بررسی مؤلفه‌های زیباشناسی فضای سبز شهری و نقش آموزشی آن‌ها در جلوگیری از تخریب محیط زیست (مطالعه موردی: شهر شاهین‌شهر)
محورهای موضوعی : ترویج و ارتقای فرهنگ حفاظت از محیط زیستحدیث معصومی 1 , محمد علی نادی 2
1 - گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
2 - گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
کلید واژه: زیباشناسی, فضای سبز, اثربخشی, آموزش.,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی مؤلفه‌های زیباشناسی فضای سبز شهری و نقش آموزشی آن‌ها در جلوگیری از تخریب محیط زیست در شاهین شهر است. این پژوهش، از نوع نیمه آزمایشی با طرح پیش‌آزمون- پس‌آزمون است. دوره‌های آموزشی شناسایی مولفه‌های زیباشناسی فضای سبز متغیر مستقل و تعیین اثربخشی آموزشی این مولفه‌ها بر جلوگیری از تخریب فضای سبز شهری متغیر وابسته این تحقیق را تشکیل می‌دهند. در این پژوهش 60 نفر به شیوه نمونه‌گیری تصادفی در گروه‌ها انتخاب شدند و در دو گروه کنترل و آزمایشی قرار گرفتند. افراد گروه آزمایشی، دوره‌های آموزشی شامل دوازده جلسه 45 دقیقه‌ای را دریافت کردند در حالی که گروه گواه این آموزش‌ها را دریافت نکردند. در این پژوهش از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته نگرش محیط زیستی بانوان به عنوان ابزار سنجش استفاده شد. براي تجزيه و تحليل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار آماري SPSS استفاده شده است، روش آماری مورد استفاده در اين تحقيق آمار توصیفی شامل میانگین، انحراف معیار، دامنه تغییرات، پایین‌ترین نمره، بالاترین نمره و آمار استنباطی شامل آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس بود. نتایج به دست آمده از داده‌های آماری بیانگر آن است که نمرات پیش‌آزمون با پس‌آزمون آن رابطه معنی‌داری ندارد. ميزان تأثير اين آموزش‌ها در مرحله پس‌آزمون 075/0 بوده است. يعني تنها در حدود 5/7 درصد از واريانس نگرش مربوط به جلوگیری از تخریب فضای سبز شهری مربوط به عضويت گروهي و يا تأثير آموزش‌ها است که این مقدار جزیی و غیر معنی‌دار است.
This study aims to investigate the aesthetic components of urban green spaces in Shahinshahr and their educational role in preventing environmental degradation. A quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test design was employed. The independent variable was educational courses on identifying aesthetic components of green spaces, while the dependent variable was the effectiveness of these courses in preventing urban green space degradation. Sixty participants were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group received 12, 45-minute training sessions, while the control group did not. A researcher-designed questionnaire on women's environmental attitudes was used as the measurement tool. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with descriptive statistics and a covariance analysis. Results showed no significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores. The effect size of the training was 0.075, indicating that only 7.5% of the variance in attitudes towards preventing urban green space degradation was attributable to group membership or the training effect, which was considered negligible and non-significant.
Aboufazeli, S., Jahani, A., & Farahpour, M. (2024). Aesthetic quality modeling of the form of natural elements in the environment of urban parks. Evolutionary Intelligence, 17(1), 327-338. [In Persian]
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological conservation, 241, 108224.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
Bagheri, M., Mirdamadi, S. M., farajallah hosseini, S. J., & Lashgarara, F. (2020). Factors Affecting the Participation of Tehran Green Space Research, Education and Counseling Center Staff in Urban Green Space Development. Agricultural Education Administration Research, 11(51), 141-152. [In Persian]
Booth, N. K. (1989). Basic elements of landscape architectural design. Waveland press.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Dastras, F., & Khajenoori, B. (2019). Investigating the Relationship between Sociological Factors and Environmental Behavior of Citizens of Shiraz. Journal of Applied Sociology, 30(4), 35-58. [In Persian]
Deng, L., Luo, H., Ma, J., Huang, Z., Sun, L. X., Jiang, M. Y., ... & Li, X. (2020). Effects of integration between visual stimuli and auditory stimuli on restorative potential and aesthetic preference in urban green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 53, 126702.
Dorst, H., van der Jagt, A., Runhaar, H., & Raven, R. (2021). Structural conditions for the wider uptake of urban nature-based solutions–A conceptual framework. Cities, 116, 103283.
Fors, H., Molin, J. F., Murphy, M. A., & van den Bosch, C. K. (2015). User participation in urban green spaces–For the people or the parks?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), 722-734.
ghashghaei, R., & mansourian, E. (2021). Influential components on improving the quality of urban green space (Case study of sidewalks in Yasuj). Geography and Human Relationships, 4(3), 50-64.
Giannico, V., Spano, G., Elia, M., D’Este, M., Sanesi, G., & Lafortezza, R. (2021). Green spaces, quality of life, and citizen perception in European cities. Environmental research, 196, 110922.
Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and urban planning, 94(3-4), 264-275.
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual review of public health, 35(1), 207-228.
Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. (2010). Beyond savanna: An evolutionary and environmental psychology approach to behavioral effects of nature scenery in green advertising. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 119-128.
Holloway, I., & Todres, L. (2003). The Status of Method: Flexibility, Consistencyand Coherence. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 345-357.
Horng, C. Y., Chen, S. C., & Cheng, Y. T. (2024). Review and Experience Sharing on Environmental Education for Pollution Prevention and Control in Taiwan. Japanese Journal of Environmental Education, 33(4), 4_79-89.
Kang, P., Huang, K., & Zhao, Y. (2024). A Study of Environmental Education Requirements in Urban Theme Parks from the Perspective of Adolescents. Sustainability, 16(2), 505.
Khadivi, m., zargar, y., & davoudi, i.. (2012). The effects of stress management based on cognitive-behavior therapy on type a personality and job stress in personnel of khozestan gas company. Journal of psychological achievements (journal of education & psychology), 19(1), 175-198.
Lafortezza, R., & Sanesi, G. (2019). Nature-based solutions: Settling the issue of sustainable urbanization. Environmental research, 172, 394-398.
Ma, B., Hauer, R.J., & Xu, C. (2020). Effects of Design Proportion and Distribution of Color in Urban and Suburban Green Space Planning to Visual Aesthetics Quality Forests, 11(3),278.
Martin, L., White, M. P., Hunt, A., Richardson, M., Pahl, S., & Burt, J. (2020). Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of environmental psychology, 68, 101389.
Morab, Y., Sadat, M., & Salehi I. (2016). Analysis and investigation of vitality in new urban parks (Case Study: Water and Fire Park, Tehran). Geographical Planning of Space, 6(20), 193-208. [In Persian]
Palliwoda, J., & Priess, J. A. (2021). What do people value in urban green? Linking characteristics of urban green spaces to users’ perceptions of nature benefits, disturbances, and disservices. Ecology and Society, 26(1), 28.
Palmer, A. (2016). Effectiveness of thematic and social awareness in environmental education. Translated by M. Rifatpour. Tehran: Afra Publications. 180.
Polat, A. T., & Akay, A. (2015). Relationships between the visual preferences of urban recreation area users and various landscape design elements. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), 573-582.
Rahmanpour; S., & Ramazani, M. A. (2019). Investigating the role of environmental education of local communities in the environmental performance of citizens of the 5th area of Tabriz municipality. Sociological Studies, 11(41), 151-169. [In Persian]
Sezavar, N., Pazhouhanfar, M., Van Dongen, R. P., & Grahn, P. (2023). The importance of designing the spatial distribution and density of vegetation in urban parks for increased experience of safety. Journal of Cleaner Production, 403, 136768.
Sharma, N., Paço, A., & Upadhyay, D. (2023). Option or necessity: Role of environmental education as transformative change agent. Evaluation and Program Planning, 97, 102244.
Taghizadeh, K., & Minaei, A. (2012). The Method of Plants Selection in Planning and Architecturing of urban Green Spaces in Iran (Represented by Using Mathematic Base and Totality Theory). Human Geography Research, 44(3), 127-140. [In Persian]
Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Stress Recovery during Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 729-742.
Van Oijstaeijen, W., Van Passel, S., & Cools, J. (2020). Urban green infrastructure: A review on valuation toolkits from an urban planning perspective. Journal of environmental management, 267, 110603.
Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., & Choi, S. (2021). Underlying relationships between public urban green spaces and social cohesion: A systematic literature review. City, culture and society, 24, 100383.Dobson, J., & Dempsey, N. (2021). Known but not done: How logics of inaction limit the benefits of urban green spaces. Landscape Research, 46(3), 390-402.