A Žižekian Reading of Linguistic and Objective Violence in Ian Russel McEwan’s ‘The Child in Time’ and ‘Black Dogs’
الموضوعات : Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies
Manoochehr Najafi
1
,
Javad Yaghoobi Derabi
2
,
Ali Salami
3
1 - Department of Literature and Foreign Languages, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2 - گروه زبانهای خارجی-دانشگاه آزاد کرج-البرز-ایران
3 - گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی دانشگاه تهران
الکلمات المفتاحية: Violence, Subjective and Objective Violence, Interpassivity, Ideology, The Child in Time, Black Dogs ,
ملخص المقالة :
This research aims to explore how are the Žižekian concepts of ‘violence’ and ‘interpassivity’ interpreted in Ian Russel McEwan's novels, "The Child in Time" (CIT) and "Black Dogs" (BD). Žižek distinguishes between subjective (physical) and objective (systemic/structural and symbolic) violence, highlighting their disparities. Subjective violence can be attributed to specific individuals. Subjective violence cannot be fully understood without considering the broader context of objective/unseen violence from which it emerges. There are two different forms of objective violence: symbolic violence of language, and systemic (or structural) violence of political and economic systems. For this study, these novels were selected owing to their notable political nature within McEwan's oeuvre. The study found instances of objective and subjective violence in both novels, with objective violence being more prevalent in "The Child in Time" and subjective violence more noticeable in "Black Dogs." Moreover, "The Child in Time" exhibited specific cases of interpassivity, while "Black Dogs" showcased a prominent manifestation of counter-violence. McEwan's purpose is to scrutinize violence as a concept that is subject to its contextual framework for justification. This study contributes to novel perspectives on the presence of violence and the validity of implementing counter-violence in society.
Abbasiyannejad, M., & Pourgiv, F. (2017, December). Emotional violence in selected Ian McEwan’s fiction. [Paper presentation].9th International Conference on Languages, Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Dubai (UAE).
Bauchi, V. (2005). Two concepts of violence. Political Studies Review 2005 VOL 3, 193– 204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2005. 00023.x
Bertens, H. (2012). Literary theory: The basics. Rutledge.
Boliaki, E. (2005). Jacques Lacan, religion and ethics. Rutledge.
Bryaro, T. (2015). Rethinking pacifism through rethinking structural violence transformation. Department of peace and conflict studies. University of Sydney.
Burman, A. (2020). A Lacanian Hegelianism: Slavoj Žižek’s (mis-)reading of Hegel. Current perspectives in Žižek Žižekstudies,16, 33-51.
Casademont, R. G. (2010). The pleasure of prose writing vs. pornographic violence: An interview with Ian McEwan. In R. Roberts (Ed.), Conversations with Ian McEwan, (pp. 54-60). University Press of Mississippi.
Dewey, J. (1899). Force, violence and law’ and ‘force and coercion’. Jo Ann Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey, The Middle Works, 1924, 1916-1917, 10, 211–15 and 244–51. Southern Illinois University Press.
Delrez, M. (1995). Escape into innocence: Ian McEwan and the nightmare of history. FNRS, University of Liege.
Engel, B. (2023). The emotionally abusive relationship: How to stop being abused and how to stop abusing. John Wiley & Sons.
Etienne, K.G., Dahlberg L., Mercy J. et al. (2002). World report on violence and health. World Health Organization.
Evans, D. (2006). An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. Routledge.
Finlay, C. J. (2006). Violence and revolutionary subjectivity: Marx to Žižek. European Journal of Political Theory, 5(4), 373-39.
Hartmann, E. (2017). Violence: Constructing an Emerging Field of Sociology. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 11, a623. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3092
Head, D. (2007). Contemporary British novelists: Ian McEwan. Manchester University Press.
Head, D. (2007). Ian McEwan. Manchester University Press.
Head, D. (2002). The Cambridge introduction to modern British fiction, 1950-2000. Cambridge University Press.
Hutcheon, L. (2007). The poetics of postmodernism: History, theory, fiction. Routledge.
Garrard, G. (Winter 2009). Ian McEwan’s next novel and the future of ecocriticism. Contemporary Criticism, 50(4), 695-720.
Gultang, J. (1969). Violence, peace &peace research. Journal of peace research, 6(3), 167-191.
Jameson, F. (1989). Cognitive mapping: Marxism and the interpretation of culture. In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 347-360). University of Illinois Press.
Kudryashov, I. S. (2023). Interpassivity and psychoanalytic theory: Transformation of the meaning under the influence of discourse of authenticity and ideology theory. Siberian Philosophical Journal, 21(1):64-78. doi: 10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-1-64-78. https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-1-64-78
Linden, H. V. (2012). On the violence of systemic violence: A Critique of Slavoj Žižek. Radical Philosophy Review, 15 (1), 33--51. doi: 10.5840/radphilrev20121516
Lodge, D. (1999). Modern criticism and theory. Longman.
Louvel, L., Menegallo,G. , & Fortin, A. L.(September 2016). An interview with Ian McEwan. Contemporary British Studies 1(12), 29.
McEwan, I. (1992). The child in time. Vintage Books.
McEwan, I. (1992). Black dogs. Anchor Books.
Oenen, G. V. (2016). Interpassivity revisited: A critical and historical reappraisal of interpassive phenomena. International Journal of Žižek Studies, 2 (2):1-16.
Parker, I. (2004). Slavoj Žižek: A critical introduction. Pluto Press.
Parker, I. (2004). Žižek: Ambivalence and oscillation. Psychology in Society, 30, 23-34Pfaller, R. (2017). Interpassivity - The aesthetics of delegated enjoyment. Edinburgh University Press.
Ricks, C. (2010). Adolescence and after. In R. Roberts (Ed.), Conversations with Ian McEwan, (pp. 19-25). University Press of Mississippi.
Roger, A. (1996). Ian McEwan’s portrayal of women. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 32(1),11-26.
Selden, R. (1989). Practicing theory and reading literature. Simon & Schuster International Group.
Selden, R., & Peter Widdowson. (2016). A reader's guide to contemporary literary theory. Simon & Schuster International Group.
Serafin, S. (1999) Encyclopedia of World Literature in the 20th Century (Vol. 4). St. James Press.
Sharpe, M. (2017). Slavoij Žižek: A little piece of real. Routledge.
Sharpe, M. & Geoff Boucher. (2010). Žižek and Politics: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Slay, J. Jr. (1996). Ian McEwan. Twayne Publishers.
Taylor, P.A. (2010). Žižek and the media. Polity Press.
Teichman, J. (2016). An introduction to modern European philosophy. Ipswich Book.
Vighi, F. & Heiko Feldner. (2007). Žižek: Beyond Foucault. Palgrave Macmillan.
Winter, D. D., & Leighton, D. C. (2001). Structural violence: Introduction. In D. J. Christie, R. V. Wagner, & D. D. Winter (Eds.). Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century (pp. 99-102). Prentice-Hall.
Wood, K. (2012). Žižek: A reader’s guide. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Yazgi, C. (2022). An exploration of the political unconscious in Ian McEwan’s The Cement Garden, The Child in Time, and Amsterdam. PhD dissertation, Ankara University.
Zeffer, A. & Tahir Zaffar. (2023). IAN McEwan’s depiction of the world as a dystopian social space. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR)2(2), 557-568.
Žižek.S. (1993). Tarrying with the negative: Kant, Hegel and the critique of ideology. Duke University Press.
Žižek.S. (2008). Violence: Six sideways reflections, big ideas, small books. Picador.
Žižek. S. (2008). The sublime object of ideology. Verso.
Žižek.S. (2013). Interrogating the real. Bloomsbury.
Zirnsak, T. M. K. (2019). Objective violence: A new collaborative philosophical project. International Journal of Žižek Studies, 13(2).
