شارک

عنوان URL للمقالة


رقم المقالة : SOIJ-2009-1371 (R3) زيارة : 181 الصفحة: 19 - 30

10.22094/soij.2021.1909686.1371

20.1001.1.23456450.2021.10.3.2.5

نوع المخطوط: ابحاث

Diary of an Architect, a Pheno-pragmatical Tool in Education

الموضوعات : Space Ontology International Journal

Homan Khajeh pour 1 , Shahab Kariminia 2 , Mahmoud Reza Saghafi 3 , Marziyeh Piravi Vanak 4

1 - Department of Architecture, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
2 - Department of Architecture, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
3 - Faculty of Architecture & Urbanism, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
4 - Faculty Member, Art Univercity, Isfahan,Iran

تاريخ الإرسال : 28 الأربعاء , محرم, 1442 تاريخ التأكيد : 14 الخميس , ذو القعدة, 1442 تاريخ الإصدار : 24 الأربعاء , محرم, 1443

الکلمات المفتاحية: Architecture education, Pheno-pragmatic, Theory and practice gap, Architectural writing,

ملخص المقالة :

This research is a primary part of a trilogy study with the purpose to establish a pheno-pragmatic mythology for architectural education. In this research the goal was to attract the subconscious interest of students’ learning curve in a limited educational timeline. To do so we have composed a pheno-pragmatic method to evaluate the conscious experience of students during a semester. Therefore, to achieve the quality of education needed in this method self-efficient education tools were required. Writing was considered as a subsequent tool to gain the proper outcome of this method. Firstly, a total of 318 students from two major universities in Isfahan were selected by random; two theory classes and one studio class, to participate in this study. The questions surrounding this study are; how does a written diary transpire as a pheno-pragmatic tool in architecture education? And can a diary establish a basic understanding of theory and practice for students? To reach the necessary outcome of this study quantitate data were gathered by processed questionnaires to establish a fundamental conclusion to this method. According to the data gathered around 25 percent of the students agreed with the theory and more than 57 percent accepted this method as both a theoretical and practical learning tool.

المصادر:


  1. Aldrich, T. (2005). Self-Awareness and Empowerment in Architectural Education: A Case Study, European Journal of Arts Education (1), 1-13.
    2.
  2. Ashkan, M. (2016). The Phenomenological Evaluation of Teaching Professionalism in The Architecture Design Studio Culture: A Case at The University of Kansas. International Journal of Architectural Research, 10(1), 41-61.
    3.
  3. Bangert-Drowns, R. Hurley, M. Wilkinson, B. (2004). The Effects of School-Based Writing-to-Learn Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29-58.
    4.
  4. Barrett, T. (2017). New Model of Problem-based learning: Inspiring Concepts, Practice Strategies and Case Studies from Higher Education: Maynooth: AISHE.
    5.
  5. Brinkmann, M. (2016). Phenomenological Theory of Bildung and Education. Springer Science. DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_94-1.
    6.
  6. Brinkmann, M. Friesen, N. (2018). Phenomenology and Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5.
    7.
  7. Cash, P. J. (2018). Developing theory-driven design research. Design Studies, 56, 84-119
    8.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative Research Designs. In V. Knight (Ed.), Research Designs (Fourth ed.). United states of America: Sage Publication.
    9.
  9. Finlay, L. (2009). Debating Phenomenological Research Methods. Phenomenology & Practice, 3(1), 20.
    10.
  10. Firmanto, A. Rahmawati, H. Degeng, I. N. S. Chusniyah, T. (2019). Pragmatism-Philosophy of John Dewey’s Education: Role and Position in Learning Information Literacy (Study in Educational Psychology). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 349, 111-117.
    11.
  11. Friesen, N., Henriksson, C., & Saevi, T. (2012). Hermeneutic Phenomenology in Education Method and Practice. Boston: Sense Publishers.
    12.
  12. Gagne, J. C. D., & Walters, K. J. (2010). The Lived Experience of Online Educators: Hermeneutic Phenomenology. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 357-366.
    13.
  13. Heath, Tom. (2010). Learning architecture/teaching architecture: a guide for the perplexed. Denarius Design Books, Australia.
    14.
  14. Henriksson, C. Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Pedagogical Practice, in: N. Friesen, C. Henriksson, T. Saevi (Eds.) Hermeneutic Phenomenology In Education, Sense Publishers, Boston, 2012.
    15.
  15. Hunt, A. (2008). Pragmatic Thinking and Learning. USA: The Pragmatic Bookshelf.
    16.
  16. Hurol, Y. (2020). On ontological approaches to academic research in architecture. Open House International. doi:10.1108/OHI-04-2020-0001.
    17.
  17. James, William, (1922). Pragmatism A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Longmans, Green and Co., New York.
    18.
  18. Kalisha, W. (2015). Writing the in-between spaces: Discovering Hermeneutic Phenomenological seeing in Dadaabi Refugee Camp, Kenya. Phenomenology & Practice, 9(1), 55-69.
    19.
  19. Kaufman, D. M. (2003). Applying educational theory in practice. BMJ, 326, 213-216.
    20.
  20. Khalifa, F. A. (2017). Autonomy in Architectural Education: A Bahraini Perspective. International Journal of Architectural Research, 11(2), 24-33.
    21.
  21. Knight, T. (1999). Applications in Architectural Design, And Education and Practice. Retrieved from Report for the NSF/MIT Workshop on Shape Computation:
    22.
  22. Küpers, W. (2011). Embodied Pheno-Pragma-Practice – Phenomenological and Pragmatic Perspectives on Creative “Inter-practice” in Organisations between Habits and Improvisation. Phenomenology & Practice, 5(1), 100-139.
    23.
  23. Krupinska, J. (2014). What an architecture student should know. New York, USA: Routledge.
    24.
  24. Lofthouse, N. (2013). The Changing Nature of Architectural Education Do Live Projects prepare students for the realities of architectural practice? (MA degree), Oxford Brookes University.
    25.
  25. Manen, M. v. (2007). Phenomenology of Practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1(1), 11-30.
    26.
  26. Page-Voth, V. Graham, S. (1999). Effects of Goal Setting and Strategy Use on the Writing Performance and Self-Efficacy of Students with Writing and Learning Problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 230-240.
    27.
  27. Marullo, F. (2019). Climatic Universal System Architecture and Living Knowledge. Journal of Architectural Education, 73(2), 168-177.
    28.
  28. Menold, J. Jablokow, K. (2019). Exploring the effects of cognitive style diversity and self-efficacy beliefs on final design attributes in student design teams, Design Studies, 60(C), 71-102.
    29.
  29. Montoya, A. O. D. (2020). Practice and Theory in the Moral Development: Question of Awareness. Education Journal, 9(1), 1-8. doi:10.11648/j.edu.20200901.11.
    30.
  30. Potts, C. (2011). Pragmatics. Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics.
    31.
  31. Owen, I. R. (2015). Phenomenology and Meaning for Consciousness Phenomenology in Action in Psychotherapy. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. pp. 17-26
    32.
  32. Sirowy, B. (2010). Phenomenological Concepts in Architecture, Towards a User-Oriented Practice. (Dissertation).
    33.
  33. Stolz, S. (2020). Phenomenology and phenomenography in educational research: A critique. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(10), 1077-1096.
    34.
  34. Potts, C. (2011). Pragmatics. Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics.
    35.
  35. Sævi, T. (2013). Between Beng and Knowing: Addressing the Fundamental Hesitation in Hermeneutic Phenomenological Writing. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 13(1), 1-11.
    36.
  36. Saevi, T. (2013). Nothing but Phenomenology…. Phenomenology & Practice, 7(1), 1-4.
    37.
  37. Salama, A. M. (2010). Delivering Theory Courses in Architecture: Inquiry Based, Active, and Experiential Learning Integrated. International Journal of Architectural Research, 4(2-3), 278-295.
    38.
  38. Schyff, D. v. d. (2016). From Necker Cubes to Polyrhythms: Fostering a Phenomenological Attitude in Music Education. Phenomenology & Practice, 10(1), 4-24.
    39.
  39. Sgambi, L., Kubiak, L., Basso, N., & Garavaglia, E. (2019). Active learning for the promotion of students’ creativity and critical thinking. International Journal of Architectural Research, 13(2), 386-407. doi:DOI 10.1108/ARCH-11-2018-0018.
    40.
  40. Smedt, F. Graham, S. Van Keer, H. (2018). The bright and dark side of writing motivation: Effects of explicit instruction and peer assistance. The Journal of Educational Research. DOI:10.1080/00220671.2018.1461598.
    41.
  41. Smyth, J. (2001). Effects of Writing About Traumatic Experiences: The Necessity for Narrative Structuring. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 161-172.
    42.
  42. Tezel, E., & Casakin, H. (2010). Learning Styles and Students’ Performance in Design Problem Solving. International Journal of Architectural Research, 4(2-3), 262-277.
    43.

سند

Sanad is a platform for managing Azad University publications

الروابط

المراكز ذات الصلة

دعامة

الصفحات الرسمية

حقوق هذا الموقع الإلكتروني مملوكة لنظام SANAD Press Management. © 1442-1446

الصفحة الرئيسية| دخول| معلومات عنا| اتصل بنا|
[English] [فارسی] [en] [fa]