Quantitative Research Literacy Among Iranian EFL Teachers at Different Levels of Education: Revelations for Policy Makers and Program Developers
Subject Areas : All areas of language and translation
1 - Department of Teaching English and Translation, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
Keywords: reflectivity, quantitative research, teacher training, research literacy,
Abstract :
ELT practitioners are expected to adopt the role of reflective practitioners, engaging in a thorough and analytical examination of their teaching practice. This is achieved through the undertaking of research, with systematic research being recognized as a crucial endeavor in implementing reflectivity within the ELT field. Concurrently with the proliferation of several novel problems and methodologies in the realm of research within ELT contexts, the act of conducting research in ELT has evolved into a multifaceted endeavor. The data for this study were gathered from 717 EFL instructors, consisting of 581 females (81%) and 136 males (19%). The participants included individuals with B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. degrees, with an average age of 25. The Quantitative Research Literacy (QRL) questionnaire, developed by Zaker and Nosratinia (2021), was utilized as the primary instrument for data collection. The utilization of the non-parametric Welch's ANOVA test and the Games-Howell post-hoc technique revealed a statistically significant disparity in the mean score on the QRL measure across participants with Ph.D., M.A., and B.A. degrees. Specifically, Ph.D. level participants exhibited a notably higher average score compared to both M.A. level and B.A. level players. Additionally, upon conducting a Welch's ANOVA and subsequently applying the Games-Howell post-hoc procedure, it was observed that the participants exhibited the highest level of proficiency in developing research topic knowledge. Conversely, the participants displayed the lowest level of knowledge in the area of data analysis. This study finishes by engaging in a comprehensive discussion of the findings and providing some recommendations.
Akbari, R. (2008). Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 641-652. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00152.x
American Educational Research Association. (1992). Ethical standards of the AERA. Educational Researcher, 21(7), 23–26.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen Irvine, C. K., & Walker, D. (2019). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Ashton-Hay, S. (2006). Constructivism and powerful learning environments: Create your own! Paper presented at the the 9th International English Language Teaching Convention: The Fusion of Theory and Practice, Middle Eastern Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/17285/1/17285.pdf
Bell, D. M. (2003). Method and Postmethod: Are They Really So Incompatible? TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 325-336. doi:10.2307/3588507
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Birjandi, P., & Siyyari, M. (2010). Self-assessment and peer-assessment: A comparative study of their effect on writing performance and rating accuracy. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 23-45.
Blessinger, P. (2015). Educational research methodology framework. Retrieved from Patrick Blessinger website: http://www.patrickblessinger.com/ermf/
Breen, L., & Darlaston-Jones, D. (2010). Moving beyond the enduring dominance of positivism in psychological research: Implications for psychology in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 45(1), 67-76. doi:10.1080/00050060903127481
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2015). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd Ed.). New York ; London: Routledge.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publication.
Ellis, R. (2010). A principled approach to incorporating second language acquisition research into a teacher education programme. Reflections in Language Teaching, 9(1), 11-23.
Fahim, M., & Zaker, A. (2014). EFL learners' creativity and critical thinking: Are they associated? Humanising Language Teaching, 16(3).
Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Reflective practice as professional development. In C. Coombe, L. England, & J. Schmidt (Eds.), Reigniting, retooling and retiring in English language teaching (pp. 23-32). East Lancing: University of Michigan Press.
Hadi, M. A., & Closs, S. J. (2016). Applications of mixed-methods methodology in clinical pharmacy research. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38(3), 635-640. doi:10.1007/s11096-015-0231-z
Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 73-85. doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00051-8
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language teacher education for a global society: A modular model for knowing, analyzing, recognizing, doing, and seeing. New York: Routledge.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd ed.): Routledge.
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories. New York: Routledge.
Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. New York: Routledge.
Nosratinia, M., & Zaker, A. (2014). Metacognitive attributes and liberated progress:The association among second language learners’ critical thinking, creativity, and autonomy. SAGE Open, 4(3). doi:10.1177/2158244014547178
Nosratinia, M., & Zaker, A. (2015). Boosting autonomous foreign language learning: Scrutinizing the role of creativity, critical thinking, and vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(4), 86-97. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.4p.86
Nosratinia, M., & Zaker, A. (2017). Scrutinizing the impact of teachers' critical thinking and teaching autonomy on their teaching success and learners' use of language learning strategies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 122-132. doi:10.17507/jltr.0801.15
Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). London: Open University Press.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). Defining critical thinking. Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/DefiningCriticalThinking.html
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language
classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scharle , A., & Szabo, A. (2000). Learner autonomy: A guide to develop learner responsibility. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
Springer, K. (2010). Educational research: A contextual approach. NJ: Wiley.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Zaker, A. (2016). Social constructivism and metacognition in an EFL context: Inspecting the contribution of critical thinking to EFL learners' social intelligence. Humanising Language Teaching 18(6). Retrieved from www.hltmag.co.uk/dec16/index.htm
Zaker, A., & Nosratinia, M. (2021). Development and validation of a quantitative research literacy questionnaire. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 9(37), 11-30. doi:10.52547/jfl.9.37.11
Zaker, A., Nosratinia, M., Birjandi, P., & Yazdanimoghaddam, M. (2019). The impact of implementing critical appraisal on EFL teachers' quantitative research literacy. Journal of Language and Translation, 9(2), 141-155. Zaker, A., Nosratinia, M., Birjandi, P., & Yazdanimoghaddam, M. (2020). The impact of implementing critical appraisal on EFL teachers’ data analysis knowledge. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 8(29), 59-74.
Zeichner, K. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4-15. doi:10.3102/0013189X028009004