کنش پذیری سوژه زن در تحولات تاریخ معاصر ایران

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه زن و جامعه

محمدرضا علی مردانی ¹ , علیرضا ازغندی ² , سیدمصطفی ابطحی ³

1 - دانش آموخته دکتری رشته علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - استاد گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1398/05/23 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/05/09 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/05/01

کلید واژه: کنش پذیری, سوژه زن, فمینیسم اسلامی, مارکسیسم ساختارگرا,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر این است تا نشان دهد زنان با گذشت زمان به عنوان حاملان حرکت­های اومانیسیتی، به جای عدم کنش پذیری در مقابل ساختار مذکر به سوژه­های سر به راهی در ساختار مذکر تبدیل شده­ اند و به جای تاکید بر ساختار غیر جنسیتی و نقد نابرابری های ساختار اجتماعی، سیاسی و اقتصادی مذکر، خود به عنوان جزیی از ساختار، حضور در ساختار را به عنوان یک وظیفه اجتماعی برای خود در نظر گرفته اند. روش: روش تحقیق تحلیلی و توصیفی است و چارچوب نظری تحقیق مارکسیسم ساختارگرا است. یافته ها: یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهد که جنبش های دفاع از حقوق زنان گرچه در اعتراض به برخی نابرابری ها در صورتبندی های اجتماعی، سیاسی و اقتصادی شکل گرفته است، اما اعتراضات زنان هم موجبات گسترش مشارکت زنان در زندگی سیاسی و فرهنگی را هموار نکرده است و هم این اعتراضات، زنان را به سوژه های متوهم و سربه راهی تبدیل کرده است.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Introduction:Women's rights movements have been formed to protest some inequalities in social, political, cultural and economic structures. Accordingly, the main question of the present study is: Have women's protests in Iran, from the constitutional period until now, led to the expansion of their participation in social, political and cultural life? Methods:  The present study, by use of analytical and descriptive methods and the theories of structuralist Marxism seeks to find an answer for the aforementioned question. The case study, obviously will be contemporary Iranian women. Findings:It has become clear that no positive changes have occurred in regard to women's condition and their participation in social, political and cultural life. Women as carriers of humanistic movements, instead of not reacting to the male structure, have become the submissive subject of the male structure. Instead of emphasizing on an asexual structure and criticizing the inequalities of the male social, political and economical structures, they themselves, as a unit of the structure, consider their presence in it as a social duty.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. (10 Ramadan 1949/ 1289 AH). Tehran: Danesh No. 1, page 2.


2. (1999). Center for Cultural and International Studies, Management of Islamic Studies: A selection of articles and texts on feminism. Tehran: Al-Huda International. 


3. Afari, Janet, Yousefian, Javad. (1998). Women’s semi-secret associations in the constitutional movement. Tehran: Banou.


4. Althusser, Louis. (1977). For Marx. London: New Left Books.


5. Althusser, Louis. (2016). Ideology and ideological mechanisms of the state, translated by Rouzbe Sadrara, Tehran: Cheshme.


6. Bashiriye, Hussein. (1994). History of political ideas and movements in the twentieth century. Political-economic information. Section 12, No. 79-80, pp. 10-17. http://ensani.ir/fa/article/102523


7. Bayat, Abdolrasoul and others. (2002). Dictionary of words. Qom: Religious thought and culture.


8. Behfar, Mehri. (1994). The defects of men: The first treaties on the defense of women. Women’s right. No. 3, pp. 52-56. http://ensani.ir/fa/article/5899


9. Çağlar, Keyder. (1995). Türkiye’de Devlet ve Sınıflar. İstanbul: İletişim  Yayınları.


10. D'Allemagne, Hanri-René. (1956). Travelogue from Khorasan to Bakhtiari, translated by Ali Mohammad Farhavashi. Tehran: Ibn Sina and Amirkabir.


11. Drouville, Gaspard. (1998). Traval in Iran. Translated by Javad Mohei. Tehran: Gothenburg.


12. Ensfandpour, Gholamreza. (1969). Women’s right and their statue since the beginning till Islam. Tehran: Aftab.


13. Etehadiye, Mansoure. (1994). Unveiling Incident, vol. 53. Kelk, pp. 211-217. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/297993


14. Ferretter, Luke. (2007). Louis Althusser. Translated by Amir Ahmadi Arian. Tehran: Markaz.


15. Fukuyama, Francis. (1999). The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. London: Profile Books.


16. Golding, Robert. (1982). Freud Psychoanalysis and Sociology: Some Observations on the Sociological Analysis of The Individual. The British Journal of Sociology, V.33, N.4: pp. 545-562. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23704012


17. Gouldner, Alivin W. (1980). The Tow Marxisms. London: Macmillan.Habermas, Jürgen. (1968). Knowledge and Human Interests, London: Heinemann.


18. Hafezian, Mohammadhossein. (2001). Women and revolution: the untold story. Tehran: Andisheye Bartar.


19. Hedin, Sven Anders. (1976). Deserts of Iran. Translated by Parviz Rajabi. Tehran: Touka.


20. Heydari, Arash. (2012). Freud and Althusser: The sociological aspects of psychoanalysis. Iran’s sociology. Vol. 3, pp. 3-24. http://www.jsi-isa.ir/article_21042.html


21. Javadi, Hassan. Marashi, Manije. Shekarlou, Shirin. (1992). Confrontation between men and women in the Qajar era: Discipline of women and the defects of men. Washington: Iran women’s history research center and Jahan company.


22. Kar, Mehrangiz. (1998). Iranian Women’s Political Rights. Tehran: Enlightenment and Women’s Studies.


23. Keddie, Nikki. (2006). The results of the Iranian revolution. Translated by Mahdi Haghighatkhah. Tehran: Qoqnus.


24. Khomeyni, Ayatollah. (1962). Sahifeye Nour. Vol. 1.


25. Lincoln, Abraham. (1994). Iran between two revolutions, translated by Ahmad Golmohammadi and Mohammad Ibrahim Fattahi. Tehran: Ney.


26. MacIntyre, Alasdair. (2008). Marcuse. Translated by Hamid Enayat. Tehran: Kharazmi.


27. Malekzadeh, Mehdi. (2004). History of the Iranian Constitutional Revolution. Tehran: Sokhan Publications.


28. Michèlle, André. (2004). Women’s Movement: Feminism. Translated by Homa Zanjanzade. Tehran: Nika.


29. Morgan Shuster, Williams. (2005). Hanging Iran (women’s delegations and the foundations of the women’s movement in Iran). Translated by Sarah Ghazi. Communist Literature.


30. Musafa, Nasrin. (1996). Women’s political participation in Iran. Tehran: Office of Political and International Studies, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.


31. Nahid, Abdul Hussein. (1981). Iranian women in the constitutional movement. Tabriz: Ehya.


32. Nahid, Abdul Hussein. (1993). The role of women in development. Tehran: Roshanfekran.


33. Payne, Michael. (2003) The culture of critical thought from the enlightenment to postmodernity. Translated by Payam Yazdanjou. Tehran: Markaz.


34. Ritzer, George. (2005). Encyclopedia of Social Theory. Vol. II. London and New Dehli: Sage Publication Thousand Oaks.


35. Serena, Carla. (1983). People and Religions in Iran: Madame Carla Serna’s Travelogue. Translated by Ali Asghar Saeedi. Tehran: Zavar.


36. Shahidian, Hamed. (1998). Islamic Feminism and the Women’s Movement. Irannameh. Issue 64, pp. 611-640. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/364051


37. Shaykh Al-Islami, Perry. (1972). Women in Iran and the World. Tehran: Zarrin.


38. Somerville, Jennifer. (2009). Feminism and the Family: Politics and Society in the United States and Britain. Translated by Mahmoud Arqavan. Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural and Social Studies.


39. Tohidi, Nayyereh. (1996). Feminism, Democracy and Islamism. Los Angeles: Ketabsara


40. Toqrangar, Hassan. (2004). Women’s socio-political rights. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Documentation Center.


41. Vatandoust, Gholamreza. Shihari, Maryam. Tavakkoli, Afarin. (2006). A study of the positions of Iranian women in constitutional publications. Tehran: Institute for Resarch and Development of Humanities.