The Effect of Collaborative Tasks and Corrective Feedback Types on Iranian EFL Learners' Recall and Production of Complex Structures

الموضوعات : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Mozhgan Ebrahimian ¹ , Bahman Gorjian ² , Zohreh Seifoori ³

1 - Department of English Language, SR, C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Arv, C, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, SR, C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

تاريخ الإرسال : 09 الخميس , رجب, 1446 تاريخ التأكيد : 03 الإثنين , رمضان, 1446 تاريخ الإصدار : 05 السبت , ربيع الثاني, 1447

الکلمات المفتاحية: Collaborative tasks, Complex structures, Corrective feedback, English grammar,

ملخص المقالة :

Complex structures, which consist of dependent and independent clauses, make it difficult for Iranian high school students to recognize their grammatical complexities. This study investigates the effect of collaborative tasks (i.e., co-practice task writers, corrective feedback providers, and evaluators) on the types of corrective feedback (i.e., teacher feedback vs. peer feedback) and their impact on EFL learners' recall and production of complex structures. A quasi-experimental design was adopted, involving three equal intact classes comprising 96 lower-intermediate students, selected through convenience sampling. A production pretest and posttest of complex structures, as well as recall pretests and posttests of complex structures, were implemented following a pilot study to validate the tests. A two-way multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was run. Findings revealed that collaborative tasks (co-practice task writers, corrective feedback providers, and evaluators) have a positive effect on high school students' recall and production of complex structures. Additionally, teacher feedback is a significant factor in students' recall and production of complex structures. No significant interaction was observed between explicit instruction of collaborative tasks and types of feedback on learners' recall and production of complex structures. The results address several suggestions for EFL teachers, learners, and pedagogical practitioners.

المصادر:

Abdolmanafi Rokni, S. J., & Seifi, A. (2014). Dialog journal writing and its effect on learners’ speaking accuracy and Fluency. Study in English Language Teaching, 2(1), 28-37. http://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v2n1p28
Braund, H., & DeLuca, C. (2018). Elementary students as active agents in their learning: an empirical study of the connections between assessment practices and student metacognition. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 65-85. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0265-z
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Creswell, J. W. (2020). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, global edition. Pearson.
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal: An Electronic Refereed Journal for Foreign and Second Language Educators, 1(1), 3-18. http://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054
Farhangi, B., & Pourmihammadi, M. (2018). The effect of intensive teaching of conditional sentence type one on Iranian grade three high school students’ writing ability. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 6(3), 99-105.
Ghoorchaei, B., Mamashloo, F., Ayatollahi, M. A., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2022). Effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on Iranian EFL writers’ short and long-term retention of subject-verb agreement. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2021.2014022
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Izadpanah, J. (2023). The effect of explicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ retention of grammar: Does the medium of feedback matter? Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English Volume, 12(1), 99-122. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22518541.2023.12.1.6.4
Javan Amani, Z., Sadeghi, K., & Alavinia, P. (2024). Combined effect of the phase of explicit instruction and feedback timing on task performance and grammar acquisition. Teaching English Language, 18(2), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.[phone]
Kang, S. H., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger III, H. L. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 528-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440601056620
Kouhsarian, M, Ghoorchaei, B., Mazandarani, O. & Shomooss, N. (2023). How collaborative learning impacts Motivation and vocabulary learning: The case of Iranian high school learners. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 11(2), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.30486/RELP.2023.1979883.1438
Kourang Beheshti, E., & Sadeghi, E. (2019). The effect of using mobile apps on the acquisition of conditional sentences among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/ 20.1001.1.24763187.2019.8.1.1.1
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2020). Teaching and learning L2 in the classroom: It's about time. Language Teaching, 53(4), 422-432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000454
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 37-66. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
Marefat, H., & Abdollahnejad, E. (2014). Acquisition of English relative clauses by adult Persian learners: Focus on presumptive pronouns. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 5(4),19-40. https://doi.org/10.22099/JTLS.2014.1858
Pakseresht Mogharab, M., Khodabandehlou, M., & Jahandar, Sh. (2014). A comparative study of teaching conditionals at the high school level: The effect of explicit vs. implicit teaching on Iranian EFL learners' knowledge of conditional sentences. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4(1), 371-377.
Rezai, M. J. (2011). Acquisition of resumptive pronouns in interrogative embedded clauses by Persian learners of English. Iranian EFL Journal, 7(4), 24-44.
Rezapoor, F., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2024). Investigating the relationship between teacher resilience, teacher immunity and emotional intelligence among Iranian EFL teachers. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 12(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.30486/RELP.2023.1989926.1479
Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. M. Norris, & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.13.09val
Seifoori, Z., & Fattahi, J. (2014). The comparison of the method section of applied linguistics articles written by native and Iranian writers in terms of grammatical complexity and clause types. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1698–1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.596
Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 263-300.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr146oa
Sippel, L. (2021). Maximizing the benefits of peer interaction: Form-focused instruction and peer feedback training. Language Teaching Research, 8, Article 136216882110046. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211004638
Van den Berg, B. A. M., Van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W. F., & Simons, P. R. J. (2008). The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1804-1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.001
Wang, C. (2024). Six-minute flipped classroom: The effect of using podcasts and collaborative learning on Taiwanese freshmen’s English communicative competence. Teaching English Language, 18(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.[phone]
Wistner, B., Hideki, S., & Mariko, A. (2013). An analysis of the Oxford Placement Test and the Michigan English Placement Test as L2 proficiency tests. Retrieved from https://www.hosei.ac.jp/bungaku/museum/html/kiyo/58/articles/Wistner.pdf