Bridging Disciplines for Deeper Insight: A Semantico-Stylistic Analysis of Authorial Style in D.H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers
الموضوعات : Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching EnglishRawa Abdulshareef Kadhim Alsaeedi 1 , Mohsen Shahrokhi 2 , Raad Shakir Abdulhasan Alnawas 3 , Ehsan Rezvani 4
1 - Department of English Language, Isf. C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Shah. C., Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
3 - Raad Shakir Abdulhasan Alnawas, English Department, College of Education for Humanities, Thi-Qar Univesity, Iraq
4 - Department of English Language, Isf. C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: Stylistics, Semantics, Componential Analysis, D.H. Lawrence, Sons and Lovers, Authorial Style, Literary Linguistics,
ملخص المقالة :
The stylistic analysis of authorial technique often struggles to reconcile subjective literary interpretation with objective, empirical evidence. This research addressed this void by demonstrating the effectiveness of an integrated semantico-stylistic approach for characterizing authorial style in D.H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers (1913). Employing a mixed-methods design, the study utilized Geoffrey Leech’s (1981) componential analysis model to systematically deconstruct and quantify the ‘logical compatibility’ between lexical items describing characters’ internal states and their surrounding habitats. Through an examination of representative passages across the novel’s five main plot stages, the study generated quantitative compatibility scores to chart how Lawrence’s stylistic strategies modulate across the narrative arc. The findings indicated that Lawrence’s authorial style is characterized by a deliberate manipulation of semantic resonance, with compatibility scores intensifying at points of high emotional conflict. The analysis provided concrete, feature-based linguistic evidence that grounds established psychological and thematic interpretations of the novel in verifiable textual patterns. This study concluded that a formal semantic framework like CA serves as a valuable tool for enhancing the objectivity of stylistics, offering an evidence-based methodology to move beyond impressionistic criticism and enabling a firmer, evidence-based grasp of how literary meaning is constructed at the lexical level.
Abro, S. (2023). Stylistics analysis of Robert Burns’ poem A red, red rose. Advances in Social Behavior Research, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7102/3/2023021
Al-Zoubi, M. (2009). The validity of componential analysis in translating metaphor. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 17(3), 151–160.
Belfarhi, K. (2013). The componential analysis of literary meaning. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 288–301.
Carter, R. (1998). Vocabulary: Applied linguistic perspectives (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Eesa, M. (2007). The validity of componential analysis in translating metaphor. Almustansiriyah Journal of Arts, 16(1), 2–17.
Gugin, D. (2008). The uses of literature: Towards a bidirectional stylistics. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 17(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007088223
Hobi, E. (2019). Componential analysis of meaning. College of Arts Journal, 98, 109–122.
Kinkead-Weekes, M. (1996). D. H. Lawrence: Triumph to exile 1912–1922. Cambridge University Press.
Korucu, A. (2018). Trauma of a family in D. H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers. Journal of International Social Research, 11(55), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20185537187
Leech, G. N. (1981). Semantics: The study of meaning (2nd ed.). Penguin Books.
Leech, G. N., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Matroud, S. (2024). Oedipal aspect in Sons and Lovers: A psychoanalytic study. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 2(5), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(5).23
Mkhitaryan, I. (2008). The linguostylistic and the linguopoetic study of metaphor in D. H. Lawrence’s “Sons and Lovers”. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 4(1-2), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.46991/afa/2008.4.1-2.060
Nida, E. A. (1975). Componential analysis of meaning: An introduction to semantic structures. Mouton.
Nwachi, E., Babarinde, O., & Ahamefula, N. (2020). Componential analysis of ‘Gba’ verbal complex and its relevance in second language teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(6), 1027–1036.
Saeed, J. I. (2009). Semantics (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Schwarz, D. (1995). The transformation of the English novel, 1890-1930: Studies in Hardy, Conrad, Joyce, Lawrence, Forster, and Woolf (2nd ed.). Macmillan Press Ltd.
Short, M. (1996). Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. Longman.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Tarrayo, V. (2020). Wounds and words: A lexical and syntactic analysis of Casocot’s “There are other things beside brightness and light.” Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 502–512. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28594
Wales, K. (2011). A dictionary of stylistics (3rd ed.). Pearson Longman.
Zhao, M. (2012). The art of balance: A corpus-assisted stylistic analysis of Woolfian parallelism in «To the Lighthouse». International Journal of English Studies, 12(2), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2012/2/161741
Zhong, X., & Chen, Q. (2024). Interpreting the symbolism of “flowers” in Sons and Lovers by David Herbert Lawrence. Scientific and Social Research, 6(5), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.26689/ssr.v6i5.6864
