Effect of Teaching Through Different Types of Flipped Classroom on Iranian Advanced EFL Learners’ Writing Performance
الموضوعات :
Fattaneh Pourverdi
1
,
Shima Ahmadi-Azad
2
,
Nesa Nabifar
3
1 - Department of English Teaching, Sarab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sarab, Iran
2 - Department of English Teaching, Sarab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sarab, Iran
3 - Department of ELT, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: flipped classroom, interactive classroom, writing, EFL learners,
ملخص المقالة :
Writing proficiency is a key factor in the development of language skills and there are different approaches to writing development. This study sought to investigate the effect of flipped classroom, interactive classroom, and the integration of two approaches on Iranian advanced English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ writing performance. Eighty-five Iranian learners enrolled in EFL programs at the Sokhan English Institution in Guilan, Iran, participated in this quasi-experimental research. There were both male and females. After homogenizing them with the Oxford Placemen, they were divided into three experimental groups: the flipped classroom, the interactive classroom, and the integration of two approaches. Three instruments were used to collect data: the Oxford placement test, the pretest, and the posttest of writing. They had 13 sessions of treatment. Data analysis by ANCOVA revealed that both flipped classroom, and interactive classroom positively impacted the writing skills of EFL learners. However, the group receiving the integration of flipped and interactive approaches treatment outperformed in its effect on learners' writing performance. The current research findings could assist creators of textbooks, educational organizers, material developers, language institutions, educators, and students in creating a more effective environment for learning foreign languages and enhancing writing skills.
Al-Jarrah, T., Mansor, N., Rashid, R., Bashir, I., & Al-Jarrah, J. (2018). EFL students’ attitude toward using metacognitive strategies in writing. English Language Teaching, 11(10), 162. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n10p162
Altemueller, L., & Lindquist, C. (2017). Flipped classroom instruction for inclusive learning. British Journal of Special Education, 44(3), 341-358.
Ariyanti, A., & Fitriana, R. (2017, October). EFL students' difficulties and needs in essay writing. In International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2017 (ICTTE 2017) (pp. 32-42). Atlantis Press.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2013). Flipped learning model increases student engagement and performance.
Bass, R. (2012). Disrupting ourselves: The problem of learning in higher education. EDUCAUSE review, 47(2), n2.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Language teaching approaches: An overview. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 3-12). Heinle & Heinle.
Coloquit, L. M. P., Canabal, L. A., & Paderan, M. P. C. (2020). Improving students’ English writing proficiency through interactive writing technique. Journal of English Education and Linguistics, 1(1), 72-81.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. London and New York.
Ibrahim, M. E. E., Eljack, N. S. A., & Elhassan, I. B. M. (2016). The effect of argumentative essay writing strategies on enhancing English as a foreign language learners critical thinking skill. Sudan University of Science and Technology Deanship of Scientific Research Journal of Humanities Sciences, 17(2), 18-22.
Jabali, O. (2018). The impact of flipped learning on the academic performance of ESL learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 23.
Johnson, L. P., & Sullivan, H. (2020). Revealing the human and the writer: The promise of a humanizing writing pedagogy for Black students. Research in the Teaching of English,
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English (Original work published 1976).
Kang, H. Y., & Kim, H. R. (2021). Impact of blended learning on learning outcomes in the public healthcare education course: a review of flipped classroom with team-based learning. BMC Medical Education, 21, 1-8.
Klein, M. L. (1985). The development of writing in children: Pre-K through grade 8.
Ma, G. (2020). The effectiveness of synchronous online flipped learning in college EFL reading course during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Maynard, J. (2019). Redefining the traditional classroom: Teaching in the 21st century. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(4), 495-510.
Moranski, K., & Kim, F. (2016). Flipping lessons in a multi‐section Spanish course: Implications for assigning explicit grammar instruction outside of the classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 830-852.
Pakpahan, N. H. (2020, December). The use of flipped classroom during covid-19 pandemic. In International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (IJCAH 2020) (pp. 286-291). Atlantis Press
Shawaqfeh, M., Taha, H., & Atia, L. (2024). Interactive writing in EFL classrooms: Exploring teacher and student perceptions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(2), 156-171.
Singer, B. D. (2004). Developmental variations in writing composition skills.
Seedoyal-Seereekissoon, M. (2017). Flipped classroom and its impact on student performance and engagement. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education (ICICTE).
Talaat, H. A. (2021). A proposed strategy based on interactive writing approach to develop primary stage pupils' EFL descriptive writing skills and their self-efficacy. مجلة القراءة والمعرفة, 21(231 الجزء الثانى), 73-103.
Veramuthu, P., & Shah, P. M. (2020). Effectiveness of collaborative writing among Secondary school students in an ESL classroom. Creative Education, 11(1), 54-67.
Vurdien, R. (2020). Enhancing writing skills via mobile learning and wikis. In Recent developments in technology-enhanced and computer-assisted language learning (pp. 99)
Witte, S. P., & Faigley, L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality. College Composition & Communication, 32(2), 189-204.
