• صفحه اصلی
  • مقایسه اثر آموزش تلفیقی با آموزش سنتی بر تفکر انتقادی و شادکامی دانش آموزان

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : 1152-ICTEDU (R5) بازدید : 381 صفحه: 39 - 57

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

مقایسه اثر آموزش تلفیقی با آموزش سنتی بر تفکر انتقادی و شادکامی دانش آموزان

محورهای موضوعی : فن‎آوری اطلاعات

آزاد الله کرمی 1 , اسماعیل زارعی زوارکی 2

1 - دانشجوی دکتری تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
2 - دانشیار دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1392/07/04 تاریخ پذیرش : 1393/01/16 تاریخ انتشار : 1393/05/10

کلید واژه: شادکامی, تفکر انتقادی, آموزش تلفیقی, آموزش سنتی,

چکیده مقاله :

این پژوهش به منظور مقایسه اثر آموزش تلفیقی با آموزش سنتی بر تفکر انتقادی و شادکامی دانش‌ آموزان پایه سوم دوره راهنمایی شهرستان قدس انجام گرفت. روش تحقیق نیمه آزمایشی بود. جامعه آماری، شامل دانش ‌آموزان پایه سوم راهنمایی شهرستان قدس که در سال ۱۳۹۱ مشغول به تحصیل بودند، می‌باشد. به منظور انتخاب نمونه آماری، از روش نمونه‌ گیری در‌ دسترس استفاده شد. بدین ترتیب، یکی از مدارس شهرستان قدس که مجهز به امکانات لازم جهت اجرای آموزش تلفیقی بود انتخاب، و از میان کلاس‌ های پایه سوم، دو کلاس به عنوان گروه های آزمایش و شاهد انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای مورد استفاده در این پژوهش، آزمون تفکر انتقادی کالیفرنیا و شادکامی آکسفورد بود. ابتدا از هر دو گروه پیش آزمون گرفته شد، سپس یک نیمسال تحصیلی گروه آزمایش با روش آموزش تلفیقی و گروه شاهد با روش سنتی آموزش دیدند. پس از پایان نیمسال، از هر دو گروه پس آزمون به عمل آمد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ ها از شاخص‌ های آمار توصیفی شامل میانگین و انحراف‌ معیار و در بخش آمار استنباطی از آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس استفاده شد. یافته‌ های پژوهش نشان داد، آموزش تلفیقی در مقایسه با روش سنتی تأثیر بیشتری بر تفکر انتقادی و شادکامی دانش‌ آموزان دارد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of blended learning with traditional instruction on critical thinking and happiness in third grade students in Qods township. The research method was a semi-experimental. The statistical population included all the third grade secondary school students in Qods town studying in 2012. The statistical sample was selected via available sampling method. Thus one school was selected since it was equipped with the necessary facilities for implementing blended learning. Two classes of third grade in this school were chosen as experimental and control groups. The tools used in this study were California Critical Thinking Test and Oxford Happiness Test. Both groups were given a pretest, and at the end of the semester a posttest was performed. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics including mean and standard deviation and inferential statistics including Covariance analysis test. The findings showed that blended learning was more effective in increasing students' critical thinking and happiness compared with traditional instruction.

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Alberktsen, G. (2003). Happiness and related factors in pregnant women. Deparyment of Psychiatare, Faculty of Mediene, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok Thailand.
    2.
  2. Alipour, A. V., & Nourbala, A. E. (2008). Reliability and validity of Oxford happiness questionnaire. Journal of Attitude and Behavior, 18, 55-65. (in Persian).
    3.
  3. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garret, R. (2007). Blending in the extent and promise of blended education in united states: The sloan consortium. Retrieved Jan 4, 2010, from http://www.blended teaching.org/special-report-blending-in
    4.
  4. Amirpour, B. (2012). Relationship of critical thinking and its dimensions with university students’ social self-esteem and happiness. Iranian Quarterly of Education Strategies, 5(3), 143-147. (in Persian).
    5.
  5. Argyle, M., & Lu, L. (1990). The happiness of extroverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1011-1017.
    6.
  6. Athari, Z. S. (2007). Relationship between the university conquer exam scores and critical Thinking skills in Isfahan University and medical science students. Isfahan, MSc Thesis, University of Isfahan. (in Persian).
    7.
  7. Baba Mohammadi, H., & Khalili, H. (2004). Critical thinking skills of nursing students in Semnan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 4(2), 23-31. (in Persian).
    8.
  8. Cece, K. D., & Webb, C. (2000). A critical inquiry into web-mediated collaborative learning. In A. Aggarwal (Ed.), Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges (pp. 307-326). Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing.
    9.
  9. Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent finding on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 25-41.
    10.
  10. Driscoll, M. (2000). Blended learning: Lets' get beyond the hype. IBM Global Services. Retrieved October 21, 2012, from http://www-07.ibm.com/services/ pdf/blended_learning.pdf
    11.
  11. Finucane, M. L., & Satterfield, T. (2005). Risk as narrative values: A theoretical framework for facilitating the biotechnology debate. International Journal of Biotechnology, 7(1-3), 128-146.
    12.
  12. Fisher, R. (2007). Teaching children to think. Tehran: Roshd. (in Persian).
    13.
  13. Franken, R. (2005). Motivation and Emotion. Tehran: Nashre Ney. (in Persian).
    14.
  14. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
    15.
  15. Kavetsos, G., & Koutroumpis, P. (2010). Technological affluence and subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 742-53. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1552404
    16.
  16. Khalili, H. (2008). Validity and Reability of California Critical Thinking Questionnare. B.Ms. Thesis, Shahid Beheshti Medical Sciences University, Nursing Faculty. (in Persian).
    17.
  17. Koka, A., & Hein, V. (2003). Perceptions of teacher's feedback and learning environment as predictors of intrinsic motivation in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 333-346.
    18.
  18. Kwan, R., & Fong, J. (2005). Web-based learning: Technology and pedagogy. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference, Symposium conducted at the meeting of Hong Kong Web Society, Hong Kong.
    19.
  19. Maazi, M. (2009). The impact of educational software on critical thinking and its relation to cognitive. Master's Thesis, Kharazmi University. (in Persian).
    20.
  20. Macdonald, J. (2007). Blended learning and online tutoring (Tranlated by Zarei Zavaraki and Salehi). Tehran, Allameh Tabatabai University Publication. (in Persian).
    21.
  21. Mansouri, S. (2008). Comparative of normal and smart schools on critical thinking skills and academic motivation of high school students in Tehran. Master's Thesis, Allameh Tabatabaei University. (in Persian).
    22.
  22. Melton, B., Graf, H., & Chopak-Foss, J. (2009). Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1).
    23.
  23. Myers, Ch. (2007). Teaching Critical Thinking. Tehran: SAMT. (in Persian).
    24.
  24. Naeemi Hoseyni, F., Zare, H., Hormozi, M., Shaghaghi, F., & Kaveh, M. H. (2012). A comparison of the effects of blended learning and lecture based-instruction on the students’ academic motivation and satisfaction. JTE, 7(1), 23-32. (in Persian).
    25.
  25. Picciano, A. G., & Seaman, J. (2007). K–12 online learning: A survey of U.S. school district administrators. The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved March 6, 2009, from http://www.sloan.org/publications/survey/pdf.2007
    26.
  26. Rasmussen, D. M. (1996). Critical theory and philosophy. In Rasmussen D.A., Editor, The handbook of critical theory, Oxford: Blackwell, PP 17-38.
    27.
  27. Saberi, M. (2007). Contemporary methods of teaching critical thinking in education. Master's Thesis, Allame Tabatabaei University. (in Persian).
    28.
  28. Saeed Pour, M. (2010). Effects of a blended learning and traditional teaching on self-regulation and creative thinking of students of nursing and midwifery. Master's Thesis, Allameh Tabatabaei University. (in Persian).
    29.
  29. Seif, A. A. (2011). Modern educational psychology. Tehran: Doran. (in Persian).
    30.
  30. Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43, 51-54.
    31.
  31. Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. Retrieved January 13, 2008, from http://www.centra.com/download/ whitepapers/blendedlearning.pdf
    32.
  32. Sloffer, S., Duber, B., & Duffy, T. M. (1999). Using asynchronous conferencing to promptcritical thinking: Two implementations in higher education. Unpublished Manuscript, Center for Research on Learning and Technology Report, Indiana University, Bloomington.
    33.
  33. Smith, L., & Laurd, L. (2010). Exploring the advantages of blended instruction at community and technical schools. Journal of Online Learning And Teaching, 6(2), 508-515.
    34.
  34. Stacey, E., & Gerbic, P. (2009). Effective blended learning practices: Evidence-based perspectives in ICT-facilitated education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
    35.
  35. Uhlaner, C. J. (1989). Relational goods and participation: Incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action. Public Choice, 62, 253-285.
    36.
  36. Zarei Zavaraki, E., & Safavi, S. M. R. (2009). Modern methods of cultivation of creativity. Tehran: Roshd Farhang. (in Persian).
    37.

مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]