تأملی پدیدارنگارانه بر فهم پژوهش از دیدگاه اعضای هیأت علمی
محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش
شراره محمدی
1
(دانشجوی دکتری .دانشگاه کردستان، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، گروه علوم تربیتی، کردستان، ایران)
جمال سلیمی
2
(دانشیار ، دانشگاه کردستان، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، گروه علوم تربیتی، کردستان، ایران)
ناصر شیربگی
3
(استاد، دانشگاه کردستان، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، گروه علوم تربیتی، کردستان، ایران)
کلید واژه: بهره وری, تولید علم, پژوهش, پژوهشگر,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه و هدف: پژوهش حاضر باهدف آگاهی از تجارب و برداشت اعضای هیأت علمی از مفهوم پژوهش صورت گرفت. روش شناسی پژوهش: رویکرد پژوهش تفسیری و راهبرد آن پدیدارنگاری و میدان تحقیق دانشگاههای کردستان، همدان، کرمانشاه و ایلام بود. حجم نمونه با استفاده از ابزار مصاحبه نیمهساختاریافته و بارعایت حداکثر تنوع باتوجه به ملاک رسیدن به اشباع نظری به 15 نفر رسید که به روش نمونهگیری هدفمند انتخاب و دادهها جمعآوری شدند و به کمک روش همسوسازی اعتبار دادهها مورد تأیید قرارگرفت. تحلیل دادهها با رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی با استفاده از کدگذاری در دو سطح باز و محوری به کمک نرم افزار MAXQDA صورت گرفت. یافته ها: نتایج شامل چهار مفهوم و مقوله اساسی پژوهش به مثابه یک عمل فنی و تکنیکال، پژوهش به مثابه یک کنش فردی، پژوهش به مثابه یک عمل اجتماعی و پژوهش به مثابه یک ارزش میباشد. که هر مقوله دارای زیرمؤلفه هایی میباشد. بحث و نتیجه گیری: دست‌یابی به توسعه و پیشرفت همه‌جانبه بدون بهره‌گیری مناسب از یافته‌های پژوهشی میسر نیست، بنابراین تصمیم‌سازی و تصمیم‌گیری در نظامهای آموزشی ایجاب می‌کند، زمینه مناسب برای رشد و پرورش پژوهشگران از اولویت برخوردار باشد.
Introduction: The aim of this study was to identify the experiences and perceptions of faculty members about the concept of research. research methodology: The approach of interpretive research and its strategy was phenomenology and the field of research of Kurdistan, Hamedan, Kermanshah and Ilam universities. The sample size reached 15 people using semi-structured interview tools and with maximum diversity according to the criterion of theoretical saturation, which were selected by purposive sampling method and data were collected and by means of harmonization method. Data validation verified. Data analysis was performed with a descriptive-analytical approach using coding at both open and axial levels with the help of MAXQDA software. Findings: The results include four basic concepts and categories of research as a technical act, research as an individual action, research as a social action and research as a value. Each category has sub-components. Achieving all-round development and progress is not possible without proper use of research findings, so decision-making in decision-making systems requires that a suitable environment for the growth and development of researchers is a priority.
Abtahi, S & Torabian, M. (2010). Assessment of Higher Education Goals Based on Twenty Year Country Vision Document Using Analytical Hierarchy Process AHP Method, Quarterly Journal of Educational Systems, 4 (8): 60- 31 [in Persian]
Altbach, P.G. (2011). The past, present & future of the research university. In P. G. Altbach & J. Salmi(Ed). The road to academic excellence: The making of world- class research university. 11- 32. Washngton: World Bank.
Azizi, N. (2014). Investigating the ways to improve the research performance of faculty members in the humanities. Farhang Strategy, 6 (21), 33-7. .[in Persian]
Blass, E., Jasman, A., & Shelley, S. (2012). Postgraduate research students: You are the future of the Academy. Futures, 44 (2), 166-173
Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. New York, NY: Palgrave Mecmillian.
Calcagnini, G., Favaretto, I., Giombini, G., Perugini, F., Rombaldoni, R. (2015). The role of universities in the location of innovative start- ups, Springer science & business media. NewYork.
Chen, Y., Nixon, M.R., Gupta, A., & Hoshower, L. (2010). Research productivity of accounting faculty: An expectancy theory analysis. Journal of education for business, 81(4), 179- 189.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches, 2nd, Thousand oaks. California: Sage publication.
Cummings, W. K. (2014). The research role in comparative. In J. C. Shin, A. Arimoto, W. K. Cummings, & U. Teihler (Eds), Teaching and research in contemporary higher education: Systems, activities, and rewards. 35-44. London: Springer.
Dagmara, M. & Weckowska. (2015). Learning in university technology transfer offices: Transactions- focused and relations- focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation. 4(42), 62- 74.
Dahlgren. L &. Fallsberg. M.. (1991). Phenomenography as a qualitative approach in social pharmacy research, Journal of Social and Administration Pharmacy, No. 8, pp. 150-156.
Danayee fard, Hassan (2009). An Analysis of the Barriers to Creating Knowledge in the Humanities: Guidelines for Improving the Capacity of Iran's National Science Policy, Science and Technology Policy, 2 (1): 16-1.[in Persian]
Davari Ardakani, R. (2011) .About science. Tehran: Hermes.[in Persian]
Eslami, Z; Hakimzadeh, R; Sabouri, A. A. (2019). A Comparative Study of Explaining Research Quality Assessment Frameworks in Iranian Higher Education System with Leading Countries in the World such as England, Australia, Netherlands, Italy and Hong Kong, Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 12(24),: 1-1.[in Persian]
Farajolahi, A.R., Sedaghat, K., Ashrafi Hafez, A., Alizadeh, M., Bustani, H. (2014). Investigating the limiting and reinforcing factors of research by faculty members of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Scientific Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences. Vol 21.[in Persian]
Fatahi. R. (2014). Confrontation of scientometric indicators with economic / social development indicators. Speech. National Conference on Science Assessment, Evaluation & Pathology (Scientific Outputs) of Isfahan University. [in Persian]
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2006). Educational Resesrch: An Intruduction, Eight Edition, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Garavand, H., & Pakmehr ,H. (2021). Presenting a Causal Model of The Effect of Motivational Orientations and Academic Stressors on Research Self-Efficacy: The Mediating Role of Research Spirit, Research in School & Virtual Learning, Year 9, No 1 (33), Summer 2021: 89-102.
Ghannadinejad, F., Soleimani, H., Heidari, Gh. (2016). Criteria for subject selection from the perspective of graduate students of humanities and social sciences, Shahid Chamran, Ahvaz, Ayar Journal of Research in Humanities. .[in Persian]
Golshani, M. (2014). Article writing fever is a plague. 72-77.[in Persian]
Jacobs, Robin J., Kane, Michael, N. (2021). Predictors of research self efficacy in first-year osteopathic medical students. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 39, 26-31.
Khalegi, N. (2008). Research ethics in social science. Journal of Ethics in Science and Thechnology. 3 (1,2): 83-93.[in Persian]
Khan, M. A. (2014). Students’ Passion for Grades in Higher Education Institutions in Pakistan. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 702-709
Kiaie Taleghani, N; Zeinabadi, H; Arasteh, H & Abbasian, H. (2020). Research Higher Iranian in Malfunctions Research the of Identification in the Policymakers Research and, Experts, Researchers Top of encesExperi and Views the of Analysis Qualitative A: System Education Iran, Strategic studies of public policy, 10(43).
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (2013). Learning and awareness, New York: Routledge
Nazim, F. (2009). Research leaders & creating a transcendent organizational atmosphere to increase research activities & science production. Leadership & Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, 2 (4), 184-167.[in Persian]
Norouzi, A. A.; Abolghasemi, M & Ghahramani, M. (2015). Investigating Barriers to Science Production from the Viewpoints of Faculty Members of Shahid Beheshti University, A New Approach in Educational Management, Journal 6, No. 2,: 77- 108.[in Persian]
Rubbia, G., Franco, C., Pellizzon, D., & Nannipieri, L. (2014). Research support services in Italian Higher Education and Research Institutions: approaches, tools & trends .
Schultz, J. (2008). Purpose of college: Integrative literature review. Research & Teaching in Developmental
Sibal. K. (2011). The road to academic execellence: The making of world- class research universities. Preface. In P.G. altbach & J.Salmi (Eds). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, Juliet (2012). Basics of qualitative research: techniques & stages of production of grounded theory, Translated by Ebrahim Afshar, Tehran: Ney Publishing
Tasdiqi, M. A., & Tasadeghi, F. (2009). Barriers to Research & Culture Research in Higher Education, Cultural Engineering, Fourth Year, No 35: 37-37.[in Persian]
Yanez, S., Uruburu, AÁ., Moreno, A., & Lumbreras, J. (2019). The sustainability report as an essential tool for the holistic and strategic vision of higher education institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 57-66.
_||_