شوکران توسعه: شبکه¬های اجتماعی مجازی فرصت یا تهدید برای آموزش؟!
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش های ترویج و آموزش کشاورزیخدیجه سلیمانی 1 * , بهمن خسروی پور 2 , مسعود یزدانپناه 3 , مسلم سواری 4
1 - دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان
2 - دانشیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان
3 - دانشگاه رامین
4 - دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان
کلید واژه: شبکه¬های اجتماعی مجازی (OSNs), کشاورزان, آموزشگران, ابزار آموزشی,
چکیده مقاله :
رشد روزافزون پیشرفتهای فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات (ICT)، موجب شده که عصر حاضر را عصر دیجیتال نامیده و آن را پیش شرط تکامل و توسعه جوامع معرفی کنند. نفوذ فناوریهای ICT از جمله شبکههای اجتماعی مجازی (OSNs) در تمام عرصههای زندگی بشر از جمله کشاورزی امری اجتناب ناپذیر است. شوکران گیاهی دارویی و سمی است که استفاده مناسب از آن مزایای بیشمار و مصرف نامناسب آن منجر به مرگ خواهد شد. در این مقاله OSNs به عنوان شوکران توسعه تلقی شدهاند تا نقش آنها در فرایند توسعه آشکارتر گردد. استفاده از این شبکهها به عنوان ابزاری برای فعالیتهای آموزشی ترویجی برای کشاورزان بعد از همهگیر شدن بیماری کووید 19 به شکل جدی آغاز شده و هنوز در مراحل ابتدایی است. در این پژوهش با استفاده از روش پژوهش کیفی (انجام مصاحبه)، دیدگاه کارشناسان و کشاورزان استان خوزستان (31 نفر) نسبت به مزایا و معایب بکارگیری این شبکهها به عنوان ابزاری برای فعالیتهای آموزشی ترویجی سنجیده شده است. نتایج حاصل از مصاحبه با نرم افزار MaxQda 2020 کدهای انتخابی و محوری استخراج شدند و کدهای محوری این مزایا و معایب در شش بعد اقتصادی، اجتماعی، آموزشی، دسترسی، محیط زیست، سلامت دسته بندی شدند.
The increasing growth of information and communication technology (ICT) advancements has led to the present era being referred to as the digital age, which is considered a prerequisite for the evolution and development of societies. The penetration of ICT technologies, including online social networks (OSNs), into all areas of human life, including agriculture, is inevitable. The plant "shokaran" is both a medicinal and toxic herb, where proper use yields countless benefits, while improper consumption can lead to death. In this article, OSNs are viewed as the " Apioideae " of development to clarify their role in the development process. The use of these networks as a tool for educational activities aimed at farmers began earnestly after the outbreak of COVID-19 and is still in its early stages. In this research, qualitative research methods (interviews) were employed to assess the perspectives of experts and farmers in Khuzestan province (31 individuals) regarding the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing these networks as a tool for educational activities. The results from the interviews, analyzed using MaxQda 2020 software, led to the extraction of selected and central codes, which were categorized into six dimensions: economic, social, educational, accessibility, environmental, and health.
چراغ ملایی، لیلا.، کدیور، پروین.، صرامی، غلامرضا. (1393). استفاده از شبکه های اجتماعی مجازی در آموزش – فرصت ها و چالش ها. اندیشه های نوین تربیتی. دوره 10، شماره 3. صص: 51-29.
Aduba, D. E., & Mayowa-Adebara, O. (2022). Online platforms used for teaching and learning during the COVID-19 era: The case of LIS students in Delta State University, Abraka. International Information & Library Review, 54(1), 17-31.
Alenazy, W.M., Al-Rahmi, W.M., Khan, M.S. (2019). Validation of TAM model on social media use for collaborative learning to enhance collaborative authoring. IEEE Access 7, 71550–71562.
Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2012). The impact of engagement with social networking sites (SNSs) on cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1748-1754.
Al-Sabaawi, M. Y. M., Dahlan, H. M., Shehzad, H. M. F., & Alshaher, A. A. (2021). A model of influencing factors of online social networks for informal learning in research institutes. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 11, 1-14.
Al-Tahitah, A. N., Al-Sharafi, M. A., & Abdulrab, M. (2021). How COVID-19 pandemic is accelerating the transformation of higher education institutes: a health belief model view. In Emerging Technologies During the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic (pp. 333-347). Springer, Cham.
Bagheri, R., Ostovar, S., Griffiths, M. D., & Hashim, I. H. M. (2023). Server connection versus marital disconnection: An investigation of the effect of internet addiction on couple burnout in Iran. Technology in Society, 72, 102163.
Balakrishnan, V. (2017). Key determinants for intention to use social media for learning in higher education institutions. Universal access in the information society, 16, 289-301.
Barabadi, S. A., Shams, A., & Wise, N. (2022). Social network sites impact on learning: Extending the TAM3 Model to Assess Academic Performance in Higher Education. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 1073-1087.
Barh, A., & Balakrishnan, M. (2018). Smart phone applications: Role in agri-information dissemination. Agricultural Reviews, 39(1), 82-85.
Bright, L. F., Kleiser, S. B., & Grau, S. L. (2015). Too much Facebook? An exploratory examination of social media fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 148-155.
Brown, S. (2010). From VLEs to learning webs: the implications of Web 2.0 for learning and teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(1), 1-10.
Calvo, S., Lyon, F., Morales, A., & Wade, J. (2020). Educating at scale for sustainable development and social enterprise growth: The impact of online learning and a massive open online course (MOOC). Sustainability, 12(8), 3247.
Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of higher education, 46(23).
Chaudhuri, S., Roy, M., McDonald, L. M., & Emendack, Y. (2021). Reflections on farmers’ social networks: a means for sustainable agricultural development?. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(3), 2973-3008.
Cheraghmollaei, L. (2019). Instructional Design Based on Social Network and its effect on Learning Approach and Student’s Perception of Learning Environment. New Educational Approaches, 13(2), 54-76. [Persian]
Cristescu, I., & Iordache, D. D. (2017). Learning tools offered by online social networks-a qualitative approach. Revista Romana de Interactiune Om-Calculator, 10(4), 271-284.
Dehghani, A., Kojuri, J., Dehghani, M. R., Keshavarzi, A., & Najafipour, S. (2019). Experiences of students and faculty members about using virtual social networks in education: A qualitative content analysis. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 7(2), 86.
Doyle, C., Sammon, D., & Neville, K. (2015). Building an evaluation framework for social media-enabled collaborative learning environments (SMECLEs). Journal of Decision Systems, 24(3), 298-317.
Fox, J., & Moreland, J. J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in human behavior, 45, 168-176.
Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, media and technology, 41(1), 6-30.
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 14(4), 1130-1161.
Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012). Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2340-2350.
Hamadi, M., El-Den, J., Azam, S., & Sriratanaviriyakul, N. (2022). Integrating social media as cooperative learning tool in higher education classrooms: An empirical study. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(6), 3722-3731.
Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Kurnia, S., & Chang, S. (2015). Understanding students' perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. The Internet and higher education, 26, 1-9.
Hansen, J. P., Melby Jespersen, L., Brunori, G., Leck Hansen, A., Holst, K., Mathiesen, C., ... & Ankjær Rasmussen, I. (2015). ICT and social media as drivers of multi-actor innovation in agriculture.
Higueras-Rodríguez, L., Medina-García, M., & Pegalajar-Palomino, M. (2020). Use of Twitter as an Educational Resource. Analysis of Concepts of Active and Trainee Teachers. Education Sciences, 10(8), 200.
Hosseini, S., Charters, S., Anthony, P., & Alhazmi, A. (2021). Effects of “the selected smartphone social-messaging applications” training on Iranian elderly’s quality of life: results of a qualitative study.
Kelly, N., Bennett, J. M., & Starasts, A. (2017). Networked learning for agricultural extension: a framework for analysis and two cases. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 23(5), 399-414.
Kennedy, T. J., & Sundberg, C. W. (2020). 21st century skills. Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory, 479-496.
Kjellberg, S. (2010). I am a blogging researcher: Motivations for blogging in a scholarly context. First Monday.
Knight, C. G., & Kaye, L. K. (2016). ‘To tweet or not to tweet?’A comparison of academics’ and students’ usage of Twitter in academic contexts. Innovations in education and teaching international, 53(2), 145-155.
Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? New York: International Universities Press.
Koohestani, H. R., Arabshahi, S. K. S., Fata, L., & Ahmadi, F. (2018). The educational effects of mobile learning on students of medical sciences: A systematic review in experimental studies. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 6(2), 58.
Kwon, S. J., Park, E., & Kim, K. J. (2014). What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 534-544.
Lederer, K. (2012). Pros and cons of social media in the classroom. Campus Technology, 25(5), 1-2.
Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and the social assurance scales. Journal of counseling psychology, 42(2), 232.
Madhusudhan, M. (2012). Use of social networking sites by research scholars of the University of Delhi: A study. The International Information & Library Review, 44(2), 100-113.
Madhusudhan, M. (2012). Use of social networking sites by research scholars of the University of Delhi: A study. The International Information & Library Review, 44(2), 100-113.
Manasijević, D., Živković, D., Arsić, S., & Milošević, I. (2016). Exploring students’ purposes of usage and educational usage of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 441-450.
Menéndez, M., Angeli, A. D., & Menestrina, Z. (2012). Exploring the virtual space of academia. In From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems: Results and Open Challenges: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, May 30-1 June, 2012 (pp. 49-63). Springer London.
Moreno, M. A., Goniu, N., Moreno, P. S., & Diekema, D. (2013). Ethics of social media research: Common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 16(9), 708-713.
Odewumi, M. O., Yusuf, M. O., & Oputa, G. O. (2018). UTAUT Model: Intention to Use Social Media for Learning Interactive Effect of Postgraduate Gender in South-West Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 14(3), 239-251.
Omer, F. V. (2015). Positive and negative aspects of using social networks in higher education: A focus group study. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(8), 1147-1166.
Pollack Ichou, R. (2018). Can MOOCs reduce global inequality in education?. Australasian Marketing Journal, 26(2), 116-120.
Schroeder, A., Minocha, S., & Schneider, C. (2010). The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. Journal of computer assisted learning, 26(3), 159-174.
Schroeder, A., Minocha, S., & Schneider, C. (2010). The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. Journal of computer assisted learning, 26(3), 159-174.
Sharma, S. K., Joshi, A., & Sharma, H. (2016). A multi-analytical approach to predict the Facebook usage in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 340-353.
Sun, Y. (2022). Social Media and Influence Detection: A Literature Review on Twitter.
Symeonides, R., & Childs, C. (2015). The personal experience of online learning: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 539-545.
Trad, R. (2021). Teachers’ and Students’ Experiences Using Social Media as a Pedagogical Tool Within Classrooms: A Systematic Literature Review.
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in human behavior, 72, 577-588.
Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2013). Scholars and faculty members' lived experiences in online social networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 43-50.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of curriculum studies, 44(3), 299-321.
Vural, O. F. (2015). Positive and negative aspects of using social networks in higher education: A focus group study. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(8), 1147-1166.