Dörnyei’s Motivational Self-System Theory and EFL learners’ L2 Selves
الموضوعات : نشریه زبان و ترجمه
Saeed Rahimi
1
,
Massoud Tajaddini
2
,
Neda Fatehi Rad
3
1 - English Department, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
2 - English Department, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
3 - English Department, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: gender, Educational transition, Residential background, Second language (L2) motivation, Second language (L2) selves,
ملخص المقالة :
Trying to motivate language learners is one of the most demanding yet vital challenges faced by L2 teachers. Dealing with Dörnyei’s motivational theory, the current research was an attempt to ponder the ideal-self, ought-to-self, and L2 experience orientations of Iranian EFL high-school students. Moreover, this study examined whether there was any relationship among three L2 motivational variables across gender and residential background. To this end, 200 male and 184 female junior-high-school students were selected through cluster sampling. The newly designed L2 motivational self-system questionnaire consisted of three main variables, in which 13 items were related to Ideal L2 Self, 12 with ought-to L2 Self, and the other nine with L2 Learning Experience. The findings revealed no significant difference between male and female students in L2 motivational orientation for English learning, and female learners’ L2 motivation in English language learning was affected by L2 motivation compared to male learners. Furthermore, there was a significant difference between female and male students’ scores in ought-to L2 self. Moreover, it was found that there was no significant difference between female and male learners’ L2 experience. Regarding residential background, there was a significant difference among the mean ranks of the city participants at three L2 Motivational Orientations but there was no significant difference among the mean ranks of the rural participants at three L2 Motivational Orientations.Keywords: Educational transition; Gender; Residential background; Second language (L2) motivation; Second language (L2) selvesTrying to motivate language learners is one of the most demanding yet vital challenges faced by L2 teachers. Dealing with Dörnyei’s motivational theory, the current research was an attempt to ponder the ideal-self, ought-to-self, and L2 experience orientations of Iranian EFL high-school students. Moreover, this study examined whether there was any relationship among three L2 motivational variables across gender and residential background. To this end, 200 male and 184 female junior-high-school students were selected through cluster sampling. The newly designed L2 motivational self-system questionnaire consisted of three main variables, in which 13 items were related to Ideal L2 Self, 12 with ought-to L2 Self, and the other nine with L2 Learning Experience. The findings revealed no significant difference between male and female students in L2 motivational orientation for English learning, and female learners’ L2 motivation in English language learning was affected by L2 motivation compared to male learners. Furthermore, there was a significant difference between female and male students’ scores in ought-to L2 self. Moreover, it was found that there was no significant difference between female and male learners’ L2 experience. Regarding residential background, there was a significant difference among the mean ranks of the city participants at three L2 Motivational Orientations but there was no significant difference among the mean ranks of the rural participants at three L2 Motivational Orientations.
Albl-Mikasa, M. J. T.-k.-Z. f. T. u. F. (2010). Global English and English as a Lingua Franca (ELF): Implications for the interpreting profession. 3(2), 126-148.
Azarnoosh, M{Albl-Mikasa, 2010 #1}., & Birjandi, P. J. W. A. S. J. (2012). Junior high school students’ L2 motivational self-system: Any gender differences. 20(4), 577-584.
Azarnoosh, M. J. J. o. l., & translation. (2014). Public Schools and Private Language Institutes: Any Differences in Students’ L2 Motivational Self System? , 4(1), 77-90.
Bemani, N. M., & Pandian, A. (2001). On The Possible Relationships between Multiple Intelligences, Listening Proficiency and Motivational Orientation among Iranian TEFL University Students.
Birjandi, P., & Tamjid, N. H. J. E. L. T. (2010). The Role of Self-Assessment in Promoting Iranian EFL Learners' Motivation. 3(3), 211-220.
Chalak, A., & Kassaian, Z. J. G. O. J. o. L. S. (2010). Motivation and attitudes of Iranian undergraduate EFL students towards learning English. 10(2).
Dahmardeh, M., Hunt, M. J. S. i. L., & Language. (2012). Motivation and English language teaching in Iran. 5(2), 36-43.
Dastgheib, A. J. U. P. d., Islamic Azad University, Science, & Research Branch, T., Iran. (1996). The role of attitudes and motivation in second/foreign language learning.
Dörnyei, Z., Csizér, K., & Németh, N. (2006). Motivation, language attitudes, and globalization: A Hungarian perspective: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., Ushioda, E. J. M., language identity, & self, t. L. (2009). Motivation, language identities, and the L2 self: Future research directions. 350-356.
Dörnyei, Z. J. M., language identity, & self, t. L. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system. 36(3), 9-11.
Dörnyei, Z. J. N. J. M. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition.
Ebrahimi, F., Sahragard, R. J. J. o. L. T., & Research. (2016). Some Insights into Iran’s English Curriculum Based on Iran’s Major Policies. 7(5), 1036-1042.
Far, H. R., Rajab, A. B., & Etemadzadeh, A. J. U.-C. F. L. (2012). Examining the relationship between L2 motivational self-system and L2—learning among TESL students. 10(6), 1266-1270.
Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. J. C. M. L. R. (1975). Motivation and second-language acquisition. 31(3), 218-233.
Ghazvini, S. D., Khajehpour, M. J. P.-s., & sciences, b. (2011). Attitudes and Motivation in learning English as Second Language in high school students. 15, 1209-1213.
Islam, M. (2013). L2 motivational self-system and relational factors affecting the L2 motivation of Pakistani students in the public universities of Central Punjab, Pakistan: University of Leeds.
Kassaian, Z., Ghadiri, M. J. J. o. L. T., & Research. (2011). An Investigation of the Relationship between Motivation and Metacognitive Awareness Strategies in Listening Comprehension: The Case of Iranian EFL Learners. 2(5).
Kikuchi, K. (2015). Demotivation in second language acquisition: Insights from Japan: Multilingual Matters.
Marefat, F., & Pakzadian, M. J. I. J. o. A. L. S. (2017). Attitudes towards English as an International Language (EIL) in Iran: Development and validation of a new model and questionnaire. 9(1), 127-154.
Memari, M. J. J. o. l. s., & biomedicine. (2013). How appropriates communicative language teaching (CLT) in EFL Context (an Iranian Case Study). 3(6), 432-438.
Mohammadi, M. H. J. C. S. S. (2017). Iranian EFL learners’ L2 motivational self-system: A study of selves and attitudes towards L2 culture and community. 13(11), 22-30.
Moiinvaziri, M. (2008). Motivational orientation in English language learning: A study of Iranian undergraduate students. Paper presented at the Global practices of language teaching: Proceedings of the 2008 International Online Language Conference.
Mori, S., & Gobel, P. J. S. (2006). Motivation and gender in the Japanese EFL classroom. 34(2), 194-210.
Nunan, D. J. T. q. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia‐Pacific Region. 37(4), 589-613.
Papi, M. J. S. (2010). The L2 motivational self-system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. 38(3), 467-479.
Rajab, A., Far, H. R., Etemadzadeh, A. J. P.-S., & Sciences, B. (2012). The relationship between L2 motivational self-system and L2 learning among TESL students in Iran. 66, 419-424.
Roshandel, J., Ghonsooly, B., & Ghanizadeh, A. J. I. J. o. I. (2018). L2 Motivational Self-System and Self-Efficacy: A Quantitative Survey-Based Study. 11(1), 329-344.
Sadighi, F., & Maghsudi, N. J. I. j. o. a. l. (2000). The Relationship Between Motivation and English Proficiency among Iranian EFL Learners. 26(1), 39-52.
Safari, P., & Rashidi, N. J. I. J. o. P. E. (2015). A Critical Look at the EFL Education and the Challenges Faced by Iranian Teachers in the Educational System. 11(2).
Sampson, R. J. L. T. R. (2012). The language-learning self, self-enhancement activities, and self perceptual change. 16(3), 317-335.
Savignon, S. (2007). Communicative language teaching (CLT) for the 21st century. In: Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Sedighi, F., & Zarafshan, M. (2006). Effects of attitude and motivation on the use of language learning strategies by Iranian EFL university students.
Sung, H., & Padilla, A. M. J. T. M. L. J. (1998). Student motivation, parental attitudes, and involvement in the learning of Asian languages in elementary and secondary schools. 82(2), 205-216.
Taguchi, T., Magid, M., Papi, M. J. M., language identity, & self, t. L. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. 36, 66-97.
Vaezi, Z. J. W. A. S. J. (2008). Language learning motivation among Iranian undergraduate students. 5(1), 54-61.
Williams, M., Burden, R., & Lanvers, U. J. B. e. r. j. (2002). ‘French is the language of love and stuff’: Student perceptions of issues related to motivation in learning a foreign language. 28(4), 503-528.
Zia, H. S., & Salehi, M. (2008). An investigation of the relationship between motivation and language learning strategies.
