Transitivity Processes in Quantitative Versus Qualitative Applied Linguistics Research Articles' Discussions

Subject Areas : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Marzieh  Bagherkazemi ¹ (Department of English Language Teaching, Islamic Azad University (South Tehran Branch), Tehran, Iran)
Zahra  Dehini ² (Department of English Language Teaching, Islamic Azad University (South Tehran Branch), Tehran, Iran)
Maryam  Jalali Moghaddam ³ (Department of English Language Teaching, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran)
Bita  Ghalandar-Zehi ⁴ (Department of English Language Teaching, Islamic Azad University (South Tehran Branch), Tehran, Iran)

Received: 2022-03-06 Accepted : 2022-04-24 Published : 2023-02-01

Keywords: Academic Discourse, Transitivity, Qualitative Articles, Quantitative Articles,

Abstract :

Transitivity and its associated clausal semantic processes are assumed to bear textual representations of reality and encode authors' conceptions of the world in linguistic terms. Given this and the differential epistemologies featuring quantitative and qualitative research, the transitivity analysis of their associated academic reports gains salience. This study involved the comparative transitivity analysis of the discussion sections of 40 quantitative and qualitative applied linguistics research articles. Relative distributions of the six transitivity processes in systemic functional linguistics (relational, material, verbal, mental, existential, and behavioral) were investigated through a series of Chi-Square tests. Moreover, the most frequent processes in quantitative and qualitative discussions were in terms of their semantic associations. The results showed that mental, relational, and behavioral processes were the most frequent in both quantitative and qualitative discussions. In addition, qualitative research articles' discussions housed more mental and material processes, while quantitative research articles' discussions involved a significantly higher number of relational, verbal, and behavioral processes. However, frequent processes were semantically similar in the two corpora. The results are discussed regarding the ideological and generic associations of quantitative and qualitative research. The findings have implications for academic writing instruction and shed light on linguistically encoded reality in quantitative and qualitative research articles.

References:

Ammara, U., Anjum, R. Y., & Javed, M. (2019). A corpus-based Halliday's transitivity analysis of 'to the Lighthouse.' Linguistics and Literature Review, 5(2), 139-162. https://doi.org/10.32350/llr.52.

Arsyad, S. (2013). A genre-based analysis of the discussion section of research articles in Indonesian written by Indonesian speakers. Online Submission, 5(4), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v5i4.3773

Banks, D. (2010). The beginnings of vernacular scientific discourse: Genres and linguistic features in some early issues of the Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions. Revue Électronique d’Études sur le Monde Anglophone, 8(1), 1-8.  https://doi.org/10.4000/erea.1334‏

Behnam, B., & Zamanian, J. (2013). Genre analysis of Oxford and Tabriz applied linguistics research article abstracts: From move structure to transitivity analysis. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 6(12), 41-59. Retrieved from: http://jal.iaut.ac.ir/article_522025.html

Berry, M. (1975). An introduction to systemic linguistics. BT Batsford Limited.

Birhan, Y. (2017). Assessment of the qualities of academic writing in senior essays of English graduates: The case of Dire Dawa University. International Journal of English and Literature, 8(8), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEL2015.0777

Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (1995). The functional analysis: A Hallidayan approach. St. Martin Press.

Chalak, A., & Dehghan, M. (2016). Code glosses in academic writing: The comparison of Iranian and native authors. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 3(2), 21-29.

Chalak, A., & Norouzi, Z. (2013). Rhetorical moves and verb tense in abstracts: A comparative analysis of American and Iranian academic writing. International Journal of Language Studies, 7(4), 101-110. Retrieved from: http://www.ijls.net/pages/volume/vol7no4.html

Choy, L. T. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(4), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-194399104

Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2010). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. Continuum.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Defazio, J., Jones, J., Tennant, F., & Hook, S. A. (2010). Academic literacy: The importance and impact of writing across the curriculum: A case study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 34-47. Retrieved from: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1746

Dobakhti, L. (2016). A genre analysis of discussion sections of qualitative research articles in applied linguistics. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(7), 1383-1389. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0607.08

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford university press.

Emilia, E., Moecharam, N. Y., & Syifa, I. L. (2017). Gender in EFL classroom: Transitivity analysis in an English textbook for Indonesian students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6877

Flowerdew, J. (2012). Discourse in English language education. Routledge.

Goatly, A. (2000). Critical reading and writing. Routledge.

Hadiyati, N. S., Said, I., & Sugiarto, B. R. (2018). Transitivity analysis of male and female students' final draft of critical responses paragraph to literature. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 2(2), 113-124. Retrieved from: https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/jall/article/view/2195

Haliday, M. (1973). Exploration of the functions of language. Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. (1976). A brief sketch of systemic grammar. Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Palmer Press.

Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.

Holmes, R. (2001). Variation and text structure: The discussion section in economics research articles. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 131(1), 107-137.  https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.131-132.06hol

Huang, P. (2009). A comparison of international and Chinese journal article abstracts: From move structure to transitivity analysis. Linguistics Journal, 4(1), 23-45.

Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to the process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8

Hyland, K. (2018). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Hyland, J., & Jiang, F. (2017). Is academic writing becoming more informal? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001  

Jalilifar, A. R. (2011). World of attitudes in research article discussion sections: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Technology of Education, 5(3), 177-186.

Jin, B. (2021). A multi-dimensional analysis of research article discussion sections in an engineering discipline: Corpus explorations and scientists' perceptions. Sage Open. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F21582440211050401

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003

Kuswoyo, H., & Rido, A. (2019). Process types of transitivity system in engineering lecture introduction: A pedagogic discourse. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 19(2), 85-96. Retrieved from: https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1472572

Liu, Y., & Buckingham, L. (2018). The schematic structure of discussion sections in applied linguistics and the distribution of metadiscourse markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34, 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.04.002

Lu, A. (2012). Transitivity shifts in academic writing. Asian EFL Journal, 14(4), 107-33. Retrieved from:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286140921

Marbun, L. (2016). Process Types of transitivity system in the National Geographic's articles. The Episteme Journal of linguistics and literature, 3(1), 1-25. Retrieved from: https://uhn.ac.id/files/akademik_files/1712070831_2016_The%20Episteme%20Journal%20of%20Linguistics%20and%20Literature%20Vol%203%20No%201_5

Martı́nez, I. A. (2001). Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 227-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00013-2

Matthiessen, C. (1995). Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. International Language Sciences Publishers.

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures, and software solution. Klagenfurt.

Nunn, R., Deveci, T., Khan, I., & Ayish, N. (2018). A Transitivity investigation of Nature journal articles: Legitimizing first-person use. Linguistics Journal, 12(1), 192-220. Retrieved from: https://www.elejournals.com/linguistics-journal/linguistics-journal-volume-12-issue-1-2018/

Ortega, L. (2013). SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. Language learning, 63 (s1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00735.x

Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis: An introduction. Continuum.

Senjawati, D. (2016). Transitivity analysis of tenth-grade students' recount texts. Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 1-22. Retrieved from: https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/L-E/article/view/4617/3216

Sheldon, E. (2019). Knowledge construction of discussion/conclusion sections of research articles written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.002

Song, Z. (2013). Transitivity analysis of A Rose for Emily. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2291-2295. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2291-2295                

Struwig, F., & Stead, G. (2007). Planning, designing and reporting research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Sukamolson, S. (2007). Fundamentals of quantitative research. [Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation]. Chulalongkorn University.

Taki, S., & Jafarpour, F. (2012). Engagement and stance in academic writing: A study of English and Persian research articles. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 157-157. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2012.03.01.157

Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley & Sons.

Vathanalaoha, K., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2018). Transitivity analysis of rhetorical moves in dental research article abstracts: Thai and international journals. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 18(3), 639-662.‏ https://doi.org/10.14456/hasss.2018.28

Wahyuni, R., Hamzah, H., & Wahyuni, D. (2019). An analysis of transitivity system in memoirs written by EFL students. English Language and Literature, 8(1), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v8i1.103060

Wales, K. (1989). A dictionary of stylistics. Routledge.

Yazdani, S., & Kamyabi Gol, A. K. (2018). Topics and transitivity choices in Iranian learners' English writings. Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), 516-529. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.20.516

Yousefi Osguee, M., Assadi Aidinlou, N., & Zoghi, M. (2019). The efficacy of an SFL-oriented register instruction in improving Iranian EFL learners' writing performance and perception: Language proficiency in focus. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 12(24), 156-178. https://doi.org/10.30495/jal.2019.671931

Yuniar, Y., Sinar, T. S., & Gurning, B (2017). The process as a transitivity element in classroom discourse. Linguistik Terapan, 14(2), 194-203. Retrieved from: https://123dok.com/document/ozl878rq-process-as-a-transitivity-element-in-classroom discourse.html 

Zhang, Y. (2017). Transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton's and Donald Trump's first television debate. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(7), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.65

Zheng, S., Yang, A., & Ge, G. (2014). Functional stylistic analysis: Transitivity in English-medium medical research articles. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n2p12

Zheng, X. (2021). Transitivity structure of research articles: Variations across sections. English Language Teaching, 14(8), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n8p8