بررسی ساز و کار سیستم سنجش عملکرد با تاکید بر نوع کارکرد، سطوح پیچیدگی و عدم قطعیت محیطی، مطالعه موردی هلدینگ خلیج فارس
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش های مالی و رفتاری در حسابداری
سیده رجا غالبی
1
(دانشجوی دکتری حسابداری ، گروه حسابداری ، واحد اهواز ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، اهواز ، ایران )
شکرالله خواجوی
2
(استاد حسابداری ، دانشکده تجارت و مالیه ، دانشگاه تهران ،تهران ، ایران)
علی محمودی
3
(استادیار گروه حسابداری ، واحد اهواز ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، اهواز ، ایران )
کلید واژه: سیستم سنجش عملکرد, کارکرد تعاملی, کارکرد تشخیصی, مزایای PMS, عملکرد سازمانی, عدم قطعیت محیطی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف هر سیستم سنجش عملکرد، به عنوان مکانیسمی از اهرم‌های کنترل، تمرکز و انتقال اطلاعات مالی و غیر مالی برای اثرگذاری بر تصمیم‌گیری و اقدامات مدیریت است. دو کارکرد تشخیصی و تعاملی سیستم سنجش عملکرد، به عنوان سیستم‌های اندازه گیری و بازخورد مورد استفاده برای طراحی و اجرای استراتژی‌ها، به مدیریت در هماهنگی فعالیت‌های سازمان کمک می‌کند. پژوهش حاضر بر آن است تا نحوه اثر کارکرد تشخیصی، تعاملی و سطوح پیچیدگی سیستم سنجش عملکرد بر نتایج سازمانی و اثر متغیر اقتضایی مداخله گر عدم‌قطعیت محیطی بر سطوح پیچیدگی و نتایج سازمانی مترتب را در در 46 شرکت فعال در صنعت پتروشیمی طی سال 1401 واکاوی نماید و در این رابطه در چارچوب اهرم‌های کنترل سیمونز، جهت طراحی و کارکرد سیستم سنجش عملکرد و تئوری اقتضایی با رویکرد سازگاری – میانجی، به آزمون فرضیه های طراحی شده با متد معادلات ساختاری حداقل مربعات جزئی ، می‌پردازد. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که کارکرد تعاملی با مزایای سیستم سنجش عملکرد رابطه مثبت معنادار دارد لیکن رابطه کارکرد تشخیصی با مزایای سیستم سنجش عملکرد تائید نگردید. همچنین ارتباط معنادار سطوح پیچیدگی و عدم قطعیت محیطی با مزایای سیستم سنجش عملکرد ، مزایای سیستم سنجش عملکرد با عملکرد سازمانی، کارکرد تشخیصی و تعاملی با سطوح پیچیدگی سیستم سنجش عملکرد، عدم قطعیت محیطی با کارکرد تشخیصی و تعاملی، تائید گردید.
The goal of any Performance Measuring System (PMS) as an integral control mechanism, is the focus on and convey of the effects financial and non-financial information on decision-making and management decisions. The Diagnostic and Interactive use of the PMS as a measurement and feedback system is used for design and strategy testing for organizational coordination. The current study attempts to assess the effects of diagnostic and interactive use alongside the inherent PMS-level complexities on Organizational returns. Alongside this, varying intervening effects of environmental uncertainty contingencies on complexity levels were analysed from across 46 active organizations in the petrol industry during 1401. In this study, within Simon’s Lever of Control (LOC) framework, we focus on the design and function of PMS, alongside Contingency plans with a compatibility-mediation approach to test the presented theories of the partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) method. Our findings displayed that interactive functionality had a significant and positive relation with PMS, while the results of diagnostic functionality are left unsatisfactory (non-confirmed). Additionally, a significant correlation between complexity levels and environmental uncertainties with PMS outcomes, PMS outcomes in operational performance, Diagnostical and Interactive Functions in PMS complexities, and environmental uncertainties with Diagnostical and Interactive functions was confirmed.
Agostino، D.، Arnaboldi، M.، (2012). Design issues in balanced scorecards: the “what” and “how” of control. Eur. Manage. J. 30 (4)، 327–339.
Ahn، H.، 2001. Applying the balanced scorecard concept: an experience report. Long Range Plann. 34 (4)، 441–461.
Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2018). Sistemas de controle gerencial. São Paulo, Brasil: McGraw-Hill.
Alamri, A. M., (2021) "Association between strategic management accounting facets and organizational performance", Baltic Journal of Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-12-2017-0411.
Barroso, R., Burkert, M., Dávila, A., Oyon, D. & Schuhmacher, K. (2016). The moderating role of performance measurement system sophistication on the relationships between internal value drivers and performance. Accounting Auditing Control, 22, 39-75. https://www.cairn-int.info/journal--2016-2-page-39.htm.
Bedford, D .Bisbe, J. Sweeney, B. (2023). Enhancing external knowledge search: The influence of performance measurement system design on the absorptive capacity of top management teams, Technovation, Volume 118, 102586, ISSN 0166-4972, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102586.
Bedford, D .Bisbe, J. Sweeney, B. (2023). The joint effects of performance measurement system design and TMT cognitive conflict on innovation ambidexterity, Management Accounting Research, Volume 57, 100805, ISSN 1044-5005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2022.100805.
Bedford، D.S.، Speklé، R.F.، (2018). Construct validity in survey-based management accounting and control research. J. Manage. Acc. Res.، in print.
Bellora-Bienengräber, L. Derfuss, D. Endrikat, J. (2023) .Taking stock of research on the levers of control with meta-analytic methods: Stylized facts and boundary conditions, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Volume 106, 101414, ISSN 0361-3682, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101414.
Bentley، K.A.، Omer، T.C.، Sharp، N.Y.، (2013). Business strategy، financial reporting irregularities، and audit effort. Contemp. Acc. Res. 30 (2)، 780–817.
Bisbe، J.، Batista-Foguet، J.M.، Chenhall، R.، (2007). Defining management accounting constructs: a methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification. Acc.، Org. Soc. 32 (7)، 789–820.
Bisbe، J.، Malagueno، R.، (2012). Using strategic performance measurement systems for strategy formulation: does it work in dynamic environments? Manage. Acc. Res. 23(4)، 296–311.
Bisbe، J.، Otley، D.، (2004). The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Acc.، Org. Soc. 29 (8)، 709–737.
Chenhall، R.H.، (2005). Integrative strategic performance measurement systems، strategic alignment of manufacturing، learning and strategic outcomes: an exploratory study. Acc.، Org. Soc. 30 (5)، 395–422.
Chenhall، R.H.، (2007). Theorizing contingencies in management control systems research. In: Chapman، C.S.، Hopwood، A.G.، Shields، M.D. (Eds.)، Handbook of Management Accounting Research. Elsevier، Oxford، UK.
Daowadueng, P. Hoozée, S. Jorissen, A. Maussen, M. (2023). Do costing system design choices mediate the link between strategic orientation and cost information usage for decision making and control?, Management Accounting Research, 100854, ISSN 1044-5005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100854.
Dos Santos، E.A.، and R.J. Lunkes. (2017). Performance Measurement Systems، Role Clarity، Psychological Empowerment and Performance Management: A Study of Its Relations. Blumenau 13(3): 143-161.
Endrikat، J.، Guenther، T.W.، Titus، R.، (2018). A Meta-analysis of the Performance Effects of Contemporary Performance Measurement Systems، Working paper. TU Dresden.
Ferreira، A.، Otley، D.،( 2009). The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis. Manage. Acc. Res. 20 (4)، 263–282.
Franco-Santos، M.، Bourne، M.، (2005). An examination of the literature relating to issues affecting how companies manage through measures. Prod. Plann. Control 16 (2)،114–124.
Franco-Santos، M.، Lucianetti، L.، Bourne، M.، (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: a review of their consequences and a framework for research. Manage. Acc. Res. 23 (2)، 79–119.
Gimbert، X.، Bisbe، J.، Mendoza، X.، (2010). The role of performance measurement systems in strategy formulation processes. Long Range Plann. 43 (4)، 477–497.
Gordon، L.A.، Narayanan، V.K.، (1984). Management accounting systems، perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: an empirical investigation. Acc.، Org. Soc. 9 (1)، 33–47.
Goventer ، L.، and Heink e، G.، (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices، trends، and recommendations. MIS Q. 597e636.
Govindarajan، V.، (1984). Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: an empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable. Acc.، Org. Soc. 9 (2)، 125–135.
Haedr، A. R. (2017). A Contingency Theory-based Investigation of the Role of Management Accounting Information in Management Control Systems in Large Manufacturing Companies in Libya. The University of Huddersfield University of Huddersfield Business School.
Hair JF, Ringle CM, Gudergan SP, et al. (2018a) Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research 1–28. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40685-018-0072-4#citeas
Heinicke، A.، Guenther، T.W.، Widener، S.K.، 2018. An examination of the relationship between the extent of a flexible culture and the levers of control system: the key role of beliefs control. Manage. Acc. Res.h 33 (1)، 25–41.
Henri، J.، (2006a). Management control systems and strategy: a resource-based perspective. Acc.، Org. Soc. 31 (6)، 529–558.
Henri، J.، (2006b). Organizational culture and performance measurement systems. Acc.، Org. Soc. 31 (1)، 77–103.
Hoque، Z.، (2014) . 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: trends، accomplishments، gaps and opportunities for future research. Br. Acc. Rev. 46 (1)، 33–59.
Hoque، Z.، James، W.، (2000). Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance. J. Manage. Acc. Res. 12، 1–17.
Hronec, S.M., (1993). Vital Signs: Using Quality, Time and Cost Performance Measurements to Chart Your Company’s Future. Amacom, New York.
Kihn، L.A.، (2007). Financial consequences in foreign subsidiary manager performance evaluations. Eur. Acc. Rev. 16 (3)، 531–554.
Klein، S.B.، (2000). Family businesses in Germany: significance and structure. Family Bus. Rev. 13 (3)، 157–181.
Koufteros، X.، Verghese، A.، Lucianetti، L.، (2014). The effect of performance measurement systems on firm performance: a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study. J. Oper. Manage. 32 (6)، 313–336.
Lee، C.، Yang، H.، (2011). Organization structure، competition and performance measurement systems and their joint effects on performance. Manage. Acc. Res. 22 (2)، 84–104.
Lopez، O.L.، Hiebl، M.R.W.، ( 2015). Management accounting in small and medium-sized enterprises: current knowledge and avenues for further research. J. Manage. Acc. Res. 27 (1)، 81–119.
Malmi، T.، 2001. Balanced scorecards in Finnish companies: a research note. Manage. Acc. Res. 12 (2)، 207–220.
Micheli، P.، Manzoni، J.، (2010). Strategic performance measurement: benefits، limitations and paradoxes. Long Range Plann. 43 (4)، 465–476.
Müller-Stewens, B. Widener, S. Möller, S. Steinmann., J. (2020). The role of diagnostic and interactive control uses in innovation, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Volume 80, 101078, ISSN 0361-3682, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.101078.
Mura, M., Micheli, P. and Longo, M. (2021), "The effects of performance measurement system uses on organizational ambidexterity and firm performance", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 41 No. 13, pp. 127-151. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-02-2021-0101
Neely, A., Gregory, M., Platts, K., (1995). Performance measurement system design. A literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 25 (12), 1228–1263.
Neely, A.D., Adams, C., Kennerley, M., (2002). The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success. Pearson Education, London.
Neely, A.D., Yaghi, B., Youell, N., (2008). Enterprise Performance Management: The Global State of the Art. Oracle and Cranfield School of Management Publication, Cranfield.
Otley، D.، 2016. The contingency theory of management accou nting and control: 1980–2014. Manage. Acc. Res. 31 (1)، 45–62.
Peñaloza, A., Laihonen, H., Lönnqvist, A., Palvalin, M., Sillanpää, V., Pekkola, S., & Ukko, J. (2020). A contingency approach to performance measurement in service operations. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(1), 43-52.
Salah A. Hammad، Ruzita Jusoh، Imam Ghozali، (2013)، "Decentralization، Perceived Environmental Uncertainty، Managerial Performance and Management Accounting System Information in Egyptian Hospitals"، International Journal of Accounting and Information Management، Vol. 21 Issue. 4، PP.314-330.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2020). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 26(4), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618823921
Simons، R.، (1991). Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strateg. Manage. J. 12 (1)، 49–62.
Simons، R.، (1994). How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal. Strateg. Manage. J. 15 (3)، 169–189.
Simons، R.، (2014). Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy. Pearson، Harlow.
Smith، P.، (1995). On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. Int. J. Public Admin. 18 (2/3)، 277–310.
Speckbacher، G.، Bischof، J.، Pfeiffer، T.، (2003). A descriptive analysis on the implementation of balanced scorecards in German-speaking countries. Manage. Acc. Res. 14 (4)، 361–387.
Speckbacher، G.، Wentges، P.، (2012). The impact of family control on the use of performance measures in strategic target setting and incentive compensation: a research note. Manage. Acc. Res. 23 (1)، 34–46.
Thomas W. Guenther، Heinicke. A. (2019) . Relationships among types of use، levels of sophistication، and organizational outcomes of performance measurement systems: The crucial role of design choices،management accounting research.pp1-25.
Valizadeh Kheragh, S., & Rahmanseresht, H. (2023). The effects of diagnostic and interactive management control systems (MCS) on the strategy-performance relationship: A case study of construction companies in Khorasan Razavi Province. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 15(31), 31-53. doi: 10.22034/jbar.2023.17780.4118. (In Persian)
Widener، S.K.، (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Acc.، Org. Soc. 32 (7-8)، 757–788.
Wiersma، E.، 2009. For which purposes do managers use balanced scorecards? An empirical study. Manage. Acc. Res. 20 (4)، 239–251.
Wouters، M.، (2009). A developmental approach to performance measures – results from a longitudinal case study. Eur. Manage. J. 27، 64–78.
Yongvanich، K.، Guthrie، J.، (2019). Balanced scorecard practices amongst Thai companies: performance effects. Pacific Acc. Rev. 21 (2)، 132–149.
Yoshikuni. C، Adilson. L، Albertin. Alberto. (2018)، "Effects of Strategic Information Systems on Competitive Strategy and Performance"، International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management، Vol. 67، Issue. 9، PP.2018- 2045
Yutong. W. Tuo. M. Liu. L. (2011). Chinas of design The indicators for agementman performance “ Information Conference international In ,”government local level-county Engineering.