نقش مدیریت اطلاعات در اداره قدرت اوج گیرنده نتوکرات‌ها در سازمان‌های دولتی (مورد مطالعه: سازمان بیمه سلامت ایران)
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت منابع انسانی
عبدالمجید نادری سمسانی
1
,
اکبر اعتباریان خوراسگانی
2
,
مهربان هادی پیکانی
3
,
البرز قیتانی
4
1 - دانشجوی دکترا مدیریت دولتی گرایش مدیریت منابع انسانی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
2 - استاد، گروه مدیریت دولتی و رسانه، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
3 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی و رسانه، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان) ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
4 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی و رسانه، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان) ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
کلید واژه: مدیریت اطلاعات, نتوکرات‌ها, اداره قدرت, بیمه سلامت.,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از انجام این پژوهش، بررسی نقش مدیریت اطلاعات در اداره قدرت اوج گیرنده نتوکرات‌ها در سازمان‌های دولتی بوده است. این پژوهش به‌صورت ترکیبی (کیفی و کمّی) و با روش نظریه داده بنیاد ساختارمند اشتراوس و کوربین انجام شده است. برای گردآوری داده‌ها در بخش کیفی از مصاحبه نیمه ساختار‌یافته با 17 نفر از مدیران و خبرگان سازمانی و دانشگاهی استفاده شد. در بخش کمّی 350 پرسشنامه محقق ساخته حاصل از نتایج بخش کیفی توسط کارکنان سازمان بیمه سلامت ایران تکمیل و با نرم‌افزارهای SPSS26 و AMOS26 داده‌ها توصیف و تحلیل و از مدل معادلات ساختاری و تکنیک تحلیل عاملی تأییدی استفاده گردید. برای بررسی پایایی 30 پرسشنامه بین افراد جامعه توزیع و جمع‌آوری گردید و نتیجه آزمون آلفای کرونباخ 97/0 به دست آمد. از 246 کد مفهومی استخراجی 53 مورد آن مربوط به شرایط زمینه‌ای و از این تعداد 21 کد به مدیریت اطلاعات سازمانی و مدیریت دانش فناوری اطلاعات اختصاص دارد. سازمان‌ها با فراهم‌سازی به‌موقع اطلاعات حیاتی و با کیفیت از بستر مدیریت اطلاعات و تسهیم آن با همه ذینفعان از طریق مدیریت دانش فناوری اطلاعات می‌توانند از وابسته‌سازی این فرایندها به افراد جلوگیری نموده و قدرت اوج‌گیرنده نتوکرات‌ها را اداره نمایند.
The purpose of this research was to investigate the role of information management in managing the rising power of netocrats in government organizations. This research was conducted in a combined (qualitative and quantitative) method using Strauss and Corbin's structured data theory method. Semi-structured interviews with 17 organizational and academic managers and experts were used to collect data in the qualitative section. In the quantitative section, 350 researcher-made questionnaires were completed from the results of the qualitative section by employees of the Iran Health Insurance Organization, and the data were described and analyzed with SPSS26 and AMOS26 software, and the structural equation model and confirmatory factor analysis technique were used. To check the reliability, 30 questionnaires were distributed and collected among the people of the community, and the result of Cronbach's alpha test was 0.97. Out of 246 extracted conceptual codes, 53 of them are related to background conditions, and 21 of these codes are dedicated to organizational information management and information technology knowledge management. Organizations can prevent the dependence of these processes on individuals by providing timely vital and quality information from the information management platform and sharing it with all stakeholders through information technology knowledge management and managing the rising power of netocrats.
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., Kamaludin, A., & Shaalan, K. (2018). The impact of knowledge management processes on information systems: A systematic review. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.001
Alberts, D. S., & Hayes, R. E. (2005). Power to the Edge: Command & Control in the Information Age. Washington, DC:CCRP Publication Series.
Ampuja, M., & Kovisto, J. (2014). From ‘Post-Industrial’ To ‘Network Society’ And Beyond: The Political Conjunctures and Current Crisis of Information Society Theory. Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(2), 447-463. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i2.568
Azizi, B., Nasrollahi, M., & Yousefli, A. (2023). Developing a Model for Digital Readiness in Public Organizations (Case Study: Imam Khomeini International University). Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 9(2), 201-240. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2022.8196.1789 [In Persian]
Bard, A., & Suderqvist, J. (2002). Netocracy: the New Power Elite and Life after Capitalism. London: Pearson Education.
Bard, A., & Suderqvist, J. (2012). The Futurica Trilogy. Stockholm: Stockholm Text.
Bicer, C., Kiral, E., Kirilmaz, H., Huseynov, R., Jhajj, S., Gunduz, V., Cengiz, V., Acik, A., Aamarat, M., Shngh, V., Kudar, A., Sarioglu, C., Akandere, G., Gok, G., Mavruk, C., Poedjiyo, A., & Umarbeyli, S. (2020). Discussion Between Economic Agent Socio-Economic Studies. The Power &Politics in Organizations. Ankara: Iksad Publications.
Carlsen, A., Clegg, S. R., Pitsis, T. S., & Mortensen, T. F. (2020). From ideas of power to the powering of ideas in organizations: Reflections from Follett and Foucault. European Management Journal, 38(6), 829–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.03.006
Castells, M. (2011). A Network Theory of Power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787.
Cifci, H., & Yuksel, N. (2018). Foresight 6.0: The New Generation of Technology Foresight In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Stuttgart, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436350
Clegg, S. R. (2004). Managing Power and Politics in Organizations:Resistance, Empowerment, Ethicsanization. SAGE Publishing.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
Danaee Fard, H., Alwani, S. M., & Azar, A. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Management: a Comprehensive Approach. Tehran: Safar Publication. [In Persian]
Danaee Fard, H., Rajabzadeh, A., & Maki, P. (2012). Understanding and Explanation of Upward Influence in Public Sector. Public Organzations Management, 1(1), 7-22. [In Persian]
Delen, G. P., Peters, R. J., Verhoef, C., & Van Vlijmen, S. F. M. (2016). Lessons from Dutch IT-outsourcing success and failure. Science of computer programming, 130, 37-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2016.04.001
Ghasemi, Z., Hosseinqolizadeh, R., & Noghani Dokhtbahmani, M. (2017). Factors affecting the distribution of power in the organizational network with an emphasis on the network analysis approach. Organizational Resource Management Research, 8(1), 133-155. [In Persian]
Iran Health Insurance Organization. (2022). Statistical Yearbook. [In Persian]
Islam, S. (2008). Power in Social Organization: A Sociological Review. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 5(1), 21-41.
Joas, M. G., Hess, T., & Neuburger, R. (2020). More self-organization, more control—or even both? Inverse transparency as a digital leadership concept. usiness Research, B13, 921–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-020-00130-0
Jones, P. (2007). From netocracy to network-shaped thinking 30th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Kirchberg am Wechsel ,Austria.
Kaur, B. (2012). Information Management. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 3(3), 424-427. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v3i3a.2949
Kis, N. (2019). ThePower of Virtuality As a Challenge for Governments: A Post-State Dystopia. Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days, 335, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v335.8
Klimczuk, A. (2012). Experts and Cultural Narcissism: Relations in the Early 21st Century. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Saarbrucken.
Kuzheleva-Sagan, I. P. (2014). Network Society. Evolution of Views: Concepts, Images, Metaphors. Cloud-Cuckoo-Land. International Journal of Architectural Theory, 19(32), 25-41.
Lauby, S. N. (2012). The 7 Types of Power:Using Power Effectively Within Organizations. ITM GROUP,Inc.
Lim, C., Kim, K. H., Kim, M. J., Heo, J. Y., Kim, K. J., & Maglio, P. P. (2018). From data to value: A nine-factor framework for data-based value creation in information-intensive services. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.007
Omisore, B. O., & Nweke, A. N. (2014). The influence of power and politics in organizations. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(7), 164-183. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i7/997
Raczkowski, K. (2016). Public Management: Theory and Practice. Springer International Publishing.
Ramos, V., Crespo, A. F., Perez, L. G., Guerra, Y., Galarza, C. R., Pazmi, B., & Tejera, E. (2019). Analysis of organizational power networks through a holistic approach using consensus strategies. Heliyon, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01172
Ranjbar, H., Haqdoost, A. A., Salsali, M., Khoshdel, A., Soleimani, M. A., & Bahrami, N. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: A guide for beginning. Scientific Research Journal of the University of Medical Sciences of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army, 10(3), 238-250. [In Persian]
Sabbaghinejad, Z., & Heidari, G. (2015). 15 definitions of Information Management. Library Studies and Information Science, 7(16), 39-58. [In Persian]
Schussler, A. E. (2017). The cyberspace myth and political communication, within the limits of netocracy. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 16(48), 65-78.
Shaheer, N. A., & Sali Li, S. (2020). The CAGE around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in a virtual world. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1), 105892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.08.002
Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á. (2019). Strategic knowledge management in the digital age: JBR special issue editorial. Journal of Business Research, 94, 223-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.016
Stahl, N. A., James, R., & King, J. R. (2020). Expanding Approaches for Research:Understanding and Using Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research. JOURNAL of DEVELOPMENTAL EDUCATION, 44(1), 26-28.
Stanton, J. M., & Stam, K. R. (2003). Information Technology, Privacy, and Power within Organizations: a view from BoundaryTheory and Social Exchange perspectives. Surveillance & Society, 1(2), 152-190.
Sullivan, W. E., & Ngwenyama, O. K. (2005). How are public sector organizations managing IS outsourcing risks? An analysis of outsourcing guidelines from three jurisdictions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(3), 73-87.
Tauceana, I. M., Tamasilaa, M., & Negru-Strauti, G. (2016). Study on Management Styles and Managerial Power Types for a Large Organization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/sbspro.2016.05.091
Terry, O. (2020). Power in the Workplace, Finding an Alternative to the Iron Fist. Open Journal of Leadership, 9(2), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2020.92007
Tsiavos, P. (2020). State, Netocrats and the Commons: Developing a Cultural Policy in the Era of Platforms. In Lekakis, S. (ed.) Cultural Heritage in the Realm of the Commons: Conversations on the Case of Greece. https://doi.org/10.5334/bcj.g
Yazdanpanah Dero, K., Zaki, Y., & Zamani, A. (2018). The citizenship and democracy in the virtual space, from the reality to the hyper reality. Soft power studies, 8(18), 8-34. [In Persian]
Yolcu, T., & Sezgin, A. A. (2017). Political view of informationalism:Social media and netocracy. Intermedia International e-Journal, 4(6), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.21645/intermedia.2017.26