• صفحه اصلی
  • بررسی پایداری مناطق مختلف شهرکرمانشاه با رویکرد توسعه پایدار

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : JEST-1609-2987 (R1) بازدید : 67 صفحه: 261 - 279

10.22034/jest.2021.20823.2987

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

بررسی پایداری مناطق مختلف شهرکرمانشاه با رویکرد توسعه پایدار

محورهای موضوعی : توسعه پایدار

سمیه زینتی زاده 1 (دکتری دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، گروه محیط زیست، تهران، ایران.)
آییژ عزمی 2 (استادیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه رازی، گروه جغرافیا، کرمانشاه، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات))
سید مسعود منوری 3 (دانشیار، گروه علوم محیطزیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیطزیست، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران)
سهیل سبحان اردکانی 4 (دانشیار گروه محیط زیست، دانشکدة علوم پایه، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1395/06/23 تاریخ پذیرش : 1397/07/07 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/08/01

کلید واژه: کرمانشاه, توسعه پایدار, Shannon's entropy,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: توسعه پایدار تعادل بین ابعاد مختلف اقتصادی، اجتماعی و زیست محیطی است که هدف آن بهبود شرایط کیفی زندگی انسان می باشد. هدف از این پژوهش، بررسی مناطق شش گانه شهر کرمانشاه بر پایه شاخص های توسعه پایدار شهری می باشد. روش بررسی: نوع تحقیق کاربردی و روش بررسی آن توصیفی- تحلیلی است. در این مطالعه سطح توسعه یافتگی مناطق مختلف شهرکرمانشاه با استفاده از سه روش SAW، ELECTRE و TOPSIS در تلفیق با روشShannon's entropy و با بهره گیری از 44 شاخص موثر در توسعه پایدار شهری و در نرم افزارهای Electre, Topsis, Excel, Shannon's entropy, Spss در سال 1396 مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. یافته ها: نتایج این مطالعه حاکی از آن است که در هر سه روش به کار برده شده، مناطق 4 و 1 از پایداری بالاتری برخوردار بوده اند. در حالی که مناطق 3 و 2 پایداری متوسط و مناطق 5 و 6 پایداری کمتری را نشان داده اند. نتایج حاصل از آزمون فریدمن نیز نشان می دهد که در رتبه بندی مناطق شهری، تفاوت معنی داری بین سه مدل به کار برده شده وجود ندارد. بحث و نتیجه گیری: با توجه به نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش، میزان برخورداری مناطق مختلف از خدمات و امکانات شهری به صورت یکسان نمی باشد. بنابراین برقراری ارتباط هماهنگ بین شش منطقه شهر کرمانشاه برای نیل به توسعه پایدار ضروری به نظر می رسد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: sustainable development is the balance between various economic, social and environmental aspects which aims at improving the quality of human life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the six different areas of Kermanshah city based on urban sustainable development indicators. Method: The research is applied and its method is descriptive-analytical. The level of development of different areas of Kermanshah has been studied using three methods, SAW, ELECTRE and TOPSIS in conjunction with Shannon's entropy and enjoying 44 effective indices in sustainable urban development as well as ELECTRE, TOPSIS, Excel, Shannon's entropy, SPSS soft wares. Findings: The results of this study indicate that in all three methods, 1 and 4 districts showed a higher stability. While areas 2 and 3 had an average sustainability and areas 5 and 6 showed less sustainability. Friedman's test results show that there is no significant difference among the three models in ranking the urban areas. Discussion and Conclusion: Given the results of this study, the level of urban services and amenities is not the same in different areas. So establishing a harmonious relationship among the six areas of Kermanshah to achieve sustainable development seems necessary.

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Varol, C., Ercoskun, O., Gurer. Y., 2010. Local participatory mechanisms and collective actions for sustainable urban development in Turkey. Habitat International, 35(1), 9-16.
    2.
  2. Connelly, S., 2007. Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept. Local Environment, 12 (3), 259–278.
    3.
  3. Oliver, P. A., 2008. City Leadership: at the heart of the global challenge. Global Asia, 3(16), 421-432.
    4.
  4. Khazaei, M., Razavian, M.T., 2013. Sustainable Urban Development (an innovative approach in the development of cities around the world). International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4 (6),1543-1547.
    5.
  5. Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Badarulzaman, N., Jaafar, M., 2011. Achievement to Sustainable Urban Development using City Development Strategies: A Comparison between Cities Alliance and the World Bank definitions. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4 (5),151-166.
    6.
  6. Taghvaei, Massoud, "Sustainable urban development and the factors affecting it (Case study: Kermanshah) in 1392", Urban Sociological Studies, Volume 3, Number 6, 1-22. (In Persian)
    7.
  7. Rotmansa, J., Asselt, M. v., Vellinga, P., 2000. An integrated planning tool for sustainable cities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 265-276.
    8.
  8. Willis, M., 2006. Sustainability, the Issue of our Age, and A concern for local government. Public Management, 88 (7), 5-12.
    9.
  9. Maleki, Saeed, "Evaluation of Sustainable Urban Development Indicators with Emphasis on Social, Physical and Urban Services Indicators (Case Study: Eight Areas of Ahvaz) in 2013", Quarterly Journal of Urban Planning Studies, Volume 1, Number 3 , 29-54. (In Persian)
    10.
  10. Laghai, Hassan Ali et al., "Introduction to the concept of sustainable urban development and the role of urban planning in 2008", Journal of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, No. 6.32-43. (In Persian)
    11.
  11. Whitehead, M., 2003. (Re) Analyzing the Sustainable City: Nature, Urbanization and the Regulation of Socio-environmental Relations in the UK. Urban Studies, 40,1183-1206.
    12.
  12. Jansen, L., 2003. The challenge of sustainable development. Journal of cleaner production, 1 (3),231-154.
    13.
  13. Berke, P. R., Conroy, M. M., 2000. Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. APA journal, 66 (1), 21-28.
    14.
  14. Poor Gholam, Hadi, "Sustainable Urban Management and Development", 8th Conference on Architecture, Urban Planning and Sustainable Development, Khavaran Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, 2013, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian)
    15.
  15. Nasiri, Hossein, "Sustainable Development of the Third World Vision", Farhang va Andisheh Publications, 2000. (In Persian)
    16.
  16. Bolay, J., Yves, P., Rabinovich, A., Catenazi, A., Carlos Garcı´a Pleya´n. 2005. Urban environment Spatial Fragmentation and Social Segregation in Latin America: Where Does Innovation Lie. Habitat International, 29, 627-645.
    17.
  17. Mubaraki, Omid, "Analysis of the hierarchy of Urmia city areas based on indicators of sustainable urban development in 1392", Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, Volume 13, Number 30, 49-65. (In Persian)
    18.
  18. Wang, L., Wang, Y. N., 2012. The Sustainability Evaluation of Weifang Urban Area. Advanced Materials Research, 616-618,1285-1291.
    19.
  19. Sen, N., Ghosh, A., Saha, A., Karmaker, B.R., 2014. Sustainability status of Indian states: Application and assessment of MCDM frameworks. IEEE, 85-87.
    20.
  20. Zarrabi, A., 2014. A study on the social sustainability using Factor analysis case study: Tehran province. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 3 (4), 88-97.
    21.
  21. Maleki, Saeed, "Ranking of urban areas in terms of sustainable development indicators using factor analysis and taxonomy methods (Ilam city) in 2009", Journal of Geography and Regional Development, No. 80, 13-45. (In Persian)
    22.
  22. Mohammad Moradi, Asghar et al., "Methodology of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Models in 2009", Armanshahr Magazine, No. 2,113-125. (In Persian)
    23.

 

 

_||_

  1. Varol, C., Ercoskun, O., Gurer. Y., 2010. Local participatory mechanisms and collective actions for sustainable urban development in Turkey. Habitat International, 35(1), 9-16.
    2.
  2. Connelly, S., 2007. Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept. Local Environment, 12 (3), 259–278.
    3.
  3. Oliver, P. A., 2008. City Leadership: at the heart of the global challenge. Global Asia, 3(16), 421-432.
    4.
  4. Khazaei, M., Razavian, M.T., 2013. Sustainable Urban Development (an innovative approach in the development of cities around the world). International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4 (6),1543-1547.
    5.
  5. Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Badarulzaman, N., Jaafar, M., 2011. Achievement to Sustainable Urban Development using City Development Strategies: A Comparison between Cities Alliance and the World Bank definitions. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4 (5),151-166.
    6.
  6. Taghvaei, Massoud, "Sustainable urban development and the factors affecting it (Case study: Kermanshah) in 1392", Urban Sociological Studies, Volume 3, Number 6, 1-22. (In Persian)
    7.
  7. Rotmansa, J., Asselt, M. v., Vellinga, P., 2000. An integrated planning tool for sustainable cities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 265-276.
    8.
  8. Willis, M., 2006. Sustainability, the Issue of our Age, and A concern for local government. Public Management, 88 (7), 5-12.
    9.
  9. Maleki, Saeed, "Evaluation of Sustainable Urban Development Indicators with Emphasis on Social, Physical and Urban Services Indicators (Case Study: Eight Areas of Ahvaz) in 2013", Quarterly Journal of Urban Planning Studies, Volume 1, Number 3 , 29-54. (In Persian)
    10.
  10. Laghai, Hassan Ali et al., "Introduction to the concept of sustainable urban development and the role of urban planning in 2008", Journal of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, No. 6.32-43. (In Persian)
    11.
  11. Whitehead, M., 2003. (Re) Analyzing the Sustainable City: Nature, Urbanization and the Regulation of Socio-environmental Relations in the UK. Urban Studies, 40,1183-1206.
    12.
  12. Jansen, L., 2003. The challenge of sustainable development. Journal of cleaner production, 1 (3),231-154.
    13.
  13. Berke, P. R., Conroy, M. M., 2000. Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. APA journal, 66 (1), 21-28.
    14.
  14. Poor Gholam, Hadi, "Sustainable Urban Management and Development", 8th Conference on Architecture, Urban Planning and Sustainable Development, Khavaran Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, 2013, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian)
    15.
  15. Nasiri, Hossein, "Sustainable Development of the Third World Vision", Farhang va Andisheh Publications, 2000. (In Persian)
    16.
  16. Bolay, J., Yves, P., Rabinovich, A., Catenazi, A., Carlos Garcı´a Pleya´n. 2005. Urban environment Spatial Fragmentation and Social Segregation in Latin America: Where Does Innovation Lie. Habitat International, 29, 627-645.
    17.
  17. Mubaraki, Omid, "Analysis of the hierarchy of Urmia city areas based on indicators of sustainable urban development in 1392", Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, Volume 13, Number 30, 49-65. (In Persian)
    18.
  18. Wang, L., Wang, Y. N., 2012. The Sustainability Evaluation of Weifang Urban Area. Advanced Materials Research, 616-618,1285-1291.
    19.
  19. Sen, N., Ghosh, A., Saha, A., Karmaker, B.R., 2014. Sustainability status of Indian states: Application and assessment of MCDM frameworks. IEEE, 85-87.
    20.
  20. Zarrabi, A., 2014. A study on the social sustainability using Factor analysis case study: Tehran province. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 3 (4), 88-97.
    21.
  21. Maleki, Saeed, "Ranking of urban areas in terms of sustainable development indicators using factor analysis and taxonomy methods (Ilam city) in 2009", Journal of Geography and Regional Development, No. 80, 13-45. (In Persian)
    22.
  22. Mohammad Moradi, Asghar et al., "Methodology of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Models in 2009", Armanshahr Magazine, No. 2,113-125. (In Persian)
    23.

 

 

مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]