Roles of Visual and Linguistic Metadiscourses in Developing Persuasive Infographic Resumes
الموضوعات : Research in English Language Pedagogy
Omid Allaf-Akbary
1
(University of Mohaghegh Ardabili)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Visual metadiscourse, Infographic resume, Metadiscourse,
ملخص المقالة :
An infographic resume is an effective medium of exchanging information from job applicants to employers, and it greatly affects and persuades employers to take action. The current study examines both how frequently linguistic and the visual metadiscourse markers (MMs) are employed in infographic resumes and the role they take in creating persuasion. A corpus of 30 infographic resumes totaling about 2463 words was extracted from digital content marketers, software engineers, and service advisors. To compare the employment of the two metadiscourse types, and find out the way visual metadiscourse perfectly coordinated with linguistic metadiscourse in creating persuasive interaction and evoking employers to hire the job applicants, we built on Hyland’s (2019) metadiscourse model and Kumpf's (2000) visual metadiscourse to analyze the corpora. Results indicated that boosters and attitude markers demonstrated higher frequencies than other linguistic MMs and were considered to be meaningful and influential ways of persuasive language. In addition, it was shown that all visual metadiscourse categories were mostly established in the data examined. The findings revealed that both linguistic and visual metadiscourse is significant in establishing the discourse, attracting the audience, and satisfying the employers’ curiosity. They were proved to be essential in persuasive language.
Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamins.
Ädel, A., & Mauranen, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 1-11.
Al-Subhi, A. (2022). Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements. Journal of Pragmatics, 87(1), 24-40.
Chen. L., & Hu, G. (2020). Mediating knowledge through expressing surprises: A frame-based analysis of surprise markers in research articles across disciplines and research paradigms. Discourse Processes, 57(8), 659-681. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2020.1737348.
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as a rhetorical act. Peter Lang.
Crismore, A. (2004). Pronouns and metadiscourse as interpersonal rhetorical devices in fundraising letters: A corpus linguistic analysis. In: Connor, U, Upton, TA (Eds.), Discourse in the Professional: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics (pp. 307-330). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113.
D'Angelo, L., Mauranen, A., & Maci, S. (Ed.). (2021). Metadiscourse in digital communication: new research, approaches, and methodologies. Springer.
DeCarlo, L. (2019). Resumes for dummies (8th edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Canada.
Dick, M. (2020). The Infographic: A history of data graphics in news and communications. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Esfandiari, R., Allaf-Akbary, O. (2022). Metadiscursive features in research articles: The role of stimulated recall. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 14(29), 245-263. Doi: 10.22034/ELT.2021.51232.2487
Fechine, L. A. R., & Pontes, A. L. (2012). O metadiscurso visual do material interposto de um dicionário em Língua Inglesa. Calidoscópio, 10(3), 294-300.
Gardner, R., & Luchtenberg, S. (2000). Reference, image, text in German and Australian advertising posters. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1807-1821.
Harris, Z. (1959). The transformational model of language structure. Anthropological Linguistics, 1(1), 7-29.
Hyland, K. (2019). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing (2nd edition). Continuum.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in scholastic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.
Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, L., Constantinescu, M., Stoica, G, & Hartular, S. (Ed.). (2022). Attitude and stance in discourse. London.
Kashiha, H. (2022). Academic lectures versus political speeches: Metadiscourse functions affected by the role of the audience. Journal of Pragmatics, 190, 60–72.
Kostelnick, C., Roberts, D., & Dragga, S. (1998). Designing visual language: Strategies for professional communicators. Longman.
Kumpf, P.E. (2000). Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 401-424
Kumpf, P.E. (2000). Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 401-424
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Kumpf, P. E. (2000). Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 401-424.
Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2020). Introduction to multimodal analysis (2nd edition). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Li, M. (2021). Researching and teaching second language writing in the digital age. Macmillan.
Mancini, C. (2005). Cinematic hypertext. Investigating a new paradigm (Vol. 122). IOS Press.
Paolucci, C. (2021). Cognitive semiotics. minds, meaning, and cognition. Dordrecht: Springer.
Povolná, R. (2020). Persuasion in technical discourse: The role of interpersonal metadiscourse markers in user manuals. Persuasion in Specialized Discourses, 229-262.
Smith-Worthington, D, & Jefferson, S. (2018). Technical writing for success (4th edition). Cengage Learning.
Tompkins, K. (2020). Resume writing simplified: Removing the guesswork so you can achieve optimal results. Amazon Digital Services.
Tseng, M., & Liu, C. (2021). Paradigmatic variation in hedging and boosting: A comparative study of discussions in narrative inquiry and grounded theory research. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 61, 1-16.
Tufte, E. R. (2001). The Visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press.
Vande Kopple, W. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93.
Vande Kopple, W. (2002). Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric. In E. Barton, & G. Stygall (Eds.), Discourse studies in composition (pp. 91-113). Hampton Press.
Yoon, H., & Römer, U. (2020). Quantifying disciplinary voices: an automated approach to interactional metadiscourse in successful student writing. Written Communication, 2(9), 1- 37.
Zhang, G., & Parvaresh V. (2019). Elastic language in persuasion and comforting. Palgrave.
