مطالعه ی روابط بین اثربخشی سازمانی ادراک شده، اعتماد معلم به همکاران و گشودگی جوّ مدرسه با شکل گیری رفتار شهروندی سازمانی مدیران و معلمان در مدارس

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

حمید فرهادی راد ¹ , عبدالله پارسا ² , شیرزاد نظری ³

1 - استادیار دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز
2 - دانشیار دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز
3 - دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/08/05 تاریخ پذیرش : 1397/05/11 تاریخ انتشار : 1397/06/01

کلید واژه: واژه‌های کلیدی: رفتار شهروندی سازمانی, اثربخشی سازمانی ادراک شده, اعتماد معلم به همکاران, گشودگی جوّ مدرسه,

چکیده مقاله :

چکیده
هدف از اجرای پژوهش حاضر، تبیین روابط بین مؤلفه‌های اثربخشی سازمانی ادراک شده ، اعتماد معلم به همکاران و گشودگی جوّ مدرسه با رفتار شهروندی سازمانی و توضیح چرایی تأثیرگذاری و عدم تأثیرگذاری هر یک از این مؤلفه‌ها بر شکل‌گیری، رشد و گسترش رفتار شهروندی سازمانی مدیران و معلمان در مدارس ابتدایی و متوسطه شهر اهواز می‌باشد. در همین راستا، از روش پژوهش آمیخته (کمی‌و‌کیفی) استفاده شده است. جامعه‌ی آماری این پژوهش را کلیه‌ی معلمان و مدیران مدارس دو مقطع ابتدایی و متوسطه شهر اهواز تشکیل می‌دهند. به اقتضای روش پژوهش ترکیبی، در بخش کمی به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای و با استفاده از جدول مورگان تعداد 256 نفر انتخاب شده‌اند. در بخش کیفی با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند تا زمانی که به سؤالات پژوهش پاسخ داده شد و اشباع نظری به دست آمد، فرآیند نمونه‌گیری ادامه یافت. داده‌ها در بخش کمی با استفاده از دو مقیاس رفتار شهروندی سازمانی و مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار بر شکل‌گیری آن در مدارس دیپائولا، تارتر و هوی (2005) به ترتیب با ضرایب پایایی 84/0 و 89/0 و در بخش کیفی با اجرای مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختمند جمع‌آوری گردیده‌اند. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها در بخش کمی از تحلیل رگرسیون و در بخش کیفی، روش تحلیل محتوای استقرایی به کار رفته است. در بخش کمی، نتایج نشان‌دهنده تأثیرگذاری مؤلفه‌ی اثربخشی سازمانی ادراک شده و عدم تأثیرگذاری مؤلفه‌‌های اعتماد معلم به همکاران و گشودگی جوّ مدرسه بر شکل‌گیری رفتار شهروندی سازمانی مدیران و معلمان مدارس مورد مطالعه می‌باشد. در پیگیری نتایج در بخش کیفی، دلایل تأثیرگذاری و عدم تأثیرگذاری هر یک از مؤلفه‌ها تبیین شده است.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Abstract
The purpose of current study, Explanation the relationship between perceived organizational effectiveness, teacher Trust in colleagues, openness of the school Climate components and Organizational Citizenship Behavior or Explaining why the impact and effectiveness of each these components on the formation, growth and development of OCB principals and teachers in primary and secondary schools Citizen of Ahwaz. in this regard, had been used mixed method approaches (quantitative and qualitative). the population consists all of the Principals and teachers elementary or secondary schools, Citizen of Ahwaz. due to a mixed method survey, were selected 256 members in quantitative Section of stratified sampling methodand by used Morgan table. in qualitative Section using purposive sampling continued sampling process was achieved theoretical saturation and as long as were answered questions research. the data were collected from using both Scales OCB and impact components from formation in the School Dipaola, Tarter and Hoy (2005) respectively with reliability coefficients 0/84 and 0/89 in quantitative section and semi-structured interviews in qualitative section. the results showed in quantitative section impacting perceived organizational effectiveness and ineffectiveness, teacher Trust in colleagues, openness of the school Climate components on the formation, growth and development of OCB principals and teachers in the case study schools. the pursuit of results, in qualitative section, has been explained the reasons for ineffectiveness and impacting of each the components.

منابع و مأخذ:

- Adams, C. (2013). “Collective trust: a social indicator of instructional capacity”. Journal of Educational Administration, 51 (3), 353-382.

-      Arianfar, K, Navidi Niko, R, & Farahi Nejad, M. (2012). “The Survey Distributive leadership style and Its effects on organizational citizenship behavior and feelings of self-efficacy of teachers”. Journal of Management Research, 95, 67-77 (In Persian).

-      Bogler, R. & Somech, A. (2005). “Organizational citizenship behavior in school: How does it relate to participation in decision making?”. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(5), 420-438.

-      Bolino,  M., & Turnley, W. (2003). “Going the extra mile: cultivating and managing employee citizenship behavior”. Academy of Management Executive, 17 (3), 60-71.

-      Bragger, J., Rodriguez-Srednicki, O., Kutcher, E., Indovino, L., & Rosner E. (2005). “Work family Conflict, Work-family Culture, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior among Teachers”. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20 (2), 303-324.

-      Christ, O., Dick, R. V., Wagner, U. & Stellmacher, J. (2003). “When teachers go the extra mile: Foci of organisational identification as determinants of different forms of organisational citizenship behaviour among schoolteachers”. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 329–341.

-      Cohen, A. (2006).“The relationship between multiple commitments and organizational citizenship behavior in Arab and Jewish culture”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 105–118.

-      DiPaola, M. F. & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2005). "Bridging or Buffering: The Impact of Schools’ Adaptive Strategies on Student Achievement". Journal of Educational Administration, 43, 60-71.

-      Dipaola, M. F., & Tarter, C. J., Hoy, W. K. (2005). “School characteristics that foster organizational citizenship behavior”. Journal of school Leadership, 15 (4), 387-406.

-      Dipaolo, M. F. & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001).“Organizational citizenship behavior in schools and its relationship to school climate”. Journal of school Leadership, 11, 424-447.

-      Dussault, M. (2006).“Teachers' self-efficacy and organizational citizenship behaviors”. Psychological reports, 98 (2), 427-432.

-      Feather, N. T. & Rauter, K. A. (2004). “Organizational citizenship behaviors in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment, and identification, job satisfaction and work values”. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 81-94.

-      Garg, P. & Rastogi, R. (2006), “Climate profile and OCBs of teachers in public and private schools in India”, International Journal of Educational Management, 20 (7), 529-541.

-      Hoffman, J. D., Sabo, D., Bliss, J. & Hoy, W. K. (1994).“Building a culture of trust”. Journal of School Leadership, 4, 484-501.

-      Hoy,  W.  K.,  &  Tarter, C.  J. (2004).  “Organizational justice in schools: no justice without trust”. International Journal of Educational Management, 18 (4), 250-259.

-      Hoy, W. K., Hannum, J. & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1997). “Organizational climate and student

- achievement: a parsimonious view”, unpublished paper.

-      Hoy, W. K. & Misskel, C. G. (2013). “Educational administration theory research and practice”. Ninth edition, McGraw  Hill.

-      Hoy, W. K. (2003). “An analysis of enabling and mindful school structures: some theoretical, research, and practical considerations”. Journal of Educational Administration, 41 (1), 87-108.

-      Hoy, W. K. (2012).  "School  characteristics  that  make  a difference for the achievement of all students". Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 76-97.

-      Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, W. A. (2006). "Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement". American Educational Research Journal, 43 (3), 425-446.

-      Kazemzadeh Bitali, M. & Hassani, M. (2015). “A study of the role of school organizational characteristics on teachers trust and organizational-citizenship behavior”. Journal of Psychology school, 4 (2), 89-103 (In Persian).

-      Miskel, C. G., Fevurly, R, & Stewart, J. (1979).“Effectiveness, Loyalty, and Job SatisfactionOrganizational Structures and Processes, Perceived School”. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15 (3), 97-118.

-      Mott, P. E. (1972). “The Characteristics of Effective Organization”, (New York: Chandler).

-      Ngunia, S., Sleegers, P., & Denessen, E. (2006). “Transformational and Transactional Leadership Effects on Teachers’ Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Primary Schools: The Tanzanian case. School”. Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17 (2), 145 – 177.

-      Oplatka, I. & Stundi, M. (2011).“The components and determinants of preschool teacher organizational citizenship behavior”. International Journal of Educational Management, 25 (3), 223-236.

-      Oplatka, I. (2006). “Going Beyond Role Expectations: Toward anUnderstanding of theDeterminants and Components of Teacher OrganizationalCitizenship Behavior”. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42 (3), 385-423.

-      Oplatka, I. (2009). “Organizational citizenship behavior in teaching: the consequences for teachers, pupils, and the school”. International Journal of Educational Management, 23 (5), 375-389.

-      Samadi MiarKalaei, H, Aghajani, H. & Samadi MiarKalaei, H. (2014). “Identification and assessment of the process of organizational citizenship behavior”. Journal of Productivity management, 28, 95-118 (In Persian).

-      Schwabsky, N. (2014).”Teachers’ individual citizenship behavior (ICB): the role of optimism and trust”. Journal of Educational Administration, 52 (1), 37 – 57.

-      Somech, A. & Bogler, R. (2002).“Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment”. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38 (4), 555-577.

-      Somech, A. & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). “Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: The relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers extra-role behavior”. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16 (5-6), 649-659.

-      Somech, A. & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2004).“Exploring organizational citizenship behavior from anorganizational perspective: the relationship between organizational learning and organizational citizenship behavior”. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77 ( 3), 281-298.

-      Spector, P. E. (2001). “Development of the work locus of control scale”. Journal of Occupational psychology, 61, 335-340.

-      Tarter, C. J., Sabo, D. & Hoy, W. K. (1995), “Middle school climate, faculty trust and effectiveness: a path analysis”. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 41-49.

-      Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001).“Collaboration and the need for trust”. Journal of Educational administration, 39 (4), 308-321.

-      Van Emmerik, IJ. H. & Euwema, M. C. (2007). “Who is offering a helping hand? Associations between personality and OCBs, and the moderating role of team leader effectiveness”. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(6), 530 –548.

-      Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2006). “Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace”. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 377-405(29).

-      Wagner, C. & DiPaola, M. F. (2011). “Academic optimism of high school teachers: Its relationship to organizational citizenship behaviors and student achievement”. Journal of   SchoolLeadership, 21 (6), 891 – 924.

-      Zein abadi, H, Behrangi, M, Naveh ebrahim, A, & Farzad, V. (2009). “organizational citizenship behavior of teachers, Analysis on the nature research methodology, antecedents and aftermath, Journal of Educational Innovations, 28, 75-110 (In Persian).

-      Zein abadi, H. (2011). “Transformational leadership in school: male and female managers? Journal of Women in Development & Politics, 8 (2), 115-141(In Persian).