نقش مدیریت کوانتومی در بهرهوری نیروی انسانی با توجه به میانجی اشتیاق شغلی در کارکنان آموزش و پرورش شهر بیرجند
محورهای موضوعی :
آموزش و پرورش
سمیه مزگی نژاد
1
,
محسن آیتی
2
,
هادی پورشافعی
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
2 - دانشیار برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران
3 - دانشیار مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران
تاریخ دریافت : 1398/07/17
تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/03/27
تاریخ انتشار : 1400/06/01
کلید واژه:
اشتیاق شغلی,
مدیریت کوانتومی,
بهرهوری نیروی انسانی,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده
مقدمه و هدف: نیروی انسانی از اساسی‌ترین منابع استراتژیک هر سازمانی محسوب می‌شود به طوری که یکی از اولویت‌های پیشرفت و توسعه سازمان، توجه به بهرهوری نیروی انسانی است. عوامل مختلفی در بهرهوری نیروی انسانی مؤثر است که این مطالعه با هدف بررسی نقش مدیریت کوانتومی در بهرهوری نیروی انسانی با توجه به میانجی اشتیاق شغلی در کارکنان آموزش و پرورش شهر بیرجند انجام شده است.
روش‌شناسی: پژوهش حاضر توصیفی از نوع همبستگی است. جامعه آماری همه کارکنان آموزش و پرورش شهر بیرجند شامل 250 نفر است که بر اساس جدول کرجسی و مورگان (1970)، 160 نفر به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه‌های استاندارد بهرهوری نیروی انسانی هرسی و گلداسمیت (1994)، مدیریت کوانتومی میرصفیان (1394) و اشتیاق شغلی سالوناوا و شوفلی (2001) بود که روایی آن‌ها تأیید و پایایی با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برای هر یک از پرسشنامه‌ها به ترتیب 94/0، 92/0 و 89/0 به دست آمد. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار آماری AMOS16 و مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری تجزیه و تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که مدیریت کوانتومی به طور غیرمستقیم و از طریق متغیر اشتیاق شغلی، بهرهوری نیروی انسانی را پیش‌بینی می‌کند. به عبارتی اشتیاق شغلی در رابطه بین مدیریت کوانتومی با بهرهوری نیروی انسانی نقش میانجی‌گری دارد.
نتیجه‌گیری: بر اساس این نتایج می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که توسعه شیوه‌های جدید مدیریتی از جمله مدیریت کوانتومی در راستای افزایش اشتیاق شغلی کارکنان، نقش بسزایی در بهبود بهرهوری کارکنان نیز دارد.
چکیده انگلیسی:
Human resources are one of the most basic strategic resources of any organization, so one of the priorities of the organization's development and development is paying attention to the productivity of manpower. Various factors affect the effectiveness of manpower. The aim of this study was the role of quantum management in human resource productivity with respect to the mediation Job Engagement in the staff of the Education Department in Birjand. The present study is a descriptive correlational study. The statistical population of all education staff in Birjand in 2017 includes 250 people. According to Krejcie and Morgan (1970) table, 160 people were selected by simple random sampling. Data collection tools were standard questionnaires of Hersi and Goldsmith (1994), Mirsafian Quantum Management (2015) and Salonava and Shuffley (2001). 0.94, 0.92 and 0.89 were obtained. Data were analyzed using AMOS16 software and structural equation modeling. The results showed that Quantum management indirectly predicts the productivity of human resources through the variable of career enthusiasm. In other words, the job craving for the relationship between quantum management with human resource efficiency plays a mediating role. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the development of new managerial practices, including quantum management, in order to increase the employee's employee eagerness, has a significant role in improving employee productivity.
منابع و مأخذ:
1. Allahverdi, M., Farahabadi, E. and Sajadi, H. (2011). Prioritizing factors effecting on human resources productivity: Viewing of middle class managers in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences-2009. Jhosp; 9 (3 and 4). pp 77-85. (In Persian)
2. Aslani, GH. (2015). Analysis of the Application of Quantum Management Components in Resolving Organizational Conflicts among the Staff of Fereidounshahr Education Department. MA in Executive Management, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch. (In Persian)
3. Babaei Khalaji, M., Ahmadi, A. and Shahbazi, M. (2013). Investigating the Factors Affecting Nursing Affiliation in Farabi Ophthalmology Hospital Affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Public Management Quarterly, 5: 4. pp 39-56. (In Persian)
4. Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 20: 4. pp 265- 269.
5. Baqarzadeh Homayi, M. (2014). The Relationship between Managers' Leadership Styles and Human Resource Productivity in Bandar Abbas Area 2 Education. M.A., Hormozgan University. (In Persian)
6. Burke, R. J. and ElKot, G. (2010). Work engagement among managers and professionals in Egypt, Potential antecedents and consequences. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 42: 1. pp 1-60.
7. Cheng, J., Chang, S., Kuo, J. and Cheung, Y. (2014). Ethical leadership, work engagement and voice behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114: 5. pp 817-831.
8. Darling, J. R. and Walker, W. E. (2001). Effective Conflict management, Use of the behavioral style model. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 22: 5. pp 230-242.
9. Ebrahimi, O. and Mohammadi, D. (2015). Investigating the Relationship between Job Desire and Human Resource Productivity in Tabriz District 2 School Staff. First Scientific Research Conference on Psychology, Education Sciences and Community Pathology. (In Persian)
10. Emami, S., Zarei, A. and Naqshbandi, S. (2017). The Relationship between Active Leisure Time and Career and Productivity of the Ministry of Sport and Youth Personnel. Journal of Applied Research in Sport Science, Education Without Borders, 2: 5. pp 20-34. (In Persian)
11. Fryad, L., Khorakian, A. and Nazemi, S. (2016). The Effect of Psychological Empowerment on Employees' Innovative Behavior according to Their Career Desire. Journal of Management Development & Evolution, 25. pp 17-26. (In Persian)
12. Ghasempour, A. and Ahmadi, M. A. (2015). Investigating the coordination of management style with employee maturity and its impact on their performance (productivity). First International Conference on Management and Entrepreneurship. (In Persian)
13. Ghyasi Nodushan, S. and Amin al-Raaya, E. (2016). Investigating the Impact of Social Capital and Intellectual Capital on Human Resource Productivity. Journal of Management Development Studies, 25: 80. pp 183-209. (In Persian)
14. Hajloo, N., Sobhigharamaleki, N. and Amelhoshmand, R . (2015). Personality Predictors of Teacher's Work Engagement. Journal Management System, 6: 22. pp 61-76. (In Persian)
15. Halkos, G. and Bousinakis, D. (2010). The effect of stress and satisfaction on productivity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59: 5. pp 415-431.
16. Hallberg, U. and Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Same same but different, Can work engagement be discriminated from job involvement and organizational commitment? European Journal of Psychology, 11. pp 119-127.
17. Heydari, M., Ghorbanidulatabadi, M. and Mohammadjani, S. (2018). M Heydari ; M Ghorbanidulatabadi1; S Mohammadjani. Journal Management System, 8: 32. pp 43-64. (In Persian)
18. Homayeni Damirchi, A., Mirkamali, M. and Homayon Aria, SH. (2018). Examining Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Job Involvement Employee with Intermediation Job Enthusiasm (Case Study: Social and Behavioral Sciences Faculties of Tehran University). Journal Management System, 9: 34. pp 275-296. (In Persian)
19. Huang, Y. H., Lee, J., McFadden, A. C., Murphy, L. A., Robertsona, M. M., Cheung, J. H. and Zohar, D. (2016). Beyond safety outcomes, An investigation of the impact of safety climate on job satisfaction, employee engagement and turnover using social exchange theory as the theoretical framework. Applied Ergonomics, 55: 3. pp 248-257.
20. Iranzadeh, S., Mesbahi Jahromi, N., Shokri, A. and Ebrahimi, R. (2016). Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Agility Dimensions and Productivity of Dana Insurance Company Personnel in East Azarbaijan Province. Journal of Productivity Management, 10: 38. pp 117-145. (In Persian)
21. Izadi, K. and Siyadat, A. (2016). Investigating the Relationship between Quantum Management with Job Desire and Job Adaptation of Isfahan University Personnel. Journal of Educational Management Innovations, 11: 3. pp 25-33. (In Persian)
22. Jalili, H., Jamshidlo, R. and Hajikhani, A. (2017). Analysis of Human Resources Productivity in Industry Sector with Resistance Economics Approach. Journal of Industrial Management, Faculty of Humanities, 12: 41. pp 119-132. (In Persian)
23. Jajri, I. and Rahmah, I. (2010). Impact of Labor Quality on Labor Productivity and Economic Growth. African Journal of Business Management, 4: 4. pp 486-495.
24. Liorens, S., Schaufeli, W. B, Bakker, A. and Salanova, M. (2013). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy belifs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23. pp 825-841.
25. Mehdipoor, E. (2020). The Effectiveness of Organizational Culture and Job stress on Personnel Productivity of university. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administrations, 11: 45. pp 305-318.
26. Mezginezhad, M., Ayati, M. and Pourshafei, H. (2018). The role of quantum management in human resource productivity with respect to the mediation of organizational voice in the staff of the Education Department in Birjand. Journal of Managing Education in Organizations, 7: 1. pp 41-77. (In Persian)
27. MirHidri, A. Siadat, A., Hoveyda, R. and Abedi, M. R. (2012). The Relationship between Organizational Learning and Career Self-Efficacy with Managers' Work Intentions. New Approach in Educational Management, 3: 2. pp 139-154. (In Persian)
28. Mirsafian, H. R. (2016). An Analysis of Job Adaptation Prediction Based on Quantum Management Implementation. Journal of Sport Studies, 39. pp 86-73. (In Persian)
29. Mirsafian, H. R. and Salimi, M. (2015). Determining the Relative Contribution of Quantum Management Components on Entrepreneurial Behaviors of Isfahan Youth and Sport Organization Staff. Journal of Modern Approaches to Sport Management, 3: 11. pp 85-97. (In Persian)
30. Mohammadadi, F. (2017). Investigation and Analysis of Quantum Learning in Optimizing Human Resources Education. Journal of Human Resource Education & Development, 4: 12. pp 29-52. (In Persian)
31. Molaye, M., Mehdad, A., and Golparvar, M. (2014). Relationship between workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and job aspiration with task performance. Journal of Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology, 15: 2. pp 47-55. (In Persian)
32. Pourabbas, A., Abedi, M. and Baghban, I. (2013). The Effectiveness of Attending Professional Self-Efficacy Workshops on Job Desire of Isfahan University Personnel. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Counseling, 5: 17. pp 37-50. (In Persian)
33. Rahi, F., Ahmadi, A. and Barzegar, M. (2013). The Relationship between Atmosphere and Organizational Culture with the Mediation of Empowerment Role on Organizational Commitment of Fars Staff Education Organization. New Approach in Educational Management, 4: 2. pp 199-220. (In Persian)
34. Reham, A., Giunipero, L. and Fox, G. (2009). A Strategic Skill Based Model of Supplier Integration and Its Effect on Supply Management Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 8: 38. pp 925-936.
35. Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A. and Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement, Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of menegement journal, 53. pp 617-635.
36. Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W. and Van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout and engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well- being? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57. pp 173-203.
37. Sharifi Asl, Z., Chabok, A., Hatamizadeh, N. and Soltani, P. (2012). The Relationship between Organizational Commitment and Productivity of Rehabilitation Team Members, Razi Psychiatric Training Center (2011). Modern Care Quarterly, 9: 2. pp 129-136. (In Persian)
38. Shelton, C.K. (2011). The Quantum skills modelin Darling. John R, Management a new paradigm to enhance effective leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal; 22: 6. pp 264-273.
39. Shojaee, S., Jamali, G. and Manteghi, N. (2016). Identifying factors affecting human resource productivity. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, Imam Hussein University, 8: 2. pp 161-181. (In Persian)
40. Shokohi, L. & Sotoudehneya, S. (2016). Factors Influencing Human Resources Productivity. Quarterly New Research in Management and Accounting, 3: 14. pp 1-15. (In Persian)
41. Upadyaya, K., Vartiainen, M. and Salmela-Aro, K. (2016). From job demands and resources to work engagement, burnout, life satisfaction, depressive symptoms, and occupational health. Burnout Research, 3: 4. pp 101-108.
42. Uthai, M. (2013). Leveraging employee engagement surveys using the turnover stimulator approach, A case study of automotive enterprises in Thailand. International Journal of Business and Management, 8: 6. pp 113-125.
43. Wong, M. W. and Ahmad, Z. (2012). A Study of Nuffnang’s organizational culture and its impact on employees’ producitvity. segi Review, 5: 1. pp 55-71.
44. Zahed Babelan, A., Moeinikia, M., Rezaeisharif, A. and Koulaei, Gh. (2019). Modeling the role of school principals’ instructional leadership in teacher job engagement through school culture. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administrations, 10: 39. pp 1-24.
45. Zaki, M. A. (2009). Sociological Study of Human Resource Productivity in Education. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, Imam Hossein University, 1: 2. pp 147-172. (In Persian)
46. Ziapour, A., Khatony, A., Kianipour, N. and Jafary, F. (2015). Identification and Analysis of Labor Productivity Components Based on ACHIEVE Model (Case Study: Staff of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences). Glob J Health Sci, 7: 1. pp 315–321.
_||_
