نقش واسطه ای راهبردهای یادگیری در ارتباط بین خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و سبک های حل مسئله
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیسیروس حدادنیا 1 , ناصر جوکار 2 , زینب رحیم دشتی 3 , راضیه شیخ الاسلام 4
1 - دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی
2 - دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی
3 - دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی
4 - دانشگاه شیراز
کلید واژه: خودکارآمدی تحصیلی, سبک های حل مسئله, راهبردهای یادگیری,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش پیش بینی سبک های حل مسئله بر اساس خودکارآمدی تحصیلی با واسطه گری راهبردهای یادگیری می باشد. روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی می باشد. جامعه آماری، شامل کلیه دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی شیراز به تعداد 16436 نفر در سال 92-91 می باشد. روش نمونه گیری، تصادفی طبقه ای است. حجم نمونه شامل 377 نفر می باشد که بر اساس جدول مورگان انتخاب شدند. برای جمع آوری داده ها از سه پرسشنامه سبک های حل مساله(psi) ، راهبردهای یادگیری (M.S.Q.L) و خودکارآمدی تحصیلی دانشجویان (CASES) استفاده گردید. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از روش های آماری، ضریب همبستگی، تحلیل رگرسیون بارون و کنی و تحلیل مسیر و نرم افزارهای SPSSو AMOS5 استفاده شده است. نتایج بیانگر: 1. بین خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و سبک های حل مسئله رابطه مثبت و معنادار وجود دارد.2. بین خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و راهبردهای یادگیری رابطه مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد.3. راهبردهای یادگیری با کنترل خودکارآمدی تحصیلی، سبک های حل مسئله را پیش بینی می کند و راهبردهای شناختی از قدرت پیش بینی کننده بیشتری برخوردار است 4. نقش واسطه ای راهبردهای یادگیری را در ارتباط بین خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و سبک های حل مسئله مورد تایید قرار گرفت.
The purpose of this study was to anticipate the style of problem solving based on academic self-efficacy with mediation strategies for learning. Descriptive method of correlation type. The statistical population consists of all students study the Islamic Azad University of Shiraz to 16436 number people a year is 92-91. In this study, a random sampling method was used for the floor. The sample size included 377 students, which is based on random sampling and Morgan were selected. To collect data used from three styles of problem-solving inventory (psi), learning strategies (M.S.Q. L) and academic self-efficacy of college students (CASES). For the analysis of data used from statistical methods, regression analysis, correlation coefficient, Baron and Kenny and path analysis and AMOS5 & SPSS software. The results showed that: 1. the academic self-efficacy between students and problem-solving styles, there is a significant and positive relationship. 2. academic self-efficacy, learning strategies between the students and there is a significant and positive relationship. 3. academic self-efficacy, learning strategies with the control problem-solving styles have predicted cognitive strategies and of the power Predictor is more. 4. role model provided a learning strategies, in the relationship between self-efficacy and problem-solving styles gives approved.
-Alborzi, Sh. Samani, S. (1999). reviews and motivational beliefs and learning strategies on comparing between male and female students are quick-witted, Shiraz, city centres guidance Journal of social sciences and Humanities at the University of Shiraz, V. 15, N. 1 (29) PS: 18-3. [In Persian].
-Amini, Sh. (2003), examined the role of self-efficacy, self-regulation and self-esteem on academic achievement in junior high school, University of empirical science. Master's thesis. Tehran University of Teacher Education. [In Persian].
-Artino, A. R. (2008). Learning online: understanding academic success from a self-regulated learning perspective. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Connecticut University).
- Assadzadeh, H. (2009) the relationship between working memory capacity
And academic performance among students, No. 1, pp. 70-53. [In Persian].
-Babapour, Kh. (2008), the effectiveness of communication skills training on students ' problem-solving manner. The journal of Psychology University of Tabriz, (3) 10: 1-16. [ in Persian].
- Bradford, s.Bell. & steve, w. j. (2008). Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self- Regulatory processes, learning and adaptability. Journal of Applied psychology, 93(2):596-316.
-Bandura, A. (1997). Self- efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
-Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187-206.
-Bandura, Albert.) 2001(. Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University.
-Bandura,A. (2002). social cognitive theory in cultural context.applied psychology an international review.51(2).269-289.
-Bembenutty , H. (2010). self-regulation of learning and Academic delay of gratification: gender and ethnic Difference among college students, journal of Advanced Academics v18 n4 p586-616.
-Borell, john. (1995). Working to word student self- direction and personal efficiency as educational goals, review of educational research, 64, 201-252.
-Borkowski, j. G. & Rellinger, M, G. & Riessleg, m,j (1990). Self- regulated cognition: interference of met cognition, attribution, and self-esteem. Dimension of thinking.
-Bouffard, Bouchard ,therese ,parent ,sophie and laviree. (2002). self-regulation on a concept – formation task among average and gated student, excremental child psychology .v56, Issue 1.p, 115-134.
-Cassidy, T. (2009). Bullying and victimization in school children: The role of social identify, problem-solving style, and familial and school context. Social psychology of Education, 12, 63-76.
-Cassidy, T., & Long, C. (1996). Problem – solving style, stress, and psychological illness: Development of a multifactorial measure. British journal of Clinical psychology, 35, 265 – 277.
-Chemers , M. Garcia ,F .B & Litzhel (2001).academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment .journal of educational psychology.93(1).55-64. [In Persian].
-Fouladvand, KH. Farzad, O. Shhrarai, M. Sangri, a. a. (2009), the effects of social support, coping strategies, stress education and education on mental health 4 (2) 143-8, pp 25-27. [In Persian].
-Garcia, T. & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: the role of self –schemas and self- regulatory strategies .In D.H.Schunk and B.H. Zimmenman (Eds.), self –Regulation on learning and performance: Issues and Applications (pp. 132-157). NI, Hillsdale, (awrence Erlbaum Associates).
-Haffman, B., & Spatariu, A. (2008). The influence of self- efficacy and met cognitive promoting on math problem solving efficiency. Contemporary educational psychology.33 (4):875-893.
- Hae. deok & song (2001). The effected of met cognition strategy instruction types and locus of control on the elaborative learning strategy utilization in Korean elementary school students American. Educational Research journal, 34, 174-206.
-Hejazi, E. Kyamnsh, AR. (2007), role Self-efficacy, achievement goals, learning strategies and stability in academic achievement in mathematics, Journal of educational innovation, the fifth year, Summer 86, No. 16.
-Heppner, P. P., vie Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78 (2), 197:226.
-Hrgenan, A. (2006). An introduction to theories of learning. Translate p. Saif. Tehran: Doran.
-Karademas, E. C. & Kalantiz, A. A. (2003). the stress process, self –efficacy expectation and psychological health. Personality and individual differences. Retraced November.17.2005. [In Persian].
-Karimi, f. salarifar, M. H. (2009). A comparison of the growth of cognitive science classes that student of different educational courses and local problem-solving mathematics. Journal of psychological science, 3 (9). pp. 65-50. [In Persian].
-King. A. (2003). Reciprocal peer questioning .clear house .Pp 131-136.
-Kjbaf, M. ; Maulvi ,H ; Ali, S. (2003) the relationship between motivational beliefs and self-regulatory strategies learning and academic performance among high school students, new Journal of Cognitive Science, Year 5, No. 1.
-Owen, S. V., & Froman, R. D. (1988). Development of a college academic self-efficacy scale. Paper presented at the 1998 annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.
-Pajares, F. Schunk, D .H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self – efficacy-concept and school achievement international perspective on individual differences.
-Pajares , F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into practice, 41(2), 116-125.
-Perfect, j. t., &Schwartz, b.l. (2004).applied met cognition. Cambridge University.
-Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
-Pintrich, p. r. (2007). motivational and self-regulation learning components of classroom Academic performance, journal international psychology, v82, pp33-40.
-Rashidi, L. (1999). Cognition, Journal of the Amouze, number 7. [In Persian].
-Rio, M. (2005). the impulse and excitement. Translate Yahya Syed Mohammed, (2007). Tehran: arasbaran.
-Safari, Y. M. Johnny, S. (2011). The use of met cognitive strategies on students' experiences and their relationship with their achievement level Journal of new approach in educational management, Marvdasht Islamic Azad University, Second Year, Fall 90, pp: 56-41. [In Persian].
-Saif, A .(2012). Modern Educational Psychology, Tehran: Publication: Doran, pp 284-290. [In Persian].
-Samadi, m. (2002). Metacognitive knowledge and problem-solving in students: the role of gender and educational performance, Journal of cognitive science, new year 4, issue 3-143-15. P. 94.
-Samadi, m. (2008). Reviews the impact of the teacher in the classroom text suck opened on the mathematical problem solving of students the journal of educational thought, modern psychology and Pedagogical University, alzahra University. V. 4. N: 4, Pp; 137-153. [In Persian].
-Scharf, E. M, Baldwin, L. P. (2007). Assessing multiple choice question mathematical perspective active learning in higher education, 71. pp31- 47.
-Schleifer, L. F. & DULL, R. B. (2009). Met cognition and performance in the accounting classroom. Issues in accounting education. 24 (3): 339-367.
-Seif, a. a. (2010) rearing Psychology (psychology of learning and teaching), Sixth Edition, and Tehran: Institute for nshrdoran; p: 372.
-Semrud, G, clikemen, H. (2006). neuropsychological aspects for evaluating disabilities, 38. Pp563-568.
-Skitka, L. J. (2002). Do the means justify the ends, or do the ends justify the means? Value protection model of justice. Reasoning personality and social psychology bulletin. 28:452-461.
-Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational psychology. prentice–hall, International .pp 246-253.
-Talebzadegan, M. (2008). A study of effective factors on academic achievement of successful students, the education research of the Khuzestan province. [In Persian].
-Treffinger, D. J. Selby, E. C. & Isaksen, S. G. (2008). Understanding individual problem-solving style: A key to learning and applying Creative Problem Solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 390 -401.
-Vermunt, J. D. and Y. Vermetten. (2004). patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational psychology Review 16; 2004. No. 4: 359-84.
-William, M & Karl holy, (2005), Model for improving science teaching for students with visual impairments,R,E,37 number 25 summer (2005) available on line <www.ebscoo.com psy. Rep/.
-Wollfolk, A.E, (2006). Beyond words: The influence of teachers’ nonverbal behaviors on students’ perceptions and performances, Elementary School Journal, 85, 513- 528.
-Zare, H . Mohammadi, N .(2011) The effect of met cognitive training in solving math problems for students, Journal of the new approach in educational management,, Marvdasht Islamic Azad University, Second Year, Fall 90, pp.161- 176. [In Persian].
-Zarei, H. A. Marandi, A. (2011). The learning and communication strategies for essay-style problem solving with the academic progress of students. The journal of educational sciences, in branch. Year 6, number 3. Summer 2011. Pp. 109-128. [In Persian].
-Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp.202-231). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-Zulkipy, N., raduan kabit, M. abd ghani, K., & Hidaya Abas, N.A. (2008). Metacognition: wath roles does it play in students’ academic performance? The fifteenth international conference on learning. University of Illinois. chicago, usa, 3-6 june.