رابطه‌ی آگاهی از حقوق شهروندی و کیفیّت زندگی در بین زنان 44-25 سال شهر شیراز
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه زن و جامعهسیروس احمدی 1 , لیلا دوکوهکی 2 , محمّد حاجی پور 3
1 - دانشیار گروه جامعه شناسی دانشگاه یاسوج
2 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد جامعه شناسی دانشگاه یاسوج
3 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه یاسوج
کلید واژه: شیراز, زنان, حقوق شهروندی, کیفیّت زندگی,
چکیده مقاله :
کیفیّت زندگی در ایران بویژه در بین زنان، در وضعیّت مطلوبی نیست. با توجه به اینکه تحقق کیفیت زندگی در شاخصهای عینی و ذهنی، پیوند نزدیکی با آگاهی شهروندان از حقوق شهروندیشان دارد، این تحقیق تلاش کرده است تا رابطه آگاهی از حقوق شهروندی و کیفیت زندگی را مورد بررسی قرار دهد. روش انجام پژوهش، پیمایشی است. جامعۀ آماری تحقیق، زنان 25-44سال شهر شیراز میباشد که 400 نفر به عنوان نمونه تعیین و با استفاده از روش نمونهگیری تصادفی چندمرحلهای انتخاب شدند. ابزار تحقیق جهت سنجش کیفیت زندگی، پرسشنامۀ کیفیّت زندگی سازمان بهداشت جهانی (WHOQOL) است و ابزار تحقیق جهت سنجش آگاهی از حقوق شهروندی، پرسشنامۀ پژوهشگرساخته و مشتمل بر سه بُعد حقوق مدنی، حقوق سیاسی و حقوق اجتماعی با استناد به قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران است که با استفاده اعتبار محتوا تعیین اعتبار شده و با استفاده از آزمون مجدّد، تحلیل پایایی گردید. نتایج توصیفی تحقیق نشان می دهند، کیفیّت زندگی زنان در سطح متوسّط است. نتایج تحلیلی تحقیق نشان دادند، رابطۀ معنادار و مثبتی بین آگاهی از حقوق شهروندی و کیفیت زندگی وجود دارد. به علاوه، در بین متغیّرهای زمینهای و جمعیّتی، تنها متغیّر تحصیلات دانشگاهی رابطۀ معناداری با کیفیت زندگی دارد. نتیجهگیری این تحقیق این است که در راستای ارتقای کیفیّت زندگی زنان باید آگاهی آنان از حقوق شهروندیشان که در قانون اساسی کشور انعکاس یافته است، افزایش یابد.
Quality of life is not in good condition in Iran especially among women. Considering that the realization of the objective and subjective quality of life indices has a close relation with citizens' awareness of the citizenship rights, the present study has tried to investigate the relationship between citizenship rights and the quality of life. The research method is a survey one. The population includes the women aged 25-44 in Shiraz that 400 people were selected by using random multi-stage sampling method. The research instrument to measure the quality of life is the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL). The research tool for measuring awareness of citizenship rights is a researcher-made questionnaire including three dimensions: civil rights, political rights and social rights based on the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran that its validity was measured using content validity and the reliability was calculated through test-retest method. Descriptive results of the study show that, the women's quality of life is at average level. Analytical results showed that, there is a significant and positive relationship between the awareness of citizenship rights and the quality of life. In addition, among demographic variables, there is only significant relationship between academic education and quality of life. Research conclusion is that in order to improve the women’s quality of life, their awareness of their citizenship rights that have been reflected in the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran should be improved.
Ahmadi, S., Mirfardi, A. and Ebtekari, M. H. (2013). The social capital impact on quality of life in Yasouj. Socio-Cultural Strategy Quarterly, 5(17): 135-158. (Text in Persian)
Ahmadi, M., Porahmad, A. and Hatami Nejad, H. (2014). Analysis of the impact of citizenship awareness in accountability and performance of aestheticization organization for improving urban landscape. Case study: zone 6th of Tehran. Geographical Space Quarterly Journal, 3(10): 1-22. (Text in Persian)
Akhtar Mohagheghi, M. (2006). Social capital. Tehran, Akhtar Mohagheghi Publication. (Text in Persian)
Arinez, I. (2009). The development of quality of life index at a county level: Quality of Life lndex for Arkansas Counties (QLAC). Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Policy, University of Arkansas.
Auh, S. (2005). An investigation of the relationships between quality of life and residential environments among rural families. Ames: Iowa State University.
Bahrami, F. and Arya, M. (2010). The place of women in the constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran. Shiite Women Journal, 5(18): 123-146. (Text in Persian)
Blais, A. and Gélineau, F. (2007). Winning, losing and satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies, 55: 425-41.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E. and Rogers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfaction. New York: Russell-Sage.
Carr, A. (2004). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths. New York, Brunner-Routledge.
Coverdill, J, E., Carlos, A. and López, M, A. (2011). Race, ethnicity and the quality of life in America: 1972-2008. Social Forces, 89(3): 783-806.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. and Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2): 276-302.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. American Psychologist, 55(10): 34-43.
Ericson, M. and Vinson, T. (2012). Life satisfaction and happiness. Richmond, Jesuit Social Services.
Enayati, T., Arasteh, H. R., Zameni, F. Nezafati Payani, Y. (2012). The relationship between students' awareness of citizenship rights with social behavior. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 7(2): 5-17. (Text in Persian)
Esmaeili Shahmirzadi, S., Shojaeizadeh, D., Kamal, A., Leili, S. and Aza, T. (2012). The impact of chronic diseases on the quality of life among the elderly people in the east of Tehran. Payavarde Salamat, 6(3): 225-235. (Text in Persian)
Faraji Molaie, A., Azimi, A. and Ziari, K. A. (2010). Analysis of quality of life in urban areas. Research and Urban Planning Journal, 1(2): 1-16. (Text in Persian)
Fitzpatrick, T. (2005). New theories of welfare. Palgrave Macmillan Education Publication.
Frey, B. S. and Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness prospers in democracy. Journal of Happiness Studies, No. 1: 79-102.
Hezarjaribi, J. and Amanian, A. (2011). Women’s awareness about citizenship rights and the effective factors on it. Urban- Regional Studies and Research, 3(9): 1-18. (Text in Persian)
Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Abbott, L. F., Kennethland, A. C., Michalos, M., Peterson, A., Sharpe, J. S., Joachim, V. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and Agenda for Research. Social Indicators Research, 55:1–96.
Hendry, F. and McVittie, E. C. (2004). Is a quality of life a healthy concept? Measuring and understanding life experiences of older people. Qualitative Health Research, 14(7).
Kim, D. and Kawachi, I. (2007). US state-level social capital and health related quality of life: Multilevel evidence of main, mediating and modifying effects. Annals of Epidemiology, 17(4): 258–269.
Liu, B. C. (1976). Quality of life indicators in US metropolitan areas: A statistical analysis. New York: Praeger.
Marshal, T. H. (1973). Class, Citizenship and social development. London, Westport, Greenwood Press.
Mayer, D. G. (2000). The funds, Friends and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55: 56-67.
Morgan, D. W. and Krijcie, R. V. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, No. 30: 607-610.
Nabavi, H., Mohammadi, S. and Rashedi, V. (2014). Health related quality of life in community dwelling older adults of Bojnourd. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, 6(2): 433-439. (Text in Persian)
Nejat, S., Montazeri, A., Holakouie Naieni, K., Mohammad. K and Majdzade, S. R. (2006). The world health organization quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire: Translation and Validation Study of the Iranian Version. Journal of School Public and Institude of Public Health Research, 4(4): 1-12. (Text in Persian)
Nejat, S. (2008). Quality of life and its measurement. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology, 4(2): 57-62. (Text in Persian)
Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being, a social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning Journal, 65:19-30.
Phillips, D. (2006). Quality of life: Concept, policy and practice. London, Routledge.
Pourezzat, A. A., Gholipor, A. and Baghestani, H. (2013). The relationship between citizens' awareness of the citizenship rights and organization's accountability and transparency. Social Welfare Journal, 10(38): 7-40. (Text in Persian)
Schalock, R. L. (2004) . The concept of quality of life: What we know and don’t know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(3): 203-216.
Schuessler, K. F. and Fisher, G. A. (1985). Quality of life research and sociology. American Review of sociology, No. 11: 129-149.
Statistical Center of Iran. (2012).National population and housing census, Tehran, SCI Pulication. (Text in Persian)
Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht/Boston.
World Health Organization. (1996). WHOQOL, Introduction, Administration, Scoring and generic version of the assessment. Geneva, WHO Publication.
Weitz-Shapiro, R. winters, M. S. (2008). Political participation and quality of life. New York, Colombia University.
Zhao, B. (2004). Perceptions of quality of life and use of human services by households: A model. Dissertation, the Graduate School University of Kentucky.
Zokaie, M. S. and Roshanfekr, P. (2006). The relationship between social capital and quality of life in urban neighborhoods. Social Sciences Journal, No. 22: 1-37. (Text in Persian)