Green Supplier Selection Using an Integrated Approach of Quality Function Deployment and Multi-Criteria Decision Making
الموضوعات : Decision Support SystemsSeyed Farid Mousavi 1 , Arash Apornak 2 , Abbas Keramati 3
1 - Department of Information Technology Management, School of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Buffalo, New York, USA
الکلمات المفتاحية: Green Supplier Selection, Integrated Approach, Quality Function Deployment, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Iran Khodro Company,
ملخص المقالة :
The Supplier selection process is evaluated as a combination of customer criteria and technical requirements. The proposed Supplier selection approach enables the firm to better understand the complex relationships of features associated with the decision-making process, which can then improve decision reliability as well as, to some extent, promote sustainable development. The aim of the present study was to select a green Supplier using a televised approach to expand quality performance and multi-criteria decision making in Iran Khodro Company. In this regard, by reviewing the literature and interviewing experts, 9 factors that are effective in selecting the green supply chain were identified that the prioritization of them were Delete Waste (0.24), Proper delivery time (0.145), Human resources (0.13), Lean production (0.11), new technology (0.09), High quality Supplier (0.086), Dynamic management (0.083), Product recycling (0.06) and Team Work with 0.04 respectively as the most important factors in choosing a green Supplier. Then, according to the weight obtained using VIKOR method, the Suppliers were prioritized. According to the results, among the four main Suppliers of the company, the second Supplier with a weight of 0.75 as the best choice, the fourth Supplier with 0.57 was chosen as the second choice, the third Supplier with 0.21 as the third choice and the first Supplier with 0.17 as the fourth option.
[1] Ahmadizadeh-Tourzani, N., Keramati, A., & Apornak, A. (2018). Supplier selection model using QFD-ANP methodology under fuzzy multi-criteria environment. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 24(1), 59-83. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2018.089295
[2] Akcan, S., & Taş, M. A. (2019). Green Supplier evaluation with SWARA-TOPSIS integrated method to reduce ecological risk factors. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(12), 736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7887-3
[3] Apornak, A., Raissi, S., Keramati, A., & Khalili-Damghani, K. (2021). Human resources optimization in hospital emergency using the genetic algorithm approach. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 14(4), 1441-1448. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2020.1806023
[4] Apornak, A., & Hezaveh, M. A. (2019). Extension of the model of manufacturing supply chain quality management: an empirical study. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 28(4), 417-437. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2019.102919
[5] Apornak, A. (2017). Customer satisfaction measurement using SERVQUAL model, integration Kano and QFD approach in an educational institution. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 21(1), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2017.081459
[6] Baki, R. (2022). An Integrated Multi-criteria Structural Equation Model for Green Supplier Selection. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-022-00456-7
[7] Banasik, A., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., Kanellopoulos, A., Claassen, G. D. H., & van der Vorst, J. G. (2016). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-016-9243-3
[8] Doherty, N. F., Shakur, M., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2015). The role of e-service quality management in the delivery business value. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 27, 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.07.002
[9] Ecer, F. (2020). Multi-criteria decision making for green Supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer. Operational Research, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-020-00553-4
[10] Fallah Jelodar, M. (2016). Prioritization of the factors affecting bank efficiency using combined data envelopment analysis and analytical hierarchy process methods. Journal of Optimization, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9341295
[11] Fallahpour, A.,Wong, K. Y., Rajoo, S., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M.,Antucheviciene, J., & Nayeri, S.(2021). An integrated approach for a sustainable Supplier selection based on Industry 4.0 concept. Environmental Science and Pollution Research1-19.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15330-5
[12] Fu, Y. K. (2019). An integrated approach to catering Supplier selection using AHP-ARAS-MCGP methodology. Journal of Air Transport Management, 75, 164-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.12.007
[13] Gao, H., Ju, Y., Gonzalez, E. D. S., & Zhang, W. (2020). Green Supplier selection in electronics manufacturing: An approach based on consensus decision making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118781
[14] Khalili-Damghani, K., Noorzadeh, F., & Apornak, A. R. A. S. H. (2022). Resource allocation problems in data envelopment analysis with simultaneous shared costs and common revenue. International Journal of Data Envelopment Analysis, 10(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30495/ijdea.2022.66147.1153
[15] Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Amiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2016). Multi-criteria evaluation of green Suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.093
[16] Gupta, S., Soni, U., & Kumar, G. (2019). Green Supplier selection using multi-criterion decision making under fuzzy environment: A case study in automotive industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 663-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.030
[17] Kannan, D., Khodaverdi, R., Olfat, L., Jafarian, A., & Diabat, A. (2013). Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for Supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.047
[18] Khalili-Damghani, K., Abdi, F., & Abolmakarem, S. (2018). Hybrid soft computing approach based on clustering, rule mining, and decision tree analysis for customer segmentation problem. Applied Soft Computing, 73, 816-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.09.019
[19] Khalili-Damghani, K., Shahrokh, A., & Pakgohar, A. (2017). Stochastic multi-period multi-product multi-objective aggregate production planning model. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering, 5(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.4995/ijpme.2017.7200
[20] Mousavi, S. F., Apornak, A., Pourhassan, M. R., & Raissi, S. (2021). Key performance indicators of HSE in the hospital management system during coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 14(1), 279-291. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.17358272.2021.14.1.13.4
[21] Mina, H., Kannan, D., Gholami-Zanjani, S. M., & Biuki, M. (2021). Transition towards circular Supplier selection in petrochemical industry: A hybrid approach to achieve sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125273
[22] Pourhassan, M. R., Raissi, S., & Apornak, A. (2021). Modeling multi-state system reliability analysis in a power station under fatal and nonfatal shocks: A simulation approach. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 38(9), 2047-2068. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2020-0401
[23] Pourjavad, E., & Shahin, A. (2020). Green Supplier development programmes selection: A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 13(6), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1750213
[24] Rahdar, M., & Sadeh, E. (2016). Identifying and ranking factors determining competitive position in financial services sector using AHP technique (Case study: Mellat Bank of Golestan province). International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS), 1(1), 966-978.
[25] Song, W., Chen, Z., Liu, A., Zhu, Q., Zhao, W., Tsai, S. B., & Lu, H. (2018). A study on green Supplier selection in dynamic environment. Sustainability, 10(4), 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041226
[26] Shi, H., Quan, M. Y., Liu, H. C., & Duan, C. Y. (2018). A novel integrated approach for green Supplier selection with interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic information: A case study in the agri-food industry. Sustainability, 10(3), 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030733
[27] Sinha, A. K., & Anand, A. (2018). Development of sustainable Supplier selection index for new product development using multi-criteria decision making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1587-1596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.275
[28] Yazdi, A. K., Wanke, P. F., Hanne, T., Abdi, F., & Sarfaraz, A. H. (2022). Supplier selection in the oil & gas industry: A comprehensive approach for multi-criteria decision analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 79, 101142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101142
[29] You, S. Y., Zhang, L. J., Xu, X. G., & Liu, H. C. (2020). A new integrated multi-criteria decision making and multi-objective programming model for sustainable Supplier selection and order allocation. Symmetry, 12(2), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12020302
[30] Zhang, Q., Pan, J., & Feng, T. (2020). Green Supplier integration and environmental performance: Do environmental innovation and ambidextrous governance matter? International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 50(2), 187-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-10-2019-0324
