Impact of Expository Text Patterns Manipulation on Iranian EFL Learn-ers’ Expository Text Writing
Subject Areas :
safieh Fallahi Dehpahni
1
,
Abbas Bayat
2
*
,
Faramarz Aziz Malayeri
3
1 - Department of ELT,Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad university , Malayer,Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of English Language, Mal. C., Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
3 - Department of TEFL, M. C., Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
Keywords: Expository text, Expository text patterns, Expository writing, EFL learners,
Abstract :
The focus of the current study was to investigate the impact of expository patterns instruction on expository writing development among Iranian intermediate EFL learners within gender and level of Proficiency. Accordingly, 125 male and female learners out of 250 EFL learners nested in five groups, intact institute classes, were selected based on PET (Preliminary English Test) scores. Participants were male and female learners divided into four experimental groups and a control group. Having gone through a factorial quasi – experimental research design and the sta-tistical analysis procedures analysis of covariance and MANOVA, the study yielded the follow-ing results :(a) The subjects, who had the opportunity to receive expository patterns instruction as the treatment of the study, outperformed the subjects with lack of treatment. Therefore, the researcher came to conclusion that the application of expository patterns manipulation had a greater meaningful effect on the writing performance of EFL learners. (b) The findings also in-dicated that male groups outperformed female groups in their achievements in term of writing development processes. (c) The expository patterns scores are similar for students with different proficiency levels of low and high intermediate levels; leading to the conclusion that writing ex-pository texts through expository patterns was not affected by the levels of proficiency. The findings of this research will have significant outcomes for the learners, teachers as well as ma-terial developers and syllabus designers.
Aljaafreh, A., Lantolf, JP. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of prox-imal development. The modern lan-guage journal, Vol. 78, No. 4 (Winter, 1994), pp. 465-483.
Armbruster, B., Anderson, T., and Ostertag, J. (1987) Does text struc-ture/summarization instruction facili-tate learning from expository text?, Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331-346.
Armbruster, B.B., Anderson, T.H., & Oster-tag, J. (1989). Teaching text structure to improve reading and writing. The Reading Teacher, 43 (2), P 130-137.
Bakken, J. P., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1997) . Reading com-prehension of expository science ma-terial and students with learning disa-bilities: A comparison of strategies. Journal of Special Education, 31(3), p 300-324.
Baradaran, A., Sarfarazi, B.(2011). The im-pact of scaffolding on the Iranian EFL learners' English academic writ-ing. Australian journal of basic and applied sciences 5(12): P 2265-2273.
Bonnie Dee Reed, A. (2005). The effects of explicit instruction of expository text structure incorporating graphic organ-izers on the comprehension of third-grade students.
Dynan, L., Cate, T., and Rhee, K. (2008). The impact of learning structure on students' readiness for self-directed learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84 (2), P 96-100.
Englert, C.S., Raphael, T.E., Anderson, L.M., Fear, K.L, & Gregg, S.L. (1988). A case for writing interven-tion: Strategies for writing informa-tional text. Learning Disabilities Fo-cus, 3(2), P 98-113.
Englert, C.S., Stewart, S.R., & Hiebert, E.H. (1988). Young writer’s use of text structure
in expository text generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (2), P 143-159.
Ghaith, G.M., & Harkouss, S.A. (2003). Role of text structure awareness in the Recall of expository discourse. For-eign Language Annals, 36(1), P 86-96.
Griffin, C.C., & Tulbert, B.L. (1995). The effect of graphic organizers on stu-dents comprehension and recall of expository text: A review of the re-search and implications for practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 11, 73-89.
Hayati, A., Ziyaeimehr, Z. (2011). A Study on the Effect of Scaffolding through Joint Construction Tasks on the Writ-ing Composition of EFL Learners. DOI: 10.3968/j.sll.1923156320110203.012.
Meyer, B.J.F. (1985) Prose analysis: pur-poses, procedures, and problems, in Britton, B.K. and Black, J.B. (eds.) Understanding Expository Text: A Theoretical and Practical Hand-book for Analyzing Explanatory Text, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl-baum Associates.
Meyer, B.J.F. and Rice, G.E. (1984) The structure of text, in Barr, R., Kamil, M.L. and Mosenthal, P. (eds.) Hand-book of Reading Research, New York: Longman.
Meyer, B.J.F., Talbot, A.P., Poon, L.W., and Johnson, M.M. (2001) Effects of structure strategy instruction on text recall in older African American adults, in Harris, J.K., Kamil, A.G. and Pollock, K.E. (eds.) Literacy in African American Communities, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum As-sociates.
Hariyati, R. (2018). Improving the exposito-ry paragraph in writing skills by using think talk write (ttw) strategy at the eighth graders of smp negeri 3 sekampung.
Slater, W.H., & Graves, M.F. (1989) Re-search on expository text: Implica-tions for teachers. In K.D. Muth (Ed.), Children’s comprehension of text, p 140-166.
Weaver, C.A., and Kintsch, W. (1996) Ex-pository text, in Barr, R., Kamil, M.L.