مروری بر روند تکاملی مدل‌های توسعه پایدار با رویکردی انتقادی
محورهای موضوعی : توسعه پایدار
حسن مقیم
1
(دانش آموخته دکتری علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری، اداره کل منابع طبیعی و آبخیزداری استان فارس.)
کلید واژه: توسعه پایدار, محیط‌زیست, رویکرد انتقادی,
چکیده مقاله :
به‌طور کلی برای بیان و به تصویر کشیدن مفهوم پایداری از مدل‌های مفهومی استفاده شده و در سال‌های اخیــر مدل‌های مختلفی برای بیان و نشان دادن مفهوم توسعه پایدار از سوی پژوهشگران و تحلیلگران این حوزه ارائه گردیده است. در این پژوهش که از نوع پژوهش‌های مروری و کتابخانه‌ای می‌باشد، تلاش گردیده روند تکاملی مدل‌های توسعه پایدار و مطالب بیان شده پیرامون مدل‌های توسعه پایدار مورد بررسی و تحلیل قرار گیرد. بدین منظور، تعداد بیش از 50 مقاله در حوزه نظری توسعه پایدار و مدل‌های آن مورد بررسی و کنکاش قرار گرفت که از میان آن‌ها تعداد 39 مقاله برتر براساس محتوا و رسایی مطلب به عنوان منبع و مآخذ مورد استفاده قرار گرفته است. این پژوهش با بیان سیر تکاملی مدل‌های توسعه پایدار در گذر زمان، مجموعه‌ای واحد در قالب مقاله‌ای مروری با رویکردی انتقادی شامل قابلیت‌ها، ظرفیت‌ها، نقاط قوت و ضعف مدل‌های توسعه پایداری که تاکنون در سطح جهانی مطرح شده‌اند، ارائه داده است. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که عدم استقلال ابعاد سه‌گانه، نادیده گرفتن بُعد زمان، و توجه کمتر به بُعد محیط‌زیستی از عمده‌ترین مشکلات مدل‌های موجود می‌باشد.
In general, conceptual models are used to express and depict the concept of sustainability, and in recent years, various models have been presented by researchers and analysts in this field to express and show the concept of sustainable development. In this research, which is a type of review and library research, an attempt has been made to examine and analyze the evolutionary process of sustainable development models and the contents expressed around sustainable development models. For this purpose, a number of more than 50 articles in the theoretical field of sustainable development and its models were examined and explored, among which 39 best articles based on content and content were used as sources and references. By expressing the evolution of sustainable development models over time, this research has presented a single collection in the form of a review article with a critical approach including capabilities, capacities, strengths and weaknesses of sustainable development models that have been proposed at the global level. The results of this research show that the lack of independence of the three dimensions, ignoring the time dimension, and paying less attention to the environmental dimension are among the main problems of the existing models.
Atkinson, A., Hatcher, R. L., & Green, S. (2004). Introducing pyramid: Versatile process and planning tool for accelerating sustainable development. The natural advantage of nations. EA Books, Australia.
Badri, S. A., & Rukhuddin Eftekhari, A. (1997). Sustainability Assessment: Concept and Method. Geographical Research Quarterly(567), 1-34. (In Persian)
Bervar, M., & Bertoncelj, A. (2016, 1-4 June 2016). The five pillars of sustainability: Economic, Social, Environmental, Cultural and Security aspects Mic- management international conference, Pula,Croatia.
BinEli, M. (2005). Sustainability, the five core principle (a new framework). The cybersex consulting group. www.sustsainabilitylabs.org
Colantonio, A., & Lane, G. (2007). Measuring social sustainability: "Best practice from urban ranewel in the UE". 2007/01: EIBURS working paper Series. Institute for sustainable development (OISD) International land markets group, Oxford: Oxford brookes University.
Costanza, R., Wainger, L., C., F., & G., M. K. (1993). Modeling complex ecological economic systems: Toward an evolutionary, dynamic understanding of people and nature, In Ecosystem Management. Ecosystem Management, 148-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4018-1_15
Dawe, N. K., & Ryan, K. L. (2003). The faulty three ‐ legged ‐ stool model of sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 17(5), 1458-1460.
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130-141.
Hamedani, A. Z. (2014). Methodology and statistical analysis of sustainable transportation criteria for certification systems [Doctoral Dissertation, University ätsbibliothek Wuppertal].
Hansmann, R., Mieg, H. A., & P., F. (2012). Principal sustainability components: empirical analysis of synergies between the three pillars of sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(5), 451-459.
Kain, J. H. (2000). Urban support systems – social and technical, socio-technical or sociotechnical. Gothenburg.
Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: science and policy for sustainable development, 47(3), 8-21. https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/sustsci/ists/docs/whatisSD_env_kates_0504.pdf
Keiner, M. (2005). Re-emphasizing sustainable development—the concept of ‘Evolutionability’. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 6(4), 379-392. https://www.zef.de/uploads/tx_zefnews/a7b9_Keiner_Evolutionabilty.pdf
Lawn, P. A. (2000). Toward sustainable development: an ecological economics approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(17), 1838-1846.
Marin, D., & Todorovova, V. (2009). Models of sustainability 18th world IMACS/MoDSIM congress, Cairns, Australia.
Mieg, H. A. (2012). Sustainability and innovation in urban development: concept and case. Sustainable Development, 20(4), 251-263.
Neumayer, E. (2003). Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
OECD. (2001). Guidelines towards Environmentally Sustainable Transport. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Publications Service.
Scerri, A., & Paul, J. (2010). Accounting for sustainability: combining qualitative and quantities research in developing "indicators" of sustainability. International Journal of social research methodology, 13(1), 41-53.
Schoolman, E. D., Guest, J. S., Bush, K. F., & Bell, A. R. (2012). How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 67-80.
SEPA. (2002). What is sustainable development? S. E. P. Agency. http://www.sepa.org.uk/education/sustainable_development Scottish Environment Protection Agency
Spangenberg, J. H., & Bonniot, O. (1998). Sustainability indicators: a compass on the road towards sustainability. Wuppertal papers, 7(4), 1-34. https://epub.wupperinst.org/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/721/file/WP81.pdf
Stavins, R. N., Wagner, A. F., & Wagner, G. (2002). Interpreting sustainability in economic terms: dynamic efficiency plus intergenerational equity. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Thakshila Ruvini Herath, H. M., & Prabodha Subhashini Rathnayake, R. M. (2019). A Critical Approach towards Sustainable Development Models - A Review. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 7(9), 4-23.
Thatcher, A. V. a., pp. . . (2014). Theoretical definitions and models of sustainable development that apply to human factors and ergonomics 11th International Symposium on Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management and the 46th Annual Nordic Ergonomics Society Conference, Santa Monica, CA.
U.N.W.S. (2005). World Summit Outcome. United_Nations_World_Summit. http://www.unep.org/geo/GEO4/report/GEO-4_Report_Full_en.pdf
Valentin, A., & Spangenberg, J. (1999). Indicators for sustainable communities international workshop ‘assessment methodologies for urban infrastructure, Stockholm.
WCED. (1987). Our common future (Brundtland report). World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford (UK) Oxford University Press.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implication for development theory, research and policy. The World Bank research observer.
_||_Atkinson, A., Hatcher, R. L., & Green, S. (2004). Introducing pyramid: Versatile process and planning tool for accelerating sustainable development. The natural advantage of nations. EA Books, Australia.
Badri, S. A., & Rukhuddin Eftekhari, A. (1997). Sustainability Assessment: Concept and Method. Geographical Research Quarterly(567), 1-34. (In Persian)
Bervar, M., & Bertoncelj, A. (2016, 1-4 June 2016). The five pillars of sustainability: Economic, Social, Environmental, Cultural and Security aspects Mic- management international conference, Pula,Croatia.
BinEli, M. (2005). Sustainability, the five core principle (a new framework). The cybersex consulting group. www.sustsainabilitylabs.org
Colantonio, A., & Lane, G. (2007). Measuring social sustainability: "Best practice from urban ranewel in the UE". 2007/01: EIBURS working paper Series. Institute for sustainable development (OISD) International land markets group, Oxford: Oxford brookes University.
Costanza, R., Wainger, L., C., F., & G., M. K. (1993). Modeling complex ecological economic systems: Toward an evolutionary, dynamic understanding of people and nature, In Ecosystem Management. Ecosystem Management, 148-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4018-1_15
Dawe, N. K., & Ryan, K. L. (2003). The faulty three ‐ legged ‐ stool model of sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 17(5), 1458-1460.
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130-141.
Hamedani, A. Z. (2014). Methodology and statistical analysis of sustainable transportation criteria for certification systems [Doctoral Dissertation, University ätsbibliothek Wuppertal].
Hansmann, R., Mieg, H. A., & P., F. (2012). Principal sustainability components: empirical analysis of synergies between the three pillars of sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(5), 451-459.
Kain, J. H. (2000). Urban support systems – social and technical, socio-technical or sociotechnical. Gothenburg.
Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: science and policy for sustainable development, 47(3), 8-21. https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/sustsci/ists/docs/whatisSD_env_kates_0504.pdf
Keiner, M. (2005). Re-emphasizing sustainable development—the concept of ‘Evolutionability’. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 6(4), 379-392. https://www.zef.de/uploads/tx_zefnews/a7b9_Keiner_Evolutionabilty.pdf
Lawn, P. A. (2000). Toward sustainable development: an ecological economics approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(17), 1838-1846.
Marin, D., & Todorovova, V. (2009). Models of sustainability 18th world IMACS/MoDSIM congress, Cairns, Australia.
Mieg, H. A. (2012). Sustainability and innovation in urban development: concept and case. Sustainable Development, 20(4), 251-263.
Neumayer, E. (2003). Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
OECD. (2001). Guidelines towards Environmentally Sustainable Transport. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Publications Service.
Scerri, A., & Paul, J. (2010). Accounting for sustainability: combining qualitative and quantities research in developing "indicators" of sustainability. International Journal of social research methodology, 13(1), 41-53.
Schoolman, E. D., Guest, J. S., Bush, K. F., & Bell, A. R. (2012). How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 67-80.
SEPA. (2002). What is sustainable development? S. E. P. Agency. http://www.sepa.org.uk/education/sustainable_development Scottish Environment Protection Agency
Spangenberg, J. H., & Bonniot, O. (1998). Sustainability indicators: a compass on the road towards sustainability. Wuppertal papers, 7(4), 1-34. https://epub.wupperinst.org/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/721/file/WP81.pdf
Stavins, R. N., Wagner, A. F., & Wagner, G. (2002). Interpreting sustainability in economic terms: dynamic efficiency plus intergenerational equity. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Thakshila Ruvini Herath, H. M., & Prabodha Subhashini Rathnayake, R. M. (2019). A Critical Approach towards Sustainable Development Models - A Review. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 7(9), 4-23.
Thatcher, A. V. a., pp. . . (2014). Theoretical definitions and models of sustainable development that apply to human factors and ergonomics 11th International Symposium on Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management and the 46th Annual Nordic Ergonomics Society Conference, Santa Monica, CA.
U.N.W.S. (2005). World Summit Outcome. United_Nations_World_Summit. http://www.unep.org/geo/GEO4/report/GEO-4_Report_Full_en.pdf
Valentin, A., & Spangenberg, J. (1999). Indicators for sustainable communities international workshop ‘assessment methodologies for urban infrastructure, Stockholm.
WCED. (1987). Our common future (Brundtland report). World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford (UK) Oxford University Press.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implication for development theory, research and policy. The World Bank research observer.