ارائه مدل شبکه دانش فنی منابع انسانی درصنعت دارو برای بین المللی شدن
محورهای موضوعی :
فرح شاپوری
1
(دانشجوی دکتری رشته مدیریت بازرگانی - بازاریابی، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم انسانی ، واحد ساوه ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، ساوه ، ایران.)
زین العابدین امینی سابق
2
(دانشیار گروه مدیریت ،دانشکده علوم انسانی ،واحد ساوه ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ،ساوه ،ایران.)
احسان ساده
3
(دانشیار گروه مدیریت ،دانشکده علوم انسانی ،واحد تهران شمال،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تهران،ایران.)
علیرضا افشارنژاد
4
(استادیار گروه مدیریت ،دانشکده علوم انسانی ،واحد ساوه ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ،ساوه ،ایران.)
کلید واژه: دانش فنی منابع انسانی, بین المللی شدن, صنعت دارو,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: اهمیت روزافزون تجاری سازی، تبدیل شدن به دهکده جهانی و لزوم برقراری ارتباط با دنیا، باعث شده به مقوله دانش فنی منابع انسانی نگاه ویژه ای شود. از این رو، هدف این پژوهش ارائه مدل شبکه دانش فنی منابع انسانی در صنعت دارو برای بین المللی شدن می باشد. روش بررسی: این پژوهش از نظر هدف بنیادی-کاربردی و بصورت کیفی و کمی انجام شد. در بخش کیفی، جامعه آماری شامل خبرگان آشنا به موضوع بودند. جامعه آماری بخش کمی را مدیران و کارشناسان صنعت داروسازی استان تهران تشکیل دادند و روش نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه ای و روش گردآوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه بود. برای تحلیل داده ها، از نرم افزار مدل ساختاری استفاده شد. یافته ها: مدل نهایی شامل ابعاد محیط درونی سازمان، محیط بیرونی سازمان، توسعه و تحقیق، تولید دانش فنی، تجاری سازی، نیازهای جامعه و بازار،آخرین وضعیت پیشرفت تکنولوژی و تولید و بازار در تجاری سازی، برنامه ریزی استراتژیک، توسعه شبکه، تهدیدها، فرصت‌ها و محدودیت‌ها در بازارهای خارجی و فرایند بین المللی شدن می باشد. نتیجه گیری: الگوی ارائه شده پاسخی برای مشکل واقعی شرکت های دارویی بوده و توجه به گام های مدل، می‌تواند آگاهی و بینش لازم برای تخصیص بهینه منابع برای سیاستگذاران را فراهم سازد.
Background and purpose: The increasing importance of commercialization, becoming a global village and the need to communicate with the world, has caused a special look at the technical knowledge category of human resources. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to provide a model of the technical knowledge network of human resources in the pharmaceutical industry for internationalization. Research method: This research was conducted qualitatively and quantitatively in terms of fundamental-applied purpose. In the qualitative part, the statistical population included experts familiar with the subject. The statistical population of the quantitative part was formed by the managers and experts of the pharmaceutical industry of Tehran province, and the stratified random sampling method and the data collection method was a questionnaire. Structural model software was used for data analysis. Findings: The final model includes the dimensions of the internal environment of the organization, the external environment of the organization, development and research, production of technical knowledge, commercialization, society and market needs, the latest state of technological progress and production and market in commercialization, strategic planning, network development, Threats, opportunities and limitations in foreign markets and the process of internationalization. Conclusion: The presented model is an answer to the real problem of pharmaceutical companies, and paying attention to the steps of the model can provide policymakers with the necessary knowledge and insight for the optimal allocation of resources
1. Al-Hakim, L. & Lu, W. (2017). The role of collaboration and technology diffusion on business performance.
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 66(1): 22-50. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-
2014-0122
2. Agnew, M. (2013). Strategic planning: an examination of the role of disciplines in sustaining
internationalization of the university. Studies in International Education. 17(2):183-202. DOI:
10.1177/1028315312464655
3. Argote, L. (2012). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Springer
Publition. DOI: 10.1177/1028315312464655
4. Bardolet, C., Sellens, J. & Royo, M. (2020). Knowledge Workers and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from
Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 11(1): 1-25.
5. Castellacci, F. (2008). Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service
industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy. 37: 978- 994.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.011
6. Delavar, A. & Mehdi Mohammadi, R. & Salami, M. (2011). Process of commercialization of products with
advanced technology (a case study in commercial aircraft). Management Improvement. 1(5): 81-104 [In
Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/1470369
7. Engez, A. & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2023). Stakeholder contributions to commercialization and market
creation of a radical innovation: bridging the micro- and macro levels. Journal of Business & Industrial
Marketing. 38(13): 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2022-0136
1 García-Valderrama
2 Engez & Aarikka-Stenroos
3 Souki
4 Agnew
آفرین ولتح انسانی منابع فصلناهمسالسومشماره ،9بهار ،3140
96
8. Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgård, A. & Sharma, D.D. (1997). Experiential Knowledge and Costs in the
Internationalization Process. Journal of International Business Studies. 28(2): 337-360.
DOI: 10.1057/9781137508829_2
9. García-Valderrama, T., Sanchez-Ortiz, J. & Mulero-Mendigorri, E. (2023). Knowledge production
and commercialization from R&D: the pharmaceutical sector. Management Decision. 61(13): 222-247.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2022-0567
10. Gaur, A.S. & Lu, J.W. (2007). Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of
institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management. 33: 84–110.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306295203
11. Gholami Avati, R., Dehghani, M. & Farrokhi Sarai, H. (2017). Review of economics in the pharmaceutical
industry. International conference on new research achievements in humanities and social and cultural
studies. Karaj [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/767709
12. Govender, L., Peruma, R. & Perumal, S. (2018). Knowledge management as a strategic tool for human
resource management at higher education institutions. South African Journal of Information Management.
20(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.4102/sajim.v20i1.966
13. Huynh, H.V., Nguyen, P. & Tran, K. (2018). Internationalization and Performance of Vietnamese
Manufacturing Firms: Does Organizational Slack Matter?. Administrative Sciences. 8(4): 1-
15. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8040064
14. Ioannidis, E., Varsakelis, N. & Antoniou, I. (2017). False Beliefs in Unreliable Knowledge Networks.
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 470: 275-295.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.070
15. Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J.E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability
of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies. 40(9): 1411-1431.
DOI:10.1057/jibs.2009.24
16. Kanellos, N. (2013). Exploring the Characteristics of Knowledge-Based Entrepreneurship in Greek High-
Technology Sector. Economics and Management of Innovation, Technology and Organizations. In
Proceedings of the DRUID Academy Conference for Doctoral Students, Aalborg, Denmark, 16–18 January.
http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/acc_papers/ji6bdjxuk1yi79hl5r2asugg4es0
17. Khosravi, A., Souri, M. & Arabi, M. (2019). Providing a framework for the application of knowledge
management of current employees. System of scientific publications of Allameh Tabatabai University.
8(32): 65-88 [In Persian]. Doi: 10.22054/IMS.2020.45549.1574
18. Knott, P. (2015). Does VRIO help managers evaluate a firm’s resources. Management Decision. 53(8):
1806-1822. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2014-0525
19. Leiponen, A. (2012). The benefits of R&D and breadth in innovation strategies: a comparison of Finnish
service and manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change. 21(5): 1255- 1281.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts022
20. Mejri, K., MacVaugh, J.A. & Tsagdis, D. (2018). Knowledge configurations of small and medium-sized
knowledge-intensive firms in a developing economy: A knowledge-based view of business-to-business
internationalization. Industrial Marketing Management. 71:160-170.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.018
21. Mobini Dehkordi, A., Nankeli, A. & Jameh Zarezi, M.J. (2015). Investigating the effect of entrepreneurial
orientation on the internationalization of companies in the glass and crystal industry with the mediating role
of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Development. 9(4): 711-729 [In Persian]. Doi:
10.22059/JED.2017.61553
22. Mukund, R.D., Sudhir, Y. (2015). Motivations, Capability Handicaps, and Firm Responses in the Early
Phase of Internationalization: A Study in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Global Marketing.
28:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2014.959231
23. Parviz, F. (2000). Great culture of materials and metallurgy. Tehran: Dunya Publications.
24. Pourhosein, M., Sabokro, M., Saeida Ardekani, S. & Charifi, M. (2023). The Future of Knowledge Workers
Studies: A Scientometric Analysis of Research Based on Web of Science Database during 1938-2021.
International Journal of Knowledge Processing Studies (KPS), 3(2): 39-52. Doi:
10.22034/kps.2022.361510.1051
25. Rasouli, H. (2016). Technology development and commercialization of research findings, obstacles and
solutions. Tehran: National Company of Petrochemical Industries. Iranian oil industry employees' magazine.
867: 34-35 [In Persian].
26. Razavi, M., Emami, H. & Valai, N. (2012). Examining the outputs and commercialization of the research
projects of the Faculty of Pharmacy of the University. Research in medicine. 37(4): 220-227 [In Persian].
http://pejouhesh.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-1252-fa.html
27. Reamer, A. (2003). Technology transfer and commercialization: their role in economic development.
Economic development administration. United States Economic Development Administration.
آفرین ولتح انسانی منابع فصلناهمسالسومشماره ،9بهار ،3140
97
28. Rezaian, A., Nazafti, N. & Bagheri, R. (2017). The formation of knowledge network in knowledge-based
companies. Business Management Studies. 10(20): 187-213 [In Persian]. Doi: 10.29252/BAR.2019.1326
29. Ribeiro, F.M. (2016). Interdisciplinary in ferment: The role of knowledge networks and department
affiliation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 113: 240-247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.021
30. Sarbabian, M. (2019). The nature and legal foundations of technical knowledge protection. Interdisciplinary
Legal Research Quarterly. 1(2): 66-85 [In Persian]. Doi: 10.29252/jiilr.1.2.66
31. Schröpfer, V., Tah, C. & Kurul, E. (2017). Mapping the knowledge flow in sustainable construction project
teams using social network analysis. Engineering, Constuction and Architectural Managemrnt. 24(2):
229-259. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2015-0124
32. Schulz, M. (2001). The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows.
Academy of Management Journal. 44(4): 661-681. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069409
33. Sherbiani M., Radfer. R. & Abedi, Z., (2014). Appropriate model of biotechnology commercialization in the
field of environment in Iran, 4th Iran Technology Management Conference, Iran Technology Management
Association, Tehran [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/94604
34. Souki, B., Najaf Beigi, R. & Daneshfard, K. (2020). Factors affecting the strategic planning in local
organizations for designing a structural model. Revista Ciencia UNEMI. 13(34): 1-15. Dor:
20.1001.1.22286853.1400.12.47.1.9
35. Srholec, M. & Verspagen, B. (2012). The voyage of the Beagle into innovation: explorations on
heterogeneity, selection, and sectors. Industrial and Corporate Change. 21(5): 1221-1253.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts026
36. Tsai, S. (2018). Innovative behaviour of knowledgeworkers and social exchange attributes of financial
incentive: implications for knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management. 22(8): 1757-1781.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2017-0293
37. Wang, F., Liu, J. & Qiao, X. (2022). An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Scientific
Collaboration and Knowledge Production of the Countries along the Belt and Road. Sustainability. 14: 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114489
38. Wu, W.W. & Wu, C. (2012). How China’s equipment manufacturing firms achieve successful independent
innovation: The double helix mode of technological capability and technology management. Chin. Manag.
Stud. 6: 160–183. DOI: 10.1108/17506141211213915.