A Multi-objective Leagile Demand-Driven Optimization Model incorporating a Reliable Omnichannel Retailer: A Case Study
الموضوعات :
Farnaz Javadi Gargari
1
(Industrial Engineering Department, Alzahra University, Deh Vanak, Tehran, Iran)
Zahra Saeidi-Mobarakeh
2
(Department of Industrial Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Hossein Amoozad Khalili
3
(Department of Industrial Engineering, sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, sari, Iran )
الکلمات المفتاحية: Supply Chain Optimization, Hybrid Integrated Meta-heuristic Algorithm, Leagile Demand-Driven Systems, Reliable Omnichannel, Case Study,
ملخص المقالة :
This research proposed a comprehensive model designed for the optimization of supply chain networks, particularly emphasizing leagile demand-driven systems within the context of omnichannel operations. The proposed model integrates various parameters such as total cost, lead time, service level, and residual capacity, addressing the complex interdependencies among an omnichannel environment of retailers. To enhance the model's reliability, a hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm is employed, combining the strengths of MOEA/D-DE (Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm with Differential Evolution), IBEA (Indicator-Based Evolutionary Algorithm), and NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II). The collaborative optimization approach ensures adaptability and efficiency in addressing diverse and intricate optimization challenges inherent in omnichannel networks. The numerical data from a case study on the supply of sanitary masks in Tabriz, Iran, during August 2021 is utilized to validate the model within the specific omnichannel context. The study includes a thorough sensitivity analysis, demonstrating the model's robustness against disturbances in the omnichannel network. The consistent performance of the odel across various disruption scenarios underscores its reliability and efficacy in ensuring the stability of supply chain operations within omni-channel frameworks. This observed resilience significantly enhances the overall robustness of the supply chain, especially when confronted with disruptive events. The model's ability to maintain stability under diverse conditions contributes to fortifying the supply chain against potential disruptions, thereby augmenting its adaptive capabilities in dynamic environments..Managerial and practical implications are discussed, emphasizing the significance of the proposed reliable omnichannel approach in leagile demand-driven systems.
1. Albadr, M. A., Tiun, S., Ayob, M., & Al-Dhief, F. (2020). Genetic algorithm based on natural selection theory for optimization problems. Symmetry, 12(11), 1758.
2. Al-Dweiri, M., Ramadan, B., Rawshdeh, A., Nassoura, A., Al-Hamad, A., & Ahmad, A. (2024). The mediating role of lean operations on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 1163-1174.
3. Allmendinger, R., Shavarani, S. M., & López-Ibáñez, M. (2023). Detecting Hidden and Irrelevant Objectives in Interactive Multi-Objective Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.
4. Babaeinesami, A., Tohidi, H., & Seyedaliakbar, S. M. (2022). Designing a data-driven leagile sustainable closed-loop supply chain network. In Big Data and Information Theory (pp. 52-64). Routledge.
5. Bag, S., Srivastava, G., Cherrafi, A., Ali, A., & Singh, R. K. (2024). Data‐driven insights for circular and sustainable food supply chains: An empirical exploration of big data and predictive analytics in enhancing social sustainability performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 1369-1396.
6. Barbhuiya, S., & Das, B. B. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment of construction materials: Methodologies, applications and future directions for sustainable decision-making. Case Studies in Construction Materials, e02326.
7. Behera, I., & Sobhanayak, S. (2024). Task scheduling optimization in heterogeneous cloud computing environments: A hybrid GA-GWO approach. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 183, 104766.
8. Behl, A., Sampat, B., Gaur, J., Pereira, V., Laker, B., Shankar, A., ... & Roohanifar, M. (2024). Can gamification help green supply chain management firms achieve sustainable results in servitized ecosystem? An empirical investigation. Technovation, 129, 102915.
9. Cai, X., Wu, L., Zhao, T., Wu, D., Zhang, W., & Chen, J. (2024). Dynamic adaptive multi-objective optimization algorithm based on type detection. Information Sciences, 654, 119867.
10. Chang, V., Xu, Q. A., Hall, K., Wang, Y. A., & Kamal, M. M. (2023). Digitalization in omnichannel healthcare supply chain businesses: The role of smart wearable devices. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113369.
11. Chen, Y., Zhong, J., Liu, W. L., Luo, L., & Cai, W. (2024). Automatic Guidance Signage Placement Through Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.
12. Chen, Z., & Hammad, A. W. (2023). Mathematical modelling and simulation in construction supply chain management. Automation in Construction, 156, 105147.
13. Chidozie, B. C., Ramos, A. L., Ferreira, J. V., & Ferreira, L. P. (2023). Residual Agroforestry Biomass Supply Chain Simulation Insights and Directions: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 15(13), 9992
14. Feng, Z. K., Zhang, L., Mo, L., Wang, Y. Q., & Niu, W. J. (2024). A multi-objective cooperation search algorithm for cascade reservoirs operation optimization considering power generation and ecological flows. Applied Soft Computing, 150, 111085.
15. Fromer, J. C., & Coley, C. W. (2023). Computer-aided multi-objective optimization in small molecule discovery. Patterns, 4(2).
16. Gao, Y., Lu, S., Cheng, H., & Liu, X. (2024). Data-driven robust optimization of dual-channel closed-loop supply chain network design considering uncertain demand and carbon cap-and-trade policy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 187, 109811.
17. Gao, Y., Lu, S., Cheng, H., & Liu, X. (2024). Data-driven robust optimization of dual-channel closed-loop supply chain network design considering uncertain demand and carbon cap-and-trade policy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 187, 109811.
18. Garcia-Buendia, N., Moyano-Fuentes, J., Maqueira, J. M., & Avella, L. (2023). The lean supply chain management response to technology uncertainty: consequences for operational performance and competitiveness. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(1), 67-86.
19. Gargari, F. J., & Pourjavad, E. (2020, December). Supplier Selection and Order Allocation Under Disruption: Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 868-872). IEEE.
20. Gargari, F. J., Amoozad-Khalili, H., & Tavakkoli-Mogaddam, R. (2021). Fuzzy Multi-Objective Scenario-based Stochastic Programming to Optimize Supply Chain. Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 12(2), 54-72.
21. Heidari, M., & Rabbani, M. (2023). Leagile sustainable supply chain network design considering disruption risk by C-Var approach: a case study. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 14(3), 1062-1088.
22. Hu, Y., Zou, J., Zheng, J., Jiang, S., & Yang, S. (2024). A new framework of change response for dynamic multi-objective optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 248, 123344.
23. Ishfaq, R., Darby, J., & Gibson, B. (2024). Adapting the retail business model to omnichannel strategy: A supply chain management perspective. Journal of Business Logistics, 45(1), e12352.
24. Jangir, P., Buch, H., Mirjalili, S., & Manoharan, P. (2023). MOMPA: Multi-objective marine predator algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems. Evolutionary Intelligence, 16(1), 169-195.
25. Javadi Gargari, F., & Seifbarghy, M. (2020). Solving multi-objective supplier selection and quota allocation problem under disruption using a scenario-based approach. Engineering Review: Međunarodni časopis namijenjen publiciranju originalnih istraživanja s aspekta analize konstrukcija, materijala i novih tehnologija u području strojarstva, brodogradnje, temeljnih tehničkih znanosti, elektrotehnike, računarstva i građevinarstva, 40(3), 78-89.
26. Javadi Gargari, F., Sayad, M., Posht Mashhadi, S. A., Sadrnia, A., Nedjati, A., & Yousefi Golafshani, T. (2021). Five-Echelon Multiobjective Health Services Supply Chain Modeling under Disruption. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 1-16.
27. Jiang, C., Xie, J., & Ye, T. (2024). Network structure guided multi-objective optimization approach for key entity identification. Applied Soft Computing, 151, 111115.
28. Kalita, K., Ramesh, J. V. N., Cepova, L., Pandya, S. B., Jangir, P., & Abualigah, L. (2024). Multi-objective exponential distribution optimizer (MOEDO): a novel math-inspired multi-objective algorithm for global optimization and real-world engineering design problems. Scientific reports, 14(1), 1816.
29. Khorasani, S. T., Cross, J., & Maghazei, O. (2020). Lean supply chain management in healthcare: a systematic review and meta-study. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(1), 1-34.
30. Kim, S., Park, J., Chung, W., Adams, D., & Lee, J. H. (2024). Techno-economic analysis for design and management of international green hydrogen supply chain under uncertainty: An integrated temporal planning approach. Energy Conversion and Management, 301, 118010.
31. Kou, G., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Alotaibi, F. S. (2024). Imputed expert decision recommendation system for QFD-based omnichannel strategy selection for financial services. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 23(01), 141-170.
32. Liang, Y., Li, H., Liang, S., Yeboah, F. K., & Yang, Z. (2024). Food demand‐driven scarce water use amplified by pollution in China. Earth's Future, 12(2), e2023EF004052.
33. MacLennan, H., Lewis, E. J., & Roman, J. (2024). Critical Analysis on the Challenges of Product Distribution in Global Infrastructure and Value-Added Systems in Logistics and Supply Chain Management. In Evolution of Cross-Sector Cyber Intelligent Markets (pp. 1-17). IGI Global.
34. Mishra, S., Singh, S. S., Mishra, S., & Biswas, B. (2024). Multi-objective based unbiased community identification in dynamic social networks. Computer Communications, 214, 18-32.
35. Mohamadi, N., Niaki, S. T. A., Taher, M., & Shavandi, A. (2024). An application of deep reinforcement learning and vendor-managed inventory in perishable supply chain management. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 127, 107403.
36. Moyano-Fuentes, J., Maqueira-Marin, J. M., Martinez-Jurado, P. J., & Sacristan-Diaz, M. (2021). Extending lean management along the supply chain: impact on efficiency. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(1), 63-84.
37. Nasiri Janagha, M. R., Javadi Gargari, F., Amoozad Khalili, H., & Saeidi-Mobarakeh, Z. (2024). Synergizing efficiency, flexibility, and sustainability of value chain to optimization of energy consumption. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering.
38. Nikneshan, P., Shahin, A., & Davazdahemami, H. (2024). Proposing a framework for analyzing the effect of lean and agile innovation on lean and agile supply chain. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 41(1), 291-323.
39. Nunes, L. J., Casau, M., Dias, M. F., Matias, J. C. O., & Teixeira, L. C. (2023). Agroforest woody residual biomass-to-energy supply chain analysis: Feasible and sustainable renewable resource exploitation for an alternative to fossil fuels. Results in Engineering, 17, 101010.
40. Ogonu, G. C., Chuku, E. E., & Jumbo, M. A. Deferment and Supply Chain Resilience of Courier Firms in Rivers State.
41. Olayiwola, M. O., Alaje, A. I., & Yunus, A. O. (2024). A caputo fractional order financial mathematical model analyzing the impact of an adaptive minimum interest rate and maximum investment demand. Results in Control and Optimization, 14, 100349.
42. Oliveira-Dias, D. D., Maqueira Marín, J. M., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2022). Lean and agile supply chain strategies: the role of mature and emerging information technologies. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(5), 221-243.
43. Parhi, S. K., & Panigrahi, S. K. (2024). Alkali–silica reaction expansion prediction in concrete using hybrid metaheuristic optimized machine learning algorithms. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(1), 1091-1113.
44. Raji, I. O., Shevtshenko, E., Rossi, T., & Strozzi, F. (2021). Industry 4.0 technologies as enablers of lean and agile supply chain strategies: an exploratory investigation. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(4), 1150-1189.
45. Reyes, J., Mula, J., & Díaz-Madroñero, M. (2023). Development of a conceptual model for lean supply chain planning in industry 4.0: multidimensional analysis for operations management. Production Planning & Control, 34(12), 1209-1224.
46. Richey Jr, R. G., Chowdhury, S., Davis‐Sramek, B., Giannakis, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Artificial intelligence in logistics and supply chain management: A primer and roadmap for research. Journal of Business Logistics, 44(4), 532-549.
47. Rostami, O., Tavakoli, M., Tajally, A., & GhanavatiNejad, M. (2023). A goal programming-based fuzzy best–worst method for the viable supplier selection problem: a case study. Soft Computing, 27(6), 2827-2852.
48. Sheykhzadeh, M., Ghasemi, R., Vandchali, H. R., Sepehri, A., & Torabi, S. A. (2024). A hybrid decision-making framework for a supplier selection problem based on lean, agile, resilience, and green criteria: a case study of a pharmaceutical industry. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-28.
49. Song, S., Tappia, E., Song, G., Shi, X., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2024). Fostering supply chain resilience for omni-channel retailers: A two-phase approach for supplier selection and demand allocation under disruption risks. Expert Systems with Applications, 239, 122368.
50. Song, Y., Wang, F., & Chen, X. (2019). An improved genetic algorithm for numerical function optimization. Applied Intelligence, 49, 1880-1902.
51. Srikantha Dath, A. (2023). Optimization of a Floor Grinding Machine for Uniform Grinding Pattern.
52. Suharto, S. (2023). Supply chain ambidexterity, business performance and mediating role of lean and agile supply chain strategies. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 557-564.
53. Tamtam, F., & Tourabi, A. (2023). An integrated fuzzy QFD approach to leagile supply chain assessment during the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 45(1), 29-39.
54. Usman, S., & Lu, C. (2024). Job-shop scheduling with limited flexible workers considering ergonomic factors using an improved multi-objective discrete Jaya algorithm. Computers & Operations Research, 162, 106456.
55. Vanvuchelen, N., De Boeck, K., & Boute, R. N. (2024). Cluster-based lateral transshipments for the Zambian health supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 313(1), 373-386.
56. Xu, J., Bai, Q., Li, Z., & Zhao, L. (2024). Maximizing the profit of omnichannel closed-loop supply chains with mean–variance criteria. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 113, 109030.
57. Xu, Y., Zhang, H., Huang, L., Qu, R., & Nojima, Y. (2023). A Pareto Front grid guided multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 136, 110095.
58. Yadav, R., Yadav, V., Mittal, M. L., Jain, R., & Yadav, J. (2024). The impact of Leagile software development on operational performance. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 15(2), 347-371.
59. Yeh, W. C., Lin, Y. P., Liang, Y. C., & Lai, C. M. (2021). Convolution neural network hyperparameter optimization using simplified swarm optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03995.
60. Yusriza, F. A., Abdul Rahman, N. A., Jraisat, L., & Upadhyay, A. (2023). Airline catering supply chain performance during pandemic disruption: a Bayesian network modelling approach. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(5), 1119-1146.
61. Zhang, W., Jiang, S., Li, X., Chen, Z., Cao, G., & Mei, M. (2024). Multi-objective optimization of concrete pumping S-pipe based on DEM and NSGA-II algorithm. Powder Technology, 434, 119314.
62. Zhu, Z., Li, X., Chen, H., Zhou, X., & Deng, W. (2024). An effective and robust genetic algorithm with hybrid multi-strategy and mechanism for airport gate allocation. Information Sciences, 654, 119892.
