Key Insights from Iranian Teachers and Junior High School Students about EFL Textbooks: A Mixed Methods Evaluation Study
الموضوعات :
Seyed Mohammad Jafari
1
,
Majid Ghaleb Barabad
2
1 - Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran
2 - Khaf Ministry of Education, Khaf, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: EFL, junior high school, mixed methods research, Prospect series, textbook evaluation,
ملخص المقالة :
Textbooks play a crucial role in shaping the instructional framework of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms, significantly influencing pedagogical approaches and learning outcomes. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Prospect series by exploring the perceptions of both students and teachers regarding its impact on language acquisition. To that end, an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was employed, beginning with a quantitative phase involving structured questionnaires administered to 100 students (55 males, 45 females) and 80 English teachers (50 males, 30 females) in Khorasan Razavi province. Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test were utilized for data analysis, followed by qualitative semi-structured interviews to gain deeper insights. The findings revealed generally positive perceptions from both students and teachers concerning the Prospect series, particularly their alignment with Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) principles and engagement strategies. Nonetheless, areas of concern were identified, especially regarding the diversity and depth of writing tasks and supplementary materials, underscoring the need for further enhancement. This study highlighted the importance of continuous evaluation and adaptation of educational resources to address the evolving needs of EFL learners. The findings may inform educators and curriculum developers of refining instructional practices, advocating for broader participation in future research to explore real classroom applications and enhance the overall effectiveness of English language teaching resources.
Abbasnejad, M., & Kamali, N. (2019). The prevalence of vocabulary learning strategies among Iranian EFL students. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory, 2(5), 37-45.
Ahmadi, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2016). EFL teachers' perceptions towards textbook evaluation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 260-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0602.06
Ahmadi Safa, M. & Karampour, F. (2020). A checklist-based evaluative study of English textbook “Prospect 3” from teachers’ and ttudents’ perspectives. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 12(1), 1-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.22111/ijals.2020.5647
Akbari, O., & Pourabbas, H. (2015). Evaluation of Iranian second-grade high school English textbook based on needs analysis approach. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(5), 19-34.
Alavi Moghaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Alavi, M. (2015). English for schools, Prospect 3: Student book, junior secondary program. Iran’s Textbook Publishing Company.
Alavi Moghaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Forozandeh Shahraki, E., Khadir Sharabian,S., & Nikoopoor, J. (2014). English for schools, Prospect 2: Student book, junior secondary program. Iran's Textbook Publishing Company.
Alavi Moghaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Ananisarab, M., Forozandeh Shahraki, E., Khadir Sharabian, S. & Ghorbani, N. (2013). English for schools, Prospect 1: Student book, junior secondary program. Iran's Textbook Publishing Company.
Al-Jarf, R. (2024). Students' assignments and research papers generated by AI: Arab instructors' views. Online Submission, 6(2), 92-98.
Alshumaimeri, Y., & Alharbi, T. (2024). English textbook evaluation: a Saudi EFL teacher’s perspective. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1479735
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (1972). Introduction to research in education. Holt, Rinehart & Winston
Asadi, M., Kiany, G. R., Akbari, R., & Samar, R. G. (2016). Program evaluation of the new English textbook (Prospect 1) in the Iranian ministry of education. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 291-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0602.10
Asakereh, A., Yousofi, N., & Weisi, H. (2019). Critical content analysis of English textbooks used in the Iranian education system: Focusing on ELF features. Issues in Educational Research, 29, 1016-1038.
Azizifar, A., Koosha, M., & Lotfi, A. R. (2011). An analytical evaluation of Iranian high school ELT textbooks from 1970 to the present. Journal of Asia TEFL, 8(1).
Banaruee, H., Farsani, D., & Khatin-Zadeh, O. (2023). Culture in English language teaching: A curricular evaluation of English textbooks for foreign language learners. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1012786. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1012786
Bauhoff, S. (2011). Systematic self-report bias in health data: impact on estimating cross-sectional and treatment effects. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 11, 44-53.
Birjandi, P., & Soheili, A. (1991). Right path to English. Ministry of Education.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Choi, G. O. (2008). The design of wayfinding affordance and its influence on task performance and perceptual experience in desktop virtual environments. The University of Texas at Austin.
Cohen, D. K. (2011). Teaching and its predicaments. Harvard University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Dabbagh, A., & Safaei, A. (2019). Comparative textbook evaluation: Representation of learning objectives in locally and internationally published ELT textbooks. Issues in Language Teaching, 8(1), 249-277.
Dӧrnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford university Press.
Finch, A. (1999). The task-based classroom in practice. Proceedings of PAC2, The Second Pan Asia Conference. KOTESOL.
Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). How English for specific purposes students respond to feedback provided by their lecturers and self-regulate their learning processes. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(2), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i2p197
Gharani, N. (2023). Enhancing the conversational section in Vision 1: Perspectives from Iranian EFL high school teachers. JELT Journal| Farhangian University, 2(2), 142-167. https://doi.org/10.48310/jelt.2024.15513.1073
Ghasemi, A., & Pasand, P. (2018). Pragmatic dimensions of Prospect Series: A textbook evaluation. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(3), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v8i3.3354
Gheinani, M. T., Tabatabaei, O., & Chakhorzadeh, S. (2017). Critical evaluation of Iranian junior high school textbooks (Prospect 1, 2, 3): Teachers’ view in focus. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(8), 541-255.
Gillham, B. (2008). Developing a questionnaire. Bloomsbury.
Goodarzi, A., Weisi, H., & Yousofi, N. (2021). Learners on the move: A mixed methods evaluation of Iranian EFL textbooks. Mextesol Journal. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v45n4-10
Goodarzi, A., Weisi, H., & Yousofi, N. (2020). CLT in Prospect series: A predictive evaluation of Iranian junior high school English textbooks. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 8(1), 195-221. https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2020.1881368.1162
Harwood, N. (2013). English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production. Springer.
Jafari, S. M., Curle, S., & Bahraman, M. (2024). An evaluation of English textbook Prospect 3 in Iranian junior high schools: A mixed methods Study. Iranian Journal of Educational Research, 3(3), 50-74. https://doi.org/10.22034/3.3.50
Jahangard, A. (2007). Evaluation of the EFL materials taught at Iranian high schools. The Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 130-150.
Juybari, M S, & Bozorgian, H (2020). Cultural linguistics and ELT curriculum: The case of ‘Prospect’ English textbooks in Iran. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30, 479-496. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12301
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3
Kheirabadi, R., & Alavimoghaddam, S. B. (2016). Evaluation of Prospect series: A paradigm shifts from GTM to CLT in Iran. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(3), 619-624.
Le Foll, E. (2024). Context and rationale: Why study textbook English? In E. Le Foll (Ed.), Textbook English: A multidimensional approach (pp. 5-24). John Benjamins.
Li, S. (2021). Conversational implicature instruction as a pedagogical strategy for English majors in a Chinese context: A pragmatic-analysis of its effectiveness. Theory and practice in language studies, 11(10), 1279-1287. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1110.16
Macalister, J., & Nation, I. P. (2019). Language curriculum design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Martínez-Adrián, M., Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Basterrechea, M. (2019). On self-reported use of communication strategies by CLIL learners in primary education. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817722054
McGrath, I. (2016). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh University Press.
Mizbani, M., & Chalak, A. (2017). Analyzing listening and speaking activities of Iranian EFL textbook Prospect 3 through Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(3), 38-43.
Motegi, H, Oikawa, M (2019). The effect of instructional quality on student achievement: Evidence from Japan. Pedagogy eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3323355
Mukundan, J., Hajimohammadi, R., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2011). Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist. Contemporary issues in education research, 4(6), 21-28.
Oviedo-Gomez, H. H. (2024). Critical interculturality and EFL textbooks: Examining the tensions. Revista Guillermo De Ockham, 22(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.6664
Papi, Z. (2015). Evaluation of Prospect 1 in terms of task types. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 238-244.
Pasand, P G, & Ghasemi, A (2018). An intercultural analysis of English language textbooks in Iran: The case of English Prospect series. Apples: journal of applied language studies, 12, 55-70. https://doi.org/10.17011/APPLES/URN.201804172107
Patel, S. (2024). Perspective of digital transformation in rural India. International Journal of Science and Research, 13(4).
Querstret, D., & Robinson, O. C. (2013). Person, persona, and personality modification: An in-depth qualitative exploration of quantitative findings. Qualitative research in psychology, 10(2), 140-159.
Quines, Z M (2023). Impact of students’ vocabulary level to their reading and writing performance. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 11(2), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijellr.13/vol11n21832
Rahman, A. (2024). Developing literacy-focused EFL modules to enhance reading skills: Bridging curriculum goals with learner needs. English Teaching and Applied Linguistics Journal, 1(1), 1-12.
Rashidi, N., & Kehtarfard, R. (2014). A needs analysis approach to the evaluation of Iranian third-grade high school English textbook. SAGE Open, 4(3), 2158244014551709.
Respati, T. K., Wicaksono, B. H., & Widodo, E. (2024). The use of digital English textbooks: A study on comprehension and language Production abilities among young learners. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(2), 833-845.
Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Sadeghi, S. (2020). Evaluation of EFL textbooks from teachers' viewpoints on the ninth grade high school Prospect 3 based on Ghorbani’s checklist. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(3), 47-61.
Sardabi, N., & Koosha, M. (2015). New perspectives in PROSPECT: an assessment of strengths and weaknesses of Iranian second year junior high school textbooks. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 3(2), 57–70.
Sim, T., & Em, S. (2023). Blended learning: The way forward for Cambodian higher education in the post-COVID-19 pandemic. Kimkong Heng, K. Sol, S. Kaing, & S. Em (Eds.), Innovations and challenges in Cambodian education: Youth’s perspectives (pp.37-52). Cambodian Education Forum.
Somaili, M. H., & Alhamami, M. (2023). Perceptions of Saudi EFL Teachers on the Adequacy of Textbooks. Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 7(2), 277-290. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v7i2.8450
Sun, Y., Zhao, X., Li, X., & Yu, F. (2023). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom on self-efficacy among students: A meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2287886. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2287886
Tajeddin, Z., & Pakzadian, M. (2020). Representation of inner, outer and expanding circle varieties and cultures in global ELT textbooks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00089-9
Tomlinson, B. (2023). Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Torki, F., & Chalak, A. (2016). An evaluation of English textbooks used in Iranian high schools: teachers’ and learners’ attitudes. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 5(1), 52-60.
Wang, K., & Zhu, C. (2019). MOOC-based flipped learning in higher education: students’ participation, experience and learning performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0163-0
Zohoorian, Z., MatinSadr, N., & Shamabadi, F. (2018). A summative evaluation of Prospect 1: Employing the ARCS model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 449-462.
