The Frayer Model Effectiveness in the LSP Vocabulary Development: The Case of English for Iranian Computer Sciences Majors

Subject Areas : Applied Linguistics

Mahmoud Jafarie ¹ , Hossein Heidari Tabrizi ²

1 - English Department, Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) BranchIsfahan, Iran
2 - English Department, Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) BranchIsfahan, Iran

Received: 2022-05-30 Accepted : 2022-07-26 Published : 2022-12-01

Keywords: vocabulary learning, یادگیری واژگان, English for Specific Purposes, graphic organizer, انگلیسی برای اهداف ویژه, Frayer model, Language for Specific Purposes, زبان برای اهداف ویژه, سامان‌بخش گرافیکی, مدل فرایر,

Abstract :

This study was intended to investigate the application of the Frayer model to teaching vocabulary to language for specific purposes students. It employed quasi-experimental control group posttest-only design. As its requirement, two intact classes of Iranian undergraduate computer sciences majors—having taken language for specific purposes course—were selected in a convenience sampling fashion (#62 students). They were assigned to two groups: control and experimental. In a twelve-week treatment period, the experimental group was taught some words present in content area texts using the Frayer model charts along with other words using textbook procedure. To be more precise, they were trained how to organize their understanding of words graphically—the words chosen from their English for specific purposes textbook, i.e., English for computer engineering. In contrast to the experimental group, the control group received instruction in vocabulary learning following just textbook procedure. At the end of the term, an identical vocabulary achievement posttest was administered to both groups. The probable effectiveness of the Frayer model application in learning vocabulary words was statistically computed through independent samples t-test procedure. The results showed that Frayer model had significantly affected the experimental English for specific purposes students’ vocabulary gain. As a result, they outperformed the normal English for specific purposes students in vocabulary learning. It is implied that the practitioners in this area can transgress the textual mode routines of vocabulary learning: they can take advantages of graphically organizing tools such as the Frayer model for the enhancement of vocabulary learning.

References:

Allen, V. F. (1983). Techniques in teaching vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, R. C. & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Anderson, R. & Nagy, W. (1991). Word meanings. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (vol. 2) (pp. 690–724). New York: Longman.

Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Washington, DC: The National Institute for Literacy.

Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press.

Bos, C., & Anders, P. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior high learning-disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(1), 31–42.

Buehl, D. (2001). Classroom strategies for interactive learning (2nd Ed.). Newark, De: International Reading Association.

Buran, A. & Filyukov, A. (2015). Mind mapping technique in language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 215 – 218.

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Cohen, V. & Cowen, J. (2007). Literacy for children in an information age: Teaching reading, writing, and thinking. Cengage Learning.

Cronbach, L. J. (1942). Measuring knowledge of precise word meaning. The Journal of Educational Research, 36(7), 528–534.

Dazzeo, R. & Rao, K. (2020). Digital Frayer model: Supporting vocabulary acquisition with technology and UDL. Teaching Exceptional Children, 53(1), 34–42.

Decarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd ed.). London: Thomson Learning.

Frayer, D., Frederick, W. C., & Klausmeier, H. J. (1969). A schema for testing the level of cognitive mastery. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Pica, T. (1998). The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 299-307.

Ghezelseflou, M. & Seyyedrezaei, S. H. (2015). The effect of teaching vocabulary through collocations on the vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL students. Journal of Language Sciences & Linguistics, 3(1), 9-16.

Graves, M.  (1985). A word is a word…Or is it?  New York: Scholastic.

Greenwood, S. (2002). Making words matter: Vocabulary study in the content areas. The Clearing House, 75(5), 258-263.

Gu, Y. (2010). Learning strategies for vocabulary development. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 9(2), 105-118.

Hamada, L. (2014). Math vocabulary instruction in an inclusive classroom 1 direct instruction and the Frayer model: Effects on mathematics achievement in an inclusive classroom. (Unpublished master thesis). Southwest State University Marshall, Minnesota.

Hatch, E. & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a clockwork orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(2), 207-223.

İlter, İ. (2015). The investigation of the effects of Frayer model on vocabulary knowledge in social studies. Elementary Education Online, 14(3), 106-112.    

Ishizuka, H. (2000). Goichishikino fukasato speakingnouryokuno soukan [Correlations between depth of vocabulary knowledge and speaking ability]. STEP Bulletin, 12, 13-25.

Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 285-299.

Lane, H & Allen, S. A. (2010). The vocabulary-rich classroom: Modeling sophisticated word use to promote word consciousness and vocabulary growth. The Reading Teacher 63(5), 362-370. DOI:10.1598/RT.63.5.2

Laufer, B. (1994). The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time? RELC Journal, 25(2), 21-33.

Laufer, B. & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54(3), 399-436.

Laufer, B. & Paribakht, T. S. (1998). The relationship between passive and active vocabulary: Effects of language learning context. Language Learning, 48(3), 365-391.

Lawson, M. J. & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary learning strategies of foreign language students. Language learning, 46(1), 101-135.

Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. London: Language Teaching Publications.

Loretta. F. (2008). The image of Daniel: An ancient graphic organizer. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 17(2), 217-224.

Monroe, E. E. & Pendergrass, M. (1997). Effects of mathematical vocabulary instruction on fourth grade students. Reading Improvement, 34(3), 120-132.

Nahampun, E. E. (2014). The effect of using Frayer model on students’ vocabulary mastery.  Journal of Applied Linguistics of FBS Unimed, 3(1), 22-36.  

Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nessel, D. & Graham, J. (2007). Thinking strategies for student achievement: Improving learning across the curriculum, K-12 (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

O’Donnell, A. M. (1993). Searching for information in knowledge maps and texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 222-239.

Palmer, J., Boon, R. T., & Spencer, V. G. (2014). Effects of concept mapping instruction on the vocabulary acquisition skills of seventh graders with mild disabilities: A replication study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(2), 165–182.

Pang, Y. (2013). Graphic organizers and other visual strategies to improve young ELL’s reading comprehension. New England Reading Association Journal, 48(2), 52-58.

Pavicic, T. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language acquisition. Clevedon: Cromwell.

Peters, C. (1974). A comparison between the Frayer model of concept attainment and the textbook approach of concept attainment. Reading Research Quarterly, 10(2), 252-254.

Putra, N. S. P., Padmadewi, N.N., & Budiarta, L. G. R. (2022). The effect of Mindmeister in teaching English vocabulary to young learner. International Journal of Latest Research in Humanities and Social Science, 5(1), 88-98.

Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading comprehension: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536.

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89.

Robb, L. (2000). Teaching reading in middle school. New York: Scholastic.

Ropič, M. & Aberšek, M. (2012). Web graphic organizers as an advanced strategy for teaching science textbook reading comprehension. Problems of Education 21st Century, 41, 87-99.

Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 589–619.

Sam, D. P. & Rajan, P. (2013). Using graphic organizers to improve reading comprehension skills for the middle school ESL students. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 155-170.

Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Schwartz, R. M. & Raphael, T. E. (1985). Concept of definition: A key to improving students’ vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 39(2), 198-205.

Sullivan, M. T. (2014). Using adapted Frayer model as graphic organizer for graph vocabulary. In N. Sonda & A. Krause (Eds.), JALT2013 Conference Proceedings (pp. 55-83). Tokyo: JALT.

Teichroew, F. J. (1982). Receptive versus productive vocabulary: A survey. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 6(2), 5–33.

Vaughn, S., Bos, C. S., & Schumm, J. S. (2007). Teaching students who are exceptional, diverse, and at risk (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Wang, X. & Dostal, J. (2018). Using a mind map to learn English vocabulary. 2^nd International Conference on Education and E-Learning, Bali, Indonesia.

Wesche, M. & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13-40.

Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.

Yousefkhani, M., Ayat, N., & Farrahi, A. (2007). English for computer engineering. Tehran: PNU Publications.