بررسی صفات مورفوفیزیولوژیک برخی از ارقام گندم نان در شرایط نرمال و تنش خشکی
محورهای موضوعی : اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهان زراعیکمال شهبازی هومونلو 1 * , علی عبادی 2 , سلیم فرزانه 3 , منوچهر خدارحمی 4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری زراعت، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
2 - گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
3 - گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
4 - موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، کرج، ایران
کلید واژه: آنزیم¬های آنتی اکسیدانت, پرولین, پلی فنول اکسیداز, کارایی مصرف آب,
چکیده مقاله :
به¬منظور بررسی تاثیر تنش خشکی بر ارقام گندم نان، پژوهشی طی دو ســال¬ زراعــی متوالی ( 98 – 1397 و 99 – 1398) در سایت آزمایش¬های غلات آبی مزرعه پژوهشی مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل (مغان) به صورت کرت¬هاي خـرد شـده در قالـب طـرح بلوك¬هاي کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار انجام شـد. کـرت¬های اصلی شامل رژیم آبیاري (آبیاري کامل تا انتهاي فصل رشد (شاهد بدون تنش خشکی)، آبیاري تا مرحله گلدهی (تنش خشکی متوسط) و آبیاری خاک آب (تنش خشکی کامل) و کرت¬های فرعی شامل شش رقم گندم نان شامل (تیرگان، احسان، کلاته، آراز، تکتاز و آفتاب) بودند. نتایج حاصل از آزمایش نشان داد که تنش خشکی متوسط و تنش خشکی کامل باعث کاهش ارتفاع بوته (به¬ترتیب 37/3 و 88/6 درصد)، تعداد پنجه بارور (به¬ترتیب 39/19 و 72/22 درصد)، تعداد دانه در سنبله (به¬ترتیب 46/7 و 76/15)، وزن دانه در سنبله (به¬ترتیب 38/6 و 86/7 درصد) و عملکرد دانه (به¬ترتیب 66/7 و 29/15 درصد) نسبت به آبیاري کامل تا انتهاي فصل رشد شد. همچنین، نتایج نشان داد تنش خشکی متوسط و تنش خشکی کامل باعث افزایش میزان پرولین (به ترتیب 45/26 و 71/45 درصد) و پلی فنول اکسیداز (به ترتیب 09/13 و 81/20 درصد) شد. به-طورلی نتایج نشان داد که ارقام تکتاز و تیرگان داراي پتانسیل عملکرد بیشتر در هر دو شرایط آبیاري کامل و تنش خشکی متوسط بودند و در شرایط تنش خشکی متوسط و تنش خشکی کامل، ارقام تکتاز و آفتاب از نظر صفات مورد بررسی برتر بودند و با توجه به تحمل بالاتر این ارقام به تنش خشکی، استفاده از این ارقام در مناطق مواجه با محدودیت رطوبت، شایسته پژوهش¬های بلند مدت با جزئیات بیشتری است.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and select bread wheat cultivars by assessing the yield, yield components and some physiological traits under drought stress conditions. Six cultivars were evaluated as sub-plots in 2018 to 2020 cropping seasons using a split plot design based on RCBD with three replicates. The Main plot covered the three irrigation regimes including normal irrigation (non-drought stress), terminal drought stress (irrigation up to boot- stage as moderate drought stress) and full drought stress (dryland). The results revealed that a significant reduction of the plant height (3.37 and 6.88%), fertile tillers number (19.39 and 22.72%), seeds number per spike (7.76 and 15.76%), seed weight per spike (6.38 and 7.86) and grain yield (7.66 and 15.29%) were recorded under the moderate drought stress and full drought stress, respectively as compared to non-stress conditions. Also moderate drought stress and full drought significantly increased the proline content (26.45 and 45.71%, respectively) and polyphenol oxidase (13.09 and 20.81%, respectively). Tektaz, Tirgan and Aftab cultivars had the highest water use efficiency and the water use efficiency increased under drought stress conditions. In general, the results showed that the wheat cultivars ‘Taktaz’ showed the highest yield potential followed by the Tirgan in both non-stress and moderate drought stress conditions and in moderate drought stress and full drought stress, Tektaz and Aftab cultivars were superior in terms of investigated traits and with regard to the higher tolerance of the cultivars to drought stress, the use of these cultivars in areas with limited humidity deserves long-term research with more details.
• Agarwal, S., and V. Pandey. 2004. Antioxidant enzyme resposes to NaCl stress in Cassia angustifolia. Plant Biology. 48: 555-560.
• Ahmad, P., and M.N.V. Prasad. 2012. Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants: Metabolism, Productivity and Sustainability, New York. (In Persian).
• Allen, R.G., L.S.Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper. 56.
• Anonymus. 2017. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). www.fao.org/ fileadmin/ templates/wsfs /.../How to Feed the World in 2050.pdf.
• Anonymus. 2021. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization).. www.fao.org/ fileadmin/ templates/wsfs /.../How to Feed the World in 2050.pdf.
• Ashraf, M., and A. Bashir. 2006. Salt stress induced changes in some organic metabolites and ionic relation in nodules and other plant parts of two crop legumes differing in salt tolerance. Flora. 198: 486-498.
• Banks, J.M., G.C. Percival, and G. Rose. 2019. Variations in seasonal drought tolerance rankings. Trees Physiology. 33(4): 1063-1072.
• Bates, L.S., R.P. Waldern, and I.D. Teare. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil. 39:205-207.
• Boukid, F., M. Dall’Asta, L. Bresciani, P. Mena, and D. Del Rio. 2019. Phenolic profile and antioxidant capacity of landraces, old and modern Tunisian durum wheat. European Food Research and Technology. 245 (1): 73-82.
• Dubois, M., K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A. Rebers, and F. Smith. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry. 28:350-356.
• Ghaead Amini, M., Gh. Fathi, A. Siyahpoosh, M.H. Gharineh, and A. Lotfi JalalAbadi. 2021. Effect of irrigation cut and different levels of nitrogen fertilizer on yield and yield components of two durum wheat cultivars. Crop Physiology Journal. 12 (48): 47-62. (In Persian).
• Haghparast, R. 2013. Principles of wheat and rainfed agriculture mixed with new and indigenous knowledge. Authors of Agricultural Insurance Fund, Agricultural Education and Extension Publications. Tehran. (In Persian).
• Karo, M., and D. Mishra. 1976. Catalase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activity during rice leaf senescence. Plant Physiology. 57: 315-319.
• Khan. V. 1975. Polyphenol oxide activity and browning of three Avocado varieties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 26: 1319-1324.
• Kiliç, H., and T. Yağbasanlar. 2010. The effect of drought stress on grain yield, yield components and some quality traits of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) cultivars. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 38(1):164-170.
• Liu, H., L.R. Searle, D.E. Mather, A.J. Able, and J.A. Able. 2015. Morphological, physiological and yield responses of durum wheat to pre-anthesis water-deficit stress are genotype-dependent. Crop and Pasture Science. 66(10):1024-1038.
• Luigi, C., F. Rizza, B. Farnaz, E. Mazzucotelli, A.M. Mastrangelo, E. Francia, C. Mare, T. Alessandro, and M.A. Stanca. 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants. Field Crops Reserch. 105: 1-14.
• Luo, L.J., H. Xia, and B.R. Lu. 2019. Editorial: crop breeding for drought resistance. Frontiers in Plant Science. 1(10): 314-324.
• Mahmoudi, H., and A. Afkari. 2020. Physiological traits of wheat in drought stress conditions. Crop Physiology Journal. 12 (46): 131-147. (In Persian).
• Mandhania, S., S. Madan, and V. Sawhney. 2006. Antioxidant defense mechanism under salt stress in wheat seedlings. Biologia Plantarum. 50(2): 227-231.
• Manivannan, P., C.A. Jaleel, B. Sankar, A. Kishurekumar, R. Somasundaram, and G.M. Lakshmanan. 2007. Growth, biochemical modifications and proline metabolism in Helianthus annuus L. as induced by drought stress. Colloids and Surfaces, Biointerfaces. 59: 141-149.
• Narimani, H., R. Seyed Sharifi, and F. Aghaei. 2020. Effect of methanol on the activity of antioxidant enzymes, some compatible osmolytes and biochemical traits of wheat under cut off irrigation conditions. Crop Physiology Journal. 12(47): 99-144. (In Persian).
• Oelke, E.A., E.S. Oplinger, and T.M. Teynor. 2004. Safflower. University of Minnesota. pp. 97-109.
• Pour-Aboughadareh, A., R. Mohammadi, A. Etminan, L. Shooshtari, N. Maleki-Tabrizi, and P. Poczai. 2020. Effects of drought stress on some agronomic and morpho-physiological traits in durum wheat genotypes. Sustainability. 12: 1-14.
• Raeesi Sadati, S.Y., S. Jahanbakhsh Godekahriz, A. Ebadi, and M. Sedghi. 2020. Effect of zinc nano oxide foliar application yield and physiological traits wheat under drought stress. Crop Physiology Journal. 12(46): 45-64. (In Persian).
• Shamsi, K., M. Petrosyan, G. Noor-mohammadi, and R. Haghparast. 2010. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in three bread wheat cultivars under drought stress. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 9(1): 1117-1121.
• Tajalli, H., S.G. Mousavi, R. Baradaran, M.H. Saberi, and E. Arazmjoo. 2013. Evaluation of 20 barley genotypes under the terminal drought condition. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 7(1): 91-104. (In Persian).
• Tatari, M., M.M. Ahmadi, and R. Abbbasi Alikamar. 2012. Effect of supplementary irrigation on rainfed wheat yield. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 10(2): 448-455. (In Persian).
• Teimouri, N., M. Saeidi, M. Ghobadi, and S. Sasani. 2020. The effect of cut of irrigation at the end of the growing season on grain yield and some physiological characteristics of bread wheat cultivars. Crop Physiology Journal. 12(46): 111-129. (In Persian).
• Vaughan, M.M., A. Block, S.A. Christensen, L.H. Allen, and E.A. Schmelz. 2018. The effects of climate change associated abiotic stresses on maize phy-tochemical defenses. Phytochemistry Reviews. 17(1): 37–49.