واکاوی مولفه های فساد خاکستری در نظام اداری ایران
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت منابع انسانی
سمیه احمدزاده
1
,
زکیه بیکی دمنه
2
*
,
علی اسماعیلی
3
1 - عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه شهید اشرفی اصفهانی دانشکده مدیریت و نوآوری
2 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، واحد اصفهان ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خوراسگان، ایران.
3 - دانشگاه شهید اشرفی اصفهانی
کلید واژه: فساد, فساد خاکستری, نظام اداری ایران,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه: فساد اداری، موضوعی است که سازمان‌ها در دوره عمر خود به ناگزیر آن را تجربه می‌کنند. این پدیده بر کارایی نظام اداری، مشروعیت نظام سیاسی و مطلوبیت نظام فرهنگی و اجتماعی تأثیر می‌گذارد و می‌تواند منجر به ایجاد دور باطل شود که در نهایت جامعه را به افول خواهد کشاند. هدف این پژوهش واکاوی مولفه های فساد خاکستری در نظام اداری ایران می باشد.
روش تحقیق: این پژوهش از نوع پیمایشی- مقطعی و با رویکرد کیفی از نوع تحلیل تم به روش شش مرحله‌ای براون و کلارک (2006) انجام شد. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات در فاز اول، مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته و عمیق بود. با بهره‌گیری از تجزیه و تحلیل تماتیک، داده‌های حاصل از مصاحبه‌های انجام شده با 10 نفر از صاحب‌نظران تا اشباع نظری انجام شد و طی سه مرحله کدگذاری انجام شد.
یافته‌ها: یافته ها 7 تم سازمان‌دهنده را شناسایی کرد که شامل تاثیرپذیری سیاسیون از سیستم سازمانی، ابهام وقدرت دور زدن قوانین، عدم ساماندهی مناسب منابع انسانی، عدم نظام مدیریت بر اساس صلاحیت ها ی حرفه ای، نبود عزت نفس در کارکنان، نظام اداری ناکارآمد و عدم فرهنگ سازی مبارزه با فساد می‌باشد.
نتیجه گیری: برای مبارزه با فساد خاکستری در نظام اداری، نیاز به اصلاحات اساسی در حوزه های واکاوی شده می باشد. اصلاحات در زمینه‌های مدیریتی، قانونی و فرهنگی می‌تواند به کاهش فساد و بهبود کارایی سازمان‌های دولتی کمک کند
Introduction: Administrative corruption constitutes an inevitable challenge encountered by organizations throughout their existence. This phenomenon undermines the efficiency of the administrative framework, compromises the legitimacy of the political system, and diminishes the desirability of the cultural and social institutions. Furthermore, it can precipitate a detrimental cycle that ultimately contributes to societal decline. The primary objective of this study is to examine the underlying elements of gray corruption within the Iranian administrative system.
Methodology: This investigation was executed as a cross-sectional survey employing a qualitative approach through thematic analysis, utilizing the six-stage methodology outlined by Brown and Clark (2006). The primary data collection instrument was a semi-structured, in-depth interview. Data obtained from interviews with ten experts were analyzed through thematic analysis until theoretical saturation was achieved, with coding conducted in three sequential stages.
Findings: The findings delineated seven principal organizing themes: the influence of politicians on the organizational system, the presence of ambiguity and the capacity to circumvent legal provisions, inadequate structuring of human resources, the absence of a management system grounded in professional qualifications, a deficiency of self-esteem among employees, an inefficient administrative system, and the lack of a robust culture committed to combating corruption.
Conclusion: To address the issue of gray corruption within the administrative system, comprehensive reforms are required in the pertinent sectors of analysis. Specifically, reforms in management, legal frameworks, and organizational culture have the potential to mitigate corruption and enhance the efficiency of governmental institutions.
Afkhami Ardakani, M. (2016). Examples and forms of administrative corruption and strategies for combating it. Third National Law Conference: The contexts of financial and administrative corruption in the Iranian legal system with the approach of reforming and developing the legal system [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/641244/.
Afshar, Zeyn-al-Abedin (2020). A Sociological Study of the Causes of Ineffectiveness of Anti-Corruption Policies and Programs in Iran After the Revolution. Strategic Studies Center of the Presidency. https://css-alborz.blog.ir/post/6544131ass
Alavi, M., Faghihi, A., Musa Khani, M., & Najaf Beigi, R. (2018). The Roots of Administrative Corruption in Iranian Government Organizations. Quarterly Journal of Management Sciences, 49, 1-36 [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/1478008/
Amir, E., Danziger, S., & Levi, S. (2019), Business corruption and economic prosperity. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 34(4), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X17732249
Ashairi, T., & Jahanparvar, T. (2023). Study of factors affecting the occurrence of corruption: a meta-synthesis of research. Parliament and Strategy, 30(116), 375-412 [In Persian]. doi: 10.22034/mr.2022.5235.5007
Bahoo, S., Saeed, S., Iqbal, M. J., & Nawaz, S. (2018). Role of China-Pakistan economic corridor in Pakistan’s trade, investment, energy, infrastructure, and stock market. JISR management and social sciences & economics, 16(1), 63-83. https://doi.org/10.31384/jisrmsse/2018.16.1.5
Benito, B. (2022). Accountability and Corruption, Europe. In A. Farazmand. (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 52-60). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3
Chang-Qing, S., Chun-Ping, C., & Qiang, G. (2019). Economic growth, corruption,financial development: Global evidence, Economic Modelling, 94, 822-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.022
Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Peña-Miguel, N. (2020). Corruption perception following privatization reforms: The moderating role of governance. Revista de Contabilidad– Spanish Accounting Review, 23(1), 127-137. https:// www.doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.361041
David-Barrett ,E., Murray, A., Polvi, J., & Burge, R. (2020). Evaluating anti-corruption agencies: learning from the Caribbean. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 12(1), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2020.1745869
Farooq, M. B., & De Villiers, C. (2019). Understanding how managers institutionalise sustainability reporting: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(5), 1240-1269. DOI:10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2958
Gholamzadeh, D., Abbasi, M., & Ahmadi Rad, M. (2012). Administrative Corruption and Its Bottlenecks in the Organizational and Management Structure of the Study of Scientific and Academic Centers (Administrative Headquarters and Centers of the University of Applied Sciences). Accounting and Management Perspectives, 5(63), 59-76 [In Persian]. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/510086
Guillamón, M. D., Cifuentes, J., Faura, U., & Benito, B. (2021). Effect of political corruption on municipal tax revenues: Efecto de la corrupción política en los ingresos impositivos municipales. Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, 24(2), 231–240. DOI:10.6018/rcsar.410581
Hayden, H., & Haimro, M. (2011). Corruption in Public Administration: A Comparative Study. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 543-564. DOI:10.70082/esiculture.vi.1117
Prenzler, T. (2021). Grey corruption issues in the public sector. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 7(2), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-02-2020-0021
Healy, P. M., & Serafeim, G. (2016). An analysis of firms’ selfreported anti-corruption efforts. The Accounting Review, 91(2), 489-511. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51191
Heidenheimer, A. J., & Johnston, M. (Eds.). (2011). Political corruption: Concepts and contexts (Vol. 1). Transaction Publishers.
Heidenheimer, A. J., & Michael, J. (2002). Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Hemmati, M.h, Alavian, M. & Karimi, M. (2010). The Peribendal State: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Political Corruption. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(91), 165-202 [In Persian]. https://nashr.majles.ir/article_218
Heydari, H., Hosseini Sadrabadi, I., & Mehrvarz, M. R. (2019). Analyzing the role of the inspection organization in preventing oversight evasion and administrative corruption of government managers. Administrative Law Quarterly. 7(22), 79-104 [In Persian]. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/qjal.7.22.79
Jensen, N. M., Li, Q., & Rahman, A. (2010). Understanding corruption and firm responses in cross-national firm-level surveys. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1481-1504. DOI:10.1057/jibs.2010.8
Jeong, J., & Han, S. (2023). Are intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and organisational identity always beneficial to the organisation? The different effects of black and grey corruption. Psychology, Crime & Law, 31(4), 484-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2023.2292512
Kim, K., Kim, K. H., Ha, E., Park, J. Y, Sakamoto, N., & Cheong, J. (2009). Hepatitis C virus NS5A protein increases hepatic lipid accumulation via induction of activation and expression of PPARgamma. FEBS Lett, 583, 2720–2726. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.07.034
Lee, J., & Liu, C. (2022). Public corruption and government management capacity. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(2), 397-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.1985538
Lee, J. H., Yoh, I., Ulf, D., & Karl, S. (2019). Social evolution leads to persistent corruption. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(27):201900078. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1900078116
Maisondra, M. (2020). The Effective Management of Corruption Treatment in Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(8), 690-696. http://eprints2.ipdn.ac.id/id/eprint/874/
Manfardi, A. (2016). Recognizing the concept of administrative corruption, its causes and consequences and ways to prevent it. The Third National Law Conference: The Foundations of Financial and Administrative Corruption in the Iranian Legal System with the Approach of Reforming and Developing the Legal System [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/641425/
Nikpour, A. (2016). Presenting a model of public supervision in order to prevent the occurrence of administrative corruption in Iranian government organizations. Majlis and Strategy, 23(87), 201-231[In Persian]. https://nashr.majles.ir/article_166_75
Oteoa, O. V., García-Torea, N., & Cuesta-Gonzálezc, M. D. L. (2025). Corporate corruption management: A proposal for an accountability framework, 28(1), 96-114. https://revistas.um.es/rcsar/article/download/543701/375321/2463971
Prihanto, H., & Gunawan, I. D. (2020). Corruption in Indonesia (Is It Right to Governance, Leadership and It to Be Caused?). Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. 11(2), 56-66. DOI: 10.7176/JESD/11-2-06
Sadeghi, A., Manouchehri, A., Nargesian, A., & Eshaghi, H. (2019). Explaining the bureaucratic model of Iranian government organizations with an emphasis on controlling administrative corruption. Strategic Management Studies, 11(44), 167-186. [In Persian]. 20.1001.1.22286853.1399.11.44.10.5
Sena, V., Duygun, M., Lubrano, G., Marra, M., & Shaban, M. (2018). Board independence, corruption and innovation. some evidence on UK subsidiaries. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 22-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.028
Soma, K., Dijkshoorn-Dekker, M. W. C., & Polman, N. B. P. (2018). Stakeholder contributions through transitions towards urban sustainability. Sustainable cities and society, 37, 438-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.003
Tran, Q. T. (2020). Corruption, agency costs and dividend policy: International evidence. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 76, 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.09.010
Tsatkhlanova, T. (2021) .Improve Performance or Corruption Motivation in Beyond Budget Implementation, Survey in Public Sector Organizations . Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 12(6), 1-9. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3820741
Zarandi, S., Hamidi Hesari, Y., & Manaani, J. (2016). Factors Affecting Administrative Corruption in Government Organizations of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Majlis and Strategy, 25(91), 165-202 [In Persian]. https://nashr.majles.ir/article_218.html