Optimal Site Selection for Construction Waste Disposal in Yazd City-Iran Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and GIS Tools
Subject Areas : EnvironmentMohammad Hassanzadeh Nafooti 1 , Mohammadreza Mirjalili 2
1 - Assistant Professor, Department of Natural Resources, Meybod Branch, Islamic Azad University, Meybod, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Environment, Meybod Branch, Islamic Azad University, Meybod, Iran
Keywords: Construction Waste Management, Landfill Site Selection, Geographical Information Systems (GIS), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),
Abstract :
Background and objective: Construction waste management is a critical concern for urban development, particularly in rapidly growing cities like Yazd, where improper disposal poses significant environmental and health risks. Identifying suitable locations for construction waste landfills, while considering environmental, social, and logistical criteria, is essential for sustainable urban planning. This study aimed to use Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify the most suitable sites for construction waste disposal in Yazd, based on key criteria such as proximity to population centers, water resources, and transportation networks. Materials and methods: A comprehensive multi-criteria evaluation was conducted by integrating spatial data with expert opinions using GIS and AHP techniques. Several key factors, including proximity to population centers, water bodies, access networks, wind direction, and land use, were considered. A pair-wise comparison matrix was developed to assign relative weights to these factors based on their importance, and a suitability map was generated to identify the optimal landfill locations. The study area was then divided into different zones, categorized based on their level of suitability for waste disposal. Results and conclusion: The final land suitability map identified three main sites, with Site 1 (44.39 hectares in the northeast) emerging as the most suitable location for a new landfill, given its favorable wind direction, distance from population centers, and stable land features. Site 2 (21.17 hectares) and Site 3 (20.6 hectares) were also identified as viable alternatives. The analysis of existing waste disposal sites revealed that the site near Azadegan Road has better suitability, while the Faqih Khorasani Boulevard site was deemed unsuitable. The results demonstrate the efficacy of GIS and AHP in facilitating informed decision-making for sustainable waste management in urban areas.
Aghad, M., Manaouch, M., Sadiki, M., Pham, Q. B., & Al Karkouri, J. (2024). Integrating fuzzy-AHP and GIS for solid waste disposal site selection in Kenitra province, NW Morocco. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(6), 537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12711-1
Ali, A., Hadeed, M. Z., Safavi, S., & Ahmad, M. (2024). Leveraging GIS for Environmental Planning and Management. In Global Challenges for the Environment and Climate Change (pp. 308-331). IGI Global. 10.4018/979-8-3693-2845-3.ch016
Ansari, M., & Ehrampoush, M. H. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of construction and demolition waste in Yazd city, Iran. Data in brief, 21, 2622-2626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.141
Chabok, M., Asakereh, A., Bahrami, H., & Jaafarzadeh, N. O. (2020). Selection of MSW landfill site by fuzzy-AHP approach combined with GIS: Case study in Ahvaz, Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08395-y
Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International journal of construction management, 19(5), 436-452.
Derin, P., Yeşilnacar, M. İ., & Çullu, M. A. (2020). A study on evaluation of site selection in sanitary landfill with regard to urban growth. Environmental Research and Technology, 4(2), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.841200
de Magalhães, R. F., Danilevicz, Â. D. M. F., & Saurin, T. A. (2017). Reducing construction waste: A study of urban infrastructure projects. Waste management, 67, 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.025
Elkhrachy, I., Alhamami, A., & Alyami, S. H. (2023). Landfill Site Selection Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Remote Sensing Data, and Geographic Information System Tools in Najran City, Saudi Arabia. Remote Sensing, 15(15), 3754. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15153754
Feng, J. (2022). An integrated multi-criteria decision-making method for hazardous waste disposal site selection. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(6), 8039-8070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01772-8
Ghazifard, A., Nikoobakht, S., & Azarafza, M. (2016). Municipal waste landfill site selection based on environmental, geological and geotechnical multi-criteria: A case Study. Iranian Journal of Environmental Technology, 2(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.22108/ijet.2018.107396.1003
Gilvari, S., Mazloumi Bajestani, A., Kashfi, S. A., & Sarsangi Aliabad, A. (2019). The Need for Environmental Assessment and Field Surveys in Landfill Location Studies (Case Study: Yazd City). Journal of Radar and Optical Remote Sensing and GIS, 2(3.4), 34-48.
Mallick, J. (2021). Municipal solid waste landfill site selection based on fuzzy-AHP and geoinformation techniques in Asir Region Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 13(3), 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031538
Morakabatchian, M., Almodaressi, S. A., Barzegar, M. R., & Mokhtari, M. (2017). Optimization of Waste Collection System Using Underground Containers with Source Separation Plan (Case Study: District 3 of Yazd Municipality, Iran). Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development, 2(4), 422-431.
Muhwezi, L., Kiberu, F., Kyakula, M., & Batambuze, A. O. (2012). An assessment of the impact of construction activities on the environment in Uganda: A case study of Iganga municipality. Journal of construction Engineering and Project Management, 2(4), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.6106/JCEPM.2012.2.4.020
Kang, Y. O., Yabar, H., Mizunoya, T., & Higano, Y. (2024). Optimal landfill site selection using arcgis multi-criteria decision-making (mcdm) and analytic hierarchy process (ahp) for kinshasa city. Environmental Challenges, 14, 100826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100826
Khodaparast, M., Rajabi, A. M., & Edalat, A. (2018). Municipal solid waste landfill siting by using GIS and analytical hierarchy process (AHP): a case study in Qom city, Iran. Environmental earth sciences, 77, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7215-3
Rahmat, Z. G., Niri, M. V., Alavi, N., Goudarzi, G., Babaei, A. A., Baboli, Z., & Hosseinzadeh, M. (2017). Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21, 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0296-9
Sharma, N., Kalbar, P. P., & Salman, M. (2022). Global review of circular economy and life cycle thinking in building Demolition Waste Management: A way ahead for India. Building and Environment, 222, 109413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109413
Stemn, E., & Kumi-Boateng, B. (2019). Hazardous waste landfill site selection in Western Ghana: An integration of multi-criteria decision analysis and geographic information system. Waste Management & Research, 37(7), 723-736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X19854530
Tafti, M. D., Monavari, S. M., Dehabadi, A. M., & Karbassi, A. (2024). Location of a municipal solid waste landfill using COCOSO, MAIRCA, MARCOS, and geographic information system (case study: Yazd). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3899390/v1
Thill, J. C. (Ed.). (2019). Spatial multicriteria decision making and analysis: a geographic information sciences approach. Routledge.
Ugwuanyi, R., & Isife, T. (2012). Urbanization and solid waste management challenges in Nigeria. Technoscience Review, 3(1/2), 13-26.
Yalcinkaya, S., & Kirtiloglu, O. S. (2021). Application of a geographic information system-based fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model to locate potential municipal solid waste incineration plant sites: A case study of Izmir Metropolitan Municipality. Waste Management & Research, 39(1), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20939636