-29.
35. Kikitsu, H., Okuda, Y., Ohashi, M., & Kanda, J. (2008). POD analysis of wind velocity field in the wake region behind vibrating three-dimensional square prism. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 96, 2093–2103.
36. Kim, Y. C., Kanda, J., & Tamura, Y. (2011). Wind-induced coupled motion of tall buildings with varying square plan with height. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 99(5), 638-650.
37. Kim, Y. M., & You, K. P. (2002). Dynamic response of a tapered tall building to wind loads. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 90, 1771-82.
38. Kim, Y., & Kanda, J. (2010). Characteris‌tics of aerodynamic forces and pressures on square plan buildings with height variations. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 98(8–9), 449-465.
39. Kuo, C. Y., Tzeng, C. T., Ho, M. C., & Lai, C. M. (2015). Wind Tunnel Studies of a Pedes‌trian-Level Wind Environment in a Street Canyon between a High-Rise Building with a Podium and Low-Level Attached Houses. Energies, 8(10), 10942-10957.
40. Kwok, K .C. S. (1988). Effect of building shape on wind-induced response of tall buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 28, 381–390.
41. Kwok, K. C. S., & Bailey, P. A. (1987). Aerodynamic devices for tall building and s‌tructures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 4(111), 349-65.
42. Lin, N., Letchford, C., Tamura, Y., Liang, B., & Nakamura, O. (2005). Characteris‌tics of wind forces acting on tall buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 93(3), 217-242.
43. McCormick, B. W. (1979). Aerodynamics, Aeronautics, and Flight Mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
44. Mendis, P., Ngo, T., Haritos, N., & Hira, A. (2007). Wind loadings on tall buildings. EJSE Special Issue: Loading on Structures, 41, 1–14.
45. Miyashita, K., Katagiri, J., Nakamura, O., Ohkuma, T., Tamura, Y., Itoh, M., & Mimachi, T. (1993). Wind induced response of high rise building: effects of corner cuts or opening in square building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 50, 319-28.
46. Mochida, A., & Lun Isaac, Y. F. (2008). Prediction of wind environment and thermal comfort at pedes‌trian level in urban area. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 96(10–11), 1498-1527.
47. Moreno, J. (1989). Analysis and Design of High-Rise Concrete Buildings, ACI SP-97 Series, Michigan: American Concrete Ins‌titute.
48. Parker, D., & Wood, A. (2013). The Tall Buildings Reference Book, Firs‌t published. New York. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
49. Sathyajith, M. (2006). Fundamentals, Resource Analysis and Economics. (1th ed.). Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
50. Schueller, W. (1977). High-Rise Building Structures. New York: John and Wiley Sons Inc.
51. Scott, D., Hamilton, N., & Ko, E. (2005). Structural Design Challenges for Tall Buildings. Structure Magazine, 2, 20–23.
52. Stathopoulos, T. (2009). Wind and Comfort, EACWE 5 - International Association for Wind Engineering, Florence, Italy.
53. Tamura, T., & Miyagi, T. (1999). The effect of turbulence on aerodynamic forces on a square cylinder with various corner shapes. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 83, 135–145.
54. Tamura, T., Miyagi, T., & Kitagishi, T. (1998). Numerical prediction of uns‌teady pressures on a square cylinder with various corner shapes. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 74-76, 531–542.
55. Tamura, Y., Kim, Y. C., Tanaka, H., Bandi, E. K.,
Yoshida, A., & Ohtake, K. (2013). Aerodynamic and response characteris‌tics of super-tall buildings with various configurations, Proceedings of the Eighth Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, December 10–14, Chennai, India.
56. Tanaka, H., Tamura, Y., Ohtake, K., Nakai, M., & Kim, Y. C. (2012). Experimental inves‌tigation of aerodynamic forces and wind pressures acting on tall buildings with various unconventional configurations. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 107–108, 179–191.
57. Taranath, B. S. (2004). Wind and earthquake resis‌tant
buildings: Structural analysis and design. CRC press.
58. Tominaga, Y., Mochida, A., Yoshie, R., Kataoka, H., Nozu, T., Yoshikawa, M., & Shirasawa, T. (2008). AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedes‌trian wind environment around buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 96(10–11), 1749-1761.
59. Tse, K.T., Hitchcock, P.A., Kowk, K. C. S., Thepmongkorn, S., & Chan, C. M. (2009). Economic perspectives of aerodynamic treatments of square tall buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Indus‌trial Aerodynamics, 97, 455–467.