رابطۀ درک رهبری اقتدارگرا و رفتارهای انحرافی کارکنان در محل کار با میانجیگری نقض قرارداد روانشناختی
محورهای موضوعی : تربیتیسید النجم الدین موسوی 1 , محسن عارف نژاد 2 , فریبرز فتحی چگنی 3 , مهدیه سپهوند 4
1 - دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران.
2 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران.
3 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران.
4 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران.
کلید واژه: رهبری اقتدارگرا, رفتارهای انحرافی کارکنان در محل کار, نقض قرارداد روانشناختی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش، بررسی رابطۀ درک رهبری اقتدارگرا و رفتارهای انحرافی کارکنان در محل کار با میانجیگری نقض قرارداد روانشناختی در کارکنان سازمان‌های دولتی استان لرستان بود. پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از لحاظ نوع تحقیق، رابطه‌ای و از نوع مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش تعداد 1317 نفر از کارکنان ادارات کل ستادی استان لرستان مستقر در شهر خرم‌آباد بودند، از این میان نمونه‌ای به تعداد 297 نفر به روش تصادفی طبقه‌ای از میان آن‌ها انتخاب گردید. برای سنجش متغیرهای پژوهش از پرسشنامۀ رهبری اقتدارگرا (Shu, Chiang & Lu, 2018)، پرسشنامۀ نقض قرارداد روانشناختی (Robinson & Morrison, 2000) و پرسشنامه رفتارهای انحرافی در محل کار (Bennett & Robinson, 2000) استفاده شده است. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزار Amos استفاده شده است. همچنین برای بررسی معنی‌داری اثر متغیر میانجی از آزمون سوبل به همراه آماره VIF که نشان‌دهندۀ شدت اثر غیرمستقیم از طریق متغیر میانجی است، استفاده شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان‌دهندۀ آن است که رهبری اقتدارگرا به‌صورت مستقیم با رفتارهای انحرافی و قرارداد روانشناختی رابطه مثبت و معنی‌داری دارد، همچنین نتایج نشان‌دهندۀ این بود که نقض قراردادهای روانشناختی، رابطۀ بین رهبری اقتدارگرا و رفتارهای انحرافی کارکنان را میانجیگری می‌کند (P<0/05).
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between authoritarian leadership and employees' deviant workplace behaviors in governmental organizations of Lorestan province, when the psychological contract violation has been considered as a mediating role. The statistical population of the study was 1317 employees of general staff of Lorestan province based in Khorramabad city. According to the Morgan table, a sample size of 297 was selected by stratified random sampling. In order to measure the variables of the research, the (Shu, Chiang and Lu’s, 2018) Authoritarian Leadership Questionnaire, (Morrison and Robinson’s, 2000), Psychological Contract Violation Questionnaire and the (Bennett and Robinson’s, 2000) Deviant Workplace Behaviors Questionnaire were used. For data analysis, structural equations modeling and Amos software have been used. Also, the Sobel test with the VIF statistic indicating the severity of the indirect effect through the mediator variable was used to evaluate the effect of the mediator variable. The results of the research show that authoritarian leadership has a positive and significant relationship with deviant behaviors and psychological contract violation directly, also The results showed that psychological contracts violation mediates the relationship between authoritarian leadership and employee deviant behaviors.
Alias, M., Mohd Rasdi, R., Ismail, M., & Abu Samah, B. (2013). Predictors of workplace deviant behaviour: HRD agenda for Malaysian support personnel. European Journal of Training and Development, 37 (2), 161–182.
Askari R, Sepaseh F, Tavazoe Z. (2016). Assesment of the Relationship between Organizational Silenceand Organizational Performance in Educational Hospitals Yazd University of Medical Sciences. The Journal of Toloo-e-behdasht, 15 (3), 22-29. [Persian]
Baghbanian, A., & Khammarnia, M. (2013). Evaluation of Workplace Deviant Behavior in Imam-Ali Hospital’s Staff: 2012 A Short Report. JRUMS. 12 (5), 399-408. [Persian]
Balogun, A. G., Esan, F.O., Ezeugwu, C. R., & Orifa, E. I. (2016). Mediating effect of job satisfaction on psychological contract breach and workplace deviance among police personnel. Practicum Psychologia, 6 (1), 14–31.
Chen, X.P., Eberly, M.B., Chiang, T.J., Farh, J.L. & Cheng, B.S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40 (3), 796-819.
Chiu, S., & Peng, J. (2008). The relationship between psychological contract breach and empoloyee deviance: The moderating role of hostile attributional style. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73 (3),426-433.
Christian, J. S., Ellis, P. J. (2014). The Crucial Role of Turnover Intentions in Transforming Moral Disengagement Into Deviant Behavior at Work. Jornal of Business Ethics, 119 (2),193–208.
Davis, R.C. (2018). Administrator Leadership Styles and Their Impact on School Nursing. NASN School Nurse, 33 (1),36-39.
Farh, J.L., Cheng, B.S., Chou, L.F. & Chu, X.P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In: A.S. Tsui, Y. Bian and L. Cheng eds. China’s domestic private firms: multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance. New York: Sharpe, 230–260.
Golparvar, M., Vaseghi, Z., & Ashja, A. (2104). Explaining the relationship between stress with alienation and deviant behaviors on the basis of the moderating role of cognitive attribution of causes of stress. Contemporary Psychology, 9(1), 71-82. [Persian]
Gu, J., Wang, G., Liu, H., Song, D., & He, C. (2018). Linking authoritarian leadership to employee creativity: The influences of leader–member exchange, team identification and power distance. Chinese Management Studies, 12 (2), 384-406.
Guo, L., Decoster, S., Babalola, M.T., Schutter, L.D., Garba, O.A., Riisla, K. (2018). Authoritarian leadership and employee creativity: The moderating role of psychological capital and the mediating role of fear and defensive silence. Journal of Business Research, 92, 219-230.
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-151.
Hongyu, N., Mingjian, Z., Qiang, L., & Liqun, W. (2012). Exploring relationship between authority leadership and organizational citizenship behavior in China. The role of collectivism. Chinese Management Studies, 6 (2), 231-244.
Jafari, S., Mohammadi, M., & Diyanati, M. (2016). The Impact of Coaching Violation and Psychological Contract on Employee Emotional Commitment and Job Commitment. Iranian journal of management sciences, 11(43), 135-152. [Persian]
Khaola, P., & Coldwell, D. (2019). Explaining how leadership and justice influence employee innovative behaviours. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 193-212.
Kiazad, K., Restubog, S. L. D., Zagenczyk, T. J., Kiewitz, C., & Tang, R. L. (2010). In pursuit of power: the role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 512–519.
Krischer, M. K., Penney, L. M., & Hunter, E.M. (2010). Can counterproductive work behaviors be productive? CWB as emotionfocused coping. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15 (2), 154-166.
Ku,T.H. (2011). How to improve organizational performance through learning and knowledge?, International Journal of Manpower,32(5),58-190.
Lapointe, E., Vandenberghe, C., & Boudrias, J. S. (2013). Psychological Contract Breach, Affective Commitment to Organization and Supervisor, and Newcomer Adjustment: A Three-wave Moderated Mediation Model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 528-538.
Latif, A., Baghoor, G.K.K., & Rasool, I. (2017). Authoritarian leadership and employees’ deviant workplace behaviors: Moderating role of benevolent leadership and mediating role of trust in leader. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 3, 331-350.
Levinson, H., Price, C.R., Munden, K.J., Mandl, H.J. & Solley, C.M. (1962). Men, Management and Mental Health. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Li, J., & Dai, L. (2015). A Review of Psychological Contract. Psychology, 6 (12), 1539-1544.
Malik, S., Bakri, N., Ajmal, M., & Malik, B. (2019). Impact of Breach of Psychological Contract on Workplace Deviant Behavior Moderating Role of Procedural Justice Among Employees of Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(2), 721–733.
Moayer Haghighi Fard, A., Yousefi, S., & Mirzadeh, A. (2011). Leadership Styles and its Consequences Based on Full Range Leadership Model. Police Organizational Development, 7(28), 11-27. [Persian]
Moghaddam, A., & Mahmoudi Meymand, M. (2018). The Effect of Organizational Cynicism on Tendency to Deviant Behaviours; the Moderating Role Leadership Style. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 27(89), 73-89. [Persian]
Ocel,. H. (2018). The Relations Between Authoritarian Leadership and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Role of Psychological Resilience. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Organization Management, 7 (1), 1-6.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. L. (2007). Behavioral outcomes of psychological contract breach in a non-western culture: the moderating role of equity sensitivity. British Journal of Management, 18 (4), 376–386.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: a multidimensional scaling study. Acad. Manage. J. 38, 555–572.
Shojaee, S. (2016). The Relationship between Psychological Contract Breach and Turnover Intention and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Emphasizing the Moderating Role of Power Distance. JMDP, 29 (2), 117-144. [Persian]
Shu, C.Y., Chiang, Y.H., Lu, C.H. (2018). Authoritarian leadership supervisor support and workers’ compulsory citizenship behavior. International Journal of Manpower, 39 (3), 468-485.
Vantilborgh, T., Bidee, J., Pepermans, R., Willems, J., Huybrechts, G., & Jegers, M. (2014). Effects of ideological and relational psychological contract breach and fulfilment on volunteers’ work effort. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23 (2), 217-230
Wang, A. C., Chiang, T. J., Tsai, C. Y., Lin, T. T., & Cheng, B. S. (2013). Gender makes the difference: the moderating role of leader gender on the relationship between leadership styles and subordinate performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122 (2), 101–113.
Wetzels, M., G., Schroder, C., & Van Oppen. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195.
_||_