واکاوی مؤلفه ها و شاخص های الگوی حکمرانی دانشگاهی بازارگرا: رویکرد نوین در اقتصاد سبز آموزش عالی
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریتنعمت جعفریان اول 1 , هادی پوشافعی 2 * , حسین مؤمنی مهموئی 3 , امیر امیری رشخوار 4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی،گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد تربت حیدریه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تربت حیدریه، ایران
2 - دانشیار مدیریت آموزشی ، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران(نویسنده مسئول)
3 - گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد تربت حیدریه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تربت حیدریه، ایران
4 - گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد تربت حیدریه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تربت حیدریه، ایران
کلید واژه: حکمرانی, دانشگاهی, بازارگرا, آموزش عالی,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی شاخص¬ها و مؤلفه¬های الگوی حکمرانی دانشگاهی بازارگرا انجام گرفت. رویکرد پژوهش حاضر کیفی و روش آن فراترکیب براساس مدل اروین و همکاران(2011) است. جامعه پژوهش، متشکل از 187 مقاله و پایان¬نامه تحصیلات تکمیلی درباره حکمرانی دانشگاهی بازارگرا است که بین سال های 1392 شمسی و 2008 میلادی تا 1402 شمسی و 2023 میلادی ارائه شده¬اند. نمونه پژوهش شامل 32 مقاله پژوهشی است که به صورت هدفمند جمع آوری و براساس پایش موضوعی داده¬ها انتخاب شده¬اند. داده¬های پژوهش از تحلیل کیفی اسناد مورد مطالعه، گردآوری شده¬اند. : بر اساس تجزیه و تحلیل داده¬ها، مؤلفه¬های حکمرانی دانشگاهی بازارگرا در 4 بُعد و 49 عامل طبقه-بندی شدند. این ابعاد شامل عوامل ارتباطی-تعاملی (مشتمل بر مؤلفه¬هایی چون ارتباطات درون سازمانی و ملی، ارتباطات برون سازمانی و بین المللی و استانداردهای بازخوردی-نظارتی)، بُعد سیاسی – قانونی (مشتمل بر مؤلفه¬هایی چون توسعه قانونی فرابخشی و اختیارات سیاست¬گذاری)، فنی-ساختاری (مشتمل بر مؤلفه¬هایی چون مدیریت داده و اطلاعات، بلوغ سازمانی-حرفه¬ای و مبنای توسعه ساختاری) و زمینه¬ای – محیطی (مشتمل بر مؤلفه¬هایی چون محرک-های اقتصادی و محرک¬های اجتماعی-فرهنگی) می¬باشد.
The current research was conducted with the aim of identifying the indicators and components of the market-oriented university governance model. The approach of the present research is qualitative and its meta-composite method is based on the model of Irvin et al. (2011). The research community consists of 187 graduate education articles and theses about market-oriented university governance, which were presented between 2008 and 2008 to 2023. The research sample includes 32 research articles that have been purposefully collected and selected based on thematic data monitoring. The research data were collected from the qualitative analysis of the studied documents. : Based on data analysis, the components of market-oriented academic governance were classified into 4 dimensions and 49 factors. These dimensions include communication-interactive factors (including components such as intra-organizational and national communications, extra-organizational and international communications and feedback-supervisory standards), political-legal dimension (including components such as trans-sectoral legal development and policy powers) planning), technical-structural (including components such as data and information management, professional-organizational maturity and the basis of structural development) and contextual-environmental (including components such as economic drivers and drivers) socio-cultural).
دباغ کاشانی، زینب(1390). شناسایی عوامل حیاتی موفقیت در چارچوب پیاده سازی مدیریت فرآیندهای کسب و کار در سازمان¬های ایرانی. پایان¬نامه کارشناسی ارشد رشته اقتصاد، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصاد، دانشگاه الزهراء
ساقی، علیرضا(1396). بررسی روند تحقیقات فناوری اطلاعات و تجارت الکترونیک با رویکرد فراترکیب تحقیقات انجام گرفته در پژوهشگاه ارتباط و فناوری اطلاعات. پایان¬نامه کارشناسی ارشد رشته مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی.
Agasisti, T., & Catalano, G. (2006). Governance models of university systems—towards quasi-markets? Tendencies and perspectives: A European comparison. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(3), 245-262.
Agasisti, T., & Catalano, G. (2019). Governance models of university systems—towards quasi-markets? Tendencies and perspectives: A European comparison. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(3), 245-262.
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colell, A., & Sapir, A. (2010). The governance and performance of universities: evidence from Europe and the US. Economic Policy, 25(61), 7-59.
Akhtar, M. M. S., & Kalsoom, T. (2012). Issues of Universities’ Governance in Pakistan. Journal of Elementary Education, 22(2), 81-94.
Akhtar, M. M. S., & Kalsoom, T. (2012). Issues of Universities’ Governance in Pakistan. Journal of Elementary Education, 22(2), 81-94.
Apkarian, J., Mulligan, K., Rotondi, M. B., & Brint, S. (2014). Who governs? Academic decision-making in US four-year colleges and universities, 2000–2012. Tertiary Education and Management, 20(2), 151-164.
Apkarian, J., Mulligan, K., Rotondi, M. B., & Brint, S. (2014). Who governs? Academic decision-making in US four-year colleges and universities, 2000–2012. Tertiary Education and Management, 20(2), 151-164.
Birkland, T. A. (2015). An introduction to the policy process: theories, concepts, and models of public policy making (4rd edition). New York: Routledge Publishing.
Bleiklie, I., Frølich, N., & Michelsen, S. (2013). Structuring perceptions of governance: Transforming Universities in Europe. In ECPR general conference–Bourdeaux, 5th–7th September.
Bleiklie, I., Frølich, N., & Michelsen, S. (2013). Structuring perceptions of governance: Transforming Universities in Europe. In ECPR general conference–Bourdeaux, 5th–7th September.
Bradshaw, P. (2020). Academic governance of universities: Reflections of a senate chair on moving from theory to practice and back. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(2), 123-133.
Bradshaw, P., & Fredette, C. (2009). Academic governance of universities: Reflections of a senate chair on moving from theory to practice and back. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(2), 123-133.
Broucker, B., De Wit, K., & Leisyte, L. (2017). New public management or new public governance for the higher education sector? An international comparison.
Broucker, B., De Wit, K., & Leisyte, L. (2022). New public management or new public governance for the higher education sector? An international comparison.
Brown, J. T. (2017). The Seven Silos of Accountability in Higher Education: Systematizing Multiple Logics and Fields. Research & Practice in Assessment, 11, 41-58.
Capano, G. (2011). Government continues to do its job. A comparative study of governance shifts in the higher education sector. Public Administration, 89(4), 1622-1642.
Carnegie, G. D., & Tuck, J. (2010). Understanding the ABC of university governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(4), 431-441.
Dakowska, D. (2015). Between competition imperative and Europeanisation: the case of Higher Education reform in Poland. Higher Education, 69(1), 129-141.
Delanty, G. (2010). The governance of universities: What is the role of the university in the knowledge society?. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 27(2), 185-198.
Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2017). Higher education governance in France, Germany, and Italy: Change and variation in the impact of transnational soft governance. Policy and Society, 36(1), 67-88.
Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2017). Higher education policies in Central and Eastern Europe: convergence toward a common model?. Governance, 22(3), 397-430.
Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher Education, 62(5), 665-683.
Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher Education, 62(5), 665-683.
Donina, D., Meoli, M., & Paleari, S. (2015). Higher education reform in Italy: Tightening regulation instead of steering at a distance. Higher Education Policy, 28(2), 215-234.
Donina, D., Meoli, M., & Paleari, S. (2015). Higher education reform in Italy: Tightening regulation instead of steering at a distance. Higher Education Policy, 28(2), 215-234.
Dordmond, G., de Oliveira, H. C., Silva, I. R., & Swart, J. (2021). The complexity of green job creation: Ananalysis of green job development in Brazil. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(1), 723-746
Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M. J. & Summers, J. A., (2011). Understanding Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Opportunities in Early Childhood Intervention Research. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(3), 186-200.
Fielden, J. (2008). Global trends in university governance. Education working paper series, 9, 278200-1099079877269.
Giannakis, M., & Bullivant, N. (2016). The massification of higher education in the UK: Aspects of service quality. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 630-648.
Giannakis, M., & Bullivant, N. (2017). The massification of higher education in the UK: Aspects of service quality. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 630-648.
Hillman, N. W., Tandberg, D. A., & Gross, J. P. (2014). Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completions?. The journal of higher education, 85(6), 826-857.
Huang, F. (2018). Higher education from massification to universal access: A perspective from Japan. Higher Education, 63(2), 257-270.
Jongbloed, B. (2015). Marketisation in higher education, Clark's triangle and the essential ingredients of markets. Higher education quarterly, 57(2), 110-135.
Kang, Y., & Xiong, W. (2021). Is entrepreneurship a remedy for Chinese university graduates’ unemployment under the massification of higher education? A case study of young entrepreneurs in Shenzhen. International Journal of Educational Development, 84, 102406.
Kohn, A(2018). ‘The trouble with rubrics’, English Journal, 95(4), pp. 12–15.
Kvilhaugsvik, H. (2022). Bridging higher education and the world of work? Employer panels in Nordic university governance. European Journal of Higher Education, 12(2), 117-133.
Lo, W. Y. W., & Tang, H. H. H. (2017). Dancing with global trends: higher education policy and university governance in Hong Kong, 1997–2012. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(1), 53-71.
Lo, W. Y. W., & Tang, H. H. H. (2017). Dancing with global trends: higher education policy and university governance in Hong Kong, 1997–2012. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(1), 53-71.
Miller, G. N., & Morphew, C. C. (2017). Merchants of optimism: Agenda-setting organizations and the framing of performance-based funding for higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 754-784.
Mok, K. H., & Han, X. (2017). Higher education governance and policy in China: managing decentralization and transnationalism. Policy and Society, 36(1), 34-48.
Nisar, M. A. (2015). Higher education governance and performance based funding as an ecology of games. Higher Education, 69(2), 289-302.
Quyên, Đ. T. N. (2014). Developing university governance indicators and their weighting system using a modified Delphi method. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 828-833.
Ross, F., & Woodfield, S. (2017). Mutuality, metaphor and micropolitics in collaborative governance: a joint venture in UK Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(1), 33-52.
Rowlands, J. (2013). Academic boards: less intellectual and more academic capital in higher education governance?. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1274-1289.
Sam, C., & Van Der Sijde, P. (2014). Understanding the concept of the entrepreneurial university from the perspective of higher education models. Higher Education, 68(6), 891-908.
Santiago, R., Carvalho, T., & Cardoso, S. (2015). Portuguese academics' perceptions of higher education institutions' governance and management: a generational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 40(8), 1471-1484.
Shah, M. (2012). Ten years of external quality audit in Australia: Evaluating its effectiveness and success. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 761-772.
Shattock, M. (2002). Re–balancing modern concepts of university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3), 235-244.
Wen, W., & Marginson, S. (2023). Governance in Chinese universities. In University collegiality and the erosion of faculty authority (Vol. 86, pp. 171-197). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Yeom, M. H. (2016). Critical reflection on the massification of higher education in Korea: consequences for graduate employment and policy issues. Journal of Education and Work, 29(1), 48-63.
Yonezawa, A., & Shimmi, Y. (2015). Transformation of university governance through internationalization: Challenges for top universities and government policies in Japan. Higher Education, 70(2), 173-186.
Yonezawa, A., & Shimmi, Y. (2015). Transformation of university governance through internationalization: Challenges for top universities and government policies in Japan. Higher Education, 70(2), 173-186.
Yudianto, I., Mulyani, S., Fahmi, M., & Winarningsih, S. (2021). The influence of good university governance and intellectual capital on university performance in Indonesia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(1), 57-70.