بررسی مقایسه‌ای نظام ارزشی فرهنگیان (مدیران و معلّمان) شهرستان دشتستان بر اساس نظریه ارزش‌های بنیادین شوارتز

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

نصراله نوروزی ¹ (دانشجوی دکترای تخصصی دانشگاه شیراز)
رحمت‌اله مرزوقی ² (دانشیار دانشگاه شیراز)
جعفر ترک‌زاده ³ (استادیار دانشگاه شیراز)
مهدی محمدی ⁴ (استادیار دانشگاه شیراز)

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/09/10 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/09/10 تاریخ انتشار : 1391/04/01

کلید واژه: مدیران مدارس, ارزش, نظام ‌ارزشی, معلّمان,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف از این پژوهش، بررسی و مقایسه‌ نظام ارزشی فرهنگیان (مدیران و معلّمان) و ابعاد نظام ارزشی آنان بر اساس نظریه ارزش های بنیادین شوارتز بود. بدین منظور، از میان مدیران و معلّمان شاغل در مدارس دوره‌های گوناگون تحصیلی شهرستان دشتستان (واقع در استان بوشهر) در سال تحصیلی 89 - 1388، نمونه‌ای به حجم 327 نفر، با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب گردید. جهت جمع‌آوری داده ها، از مقیاس زمینه‌یابی ارزش‌های شوارتز که شامل ده گونه ارزشی در قالب پنجاه و هفت عبارت ارزشی است، استفاده شد. روایی ابزار یاد شده بین 76/0– 36/0 و پایایی آن 74/0 محاسبه گردید. نتایج بدست آمده از آزمون تحلیل واریانس اندازه‌گیری‌های پی در پی نشان داد که نظام ارزشی مدیران و معلّمان این شهرستان مشابه یکدیگر و به ترتیب شامل ابعاد ارزشی خیرخواهی، جهان‌گرایی، امنیّت، خوداتکایی، سنّت، قدرت، همنوایی، موفقیت، برانگیختگی و لذّت‌طلبی بوده و بین این ابعاد ارزشی در سطح 0001/0 تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد. افزون بر این، نتایج بدست آمده از آزمون تحلیل واریانس دوسویه نیز نشان داد که بین ابعاد نظام ارزشی مدیران و معلّمان، بر اساس متغیرهای جنسیت، دوره‌ تحصیلی و سابقه خدمت، تفاوتی معنادار وجود ندارد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The purpose of the study was to investigate and compare value system of principals and teachers as well as the dimensions of their value system based on Schwartz's fundamental values theory. To this end, A sample of 327 Principals and teachers was selected using stratified random method in the academic year 2009 – 2010. For data gathering, Schwartz Value Survey was used and its reliability was between 0/36 and 0/76 and its validity was 0/74. Data analysis (ANOVA) indicated that the value system of principals and teachers was similar it included dimensions of benevolence, universalism, security, self-direction, tradition, power, conformity, achievement, stimulation and hedonism. There was a significant difference between these dimensions at 0/0001. Furthermore, the results of two-way ANOVA showed that there was no significant difference between dimensions of value system of principals and teachers in terms of variables of gender, academic levels and year of experience

منابع و مأخذ:

Abdel–Fattah, Y. (1992). “Child perception and parental care: social

adjustment and values.” The Social Sciences Journal of, Vol. 20, No. 3 – 4: 105

– 124.

Allport, G. W., Wernon, PH. E., & Lindse, G. (1960). Study of values.

Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Altintas, F. C. (2008). “A comparative analysis of Turkish and German

mangers’ personal values.” Ankara Universitesi SBF Dergisi, Vol. 63, No. 4:

65– 8. 

Azadmarzabadi, E. (2008). “The relationship between family values and

adolescent values system.” Journal of Behavioral Sciences, Vol 2, No. 2: 117-

126.

Coyne, B. J. (1988). “The predictive validity of the rokeach values survey

for college academic achievement.” Educational and Psychological

Measurement, 48: 165-173.

Delkhamosh, M. T. (2006). “Iranian student’s hierarchy of values.” Journal

of Iranian Psychologists, Vol 2, No. 8: 299-318.

Faramarzi, D. (2000). “Investigate of Tarbiat Modares University students'

value structure.” M.A. thesis in Sociology, Tarbiat Modares University, School

of Humanity Science.

 Feather, N. T. (1984). “Masculinity, femininity, psychological androgyny and

the structure of value.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47: 604-

620.

Feather, N. T. (2004). “Value correlates of ambivalent attitudes toward

gender relations.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30: 3-12.

Ghasemi, B. (2003). Theories of organizational behavior. Tehran: Heiat

publishing.

Hofstede. G. (1984). “The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept.”

Acaderny of Management Review, 9: 389-398.

Imamoglu, E. O., & Ayguen, Z. (1999). “Value performance from 1970s to

1990s Turk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14 – 122.” Abstract- PsycINFO.

Johnston, C. S. (1995). “The Rokeach Value Survey: Undrelying structure

and multidimensional scaling.” Journal of Psychology, 129: 583-598.

Karami, M. (2002). “Investigate of the value system of Undergraduate

students at Shiraz University.” M. A. thesis in the philosophy of education,

Shiraz University, School of Education and Psychology.

Khalife, A. M. (1999). Psychological Study of transformation of values

(Seyadi, S. H) Mashhad: Astan Ghodse Razavi Publishing.

Kneller, G. (1964). Introduction to the philosophy of education. New York,

NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Lietz, P., & Matthews, B. (2010). “The effects of college students’ personal

values on changes in learning approaches.” Res High Educ, 51: 65–87.

Matthews, B., Lietz, P., & Darmawan, I. G. N. (2007). “Values and learning

approaches of students at an international university.” Social Psychology of

Education, 10: 247–275.

Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1989). “A work values

approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and

its relationship to individual outcomes.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 424

– 432. 

Mohammadi, R. (2002 ). “Evaluation of values conformity of Shiraz

principals and teachers.” M. A. thesis in Educational Administration. Shiraz

Islamic Azad University.

Pohjanheimo, E. (1997). “Arvojen muutos, työ ja sosiaalinen tausta.

Tutkimus työikäisistä pyhtääläisistä 1982-1993.” (Research reports No1). Study

of University of Helsinki, Department of Social Psychology. Abstracct available

at: http://proquest.umi.com.[22 August 2010].

Rafiapoor, F. (1999a). Anatomy of society. Tehran: Enteshar Company

Ravlin, E. C., & Meglino, B. M. (1987). “Effect of values on perception and

decision-making: A study of alternative work values measures.” Journal of

Applied Psychology, 72: 666 - 673.

Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies

and applications. 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human value. New York: Free Press.

Ryckman, R. M., & Houston, D. M. (2003). “Value priorities in American

and British female and male university students.” The Journal of Social

Psychology, 143: 127-138.

Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). “Value priorities and subjective wellbeing:

Direct relations and congruity effects.” European Journal of Social

Psychology, 30: 177- 198.

Samiee, F., Naeli, H., Neshatdost, H. T. (2005). “Relationship between

values-system and creativity among the first year students of University of

Isfahan.” Isfahan University research journal, Vol 19, No. 2: 83-98.

Sheikhi, SH. ( 2001) “Investigate of relationship between value systems of

Shiraz secondary school teachers and students.” M.A thesis in of educational

administration, Shiraz University, School of Education and Psychology.

Schwartz, S. H. (1994a). “Are there universal aspects in the structure and

contents of human values?” Journal of Social Issues, 50: 19-45.

Schwartz, S. H. (1999). “A theory of cultural values and some implications

for work.” Applied psychology: An International Review, 48 (1): 23- 47.

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). “Universals in the content and structure of values:

Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.” Advances in

experimental social psychology, Vol. 24: 1- 65.

Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). “Value hierarchies across cultures:

Taking a similarities perspective.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32:

268-290.

Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001).

“Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with

a different method of measurement.” Journal of Crosscultural Psychology, Vol.

32, No. 5: 519-542. 

Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). “Identifying culture-specifics in the

content and structure of values.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26: 92-

116.

 Schwartz, S. H., & Sagie, G. (2000). “Value consensus and importance: A

cross-national study” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 4:

465 – 497.

Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). “Sex differences in value priorities:

Cross-cultural and multimethod studies.” Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 89: 1010-1028.

Shafer, W. E., Fukukawa, K., & Lee, G. M. (2007). “Values and the

perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility: The U.S. versus China

.” Journal of Business Ethics, 70: 265–284.

Shechtman, Z. (2002). “Validation of the democratic teacher belief scale

[DTBS].” Assessment in Education, 9: 363-377.

Valencia, E. Y. (2000). “Values orientations in colombia. Variations in age,

gender and socioeconomic status: An empirical study.” Unpublished Doctrol

dissertation. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology.

Yazdi, S. M., & Hoseinian, S. (2005). “A comparison of the occupational

values between male and female university graduates prior to entering the job

market”. New thought to education, Vol 1, No. 1: 51-60.