Quality in English Language Teaching: Postulating a Prospective Quality Enhancement Model

Subject Areas : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Zahra  Kafi ¹ (Department of English, Torbat-e Heydarieh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e Heydarieh, Iran)
Khalil  Motallebzadeh ² (Department of English, Torbat-e Heydarieh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e Heydarieh, Iran)
Hossein  Khodabakhshzadeh ³ (Department of English, Torbat-e Heydarieh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e Heydarieh, Iran)
Mitra  Zeraatpisheh ⁴ (Department of English, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran)

Received: 2019-11-14 Accepted : 2020-02-01 Published : 2020-09-01

Keywords: Quality, Private English institutions, Prospective, Quality enhancement, CIPP Model,

Abstract :

The literature review left the researchers with an unanswered query about whether teachers' years of teaching experience could act as an index for enhancing the quality of teaching learning output. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to propose a quality enhancement model for the status of private Iranian English institutions. An ex post-factorial design was employed for the study. Thus, 250 male and female EFL teachers filled a previously developed English Language Teaching Quality Indices Survey. The reliability and validity of the survey were checked by Cronbach alpha, 95, EFA and CFA. Then, the researchers calculated the means of ELTQI constructs. The aim was to pinpoint the most prominent components that impact the quality of ELT as "must" to be indices in any educational setting. Besides, the researchers utilized the index with the highest mean as well as the ones which were highly recurrent in the literature and shared relations/predictions with teachers' years of teaching experience. Then, a model was proposed by running CFA, AMOS Software. It included factors like years of teaching experience, 21st century skills, teachers' qualifications and recruitment, teaching activities and methodologies, CPD (Continuing Professional Development) and assessment procedure. The results revealed that all the predictions were supported except for 21st century skills. Also, Teachers’ qualifications and recruitment gained the most importance from the teachers' point of view. As the pedagogical implication, proposing a prospective quality enhancement model can bring about clarity among different stakeholders, teachers, and learners of what is exactly expected of them.

References:

Akbari, Z. (2015). Current challenges in teaching/learning English for EFL learners: The case of  

      junior high school and high school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199 (3), 394-401.

Akbari, R., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2011).EFL teachers’ recruitment and dynamic assessment in private language institutes of Iran. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning,8, 30-51.

Althuhami, A.D.A.R. (2011). Evaluating EFL intermediate teachers' performance in the light of  

      quality standards in Saudi Arabia. (Master’s thesis, Taif University,Kingdom of Saudi Arabia).

Barrett, A. M., Duggan, R. C., Lowe, J., Nikel, J., & Ukpo, E.( 2006). The concept of quality in  

      education: A review of the international literature on the concept of quality in education. EdQual  

      RPC.

Behroozi, M., & Amoozegar, A. (2014). Challenges to English language teachers of secondary  

      schools in Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 203-207.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code 

      development. London: Sage.

Breene, K. (15, November, 2016). Which Countries are best at English as a Second Language.

      World Economic Forum.

Dossett, D., & Munoz, M. A. (2003). Classroom accountability: A value-added methodology. Paper  

      presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago,  

      IL.

Ewell, P. (2008), “Building academic cultures of evidence: a perspective on learning outcomes in 

      higher education”, paper presented at the symposium of the Hong Kong University Grants 

      Committee on Quality Education, Quality Outcomes.

Goldhaber, D. E. (2004). Indicators of teacher quality. ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education  

      New York NY.

Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Lain, R. D. (1996). The effects of school resources on student  

      achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361-396.

Grisay, A., & Mahlck, L. (1991). The quality of education in developing countries: A Preview of

      Some Research Studies and Policy Documents. Paris: IIEP.    

Guidelines for Quality in Language Teaching. (2009-2011). Quality in Language Teaching for  

      Adults Grundtving Learning Partnership (pp. 1-40).

Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schoolsJournal of Economic Literature, 24(3), 1141–1177.

Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance.  

      Educational Researcher,18(4), 45-65.

Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An  

      update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141-164.

Hedge, L. V., Lain, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A metaanalysis of studies 

      of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3),  5-14.

Jain, C., & Prasad, N. (2018). Quality of secondary education in India. Singapore: Springer 

      Nature.           

Kafi, Z., Motallebzadeh, kh., Khodabakhshzadeh, H., & Zeraatpishe, M. (2019). Developing,  

      glocalizing & validating a quality indices rubric in English language teaching: A case of CIPP  

      Model. Cognet Education,6,1-23.

Kanstoroom, M., & Finn, C. E. (1999). Better teachers, better schools. Thomas B Fordham  

      Foundation.

King Rice, J. (2003). Teacher quality. Understanding the Effectiveness of Teacher Attributes.  

      Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

Kini, T., & Podolsky, A. (2016). Does Teaching Experience Increase Teacher Effectiveness? A

      Review of the Research. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

Language Learning Services outside Formal Education –Requirements. (2015). Iranian

      National Standardization Organization.

Linston, C. (1999). Managing quality and standard. Buckhingam: Open University Press

Louws, L. M., Veen, K. L., Meirink, J. A., & Driel, J. V. (2017). Teachers' professional learning  

      goals in relation to teaching experience. European Journal of Teaching Education, 40(4), 487-

      504.

Olson, L., & Hoff, D. J. (1999). Teaching tops agenda at summit. Education Week, 19(6), 1-20.

Sağlam, G., & Salı, P. (2013). The essentials of the foreign language learning environment:          

      Through the eyes of the pre-service EFL teachers.  Procedia-Social And Behavioral, 93, 1121-  

      1125.

Sallis, E. (1996). Total quality management in education. London: Kogan Page.

Satterlee, A. G. (2010).  Online Faculty Satisfaction and Quality Enhancement Initiatives.

       IABR & ITLC Conference Proceedings .Dublin, Ireland

School of Education. (2019). Professional development for teachers: Understanding its important. 

      American University, Washington, DC.

Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural 

      equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of 

     Educational Research, 99(6).

Shishavan, H., & Sadeghi, K. (2009). Characteristics of an effective English language teacher as

      perceived by Iranian teachers and learners of English. English Language Teaching, 2 (4).

Tam, M. (2014). Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in

      higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 22 (2), 158-168.

TESOL. (2003). TESOL / NCATE program standards: Standards for the accreditation of initial  

      programs in P-12 ESL teacher education. Alexandria, VA.

The Dakar Framework for Action. (2000). World Education Forum. Adopted by the 

      World education Forum Dakar, Senegal, 26-28 April 2000.

UNICEF. (June 2000). Defining quality in education. A paper presented by UNICEF at the  

      meeting of the international working group on education florence, Italy, Working Paper Series,  

      Education Section, Programme Division,United Nations Children’s Fund UNICEF, USA.

Wadsworth, H. M., Stephens, K. S., & Godfrey, A. B. (2002). Modern methods for quality control 

      and improvement. New York: Wiley.

Walker, T. (2016). Does teaching experience matter?Lets count the ways. Education Policy.  

      Teacher Recruitment and Retention.      

Wayne, A. J., & Young, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A

      review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122.

Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How Teaching Matters: Bringing the Classroom Back into Discussions of  

      Teacher Quality. Princeton, NJ: Milken Family Foundation and Educational Testing.

Wenglinsky, H. (2002). The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic  

      performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10 (12), 1-30.

Ye, R. M. (2000). The effect of teacher characteristics, beliefs, relations with students, and in-

      service education on student science achievement. Unpublished doctoraldissertation, Texas

      Technology University.

Zhang, D. (2008). The effects of teacher education level, teaching experience, and teaching

      behaviors on student science achievement(Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations.