اثربخشی آموزش شادکامی به شیوه فوردایس بر بهزیستی ذهنی، تابآوری و خودکارآمدی اجتماعی در بستر فرهنگی زنان دارای همسر شهید
زهرا استکی
1
(
دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه روان شناسی، دانشکده شهید شهریاری، واحد نایین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نایین، ایران
)
فاطمه سادات طباطبایی نژاد
2
(
استادیار، گروه روان شناسی، دانشکده شهید شهریاری، واحد نایین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نایین، ایران
)
کلید واژه: آموزش شادکامی فوردایس, بهزیستی ذهنی, تابآوری, خودکارآمدی اجتماعی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش اثربخشی آموزش شادکامی به شیوه فوردایس بر بهزیستی ذهنی، تابآوری و خودکارآمدی اجتماعی در بستر فرهنگی همسران شهدا بود.. جامعه آماری این پژوهش تمامی زنان دارای همسر شهید شهر اصفهان در اردیبهشتماه سال 1403 بود. روش نمونهگیری هدفمند بود که از بین آنها 30 نفر انتخاب و به طور تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایش (15 نفر ) و کنترل(15 نفر) جایگزین شدند. روش پژوهش کاربردی و از نوع نیمه آزمایشی با طرح پیشآزمون – پسآزمون بود. برای گرداوری اطلاعات از مقیاس تاب آوری کانر و دیویدسون (2003)، مقیاس بهزیستی ذهنی کییز و ماگیارمو (2003) و پرسشنامه خودکارآمدی اسمیت و بتز (2007) استفاده شد. جلسات آموزشی شادکامی فوردایس بر روی گروه آزمایش طی 8 جلسه 60 دقیقهای اجرا شد. دادههای به دست آمده با استفاده از تحلیل کوواریانس چند متغیره و تک متغیره تجزیه و تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد که بین دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد (05/0≥p)؛ به عبارت دیگر آموزش شادکامی به شیوه فوردایس بر بهبود بهزیستی ذهنی، تابآوری و خودکارآمدی اجتماعی زنان دارای همسر شهید اثربخش بود. همچنین فرهنگ حاکم بر جامعه نیز میتواند بر روی مسائل روانشناختی زنان دارای همسر شهید تاثیرگذار باشد به گونهای كه چگونگي پيدايش و استمرار پدیدههای فرهنگی و اجتماعي، از جمله شهادت و الگو بودن وابسته به آن میباشد.
چکیده انگلیسی :
The aim of this research was to study the effectiveness of Fordyce's happiness training method on mental well-being, resilience and social self-efficacy at the cultural background of martyrs' wives. The statistical population of this research included all the wives of the martyrs of Isfahan city in May 2024. Thirty participants were selected by purposeful sampling procedure and randomly assigned in two experimental and control groups (15 indiviuals in each group). The current research was applied one in terms of purpose and semi-experimental method with a pre-test-post-test design was processed. Connor and Davidson (2003) Resilience Questionnaire, Keyes & Magyarmo (2003) Mental Well-being Scale, and Smith & Betz (2007) Self-efficacy Questionnaire were used to collect data. Fordyce's happiness training sessions were conducted on the experimental group during 10 sessions with 60-minutes duration. The obtained data were analyzed via multivariate and univariate covariance analysis. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the two experimental and control groups (p≤0.05); In other words, teaching happiness in Fordyce's way improved the mental well-being, resilience and social self-efficacy of martyrs' wives. Thus, the dominant culture of the society could also influence the psychological issues of the spouses of the martyrs, in such a way that the emergence and continuation of social phenomena, including martyrdom and being an epitome might depend on it.
Ali, R. A. (2020). Descriptive study of stresses in a sample of the wives of the martyrs in Lattakia city in the light of some variables. Tishreen University Journal-Arts and Humanities Sciences Series, 42(1),399-416. URL: https://journal.tishreen.edu.sy/index.php/humlitr/article/view/9444
Ayed, N., Toner, S., & Priebe, S. (2019). Conceptualizing resilience in adult mental health literature: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 92(3), 299-341. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12185
Bani Fatemeh, H., & Ahmadzadeh, H. (2016). Investigating factors affecting the quality of life of Shahid's wives in Tabriz. Socio-Cultural Changes, 13(2). URL: https://journals.iau.ir/article_528039.html
Benmoussa, G., & Maisha, B. (2021). Grieving and Resilience Factors for the Widow (er): Role Transition. In Fostering Resilience Before, During, and After Experiences of Trauma (pp. 149-169). Routledge. URL: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003150855-10/grieving-resilience-factors-widow-er-ghislaine-benmoussa-buuma-maisha
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor‐Davidson resilience scale (CD‐RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76-82. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
Datu, J. A. D., Wong, G. S. P., & Rubie-Davies, C. (2021). Can kindness promote media literacy skills, self-esteem, and social self-efficacy among selected female secondary school students? An intervention study. Computers & Education, 161, 104062. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104062
Ekrami, R., Ghamari, M., Jafari, A., & Aghapour, M. (2013). The effectiveness of group-based happiness training on psychological well-being and positive and negative emotions of housewives. Women and Family Studies, 6(22), 21-35. URL: https://sid.ir/paper/206315/fa
Eshaghi, L., & Nikrahan, G. (2018). The effectiveness of lyubomirsky happiness training on mental health, life satisfaction, life expectancy and happiness in Shahreza nursing home women. Journal of Gerontology, 3(1), 45-54. URL: http://joge.ir/article-1-200-en.html
Fayazi, M., Ayadi, N., Sadri, S., & Kasirloo, Y. (2019). The effectiveness of Fordyce's cognitive-behavioral happiness training on the psychological well-being and stress experienced by women with physical-motor disabilities. Rooyesh, 8(8), 17-24. URL: http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-1394-fa.html
Fordyce, M. W. (1997). Educating for happiness. Ravue Quebecoise Depsychology, 2(18), 239-252. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38650959
Fordyce, M. W. (1983). A program to increase happiness: Further studies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30(4), 483-498. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.30.4.483
Fordyce, M. W. (1988). A review of research on the happiness measures: A sixty second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20, 355-381. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302333
Ghadampour, A., Heydariani, L., & Barzegar Bafroei, M. (2018). The effectiveness of treatment based on improving the quality of life on the mental well-being, resilience and marital satisfaction of veterans' wives. Journal of Military Medicine, 21(1), 22-31. URL: https://www.sid.ir/paper/1201070/fa
Ghamari, M., Jian Bagheri, M., & Ahmadi, Z. (2018). The relationship between resilience and self-control with interpersonal forgiveness and the quality of life of martyrs' wives. Islamic Psychology, 4(9), 97-113. URL: http://noo.rs/tpLwu
Golestani Bakht, T. (2007). Providing a model for mental health and happiness in the population of Tehran. PhD thesis in psychology, al-Zahra University. URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Haranof, M. (2022). The effectiveness of teaching the Fordyce model of happiness on family functioning and social sufficiency of mothers with mentally retarded children in Arak city. Social Psychology, 10(65), 47-63. URL: https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23455098.1401.10.65.4.1
Khaledi, A., Cherami, M., Amadi, R., & Sharifi, T. (2022). Validation and Effectiveness of Women’s Psychological Empowerment Package on Resilience and Mental Health of Women with Veteran Husbands. Military Caring Sciences Journal, 9(3), 216-230. URL: http://mcs.ajaums.ac.ir/article-1-537-en.html
Keyes, C. L. M., & Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2003). The Measurement and Utility of Adult Subjective Well-Being. In S. J. Lopez, & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures (pp. 411-425). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/10612-026
Kohsari, Z., Shafie, S., & Azari, H. (2020). Social policies of Martyr Foundation from the point of view of martyrs' wives; Qualitative study. Political Sociology of Iran, 11, 244-268. URL: https://doi.org/10.30510/PSI.2020.215987.1108
Kotera, Y., Cockerill, V., Chircop, J., Kaluzeviciute, G., & Dyson, S. (2021). Predicting self-compassion in UK nursing students: Relationships with resilience, engagement, motivation, and mental wellbeing. Nurse Education in Practice, 51, 102989. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.102989
Leng, J., Guo, Q., Ma, B., Zhang, S., & Sun, P. (2020). Bridging personality and online prosocial behavior: The roles of empathy, moral identity, and social self-efficacy. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 575053. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575053
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Investing and developing positive organizational behavior. Positive organizational behavior, 1(2), 9-24. URL: https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=4912627&publisher=FZ7200#page=22
Mikaeili, N., & Rahimzadegan, S. (2020). The effect of cognitive-behavioral Fordyce happiness training on fatigue perception and sense of coherence in diabetic patients type 2. Rooyesh, 9 (9), 61-70. URL: http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-2100-fa.html
Mitchell, K. M., McMillan, D. E., Lobchuk, M. M., Nickel, N. C., Rabbani, R., & Li, J. (2021). Development and validation of the situated academic writing self-efficacy scale (SAWSES). Assessing Writing, 48, 100524. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100524
Mohammadi, M. (2005). Investigating factors affecting resilience in people at risk of drug abuse, PhD thesis, University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences. URL: https://japr.ut.ac.ir/article_91203.html
Mohammadi Niko, M., Rezapour Mirsaleh, Y., & Motaghi, Sh. (2022). An exploration of the lifestyle of the wives of the martyrs of the imposed war: a qualitative study. Scientific Quarterly of Sacred Defense Studies, 8(3), 157-183. URL: https://doi.org/20.1001.1.25883674.1401.8.3.7.4
Mokhtarian, P. L. (2019). Subjective well-being and travel: Retrospect and prospect. Transportation, 46(2), 493-513. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9935-y
Morris, E., Kubik-Huch, R. A., Abdel-Wahab, M., Balogun, E., Beardmore, C., Beets-Tan, R., ... & Hricak, H. (2020). Women in focus: advice from the front lines on how to enable well-being and build resilience. Insights Into Imaging, 11(1), 55. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00858-7
Roozitalab, A., Maredpour, A., & Taghvaeinia, A. (2022). The effect of education based on time perspective on psychological well-being, sense of meaning in life and vitality of spouses of martyrs and veterans. Journal of Psychological Sciences, 21(116), 1663-1678. URL: http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-1693-fa.html
Ruggeri, K., Garcia-Garzon, E., Maguire, Á., Matz, S., & Huppert, F. A. (2020). Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: a multidimensional analysis of 21 countries. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 1-16. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01423-y
Sadri, A. S., Khanjani, M. S., Younesi, S. J., & Nabati Saravan, E. (2021). Barriers of Adaptability with Spouse Death in Martyrs' Wives. Iranian Journal of War and Public Health, 13(1), 71-77. URL: http://ijwph.ir/article-1-961-en.html
Smith, H. M., & Betz, N. E. (2000). Development and validation of a scale of perceived social self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 8(3), 283-301. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/106907270000800306
Van Agteren, J., Iasiello, M., Lo, L., Bartholomaeus, J., Kopsaftis, Z., Carey, M., & Kyrios, M. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental wellbeing. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(5), 631-652. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01093-w
Weiss, L. A., Oude Voshaar, M. A., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Westerhof, G. J. (2020). The long and winding road to happiness: A randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of a positive psychology intervention for lonely people with health problems and a low socio-economic status. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18, 1-17. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01416-x
West, C. L., Dreeben, S. J., & Busing, K. (2021). The development of the widowhood resilience scale. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 83(4), 958-975. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228198734
Zare, M., Latifian, M., & Foladchang, M. (2014). Causal model of attachment dimensions and emotion regulation strategies mediated by social self-efficacy and self-disclosure. Social Psychology Research, 3(11), 13-32. URL: https://doi.org/10.22054/jpe.2020.44081.2014