تاثیر بگارگیری شبکه‌های اجتماعی بر توانمندسازی دبیران با توجه به نقش میانجی انتقال دانش

محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسی

کلثوم نامی ¹ (استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد بندرعباس،‌دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی‌، بندرعباس ، ایران)
مرضیه نظری هنزایی ² (دانش آموخته کارشناسی‌ارشد، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد بندرعباس،‌دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی‌، بندرعباس‌، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1398/12/11 تاریخ پذیرش : 1399/06/03 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/07/01

کلید واژه: توانمندسازی, انتقال دانش, شبکه‌های اجتماعی,

چکیده مقاله :

چکیده هدف از انجام این پژوهش بررسی تاثیر میزان استفاده دبیران از شبکه‌های اجتماعی بر توانمندسازی آنان با نقش میانجی انتقال دانش می‌باشد. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت جمع آوری اطلاعات، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی می‌باشد. جامعه آماری کلیه دبیران متوسطه دوم ناحیه یک شهر بندرعباس به تعداد 428 نفر بود، حجم نمونه با استفاده جدول کرجسی و مورگان به تعداد۲۰۵ نفر که به شیوه تصادفی - طبقه‌ای انتخاب گردیدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه‌های توانمندسازی اسپریتزر (1995) با ۱۸ گویه ، انتقال آموزش هالتون و همکاران(۲۰۰۰) با ۴۵ گویه ، شبکه های اجتماعی اندام(۱۳۹۵ ) با ۱۴ گویه بود، روایی صوری و محتوایی آنها مورد تایید متخصصان قرار گرفت و پایایی آن‌ها با استفاده از روش ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به ترتیب مقادیر ۸۶/۰، ۸۴/۰ و ۸۹/۰ به دست آمد. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS23 و LISREL8.80 مورد پردازش قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که استفاده از شبکه اجتماعی بر انتقال دانش توسط دبیران اثر مستقیم دارد. استفاده از شبکه اجتماعی بر توانمندسازی دبیران اثر مستقیم دارد. انتقال دانش با توانمندسازی دبیران اثرمستقیم دارد. و انتقال دانش در تاثیر بکارگیری شبکه اجتماعی بر توانمندسازی دبیران نقش میانجی دارد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of teachers' use of social networks on empowering them with the mediating role of knowledge transfer. The purpose of this study is practical and descriptive correlational in nature. The population of the study consisted of 428 second-grade teachers in the second district of Bandar Abbas city. The sample size was 9 persons who were selected by stratified random sampling using Krejcie and Morgan table. Data collection tools were Spritzer Empowerment Questionnaires (1995) with 2 items, Halton et al. (1) education questionnaire with 2 items, 2-item social networks (1), face validity and content validated by experts. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to determine their reliability at the values ​​of 0.5, 0.5 and 0.5, respectively. Data were analyzed using SPSS23 and LISREL8.80 software. The results showed that using social network had a direct effect on teachers' knowledge transfer. Using social networking has a direct effect on empowering teachers. Knowledge transfer has a direct effect on empowering teachers. And knowledge transfer plays a mediating role in the impact of using social networking on empowering teachers.

منابع و مأخذ:

[1]Afrasiabi, M.S. (2016). The Potential of Networks and Social Media in Enhancing Knowledge Management, Journal of [1]Afrasiabi, M.S. (2016). The Potential of Networks and Social Media in Enhancing Knowledge Management, Journal of Library and Information Science, 1 (1), 2.(InPersian). [2]Argote, L. & Fahrenkopf, E. (2016). Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 146-159. [3]Bagheri, F. & Ayat, S.S. (2012). The Role of Social Media in Empowering Media Organizations, National Conference on Computer and Information Technology, Kerman, Sama Kerman School. .(InPersian). [4]Bartol, K. M. & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64-76. [5]Bernardin, H. J. (2003). Human Resource Management: an experiential approach. 3th Ed. New York: McGraw Hill. [6]Bowen, D. E. & Lawler, E. E.(2012). The Empowerment of Service Workers. What, Why, Who, When, Sloan Management Review. [7]Castells M. (2010) Introduction in International Seminar on Network Theory: Network Multidimensionality in the Digital Age, February 19, 2010. The Annenberg Networks Network (ANN), University of Southern California. [8]Dehghani Soltani, M., Mesbahi, M. & Avami, M., Ramezani, S. (2018). Effect of Using New Information Technologies on Psychological Empowerment of Employees by Explaining the Role of Mediator of Knowledge Sharing (Case study: Imam Khomeini Naval Academy’s staff). Journal of Research on Management of Teaching in Marine Sciences, 5(1), 41- 59. (InPersian). [9]Doornbos, A. J., Bolhuis, S., & Denessen, E. (2004). Exploring the relation between work domains and work-related learning: the case of the Dutch police force. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(3), 174-190. [10]Etesami Fard, Z., Etesami Fard, E. & Rivaz, A. (2016). Investigating the Relationship between Implicit Knowledge Transfer in Organizations and Empowering Personnel, International Conference on Management and Dynamic Iran-Malaysia, Malaysia-Penang Peninsula USM University, Iran Modern Education Development Center (Meta). (InPersian). [11]Ghalavandi, H., & Ashrafisalimkandi, F. (2017). Investigate the relationship between knowledge management and empowerment among the staff of Urmia University. The Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education, 12(2), 137-124. (InPersian). [12]Ghaffari, S., Zakiani, S. & Rezaie, Z. (2018). The Effect of Information Technology (IT) in the Empowerment of Staff in Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Payavard Salamat, 11(6), 632-638. (InPersian). [13]Ghorbanzadeh, V. & Khaleghinia, Sh. (2009). Effects of Implicit Knowledge Transfer on Employees' Empowerment. Journal of Research in Human Resources Management, 1(2), 85-105. (InPersian). [14]Hamid, S. A. (2020). Knowledge Management using Social Media Tools in Higher Education Institution. Recent Trends in Information Technology and its Application, 3(1). [15]Holton, E. F., Bates, R. A., & Ruona, W. E. (2000). Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human resource development quarterly, 11(4), 333-360. [16]Kim, H., Lee, J., & Oh, S. E. (2019). Individual characteristics influencing the sharing of knowledge on social networking services: online identity, self-efficacy, and knowledge sharing intentions. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-12. [17]Kline, R. B. (2011). Principals and practice of structural equation modeling. (3tdEdition ed). New Yurok: the Guilford Press. [18]Leask, M., Turner, T., & Capel, S. (2009). Learning to teach in the secondary school: a companion to school experience. Routledge. [19]Lee C. K., & Al-Hawamdeh S. (2002). Factors impacting knowledge sharing. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 1(1), 49-56. [20]Medina, M. N. (2017). Training motivation and satisfaction: The role of goal orientation and offshoring perception. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 287-293. [21]Monurian, A., & Asgari, N. (2009). Organization in the Age of Industry, Information and Knowledge, Tehran: Tehran University Press. (InPersian). [22]Naghizadeh, Y., & Ghaffari, S. (2017). Impact of information technology on empowerment Tehran University of Medical Sciences. , 3(3), 83-104. doi: 10.22091/stim.2017.2161.1144. (InPersian). [23]Ou, C.X.J., Davison, R.M., & Wong, L.H.M. (2016). Using interactive systems for knowledge sharing: The impact of individual contextual preferences in China. Information & Management. 53(2): 145-156. [24]Qi, C., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2018). Will enterprise social networking systems promote knowledge management and organizational learning? An empirical study. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 28(1), 31-57. [25]Regan, P. M., & Steeves, V. (2010). Kids r us: online social networking and the potential for empowerment. Surveillance & Society, 8(2), 151-165. [26]Rehman, W. U., Ahmad, M., Allen, M. M., Raziq, M. M., & Riaz, A. (2019). High involvement HR systems and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment, and the moderating roles of manager and co-worker support. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(4), 525-535. [27]Schermuly, G. M., Gandez, F.& Ergad, H. (2016) “Psycological Empowerment in the Work Place. Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation”, Academy of Management Journal, 38,1442-1465. [28]Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.   Library and Information Science, 1 (1), 2.(InPersian). [2]Argote, L., & Fahrenkopf, E. (2016). Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 146-159. [3]Bagheri, F., & Ayat, S.S. (2012). The Role of Social Media in Empowering Media Organizations, National Conference on Computer and Information Technology, Kerman, Sama Kerman School. .(InPersian). [4]Bartol, K. M.,& Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64-76. [5]Bernardin, H. J. (2003). Human Resource Management: an experiential approach. 3th Ed. New York: McGraw Hill. [6]Bowen, D. E., & Lawler, E. E.(2012). The Empowerment of Service Workers. What, Why, Who, When, Sloan Management Review. [7]Castells M. (2010) Introduction in International Seminar on Network Theory: Network Multidimensionality in the Digital Age, February 19, 2010. The Annenberg Networks Network (ANN), University of Southern California. [8]Dehghani Soltani, M., Mesbahi, M., & Avami, M., Ramezani, S. (2018). Effect of Using New Information Technologies on Psychological Empowerment of Employees by Explaining the Role of Mediator of Knowledge Sharing (Case study: Imam Khomeini Naval Academy’s staff). Journal of Research on Management of Teaching in Marine Sciences, 5(1), 41- 59. (InPersian). [9]Doornbos, A. J., Bolhuis, S., & Denessen, E. (2004). Exploring the relation between work domains and work-related learning: the case of the Dutch police force. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(3), 174-190. [10]Etesami Fard, Z., Etesami Fard, E., & Rivaz, A. (2016). Investigating the Relationship between Implicit Knowledge Transfer in Organizations and Empowering Personnel, International Conference on Management and Dynamic Iran-Malaysia, Malaysia-Penang Peninsula USM University, Iran Modern Education Development Center (Meta). (InPersian). [11]Ghalavandi, H., & Ashrafisalimkandi, F. (2017). Investigate the relationship between knowledge management and empowerment among the staff of Urmia University. The Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education, 12(2), 137-124. (InPersian). [12]Ghaffari, S., Zakiani, S., & Rezaie, Z. (2018). The Effect of Information Technology (IT) in the Empowerment of Staff in Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Payavard Salamat, 11(6), 632-638. (InPersian). [13]Ghorbanzadeh, V., & Khaleghinia, Sh. (2009). Effects of Implicit Knowledge Transfer on Employees' Empowerment. Journal of Research in Human Resources Management, 1(2), 85-105. (InPersian). [14]Hamid, S. A. (2020). Knowledge Management using Social Media Tools in Higher Education Institution. Recent Trends in Information Technology and its Application, 3(1). [15]Holton, E. F., Bates, R. A., & Ruona, W. E. (2000). Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human resource development quarterly, 11(4), 333-360. [16]Kim, H., Lee, J., & Oh, S. E. (2019). Individual characteristics influencing the sharing of knowledge on social networking services: online identity, self-efficacy, and knowledge sharing intentions. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-12. [17]Kline, R. B. (2011). Principals and practice of structural equation modeling. (3tdEdition ed). New Yurok: the Guilford Press. [18]Leask, M., Turner, T., & Capel, S. (2009). Learning to teach in the secondary school: a companion to school experience. Routledge. [19]Lee C. K., & Al-Hawamdeh S. (2002). Factors impacting knowledge sharing. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 1(1), 49-56. [20]Medina, M. N. (2017). Training motivation and satisfaction: The role of goal orientation and offshoring perception. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 287-293. [21]Monurian, A., & Asgari, N. (2009). Organization in the Age of Industry, Information and Knowledge, Tehran: Tehran University Press. (InPersian). [22]Naghizadeh, Y., & Ghaffari, S. (2017). Impact of information technology on empowerment Tehran University of Medical Sciences. , 3(3), 83-104. doi: 10.22091/stim.2017.2161.1144. (InPersian). [23]Ou, C.X.J., Davison, R.M., & Wong, L.H.M. (2016). Using interactive systems for knowledge sharing: The impact of individual contextual preferences in China. Information & Management. 53(2): 145-156. [24]Qi, C., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2018). Will enterprise social networking systems promote knowledge management and organizational learning? An empirical study. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 28(1), 31-57. [25]Regan, P. M., & Steeves, V. (2010). Kids r us: online social networking and the potential for empowerment. Surveillance & Society, 8(2), 151-165. [26]Rehman, W. U., Ahmad, M., Allen, M. M., Raziq, M. M., & Riaz, A. (2019). High involvement HR systems and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment, and the moderating roles of manager and co-worker support. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(4), 525-535. [27]Schermuly, G. M., Gandez, F.& Ergad, H. (2016) “Psycological Empowerment in the Work Place. Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation”, Academy of Management Journal, 38,1442-1465. [28]Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.