Separation of Mercury Resistant Bacteria from Wastewater of Milk, Detergent and Ceramic Industry
Subject Areas : Journal of Chemical Health RisksM. Moghbeli 1 , F. Shakeri 2 , H. Hashemi-Moghaddam 3
1 - Department of Microbiology, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 36716-
39998, Damghan, Iran
2 - Department of Microbiology, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 36716-
39998, Damghan, Iran
3 - Department of Chemistry, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 36716-39998,
Damghan, Iran
Keywords: Bacteria, Biosorption, Mercury sorption, Industrial waste,
Abstract :
Use of microorganisms for removing mercury is an effective technology for the treatment of industrial wastewaters and can become an effective tool for the remediation of man-impacted coastal ecosystems with this metal. In this study, seven types of mercury resistant bacteria were separated from industrial waste and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), were determined for these bacteria. Results showed that two strains of bacteria, which isolated from waste water detergent plants, are more resistant to mercury and able to grow at the presence of 52 ppm of mercuric chloride. These bacteria could be used for biological treatment of mercury in contaminated wastewater.
- Adebowale A., 2004. Bioremediation of Arsenic,
- Chromium,Lead, and Mercury, National
- Network of Environmental Management
- Studies Fellowfor U.S. Environmental
- Protection Agency. www.clu-in.org
- Arif Tasleem J., M. Imtiyaz, A. Arif and H.
- Rizwanul, 2009. Mercury pollution: an
- emerging problem and potential Bacterial
- remediation strategies., World J Microbiol
- Biotechnol 25:1529âââ1537
- Clarkson T. W., L. Magos and G. J. Myers,
- Toxicology of mercury;current
- exposure and clinical manifestations. N Engl
- J Med 349:1731âââ1737
- Devars S., J. S. RodrÃÂguez-Zavala and R.
- Moreno-Sánchez, 2010. Enhanced Tolerance
- to Mercury in a Streptomycin-Resistant Strain
- of Euglena gracilis, Water, Air, & Soil
- Pollution
- Essa A. M. , L. E. Macaskie and N. L.
- Brown, 2005. A new method for mercury
- removal, Biotechnology Letters (2005)
- : 1649âââ1655
- Jaysankar De , N. Ramaiah, A. Mesquita and
- X. N. Verlekar. (2003), Tolerance to
- Various Toxicants by Marine Bacteria
- Highly Resistant to Mercury., Marine
- Biotechnology
- Mortazavi S., A. Rezaee, A. Khavanin, S.
- Varmazyar and M. Iafarzadeh ,2005.
- Removal of Mercuric Chloride by a
- Mercury Resistant Pseudomonas putida
- Strain. Journal ofBiological Sciences 5
- (3): 269-273
- Moshafi M.H., Mansori S., Nemati R.,
- Forootanfar H.(2009), Simultaneous
- Resistance to heavy Metals and
- Antibiotics in Escherichia coli Strains
- Isolated from Clinical Samples.
- Rafsanjan Med. Sci. Univer. J. , (8),
- -202
- Okino S., K. Iwasaki, O. Yagi and H.
- Tanaka, 2000. Development of a
- biological mercury removal-recovery
- system., Biotechnology Letters 22: 783âââ
- Poulain A. J., S. M. N. Chadhain, A. P.
- Ariya, M. Amyot, E. Garcia, P. G. C.
- Campbell, G. J. Zylstra and T. Barkay,
- Potential for mercury reduction by
- microbes in high Arctic. Appl Environ
- Microbiol 73(7):2230âââ2238
- Rasmussen LD, Zawadsky C, Binnerup SJ,
- Oregaard G, Sorensen SJ,Kroer N (2008)
- Cultivation of hard to culture subsurface
- mercury resistant bacteria and discovery
- of new merA gene sequences. Appl
- Environ Microbiol 74(12):3795âââ3803
- Ruiz NO, Daniell H (2009) Genetic
- engineering to enhance mercury
- phytoremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol
- :1âââ7
- Schue M, Dover LG, Besra GS, Parkhill J,
- Brown NL (2009) Sequence and analysis
- of a plasmid encoded mercury resistance
- operon from Mycobacterium marinum
- identifies MerH, a new mercuric ion
- transporter. J Bacteriol 191(1):439âââ444.
- Doi
- Summers A. O., 2009. Damage control:
- regulating defenses against toxic metals
- and metalloids. Curr Opin Microbiol
- :1âââ7