A Gender and Attitude-Based Study on the Washback Effects of Tradi-tional and Task-Based Assessments in Developing Reading Skills

Subject Areas :

Mojtaba Aghajani ¹ , Hamid Reza Khalaji ^{2 *} , abbas bayat ³

1 - Candidate in TEFL, English Language Department, Islamic Azad University, Malayer Branch, Malayer, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor in TEFL, English Language Department, Islamic Azad University, Malayer Branch, Malayer, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor in TEFL, English Language Department, Islamic Azad University, Malayer Branch, Malayer, Iran

Received: 2023-03-31 Accepted : 2023-06-07 Published : 2025-03-11

Keywords: Attitude, Gender, Reading skill, Task-Based Language Assessment, Washback effect,

Abstract :

The objectives of this mixed-method study are to study washback effect of task-based language assessment on developing reading skill and also students` attitude towards TBLA. ‎108 EFL learners ‎participated in the study were randomly chosen and were allocated into two classes of 54. The two groups took a reading class which carried out 90 minutes per week and continued for 3 months. By administering the PET, the homogeneity of two groups was approved. Both groups received similar instruction over 24 sessions, but only participants in experimental class took the researcher-designed task-based reading quizzes each four sessions. Next, both groups were given a reading post-test after the treatment, Results showed that TBLA has a positive im-pact of washback on reading improvement among EFL students. Furthermore, the attitude of learners about TBLA was calculated by employing an “Attitude Questionnaires on Reading”. To analyze the data received from “Attitude Questionnaire” A paired-sample t-test was run. By analyzing the results of quantitative questionnaire, it is revealed that learners commonly have a tendency to the application of TBLA in learning and teaching reading skill. Results of the re-search show that TBLA need to be replaced by traditional assessment procedures since all ‎educational planning always attempts to take full advantage of educational achievements and also improvements.

References:

Alderson, J. C. (1988). Innovation in language testing: can the microcomputer help? University of Lancaster.
Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does Washback Exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.115
Bacha, N. (2001). Writing evaluation: What can analytic versus holistic essay scoring tell us? System, 29(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00025-2
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford University Press.
Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: a review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300303
Biggs, J. (1995). Assessing for learning: Some dimensions underlying new approaches to educational assessment. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41(1), 1–17.
Boroughani, T., Xodabande, I., & Karimpour, S. (2023). Self-regulated learning with mobile devices for university students: exploring the impacts on academic vocabulary development. Discover Education, 2(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00028-z
Brown, J. D. (2000). University entrance examinations: Strategies for creating positive washback on English language teaching in Japan. Shiken:JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 3(2), 2–7. https://hosted.jalt.org/test/bro_5.htm
Buck, G. (1988). Testing listening comprehension in Japanese university entrance examinations. JALT Journal, 10(1), 15–42. https://jalt-publications.org/sites/default/files/pdf-article/jj-10.1-art1.pdf
Chapman, D. W., & Snyder, C. W. (2000). Can high stakes national testing improve instruction: reexamining conventional wisdom. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(6), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(00)00020-1
Cheng, L. (1997). How Does Washback Influence Teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789708666717
Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback or Backwash: A Review of the Impact of Testing on Teaching and Learning. In Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. (pp. 3–17). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609731-9
Cheng, L., Rogers, T., & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21(3), 360–389. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt288oa
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047
Gardner, R. C. (2004). Attitude/Motivation Test Battery: International AMTB Research Project. https://publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/docs/englishamtb.pdf
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Koné, K. (2015). The Impact of Performance-Based Assessment on University ESL Learners’ Motivation [Minnesota State University - Mankato]. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/402/
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587368
McNamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800402
Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300302
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2002). Design and analysis in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt241oa
Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-Based Teaching and Testing. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 578–594). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch30
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Popham, W. J. (1987). The Merits of Measurement-
Driven Instruction. Phi Delta Kappa International, 68(9), 679–682. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20403467
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.
Schoonen, R., van Gelderen, A., Stoel, R. D., Hulstijn, J., & de Glopper, K. (2011). Modeling the Development of L1 and EFL Writing Proficiency of Secondary School Students. Language Learning, 61(1), 31–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00590.x
Shohamy, E. (1992). Beyond Proficiency Testing: A Diagnostic Feedback Testing Model for Assessing Foreign Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 76(4), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb05402.x
Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: washback effect over time. Language Testing, 13(3), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300305
Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. Heinemann.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
Wong, Y. (2001). The impact of a new oral exam on students’ spoken language performance. University of Hong Kong.
Zakian, M., Xodabande, I., Valizadeh, M., & Yousefvand, M. (2022). Out-of-the-classroom learning of English vocabulary by EFL learners: investigating the effectiveness of mobile sisted learning with digital flashcards. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00143-8