بررسی عملکرد و شاخص‌های ارزیابی کشت مخلوط ذرت و عدس
الموضوعات : یافته های نوین کشاورزی
رضا صیامی
1
(باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران)
بهرام میرشکاری
2
(گروه زراعت واصلاح نباتات، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران)
الکلمات المفتاحية: کشت مخلوط, نسبت برابری زمین, تراکم, مجموع ارزش نسبی,
ملخص المقالة :
به منظور بررسی عملکرد و شاخص‌های ارزیابی کشت مخلوط ذرت و عدس، یک آزمایش فاکتوریل در سال زراعی 1391 در دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تبریز بر پایه طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار اجرا گردید. عامل اول تاریخ‌های کاشت عدس شامل 6، 16 و 26 اردیبهشت ماه و عامل دوم تراکم‌های کاشت آن و شامل 5/12%، 25%، 5/37%، 50 % و 100% تراکم مطلوب آن همراه با ذرت بود. نتایج نشان داد که عملکرد دانه ذرت و عدس در شرایط تک کشتی حداکثر بود و با حضور عدس در کشت مخلوط، از عملکرد دانه ذرت کاسته شد. نسبت برابری زمین فقط در تیمار کاشت عدس در 16 اردیبهشت ماه با حداقل تراکم آن کمتر از واحد بود و در بقیه تیمارهای کشت مخلوط نسبت به تک‌کشتی برتری داشت که از بین آن‌ها نیز تیمار اولین تاریخ کاشت عدس با حداقل تراکم آن به دلیل دارا بودن بیشترین مجموع ارزش نسبی معادل 4/1 به عنوان سودمند‌ترین حالت کشت مخلوط توصیه می‌شود.
1 - Alizadeh, Y., Koucheki, A.R. and Nasiri Mahallati, M. 2010. Investigation of growth traits, yield, yield components and weeds control potential in bean and basil intercropping. Journal of Crops Ecology. 2:383-397.
2- Allahdadi, M., Shakiba, M. R., Dabbagh Mohammadinasab, A. and Amini, R. 2013. Evaluation of yield and advantageous of intercropping soybean and calendula. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 23(3):47- 58.
3- Awal, M.A., Koshi, H. and Ikeda, T. 2006. Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 139: 74-83.
4- Darkhal, H. 2007. Final report of research design of evaluation and compare yield of align maize hybrids with economic cultivars in Isfahan. Agricultural and natural sources search center of Isfahan.
5- Dehmardeh, M., Ghanbari, A., Siyahsar, B. A. and Ramroudi, M. 2011. Compare of yield and protein content of maize in intercropping with cowpea. Iranian Journal of Agronomy Sciences. 13(4):658-670.
6-Eshghizadeh, H. R., Chaichi, M. R., Ghalavand, A., Shabani, G., Azizi, K., Torknejad, A. and Raeisi, H. 2008. Evaluation of intercropping on yield and protein content of alfalfa- barley in dry farming. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi. 75:103-112.
7-Foutouhi Chiyaneh, S., Javanshir, A., Dabbagh Mohammadinasab, A., Zand, A., Razavi, F. and Rezaei Chiyaneh, A. 2012. Effect of different intercropping sowing densities of maize and red bean on their yield and weeds biomass. Agroecology. 4(2):131-143.
8- Ghanbari, A., Nasirpour, M. and Tavassoli, A. 2010. Evaluation of ecophysiological traits in millet and cowpea intercropping. Journal of Agronomy Sciences. 4: 556-564.
9- Ghosh, P. K., Manna, M. C., Bandyopadhyay, K. K., Ajay Tripathi, A. K., Wanjari,R. H., Hati, K. M., Misra, A. K., Acharya, C. L. and Subba Rao, A. 2006. Inter- specific interaction and nutrient use in soybean- sorghum intercropping system. Journal of Agronomy. 98: 1097-1108.
10- Jahani, M., Koucheki, A. R. and Nasiri Mahallati, M. 2008. Investigation of different combinations of intercropping cummin with lentil in low input agricultural systems. Iranian Agronomy Research. 6(1): 67-77.
11- Javanshir, A., Dabbagh Mohammadinasab, A., Hamidi, A. and Gholipour, M. 2000. Intercropping Ecology (Translated). Jehad- e- Daneshgahi, University of Mashhad, Iran.
12- Jonathan, D. C. 2008. Intercropping with maize in sub-Arid Regions. Community planting and Analysis. Definition and benefits of intercropping. Technical Brief. April, 16.
13- Kamkar, B. and Damagani, A. 2008. Sustainable Agriculture Principle. Ferdowsi Mashhad University Publication. 316pp.
14- Kandhro, M. N., Tunio, S. D., Memon, H. R. and Ansari, M. A. 2007. Growth and yield of sunflower under influence of mung bean intercropping. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research. 23: 9-13.
15-Khaneh, Z., Javanmard, A., Sohrabi, M. and Yazdanseta, S. 2012. Evaluation of seed yield in maize and bean intercropping. 2nd National Meeting on Biodiversity, Urmia, Iran.
16-Khorramivafa, M. 2006. Ecology of intercropping maize and cucurbita pepo.Ph.D thesis in Agronomy, University of Tabriz, Iran.
17- Laster, M. L. and Furr, R. E. 2006. Heliothis population in cotton- sesame interplantings. Journal of Economics Entomology. 65 (5): 1524-1525.
18- Latati, M., Pansu, M., Drevon, J. J. and Ounane, S. D. 2013. Advantage of intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on yield and nitrogen uptake in Northeast Algeria. International Journal of Research in Applied Sciences. 01: 1-7.
19- Lawson, I. Y. D., Issahaku, A., Acheampong, S. A., Adams, B. and Tuffour, V. 2013. Time of planting and weed suppression abilities of some legumes intercropped with maize in the Guinea savanna zone of Ghana. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America. 4(4): 358-363.
20- Lithourgidis, A. S., Dordas, C. A., Damalas, C. A. and Vlachostergios, D. N. 2011. Annual intercrops: an alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Aust.J. Crop Sci: 5(4):396-410.
21- Metwally, A. E. A., Shafik, M. M., Sherief, M. N. and Abdel- Wahab, T. I. 2012. Effect of Intercropping Corn on Egyptian Cotton Characters. The Journal of Cotton Science. 16:210-219.
22- Minal, L., Tilahun, T. and Alemayehu, A. 2001. Determination of nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizer levels in different maize- faba bean intercropping patterns in Northwestern Ethiopia. Seven Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference. 513-518.
23- Mirhashemi, S. M., Koucheki, A. R., Parsa, M. and Nasiri Mahallati, M. 2009. intercropping of aniseed and fenugreek in different manures and planting pattern. Iranian Agronomy Research. 7(1).
24- Mirshekari, B. 2001. Crops Production Sciences (Translated). First edition. Islamic Azad University of Tabriz Publication. 707pp.
25- Morales, R. E. J., Escalante, E. J. A., Sosa, C. L. and Volke, H. V. H. 2009. Biomass yield and land equivalent ratio of Helianthus annus L. in sole crop and intercropped with Phaseolus Vulgaris L. in high valleys of Mexico. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystem. 10: 431-439.
26- Nasrollahzadeh Asl, A., Dabbagh Mohammadinasab, A., Zehtab Salmasi, S., Moghaddam, M. and Javanshir, A. 2012. Evaluation of potato and cowpea intercropping. Crops Ecophysiology Journal. 6(2):111-126.
27- Nourmohammadi, G., Siadat. A. and Kashani, A. 2007. Cereal Crops. Shahid Chamran Publication, Ahwaz University.
28- Oyejola, B. A. and Mead, R. 1982. Statistical assessment of different ways calculating land equivalent ratio. Experimental Agriculture. 18: 125-138.
29- Rezaei Chiyane, A., Dabbagh Mohammadinasab, A., Shakiba, M. R., Ghasemi Golezani, K. and Aharizad, S. 2011. Evaluation of some agronomic traits of maize in intercropping with faba bean. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 21(2):1-14.
30- Rezvan Bidokhti, S. 2004. Compare of different sowing combinations in maize and bean intercropping. Agronomy thesis of Ferdowsi Mashhad University. 124pp.
31- Rostami, L., Mandani, F., Khorramdel, S., Koucheki, A.R. and Nasiri Mahallati, M. 2009. Effect of Different intercropping densities of maize and bean on crops yield and weeds population. Weeds Research Journal. 1(2):37-51.
32- Seran, T. H. and Brintha, I. 2009. Studies on determining a suitable pattern of capsicum (Capsicum annum L.) vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 22: 1153- 1154.
33- Shaygan, M., Mazaheri, D., Rahimian Mashhadi, H. and Paygambari, S. A. 2008. Effect of sowing date and intercropping of maize and millet on their seed yield and weeds control. Iranian Journal of Agronomy Sciences. 10(1): 31-46.
34- Shirzadi, M. H., Rezaei, S., Hemayati, S. S. and Abedi, M. 2011. Evaluation of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum- graecum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) intercropping. Plant Ecophysiology. 3: 53-58.
35- Yirzagla, J. 2013. Effect of spatial arrangement on the performance of Pearl millet- Cowpea Intercrop.Journal of Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology . 1(3):28-31.
