Effects of an Optimization Method to Determine Optimal Complementary Learning Clusters on Iranian EFL Learners' Language Proficiency
الموضوعات : نشریه مطالعات آموزش زبان انگلیسی
1 -
الکلمات المفتاحية: Genetic Algorithm, Optimization, Cooperative learning, language proficiency, Complementary Learning Clusters,
ملخص المقالة :
Cooperative learning has widely been used as a teaching method in English class around the world,and has attracted worldwide attention for its remarkable achievement. This study was an attemptto investigate the effects of an optimization method named genetic algorithm to determine optimalcomplementary learning clusters on Iranian EFL learners' English proficiency. The subjects of thismixed method study were 40 male students at intermediate level with the age of 12-17, and thestudy was done in winter, 2016, in a private language institute in Isfahan, Iran. They were dividedin two groups, the experimental group (EG) who were taught cooperative learning with optimalclustering, and the control group (CG) who were thought traditional cooperative learning. At thequantitative phase, an Independent Samples T-test was used to compare the means of pre andposttests. The results indicated that, in listening, speaking, and vocabulary, the subjects'performances in EG were significantly better than CG. At the qualitative phase, the findings of theinterviews revealed that Iranian EFL learners had positive attitudes towards using cooperativelearning in improving their English knowledge. This study could benefit teachers, students, andEnglish private institutes in teaching and learning process. It could also help language designers,policy makers, and administrators employing optimization methods to facilitate teaching Englishskills, and components.
Ahangari. S., & Samadian. z. (2014). The effect of cooperative learning activities on writing skills of Iranian EFL learners. Linguistics and Literature Studies 2(4), 121-130.
Azmahani,A., Khairiyah, M., Amirmudin, U., & Jamaludin, M. (2013). A longitudinal study on the impact of cooperative problem-based learning in inculcating sustainable development. Putrajaya: Aalborg university press.
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2009). Convex optimization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Delli, C. M. (2009). Enhancing cooperative learning in TESOL teacher education. ELT Journal, 63 (1), 42-50.
Farrell, T. S., & Jacobs, G. M. (2010). Essential for successful English language teaching. London: Continum International Publishing Group.
Fellers, J. W. (1996). Teaching teamwork: Exploring the use of cooperative learning teams in information systems education, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 27(2), 44-60.
Huong, L. P. (2006). Learning Vocabulary in Group work in Vietnam. RELC,37(1), 105-121.
Jalali, V. M., & Hassan, N. (2012). Neurogenetic algorithm for solving combinatorial engineering problems. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Applied Mathematics, 25(4), 89-101.
Jalali Varnamkhasti, M., & Lee, L. S. (2012). A fuzzy genetic algorithm based on binary encoding for solving multidimensional knapsack problems. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 35(3), 165-178.
Jalali Varnamkhasti, M., & Lee, L. S. (2013). A genetic algorithm based on sexual selection for the multidimensional 0/1 knapsack problems. International Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 422–431.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Cooperative classrooms. In M. Brubacher, R. Payne & K. Rickett (Eds.), Perspectives on small group learning: Theory and practice (pp. 119-131). Ontario: Rubicon Publishing Inc.
Khan, S. A., Javaid, M. A, & Farooq, U. (2015). Evaluation of the effectiveness of cooperative learning method versus traditional learning method on the writing ability of the students. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 4(1) 23-32.
Krecic, M. J., & Grmek, I. (2008). Cooperative learning and team culture in schools: Conditions for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 59–68.
Kumar, M., Husian, M., Upreti, N., & Gupta, D. (2010). Genetic algorithm: Review and application. International Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management, 2 (2), 451-454.
Lichtenstein, M. (2005). The importance of classroom environments in the assessment of learning community outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 46(4), 341-356.
Mabrouk, P.A. (2007). Active learning: Models from the analytical sciences. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
Macpherson, A. (2008). Cooperative learning group activities for college courses. British Columbia: The Centre for Academic Growth, Kwantlen University.
Momtaz, E., & Garner, M. (2010). Does collaborative learning improve EFL learners’reading comprehension? Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 1(1), 15-36.
Newton, J. (2001). Options for vocabulary learning through communication tasks. ELT Journal, 55 (1), 30-37.
Rahavard, Z. J. (2010). Cooperative learning strategies and reading comprehension. California Linguistic Notes, 35(2), 1-15.
Slavin, R.E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342.
Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 429-445.
Slavin, R. E. (1989). Research on cooperative learning: consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 52-54.
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Handbook of research on learning and instruction. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Wang, J. (2011). Improve college students’ autonomous English learning effectiveness with new learning model. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 580-587.
Wang, Y., Li, Y., & Liao, H. C. (2011). Using a genetic algorithm to determine optimal complementary learning clusters for ESL in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 14832–14837.
Wei, P., & Tang, Y. (2015), Cooperative learning in English class of Chinese junior high school. Creative Education, 6, 397-404.
Wyk, M. M. V. (2012). The effects of STAD-cooperative learning method on student achievement, attitude and motivation in economics education. Journal of Social Sciences, 33(2), 261-270.
