Investigation the Effects of Bacterial Additive and Moisture Absorbent on the Fermentability and Nutrient Composition of Potato Silage
الموضوعات :M. Jalili 1 , H. Mohammadzadeh 2 , A. Hossein-Khani 3 , A. Taghizadeh 4
1 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
4 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: starch, aerobic stability, lactic acid, Bacterial inoculant, Dry matter recovery,
ملخص المقالة :
Potato dry matter is mainly composed of starch, which can be used in animal feed due to its high available energy. This study aimed to improve the quality of potato silage using wheat straw and additives containing Lactobacillus. This study was conducted in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments and 3 replications: 1- Potatoes without additives, control, (PS), 2- Potatoes mixed with wheat straw (90:10 ratio on a fresh basis) (PWS), 3- Potatoes inoculated with SiloOne additive (including Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus plantarium, Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactic acid pediococcus and multivalent enzyme), (PLS), 4- Sliced potatoes with wheat straw (90:10 ratio on a fresh basis) and SiloOne additive (PWLS). The samples were stored in laboratory silos for 60 days at a temperature of 25 degrees Celsius. According to the results, there was a significant difference between the treatments in terms of pH, dry matter (DM), ash and insoluble fiber in neutral and acidic detergents. The addition of wheat straw reduced the loss caused by silage effluent and increased dry matter (DM) recovery (P<0.01). The lactic acid concentration of inoculated silages (PLS and PWLS) was greater than non-inoculated silages (P<0.01). The lowest concentrations of acetic acid and propionic acid were observed in the treatment with wheat straw in the absence of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (PWS) (P<0.05). Concentrations of valeric acid and iso-valeric acid were not affected by wheat straw and inoculation with LAB (P>0.05). The results of this study showed that ensiling potatoes with a wheat straw reduces silage effluent losses and increases DM recovery. But the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of PWS were lower than PS. However, LAB inoculation improved the fermentation quality. The use of wheat straw along with LAB inoculation increased the ratio of lactic acid to total volatile fatty acids (VFA).
AOAC. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. 18th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Babaeinasab Y., Rouzbehan Y., Fazaeli H. and Rezaei J. (2015). Chemical composition, silage fermentation characteristics, and in vitro ruminal fermentation parameters of potato-wheat straw silage treated with molasses and lactic acid bacteria and corn silage. J. Anim. Sci. 93, 4377-4386.
Barrell P.J., Meiyalaghan S., Jacobs J.M. and Conner A.J. (2013). Applications of biotechnology and genomics in potato improvement. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11(8), 907-920.
Borreani G., Tabacco E., Schmidt R.J., Holmes B.J. and Muck R.E. (2018). Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. J. Dairy Sci. 101(5), 3952-3979.
Bradshaw L., MacGregor S. and Olsen T. (2002). Potato by-product feeding in the Pacific Northwest. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 18(2), 339-347.
Chung H.J. and Liu Q. (2010). Molecular structure and physicochemical properties of potato and bean starches as affected by gamma-irradiatio. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 47(2), 214-222.
Damodaran S., Parkin K.L. and Fennema O.R. (2018). Fennema's Food Chemistry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Da Silva Figueiró C., Trojaner M.R., Santana R.M.C. and Calcagno C.I.W. (2022). Rheological and structural characterization of cassava starches foam with low and high amylose contents. J. Polym. Res. 29, 30-39.
Dehghan M., Tahmasebi R., Dayani O. and Kezre A. (2012). Determination of physical, chemical and digestibility of some agricultural by-products. Iranian J. Anim. Sci. Res. 3(4), 412-421.
Driehuis F. and Wikselaar V. (1999). The prevention of alcoholic fermentation in high dry matter grass silage. DLO Institut for Animal Science and Health, P.O. Box 65, 8200 AB, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Fang D., Dong Z.,Wang D., Li B., Shi P., Yan J., Zhuang D., Shao T. and Wang W. (2022). Evaluating the fermentation quality and bacterial community of high-moisture whole-plant quinoa silage ensiled with different additives. J. Appl. Microbiol. 132(5), 3578-3589.
FAOSTAT. (2017). Database of the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. Availabe at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home.
Filya I. (2003). The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus plantarum on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and ruminal degradability of low dry matter corn and sorghum silages. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 3575-3581.
Galliard T. and Bowler P. (1987). Morphology and composition of starch. Pp. 281 in Starch: Properties and Potential. T. Galliard, Ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Gallo A., Fancello F., Ghilardelli F., Zara S. and Spanghero M. (2022). Effects of several commercial or pure lactic acid bacteria inoculants on fermentation and mycotoxin levels in high-moisture corn silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 286, 115256.
Halliday L. (2015). Ensiling potatoes. Prince Edward Island, Agriculture and Fisheries, Canada.
Jane J., Chen Y.Y., Lee L.F., McPherson A.E., Wong K.S., Radosavjevic M. and Kasemsuwan T. (1999). Effects of amylopectin branch chain length and amylose content on the gelatinization and pasting properties of starch. Cereal Chem. 76, 629-637.
Kaur L., Singh N., Sodhi N.S. and Gujral H.S. (2002). Some properties of potatoes and their starches I. Cooking, textural and rheological properties of potatoes. Food Chem. 79(2), 177-181.
Khorvash M., Mohammadzadeh H. and Yekdanegi M.B. (2014). Management of Silage Production and Utilization. Arkan Danesh Publications. Esfahan. Iran.
Kilic A. )1986(. Silo Feed (Instruction, Education and Application Proposals). Bilgehan Press, Izmir, Turkey.
Lee S.Y., Lee K.Y. and Lee H.G. (2018). Effect of different pH conditions on the in vitro digestibility and physicochemical properties of citric acid-treated potato starch. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 107, 1235-1241.
Lindahl I., Davis R.E. and Ellis N.R. (1946). Effect of temperature and length of storage on ensilage made from cooked white potatoes. J. Anim. Sci. 5, 279-280.
McDonald P., Edwards R.A., Greenhalgh J.F.D., Morgan C.A., Sinclair L.A. and Wilkinson R.G. (2010). Animal Nutrition. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd, London, United Kingdom.
McDonald P., Henderson N. and Heron S. (1991). The Biochemistry of Silage. Chalcombe Publications, Marlow, United Kingdom.
Mohammadzadeh H., Khorvash M. and Ghorbani G. (2013). Effects of bacterial inoculant containing homo and heterolactic lactobacillus on fermentation ofcorn silage and performances of Holstein dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci. Res. 24(1), 35-45.
Monteils V., Jurjanz S., Colin-Schoellen O., Blanchart G. and Laurent F. (2002). Kinetics of ruminal degradation of wheat and potato starches in total mixed rations. J. Anim. Sci. 80(1), 235-241.
Narita J., Nakahara S., Fukuda H. and Kondo A. (2004). Efficient production of L-(+)-lactic acid from raw starch by Streptococcus bovis 148. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 97, 423-425.
Nelson M.L. (2010). Utilization and application of wet potato processing coproducts for finishing cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 88, 133-142.
Nishino N., Yoshida M., Shiota H. and Sakaguchi E. (2003). Accumulation of 1, 2 propanediol and enhancement of aerobic stability in whole crop maize silage inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94, 800-807.
Nkosi B.D., Meeske R., van der Merwe H.J. and Groenewald I.B. (2010). Effects of homofermentative and heterofermentative bacterial silage inoculants on potato hash silage fermentation and digestibility in rams. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 157(3), 195-200.
Okine A., Hanada M., Aibibula Y. and Okamoto M. (2005). Ensiling of potato pulp with or without bacterial inoculants and its effect on fermentation quality, nutrient composition and nutritive value. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 121(3), 329-343.
Pazhouhandeh M., Karvan G. and Razavi A.S. (2017). A review on potato genetic engineering researches yet. Genet. Eng. Biosaf. 6(1), 175-188.
Peshin A. (2001). Characterisation of starch isolated from potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum). J. Food Sci. Technol. Mysore. 38, 447-454.
Pringojin I., Fallik E., Qat Y., Ajalin H., Allam M.M., Ezzat M., Al Masri M. and Bader M. (2005). Middle East Regional Agriculturel Program Survey on Postharvest Losses of Tomato Fruit (Lycopersicon esculentum) and Table Grapes (Vitis Vinifera). Pp. 48 in Proc. 5th Int. Postharvest Symp. Verona, Italy.
Reddy G., Altaf M., Naveena B.J., Venkateshwar M. and Kumar E.V. (2008). Amylolytic bacterial lactic acid fermentation - a review. Biotechnol. Adv. 26, 22-34.
Rocha T.D.S., Carneiro A.P.D.A. and Franco C.M.L. (2010). Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on some physicochemical properties of root and tuber granular starches. Ciênc. Tecnol. Aliment. 30, 544-551.
SAS Institute. (2004). SAS®/STAT Software, Release 9.4. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. USA.
Sauter E.A., Hinman D.D. and Howes A.D. (1979). Energy losses from potato processing waste during laboratory storage. J. Anim. Sci. 49, 607-612.
Savoie P. and Jofriet J.C. (2003). Silage strorage. Pp. 405-467 in Silage Science and Technology. D.R. Buxton, R.E. Muck and H.J. Harrison, Eds. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.
Svihus B., Uhlen A.K and Harstad O.M. (2005). Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 122, 303-320.
Van Soest P.V., Robertson J.B. and Lewis B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74(10), 3583-3597.
Wang M., Wang H., Zheng H., Uhrin D., Richard J.D. and Rainer R. (2021). Comparison of HPLC and NMR for quantifcation of the main volatile fatty acids in rumen digesta. Sci. Rep. 11, 24337-24345.
Wang L., Wang M., Zhou Y., Wu Y. and Ouyang J. (2022). Influence of ultrasound and microwave treatments on the structural and thermal properties of normal maize starch and potato starch: A comparative study. Food Chem. 377, 131990.
Xia C., Zhong L,. Wang J., Zhang L., Chen X., Ji H., Ma S. Dong W., Ye X., Huang Y., Li Z. and Cui Z. (2021). Structural and digestion properties of potato starch modified using an efficient starch branching enzyme AqGBE. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 184, 551-557.
Yusupha M., Testera R.F., Ansella R. and Snapeb C.E. (2003). Composition and properties of starches extracted from tubers of different potato varieties grown under the same environmental conditions. Food Chem. 82, 283-289.
Zhang W.W., Zhang Y.G. and Liu Z. (2012). Effect of different absorbents on fermentation quality of wet potato pulp. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 22, 4230-4235.
