تاثیر تجربه همآفرینی بر رفتار سبز با نقش میانجی کیفیت زندگی و تعدیلگری نگرش سبز در صنعت گردشگری استان مازندران
محورهای موضوعی : توسعه پایدارمحمد باشکوه اجیرلو 1 , ایمان قاسمی همدانی 2
1 - استاد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی،دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
2 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازاریابی، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی،دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
کلید واژه: تجربه هم آفرینی, رفتار سبز, کیفیت زندگی, نگرش سبز.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: مطالعه حاضر با هدف تاثیر تجربه همآفرینی بر رفتار سبز با نقش میانجی کیفیت زندگی و تعیدلگری نگرش سبز، انجام شده است.
روش بررسی: این مطالعه از لحاظ هدف کاربردی است که از لحاظ روش اجرا در قالب یک پژوهش توصیفی-پیمایشی با رویکرد مقطعی انجام شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، کلیه کارکنان شرکتهای گردشگری استان مازندران میباشند که از این میان، نمونهای متشکل از 384 نفر با استفاده از فرمول کوکران انتخاب شده است. در این مطالعه برای جمعآوری اطلاعات جهت آزمون فرضیات از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته اقتباسی از مطالعه لو (2021) شامل 4 بعد و 33 سوال استفاده شده است که بر مبنای طیف لیکرت پنج درجه تدوین شده است. روایی پرسشنامه با استفاده از روش روایی محتوا مورد تایید قرار گرفت. برای ارزیابی پایایی پرسشنامه، ضریب آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه شد. ضریب آلفای کرونباخ بیش از 7/0 بدست آمد که نشان میدهد پرسشنامه از پایایی مطلوبی برخوردار است. برای آزمون فرضیات از تکنیک حداقل مربعات جزئی و نرم افزار اسمارت پی.ال.اس استفاده شده است.
بحث و نتیجه گیری: نتایج حاصل از آزمون فرضیههای تحقیق نشان داد که تجربه هم آفرینی تاثیر مثبت و معناداری بر رفتار سبز و کیفیت زندگی دارد؛ کیفیت زندگی تاثیر مثبت و معناداری بر رفتار سبز دارد. علاوه بر این، مشخص شد که کیفیت زندگی، رابطه بین تجربه هم آفرینی و رفتار سبز را میانجی گری؛ و نگرش سبز رابطه بین رابطه بین تجربه هم آفرینی و رفتار سبز را میانجیگری میکند.
Background and Objective: The present study was conducted with the aim of the effect of co-creation experience on green behavior with the mediating role of quality of life and normalization of green attitude.
Material and Methodology: This study is applied in terms of its purpose, which was carried out in the form of a descriptive-survey research with a cross-sectional approach. The statistical population of the research is all employees of tourism companies in Mazandaran province, from which a sample of 384 people was selected using Cochran's formula. In this study, to collect information to test hypotheses, a researcher-made questionnaire adapted from Luo's study (2021) including 4 dimensions and 33 questions was used, which was developed based on a five-point Likert scale. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed using the content validity method. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was more than 0.7, which shows that the questionnaire has good reliability. Partial least squares technique and SmartPLS software were used to test the hypotheses.
Findings: The results of the research hypotheses test showed that the experience of co-creation has a positive and significant effect on green behavior and quality of life; Quality of life has a positive and significant effect on green behavior.
Discussion and Conclusion: In addition, it was found that quality of life mediates the relationship between co-creation experience and green behavior; And green attitude mediates the relationship between co-creation experience and green behavior.
1. Wu, Q., Cao, H., Lin, X., Zhou, N., & Chi, P. (2021). Child maltreatment and subjective well-being in Chinese emerging adults: A process model involving self-esteem and self-compassion. Journal of interpersonal violence, 0886260521993924.
2. Hassanpour, Akbar; Ebrahimi, Sara. 2019. Identification and ranking of factors affecting the green behavior of employees with the DANP technique. Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterly. 9(1): 177-207.(In Persian)
3. Adriana, L. T. D., Fahira, K. T., Nailissa’adah, M., & El Maula, H. (2020, May). A review the important of green human resource management practices toward employee green behaviour in organization. In Journal of International Conference Proceedings (JICP) (Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 124-135).
4. Xiao, J., Mao, J. Y., Huang, S., & Qing, T. (2020). Employee-organization fit and voluntary green behavior: a cross-level model examining the role of perceived insider status and green organizational climate. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2193.
5. Juvan, E., & Dolnican, S. (2016). Measuring environmentally sustainable tourist behaviour. Annals of Tourism Research, 59, 30-44.
6. Tian, H., Zhang, J., & Li, J. (2020). The relationship between pro-environmental attitude and employee green behavior: the role of motivational states and green work climate perceptions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(7), 7341-7352.
7. Correia, A., Kozak, M., Gnoth, J., & Fyall, A. (Eds.). (2017). Co-creation and well-being in tourism. Springer.
8. Neuhofer, B., Buhalis, D., & Ladkin, A. (2014). A typology of technology‐enhanced tourism experiences. International journal of tourism research, 16(4), 340-350.
9. Lanier, C., & Hampton, R. (2008). Consumer participation and experiential marketing: Understanding the relationship between co-creation and the fantasy life cycle. Advances in Consumer Research, 2008, 35(1): 44-48.
10. Ramaswamy, V., & Gouillart, F. J. (2010). The power of co-creation: Build it with them to boost growth, productivity, and profits. Simon and Schuster.
11. Binkhorst, E., & Den Dekker, T. (2013). Agenda for co-creation tourism experience research. In Marketing of tourism experiences (pp. 219-235). Routledge.
12. Mohammadi, Fatima; Yazdani, Hamidreza; Jamipour, Mona; Soltani, Morteza. 1400. Systematic review of the global trend of research in the field of co-creation in tourism. Quarterly journal of scientific research on tourism and development. 10(1): 17-31. (In Persian)
13. Wu, Y., Xiao, J., & Xie, K. (2020, January). The Role of Social Media Technologies in Service Innovation: Perceptions of Exceptional-customer-engaged Value Co-creation. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
14. Pham, T. A. N., Le, H. N., Nguyen, D. T., & Pham, T. N. (2022). Customer service co-creation literacy for better service value: evidence from the health-care sector. Journal of Services Marketing, (ahead-of-print).
15. Reese, G., & Jacob, L. (2015). Principles of environmental justice and pro-environmental action: A two-step process model of moral anger and responsibility to act. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 88-94.
16. Liu, A., Ma, E., Qu, H., & Ryan, B. (2020). Daily green behavior as an antecedent and a moderator for visitors’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(9), 1390-1408.
17. Chen, D., Chu, X., Yang, X., Sun, X., Li, Y., & Su, Y. (2015). PSS solution evaluation considering sustainability under hybrid uncertain environments. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(14), 5822-5838.
18. Laing, J. H., & Frost, W. (2017). Journeys of well-being: Women's travel narratives of transformation and self-discovery in Italy. Tourism Management, 62, 110-119.
19. Pyke, J., Pyke, S., & Watuwa, R. (2019). Social tourism and well-being in a first nation community. Annals of Tourism Research, 77, 38-48.
20. Mathis, E. F., Kim, H. L., Uysal, M., Sirgy, J. M., & Prebensen, N. K. (2016). The effect of co-creation experience on outcome variable. Annals of tourism research, 57, 62-75.
21. Rusyani, E., Lavuri, R., & Gunardi, A. (2021). Purchasing eco-sustainable products: Interrelationship between environmental knowledge, environmental concern, green attitude, and perceived behavior. Sustainability, 13(9), 4601.
22. Nagar, K. (2015). Modeling the effects of green advertising on brand image: investigating the moderating effects of product involvement using structural equation. Journal of global marketing, 28(3-5), 152-171.
23. Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of environmental psychology, 19(1), 1-19.
24. Quoquab, F., Thurasamy, R., & Mohammad, J. (Eds.). (2017). Driving green consumerism through strategic sustainability marketing. IGI Global.
25. Safari, A., Salehzadeh, R., Panahi, R., & Abolghasemian, S. (2019). Multiple pathways linking environmental knowledge and awareness to employees’ green behavior. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society.
26. Unanue, W., Vignoles, V. L., Dittmar, H., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2016). Life goals predict environmental behavior: Cross-cultural and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 10-22.
27. Prebensen, N. K., Woo, E., Chen, J. S., & Uysal, M. (2013). Motivation and involvement as antecedents of the perceived value of the destination experience. Journal of travel research, 52(2), 253-264.
28. Cova, B., Dalli, D., & Zwick, D. (2011). Critical perspectives on consumers’ role as ‘producers’: Broadening the debate on value co-creation in marketing processes. Marketing theory, 11(3), 231-241.
29. Kaida, N., & Kaida, K. (2019). Positive associations of optimism–pessimism orientation with pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study on quality of life and everyday behavior. Quality of Life Research, 28(12), 3323-3332.
30. Su, L., & Swanson, S. R. (2019). Perceived corporate social responsibility's impact on the well-being and supportive green behaviors of hotel employees: The mediating role of the employee-corporate relationship. Tourism management, 72, 437-450.
31. Farhadinejad, Mohsen; Ali Karmi, Sajjad; Abdi, Marzieh. 2018. Investigating the impact of green transformational leadership on green behaviors at the workplace: the mediating role of employees' environmental green attitude. Change management research paper. 11(22): 30-52. (In Persian)
32. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424.
33. Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European journal of marketing, 30(5), 35-55.
34. Eilam, E., & Trop, T. (2012). Environmental attitudes and environmental behavior—which is the horse and which is the cart?. Sustainability, 4(9), 2210-2246.
35. Kaiser, F. G., Doka, G., Hofstetter, P., & Ranney, M. A. (2003). Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: A life cycle assessment of a self-report measure. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(1), 11-20.
36. Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of environmental education, 18(2), 1-8.