بررسی رویکرد موافق در مورد فناوری تراریخته در بخش کشاورزی ایران
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی
یحیی صافی سیس
1
(دکتری ترویج کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران.)
میلاد جودی دمیرچی
2
(کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران.)
نجیمه اسماعیلی
3
(کارشناسی ارشد آموزش کشاورزی پایدار و محیط زیست، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران.)
کلید واژه: خودکفایی, سلامتی مردم, افزایش بهره‌وری, حفظ محیطزیست,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی رویکرد موافق در مورد فناوری تراریخته در بخش کشاورزی ایران است. بدین منظور با استفاده از تحلیل محتوا، رویکرد موافق در مورد فناوری تراریخته مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. برای گردآوری داده‌ها، مصاحبه با 23 نفر از پژوهشگران انجام شد. یافتههای پژوهش نشان داد چهار عامل «حفظ محیطزیست»، «بهبود سلامتی انسان»، «اجتناب ناپذیربودن توجه به نظام کشاورزی مبتنی بر مهندسی ژنتیک» و «عدم مقبولیت ادعاهای مخالفان» از دلایل موافقت با کشت و مصرف محصولات تراریخته از دیدگاه پژوهشگران میباشند. برای رسیدن به خودکفایی در شرایط تحریم کنونی و رفع نگرانی در مورد احتمال آلودگی بذور تراریخته وارداتی، در مرحله نخست انجام پژوهش‌های بیش‌تر بر روی ابعاد گوناگون محصولات تراریخته (سلامتی، محیطزیست، اقتصادی و غیره) و تقویت بخش پژوهش‌های بیوفناوری در عرصه کشاورزی و پزشکی پیشنهاد میشود و پس از رسیدن به توانایی لازم در زمینه تولید بذر و سایر نهادههای تراریخته و هم‌چنین، ارزیابی ایمنی این محصولات، تولید محصولات تراریخته با اهداف غیرخوراکی نظیر پنبه تراریخته و محصولات تراریخته به عنوان خوراک دام میتواند در دستور کار قرار گیرد.
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the agreed approach to transgenic technology in Iran's agricultural sector. To this end, using content analysis, the agreed approach to transgenic technology was examined. To collect the data, 23 researchers were interviewed. The findings show that the four factors of "environmental protection", "improving human health", "inevitability of attention to the agricultural system based on genetic engineering" and "non-acceptance of the claims of the opposition" are the reasons for agreeing to cultivate and consume transgenic crops. To achieve self-sufficiency under current sanctions and to remove concerns about possible contamination of Imported transgenic seeds, In the first phase, further research on different aspects of transgenic crops (health, environment, economy, etc.) and strengthening of the biotechnology research sector in the field of agriculture and medicine is recommended and after reaching the necessary ability in seed production and other transgenic inputs, as well as assessing the safety of these crops, producing non-food transgenic products such as transgenic cotton and transgenic crops as feedstuffs can be on the agenda.
Aerni, P. (2013). Resistance to agricultural biotechnology: the importance of
distinguishing between weak and strong public attitudes. Biotechnology Journal, 8,
1129–1132.
Azadi, H., Samiee, A., Mahmoudi, H., Jouzi, Z., Rafiaani Khachak, P., De Maeyer, P.,
& Witlox, F. (2016). Genetically modified crops and small-scale farmers: main
opportunities and challenges. Critical reviews in biotechnology, 36(3), 434-446.
Amin, L. Jahi, J. Nor, A. R. Osman, M & Mahadi, M. (2007). Attitude Towards
Genetically Modified Soybean Amongst The Klang Valley Stakeholders. Malaysian
Journal of Environmental Management, 8 (2007):141 – 155.
Acharya, T., Daar, AS., & Singer, PA. (2003). Biotechnology and the UNs millennium
development goals. Nat Biotechnol, 21, 1434–6.
Azadi, H., Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, O. M., Khachak, P. R., Taning, C. N., & Hajivand,
R. Y., et al. (2015). Genetically modified crops: Towards agricultural growth,
agricultural development or agricultural sustainability? Food Reviews International,
31(3), 195–221.
Burns, N. & Grove, S.K. (2005). The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique
& Utilization. Elsevier Saunders, St Louis.
Bennett, R., Morse, S., & Ismael, Y. (2005). The economic impact of genetically
modified cotton on South African smallholders: Yield, profit and health effects. The
Journal of Development Studies, 42(4), 662-667.
Bengtson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content
analysis. Nursing Plus Open, 2(6), 8-14.
Buah, J. (2011). Public perception of genetically modified food in Ghana JN Buah.
American Journal ofFood Technology, 6(7), 541–554.
Chen, M. F., & Li, H. L. (2007). The consumer’s attitude toward genetically modified
foods in Taiwan. Food Quality & preference, 18(4), 662-674.
Cui, K., & Shoemaker, S. P. (2018). Public perception of genetically-modified (GM)
food: A Nationwide Chinese Consumer Study. Science of Food, 2(10), 34-47.
Dewar, A.M., May, M., Woiwod, I., Haylock, L., Champion, G., Garner, B.H.,
Sands, R.J.N., Qi, A., & Pidgeon, J. (2003). "A Novel Approach to the Use of
Genetically Modified Herbicide Tolerant Crops for Environmental Benefit."
Proceedings of the Royal Society. Biological Sciences, 270(1513), 335-340.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of
advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014).
Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE open, 4(1),
2158244014522633.
Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis.
African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93-99.
FAO,) 2009(. How to Feed the World in 2050. Discussion Paper, Highlevel Expert
Forum. The Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, O. M., Kitterlin, M., Jahangiry, S., Zarafshani, K., Van Passel,
S., & Azadi, H. (2016). Attitudes of agricultural experts toward genetically modified
crops: A case study in Southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(2), 509-
524.
Ghasemi, S., Karami, E., & Azadi, H. (2013). Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral
intentions of agricultural professionals toward genetically modified (GM) foods: A
case study in Southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1201-1227.
Ghoochani, O. M., Ghanian, M., Baradaran, M., Alimirzaei, E., & Azadi, H. (2018).
Behavioral intentions toward genetically modified crops in Southwest Iran: a multi-
stakeholder analysis. Environment Development Sustainable, 20(4), 233–253.
Ghoochani, O. M., Ghanian, M., Baradaran, M., & Azadi, H. (2017). Multi
stakeholders’ attitudes toward Bt rice in Southwest, Iran: Application of TPB and
multi attribute models. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(1), 141-
163.
Ghiasvand Ghiasi, F. Mirkzadeh, A. A. & Shiri, N. A. (2015). Factors Affecting
Consumers' Attitudes Towards Transgenic Food Products (Case Study: Qazvin
County), Iran, Economic Research and Agricultural Development, 46(3), 438-427.
(In Persian)
Ghoochani, A., Ghanian, M., & Baradaran, M. (2016). Analysis of Factors Affecting the
Attitudes of Experts Towards Iranian Transgenic Rice. Iranian Journal of
Agricultural Extension and Education, 12(2), 53-72. (In Persian)
Harlander, S. K. (1991). Social, moral, and ethical issues in food biotechnology. Food
Technology, 45(5), 152–160.
Hill, R., Stanisstreet, M., Boyes, E., & Sullivan, O. (1998) Reactions to a new
technology: students’ ideas about genetically engineered foodstuffs. Res Sci Technol
Edu, 16(2), 203–216.
Izumi, S., Mori, H., Kusaba, S., Okada, T., Murayama, T., & Yamamoto, T. (2010).
Japanese Attitudes toward Genetic Engineering: the Osaka, KITKyoto, Tokyo
Metropolitan, and UT-Tokyo teams.
James, C. (2008) Global status of commercialised biotech/GM crops: 2008 ISAAA
Brief No 39.
Klümper, W., & Qaim, M. (2014). A metaanalysis of the impacts of genetically
modified crops. PloS one, 9(11), e111629.
Kimenju, S. C., De Groote, H., Karugia, J., Mbogoh, S., & Poland, D. (2005).
Consumer awareness and attitudes toward GM foods in Kenya. African Journal of
Biotechnology, 4(10), 71-93.
Kim, Y. G. (2014). Ecological Concerns about Genetically Modified (GM) Food
Consumption using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 159 (13), 677 – 681.
Martinez-Poveda, A., Molla-Bauza, M. B., Campo Gomis, F. J. D., & Martinez-
Carrasco, M. L. (2009). Consumer-perceived risk model for the introduction of
genetically modified food in Spain. Food Policy, 34(6), 519–528.
Mohapatra, A. K., Priyadarshini, D., & Biswas, A. (2010). Genetically Modified Food:
Knowledge and Attitude of Teachers and Students. Journal of Science Education
Technology, 19(7), 489–497.
Morse, J. M. (1994). Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Sage
Publications, London.
Naimi, A., Pezeshkirad, Gh M., & Qarayazi, B. (2010). Analysis of agricultural
biotechnology development problems from the perspective of biotechnology experts
in Tehran province. Iranian Agricultural Economics and Development Research.
4(42), 45-56. (In Persian)
Naimi, A., Biglary, N., Abbasi, F. Pezeshkirad, Gh. R. & Chizari, M. (2011). The effect
of breeders' personal and professional characteristics on their attitudes toward using
participatory breeding. Iranian Agricultural Economics and Development Research.
10 (4), 579-588. (In Persian)
Nicolia, A., Manzo, A., Veronesi, F., & Rosellini, D. (2014). An overview of the last 10
years of genetically engineered crop safety research, Critical Reviews in
Biotechnology, 34 (1) 77–88.
Onyango, B., Govindasamy, R., Hallman, W., Jang, H. M., & Puduri, V. S. (2004).
Consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods in Korea: factor and cluster
analysis. Food policy institute working paper, 7 (11),1104-1115.
Pezeshkirad, Gh. M., & Naimi, A. (2010). Factor analysis of the attitude of
biotechnologists in Tehran province towards the use of transgenic plants. Iranian
Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 7(2), 31-52. (In Persian)
Prasad, B. D. (2008). Content analysis. Research methods for social work, 5, 1-20.
Qaim, M. (2009). The economics of genetically modified crops. Annual Review of
Resource Economics , 1:665-694.
Raney, T. (2006). Economic impact of transgenic crops in developing countries. Current
Opinion in Biotechnology Volume 17, Issue 2, 17(2), 174-178.
Razzaqi Borkhani, F. (2009). Extension of the use of transgenic plants as an effective
strategy for sustainable agricultural development. Regional Conference on Food and
Biotechnology. Kermanshah, Islamic Azad University. (In Persian)
Rzymski, P., & Królczyk, A. (2016). Attitudes toward genetically modified organisms
in Poland: to GMO or not to GMO? Food Security. 8(2), 689–697.
Sorgo, A., & Ambrozis-Dolinsek, J. (2009). The relationship among knowledge of
attitudes toward and acceptance of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) among
Slovenian teachers. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 12(4), 1-2.
Sturgis, P., Cooper, H., & Fife-Schaw, C. (2005). Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating
the opinions of a better-informed public. New Genetics and Society, 24, 31–56.
UNDP. (2013). The millennium development goals. Available at: http:// www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home
Verma, S.R.) 2013). Genetically modified plants: public and scientific perceptions,
ISRN Biotechnol.
Von Braun, J. (2007). The world food situtation: new driving forces and required
actions. Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
Wong, A. Y., & Chan, A. W. (2016). Genetically modified foods in China and the
United States: A primer of regulation and intellectual property protection. Food
Science and Human Wellness, 5 (18) 124–140.
Zhang, M., Chen, C., Hu, W., Chen, L., & Zhan, J. (2016). Influence of source
credibility on consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods in China.
Sustainability, 8(9), 899-921.
Zhong, F., Marchant, M. A., Ding, Y., & Lu, K. (2002). GM foods: A Nanjing case
study of Chineseconsumers’ awareness and potential attitudes. Agrobiotechnology
Management & Economics, 5(4), 136–144.
_||_